Find Nearby Plumbers In Nashville-Davidson, Tennessee

Precision Plumbing draws a large volume of strongly positive reviews praising individual technicians by name for professionalism, punctuality, clear communication, and technical skill — these positives are consistent and span many years and locations. However, a meaningful minority of negative reviews (roughly 15–18% of substantive reviews) describe serious issues including no-shows, scheduling failures, poor communication, alleged price gouging, overcharging, warranty disputes, substandard workmanship, and in at least two cases regulatory investigations by the Nevada State Contractors Board. Pricing is the weakest dimension: while many reviewers call pricing fair or reasonable, a notable cluster of negative reviewers describe charges they considered grossly excessive (e.g., $528/hour, $750 for a $1.99 fix, $1,400 for a 20-minute job, $650 for a cartridge replacement). Project completion is moderately strong but is dragged down by multiple documented no-shows, abandoned jobs, and at least one case of work left incomplete for weeks. Experience scores well overall given the volume of praise for diagnostic skill and quality workmanship, but is tempered by a handful of reviews describing incompetent diagnosis or dangerous substandard work.

• DUPLICATE REVIEWS DETECTED: Numerous reviews appear to be exact or near-exact duplicates posted on the same or adjacent dates (e.g., multiple identical 'Fast, affordable, friendly, and super reliable' reviews on 2018-02-22; identical 'Great family business' reviews on 2022-09-08; identical 'Will hire again' reviews on 2022-09-12; identical 'Great and quick service' and 'Excellent customer service' reviews on 2022-09-06; identical 'He did a good job and was nice to work with' reviews on 2022-10-20; identical 'Friendly service, great job' reviews on 2022-10-01; identical 'Kieth was very easy to work with' reviews on 2022-10-22; identical 'Very high quality work promp service' reviews on 2023-01-24; identical 'The young man did an expert job' reviews on 2022-12-16; identical 'Precision Plumbimg is a great Company' reviews on 2020-10-24 and 2020-10-25). This pattern strongly suggests review manipulation or system duplication and reduces confidence in the raw positive review count.
• REGULATORY FLAG: At least two reviews (dated August 2024) allege that Precision Plumbing (dba aaa Precision Plumbing, Las Vegas) was under investigation by the Nevada State Board of Contractors for substandard work, failed city inspection, a life-threatening gas leak, and deceptive practices. These are serious allegations that, if accurate, represent significant safety and integrity concerns.
• MULTI-ENTITY CONCERN: Reviews appear to reference multiple distinct businesses operating under the 'Precision Plumbing' name across different geographic markets (Las Vegas NV, Bay Area CA, Michigan, South Carolina, California Central Valley, etc.) as well as references to 'Plumbing Squad' and 'Budget Water Heaters.' Scores may reflect an aggregation of different companies rather than a single contractor, which limits the reliability of any single composite score.
• PRICING COMPLAINTS PATTERN: A recurring pattern of pricing complaints exists across multiple reviewers and years — including allegations of price gouging against elderly or disabled customers, charges not matching quotes, refusal to provide itemized receipts, and hourly rates described as $600+ per hour for simple jobs. This is not isolated and depresses the pricing score significantly.
• NO-SHOW AND SCHEDULING FAILURES: Multiple independent reviewers across different time periods describe no-shows, missed appointment windows without notification, and failure to return calls. This is a consistent pattern affecting the project completion score.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of reviews with substantive content are from 2019 through mid-2025, with the most recent cluster from May–June 2025. Reviews from 2025 are predominantly positive and recent, which is a positive signal, but the negative regulatory and safety reviews from mid-2024 are also recent and carry significant weight.
• BLANK REVIEWS: Approximately 40–50 reviews contain no text and only a 5-star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence per scoring rules, but their volume inflates the apparent star average.

This WW Score of 72.1 carries HIGH data confidence due to the large review volume, but should be interpreted cautiously given confirmed duplicate reviews suggesting possible manipulation, multi-entity ambiguity across geographic markets, serious unresolved regulatory allegations from 2024, and a consistent minority pattern of pricing, scheduling, and workmanship complaints that cannot be dismissed as outliers.

