Find Nearby Plumbers In Kansas City, Missouri

Rescue 1 Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most consistently praised attribute — punctuality, courtesy, clear communication, and responsiveness are mentioned repeatedly across many years of reviews. Project completion scores well, with numerous reviewers noting same-day service, timely arrivals, and jobs finished cleanly and completely, though one older review describes a technician arriving without tools and a callback that was not honored. Pricing is the weakest dimension: while many reviewers praise fair and transparent pricing, three negative reviews specifically cite overcharging, a $1,400 estimate for a job done elsewhere for $530, and a refusal to provide an itemized invoice — these are substantive complaints that meaningfully drag the pricing score down. Experience scores solidly based on reviewers describing knowledgeable diagnostics, skilled installations, and problem-solving across a wide range of plumbing tasks, with one notable negative involving incorrect pipe threading that destroyed a $1,000 valve.

• 18 reviews contain no text — only a star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence.
• Several reviews use 'unknown' as text and were excluded from scoring.
• The review corpus spans from 2009 to 2025. Reviews older than 2 years (pre-2023) were given reduced weight in scoring, as business quality and staffing may have changed significantly over that period.
• Three 1-star reviews contain specific, credible, and detailed complaints about pricing transparency, overcharging, and workmanship damage. These are not vague and were weighted seriously.
• One 1-star review from 2024-12-11 contains no text — it cannot be analyzed but its low rating is noted as a potential signal.
• Two reviews from 2019 (Chad/swamp cooler) appear nearly identical in content and phrasing, suggesting a possible duplicate submission by the same customer. These were counted as one data point for scoring purposes.
• The overwhelming majority of reviews are 5-star, which is a mild flag for review authenticity. However, most positive reviews contain specific names, job details, and narrative context, which reduces the likelihood of systematic fake reviews. The pattern appears genuine overall.

This WW Score is based on a large and diverse review set spanning 16 years with strong mention counts across all dimensions, making it statistically reliable — however, consumers should note that three credible negative reviews raise legitimate concerns about pricing transparency and occasional workmanship errors, and the recency of those concerns (2023–2024) warrants caution.

Crosby Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most consistently praised attribute — reviewers repeatedly highlight punctuality, courteous communication, and willingness to explain work in detail. Project completion is also well-supported, with numerous accounts of same-day or next-day responses, jobs finished as promised, and follow-through on callbacks. Experience scores solidly, with multiple reviewers noting technicians solved problems others could not, and instances of honest diagnosis that saved customers money. Pricing is generally viewed as fair or better than expected, though three notable negative reviews — one citing $512 for a two-faucet install, one citing $250 for a single faucet install as excessive, and one involving a disputed sump pump installation and cost overrun — prevent a higher pricing score. A small number of older reviews also flag a failed repair, an unreturned quote call, and a discounted referral that was not honored, which modestly temper the project completion and professionalism scores.

• 6 reviews contain no text whatsoever (blank, '....', or 'unknown') and were excluded from dimension scoring — these blank 5-star entries are a minor concern for authenticity.
• Two reviews from January 2018 appear to be duplicate submissions from the same customer describing the same $512 faucet installation incident — only counted once in scoring.
• The majority of negative reviews (1–2 star) are dated 2018–2020, suggesting either a period of service quality issues or staff changes. Recent reviews (2024–2025) are overwhelmingly positive with specific detail, which is a positive recency signal.
• Most reviews are 5-star with no mixed ratings in recent years, which warrants mild caution, though the specificity of names, job types, and details in recent reviews reduces fake review suspicion significantly.
• Recency note: Reviews from 2013–2017 carry reduced weight per scoring rules; the bulk of high-confidence scoring is drawn from the 40+ reviews dated 2024–2025.

This WW Score is based on a substantial volume of reviews (68 total, 62 with usable data) spanning over a decade, with strong recent activity in 2024–2025, making it a reasonably reliable representation of current service quality — though the pricing dimension should be interpreted with caution given documented instances of charges that customers found excessive.

The combined review pool — spanning Bill Fry The Plumbing Guy and Advocate Master Plumbing — reflects a strong overall service record, with professionalism being the most consistently praised dimension across both companies. Technicians are repeatedly described as punctual, courteous, communicative, and respectful of customer spaces. Project completion scores well but is tempered by one notable complaint of a two-trip failure to complete a simple supply line replacement, and one older complaint about a drain cleaning that backed up two days later with no warranty honored. Pricing is generally praised as fair and transparent, but one review explicitly describes a $320 charge for a shutoff valve as grossly overcharging a single mother, which meaningfully pulls the pricing score down. Experience scores are solid, with multiple reviewers citing knowledgeable diagnostics, problem-solving, and quality workmanship across both companies.

• 5 reviews contained no text — only a star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence.
• A significant portion of Bill Fry reviews (especially the cluster dated 2025-04-10) share identical dates, which may indicate batch-imported or solicited reviews. Language varies enough to suggest they are likely genuine but the identical date pattern warrants mild caution.
• The review pool contains two distinct companies: Bill Fry The Plumbing Guy (recent reviews, 2025) and Advocate Master Plumbing (older reviews, 2013–2024). Scores reflect the combined pool, but the companies should ideally be scored separately for accuracy.
• Several Advocate Master Plumbing reviews are significantly older (2013–2019) and carry reduced weight per recency rules. The most recent Advocate review is from March 2024.
• One 1-star review for Advocate Master Plumbing alleges the contractor did not back up his work on a drain cleaning and charged again for a callback — a direct project completion concern.
• One 1-star review alleges overcharging ($320 for a shutoff valve) — a direct pricing concern that reduces the pricing score.
• One 1-star review alleges failure to respond to multiple calls despite advertising 24/7 service — a professionalism concern.
• One 2-star review for Bill Fry describes upselling of a membership club over completing the actual repair, requiring two service trips and two fees, with a promised refund not yet issued — a project completion and pricing concern.

This WW Score is based on a large and diverse review pool with high mention counts across all four dimensions, giving it HIGH overall confidence, but users should note the score blends two separate companies and includes reviews spanning over a decade, with older reviews carrying less predictive weight about current service quality.

John the Plumber demonstrates strong professionalism with punctual, courteous technicians who communicate clearly and explain work thoroughly. Technical expertise is consistently praised across hundreds of reviews, with skilled problem-solving and knowledgeable staff. Project completion is generally reliable with most jobs finished as promised, though some callbacks and follow-up issues are noted. Pricing is the weakest dimension—while many customers report fair rates, a significant minority report overcharging, high estimates, and pricing that exceeds competitors by $1,000+, creating polarized sentiment around value.

• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Multiple identical or near-identical review texts appear across different dates (e.g., 'We are very thankful for James and his expertise...' appears twice; 'Tech were great scheduled appointment immediately' appears twice; 'Good service. Good follow up...' appears twice). This repetition is unusual and suggests possible review manipulation or data duplication.
• PRICING POLARIZATION: Extreme divergence in pricing feedback. Many 5-star reviews praise 'fair' and 'reasonable' pricing, while multiple 1-star reviews cite charges of $750–$9,900 for jobs competitors quote at $150–$3,000. This suggests either inconsistent pricing practices, variable technician judgment, or selective upselling.
• QUALITY INCONSISTENCY: Several reviews report misdiagnosis (e.g., wrong leak source, incorrect septic assessment) requiring callbacks or second opinions. A few reviews mention poor workmanship (crooked pipes, incorrect hot/cold hookups, damage to property).
• RECENCY BIAS: Most recent reviews (2024–2025) are overwhelmingly 5-star with generic praise. Older reviews (2015–2023) show more balanced feedback with specific complaints. Recent reviews lack detail and specificity typical of authentic customer feedback.
• NEGATIVE REVIEWS CLUSTER: Multiple 1-star reviews cite communication failures, rude staff, no-shows, and refusal to honor warranties or callbacks. These are concentrated in 2019–2023 period, suggesting possible operational or management issues during that timeframe.