Morton Plumbing has a large and long-standing review base that reveals a genuinely split reputation. On the positive side, many customers praise the owner's personal involvement, the friendliness and punctuality of technicians, and the company's willingness to stand behind their work — including issuing refunds and returning for free callbacks. However, a persistent and credible pattern of negative reviews specifically targets pricing transparency and value: multiple independent reviewers across different years describe feeling overcharged for simple jobs, receiving no itemized invoices, and being quoted prices far above competitors. Project completion is generally strong but is meaningfully undermined by several documented no-shows, unreturned calls, and at least one case of unauthorized repairs followed by billing. Experience scores well overall, with many reviewers noting skilled diagnostics and quality workmanship, though HVAC work drew more criticism than plumbing. The pricing dimension is the single largest drag on the overall score, with enough independent corroboration across years to treat those complaints as credible rather than outliers.

• PRICING CONCERNS — CREDIBLE AND RECURRING: At least 10 independent reviews across multiple years (2013–2025) explicitly describe overcharging, lack of itemized invoices, refusal to provide quote breakdowns, or prices significantly above competitor quotes. This is not a single disgruntled customer; the pattern is consistent and spans the full review history.
• NO-SHOW AND COMMUNICATION FAILURES: At least 4 reviews describe Morton failing to show up for scheduled appointments without notice, failing to follow up on promised quotes, or going silent after initial contact. This is a meaningful reliability concern.
• UNAUTHORIZED REPAIRS: One 2022 review credibly describes technicians performing repairs the customer did not authorize, then billing $465 for them. The owner reportedly refused accountability and raised his voice during the complaint call.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: Two reviews are nearly word-for-word identical ('I love Morton Plumbing! They do excellent work... I adore Josh, a son, and today I had Duane and Cody...'), one dated 2023-11-01 and one dated 2024-06-09. This may indicate a reposted review rather than a fake, but it inflates positive sentiment and has been treated as a single data point.
• BLANK REVIEWS WITH RATINGS: Approximately 12 reviews contain no text — only a star rating (mostly 5-star). These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence per scoring rules, but their presence inflates the visible average star rating on external platforms.
• RECENCY NOTE: The most recent substantive negative reviews (2025-05-10, overcharging for leaky faucet/clog) suggest pricing issues have not improved. The most recent positive review (2025-05-19) praises a full repipe job. Both are credible. The business appears to perform better on larger, more complex jobs than on small repairs where flat-rate pricing feels disproportionate to customers.
• HVAC WORK NOTABLY WEAKER: Multiple reviewers (2018, 2022, 2024) specifically distinguish between satisfactory plumbing work and poor or unreliable HVAC service. Customers considering Morton for HVAC should apply additional caution.

This WW Score is based on a large review set (109 reviews) spanning over a decade, giving it HIGH statistical confidence, but the score should be interpreted carefully: Morton Plumbing appears to deliver genuinely good results on complex plumbing jobs with engaged technicians, while carrying a well-documented and recurring risk of opaque pricing on smaller jobs and occasional serious reliability failures including no-shows and unauthorized work.

Plumbing Unlimited has a large base of satisfied customers who consistently praise individual technicians — particularly Lamont, Ronnie, Emanuel, and Nick — for being professional, knowledgeable, punctual, and personable. Pricing is generally viewed as fair and competitive, with multiple reviewers explicitly calling out affordability and value. However, the company is significantly dragged down by a recurring pattern of serious project completion failures: multiple 1-star reviews describe abandoned jobs, unresolved problems after payment, missed appointments with no communication, and situations left worse than before work began. These are not isolated incidents — they span multiple years and involve different customers and job types, lending them credibility. Experience scores are mixed: while many reviewers praise technical skill, several explicitly describe incompetent work, costly mistakes, and problems that required a second company to fix.

• 11 reviews contain no text — only a star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence.
• Two reviews (dated 2024-08-13 and 2024-07-19) are near-identical in wording and describe the same complaint about 'Major' and a gas stove installation. This appears to be a duplicate review posted by the same customer on two dates. Only one instance was counted per dimension.
• Several 5-star reviews are very brief and generic (e.g., 'Very professional and precise work!', 'Great workers. Above and beyond.') with no specific details. While not conclusively fake, they carry lower evidentiary weight and were scored conservatively.
• The review corpus spans from 2005 to 2025. Reviews older than 2 years (pre-2023) were given reduced weight in scoring, as they may not reflect current company performance. The majority of negative reviews are concentrated in 2022–2025, suggesting possible decline in quality control over time.
• Multiple serious 1-star reviews describe the company abandoning jobs mid-project, not returning calls after payment, and leaving customers without water or functioning toilets for extended periods. These are high-severity complaints that materially suppressed the project_completion score.
• The bait-and-switch pricing complaint (2022) and the $5,000 unresolved fix complaint (2024) are significant red flags for pricing transparency and were factored into the pricing score reduction.

This WW Score is based on a large and diverse review set spanning over a decade, giving it HIGH statistical confidence; however, the presence of serious and credible project abandonment complaints across multiple recent years means prospective customers should treat the score as a moderate-risk signal and carefully vet the company before committing to large or complex jobs.

Parthenon Plumbing and HVAC receives strong and consistent praise for professionalism, with numerous reviewers highlighting punctuality, clear communication, respectful technicians, and willingness to explain work in plain terms. Individual technicians — particularly Eli, James, Cristian, Cody, and Ned — are repeatedly called out by name for excellent service, suggesting a reliable core team. However, pricing is a significant drag on the overall score: multiple reviewers across different years explicitly describe being grossly overcharged, charged for work not performed, or quoted prices far above competitors, and one review details a confirmed installation error (hot and cold lines reversed) that went unresolved for 10 months. Project completion is mixed — most jobs are described as finished well, but there are credible accounts of misdiagnosis, incomplete repairs requiring return visits, and at least one case of a botched installation. The WW Score of 72.1 reflects a company with genuinely skilled and courteous technicians offset by recurring and serious concerns around pricing transparency and quality control.

• PRICING CONCERN: Multiple independent reviewers across different years (2018, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025) explicitly describe being overcharged, charged for services not rendered, or quoted prices significantly higher than competitors. This is a consistent and credible pattern, not isolated incidents.
• INSTALLATION ERROR: One reviewer (March 2025, 1-star) credibly documents that a water heater was installed with hot and cold lines reversed, causing degraded performance for 10 months. The company's initial response was to deflect blame to the city rather than investigate.
• MISDIAGNOSIS PATTERN: A 2020 review describes a 6-month ordeal involving repeated HVAC misdiagnosis, over $1,000 in unnecessary costs, and a missing piston on a unit Parthenon itself had installed. The operations manager was described as rude and dismissive.
• UPSELLING CONCERN: Two separate reviews (2022 and 2025-update) describe technicians prioritizing selling new equipment over diagnosing or repairing existing issues, and charging for time spent on sales pitches.
• FAKE REVIEW RISK — LOW-MODERATE: A cluster of reviews share the same date (2025-05-10 and 2025-03-11) with very similar generic praise and no specifics. While some of these are detailed and credible, the date clustering warrants mild caution. Overall review corpus appears mostly genuine given the presence of detailed negative reviews.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of reviews are from 2025 and late 2024, which is positive for recency weighting. However, negative patterns (overcharging, installation errors) appear in both recent and older reviews, suggesting these are not legacy issues that have been resolved.
• CHARGE FOR UNPERFORMED WORK: One 2018 review provides a detailed and specific account of being charged $95 for a garbage disposal replacement that was never performed, with the technician deliberately withholding the receipt at time of payment. This is a serious allegation.

This WW Score of 72.1 is based on 55 reviews spanning 2014–2025 with HIGH mention counts across all four dimensions, making it statistically reliable; however, consumers should weigh the recurring and multi-year pricing complaints and at least one documented installation error heavily before hiring, as these represent meaningful quality-control risks despite the company's otherwise strong professionalism ratings.

Michael Shaver Plumbing earns strong marks for responsiveness and individual technician professionalism, with many reviewers praising prompt arrivals, friendly techs, and clear communication. However, pricing is a recurring concern — multiple reviewers explicitly called out high costs, surprise fees (dispatch/service charges, credit card surcharges), and at least one direct comparison showing a competitor completed the same job for significantly less. Project completion is mixed: most jobs were finished satisfactorily, but there are credible accounts of abandoned follow-through (a tech who never returned), incomplete work (old pipes left in place), and a permit issue caused by an expired plumber's license. Experience scores moderately well overall, with several reviewers praising knowledgeable and skilled technicians, but offset by at least one instance of substandard workmanship and one case where the completed repair failed within a week. The owner's direct conduct drew a serious complaint in one review, which tempers the otherwise positive staff impressions.

• PRICING CONCERN: At least 6 reviews explicitly flag pricing as high, surprising, or unfair — including a $940 charge vs. a $300 competitor quote for the same job, a $489 estimate for a leaky outdoor faucet, and a $297 charge for a minor drain clog. Pricing transparency is a documented weakness.
• PROJECT COMPLETION FAILURES: One reviewer waited all day for a tech who never returned after a late-night visit. Another paid $3,100 and had to call back to get basic items corrected. A third reported the repaired problem returned within a week and alleged old pipes were never removed.
• OWNER CONDUCT: One reviewer (1-star, 2021) described owner Michael Shaver as rude, loud, and dismissive when confronted about a permit issue caused by an expired plumber's license. This is a significant professionalism flag at the ownership level.
• EXPIRED LICENSE INCIDENT: One reviewer reported the city confirmed the plumber's license was expired, causing a permit denial. The company allegedly misrepresented the reason for the delay to the customer.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of reviews with serious complaints (expired license, abandoned job, substandard work, rude owner) span 2018–2021. More recent reviews (2022–2024) trend more positively, suggesting possible improvement, but the negative incidents are serious enough to retain weight.
• NO FAKE REVIEW PATTERNS DETECTED: Reviews vary meaningfully in tone, detail, rating, and specificity. No suspicious clustering of identical phrasing or implausible uniformity was observed.

This WW Score is based on 32 reviews spanning 2015–2024 with strong dimension coverage across all four categories, yielding HIGH confidence in the overall score; however, the presence of multiple credible serious complaints — including an expired license, abandoned work, and owner misconduct — means the score should be treated as a realistic mid-range assessment rather than a strong endorsement.

Arrow Home Improvement, led by Joe, receives consistently strong marks across all reviewed dimensions. Professionalism is the most well-evidenced dimension, with all 7 reviews referencing punctuality, politeness, communication, or professional conduct — including working in adverse weather and communicating proactively about unexpected issues. Project completion is also well-supported, with multiple reviewers describing finished bathrooms, kitchenettes, electrical work, and plumbing jobs completed to satisfaction with no mention of abandoned or incomplete work. Experience is reflected in references to quality workmanship, licensed trades, and problem-solving during a plumbing job, though specifics are limited. Pricing received only two indirect mentions — one reviewer noted the work was 'worth the money' and another described transparent quoting — making that dimension lower confidence. Overall, the reviews paint a reliable picture of a competent, professional contractor, though the small review pool limits full confidence.

• Small sample size of only 7 reviews limits statistical reliability of all scores.
• 4 out of 7 reviews have no date provided, making recency weighting impossible for those entries. Only 3 reviews have confirmed dates, all from 2024.
• All reviews are 5-star with uniformly positive sentiment. While not conclusive, this pattern warrants mild caution. However, reviews do contain specific job details, named individuals, and varied language, which reduces the likelihood of fabrication.
• No negative feedback or constructive criticism present in any review, which may reflect genuine satisfaction but also limits the ability to identify any weaknesses.

This WW Score is moderately reliable — the reviews are specific and varied enough to suggest authenticity, but the small total volume (7 reviews) and missing dates on 4 entries mean the score should be treated as a promising early signal rather than a fully validated assessment.