This WW Score of 82.1 is reliable for overall assessment but should be interpreted with caution: professionalism and experience scores (85+) are well-supported by 150+ mentions each and reflect genuine customer satisfaction with technician quality. However, the pricing score (72.8) masks significant polarization—some customers report excellent value while others report substantial overcharges. The recent flood of generic 5-star reviews and detected duplicate text patterns reduce confidence in the most recent data. Prospective customers should obtain multiple quotes and verify pricing upfront, as this company's cost structure appears inconsistent or variable by technician/location.

Water Works Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all dimensions, with particular strength in professionalism (85.2) and project completion (83.5). The company excels at punctuality, communication, and technical expertise, as evidenced by numerous mentions of on-time arrivals, clear explanations, and skilled problem-solving. Pricing is fair and competitive (79.8), though some customers note occasional communication gaps around costs. Experience scores (81.3) reflect consistent quality workmanship and knowledgeable technicians. However, the presence of several negative reviews citing communication failures, incomplete work, and customer service issues prevents a higher overall score.

• NEGATIVE REVIEW CLUSTER: Multiple 1-star reviews (approximately 15-20) citing serious issues including incomplete work, poor communication, no-shows, rude staff, and billing disputes. These are not isolated incidents but represent a pattern of service failures.
• COMMUNICATION FAILURES: Several reviews mention lack of follow-up, unreturned calls, and scheduling issues. Examples include customers waiting weeks for callbacks and plumbers not showing up to appointments.
• BILLING DISPUTES: Multiple complaints about unclear pricing, hidden charges, per-hour rates not disclosed upfront, and overcharging. Some customers report being quoted one price and charged significantly more.
• INCOMPLETE WORK: Several reviews document jobs that required callbacks to fix, work left unfinished, or problems that recurred shortly after service.
• STAFF CONDUCT ISSUES: A few reviews mention unprofessional behavior including hanging up on customers, rudeness, and one incident of a technician walking off the job mid-appointment.
• RECENCY CONSIDERATION: Most recent reviews (2025) are overwhelmingly positive (5-star), while older reviews (2009-2022) show more balanced feedback with notable negative experiences. This suggests either improved service quality or potential review manipulation.
• EMPTY REVIEWS: Approximately 20 reviews contain only a 5-star rating with no text, which is unusual and may indicate fake or placeholder reviews.
• INCONSISTENT QUALITY: Wide variance in customer experiences suggests inconsistent service delivery, possibly dependent on which technician is assigned or which location serves the customer.

This WW Score of 82.1 should be treated with moderate caution. While the HIGH confidence rating reflects substantial data volume, the significant cluster of negative reviews documenting serious failures (no-shows, incomplete work, billing disputes, poor communication) indicates real service quality issues that coexist with many positive experiences. The recent surge of uniformly positive 5-star reviews without detail raises concerns about review authenticity. Prospective customers should expect generally competent work and fair pricing but should be aware of documented risks around communication, billing transparency, and follow-through on complex jobs.

Kevin Ginnings Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 82.1. The company excels in professionalism (88.5) and experience (87.3), with technicians consistently praised for punctuality, courtesy, knowledge, and quality workmanship across 127 and 89 mentions respectively. Project completion is solid at 86.8, with most jobs finished on time and to customer satisfaction. However, pricing emerges as a notable weakness at 71.2, with 32 reviews citing concerns about high costs, unexpected charges, and lack of transparent upfront pricing. Several customers reported feeling overcharged relative to market rates, though others found value through promotional deals. The company's strength in service quality is somewhat offset by pricing inconsistency and transparency issues.

• PRICING CONCERN: 32 reviews mention pricing issues. Multiple customers (at least 8 distinct reviews) report significantly higher charges than expected or quoted by competitors. Examples include: $766 for a simple faucet replacement (45 min work), $540 for thermostat replacement vs. $250 quoted elsewhere, $388 for a $15 valve, $450 reduced to $385.50 for valve repair. This pattern suggests inconsistent or aggressive pricing practices.
• TRANSPARENCY ISSUE: Several reviews note lack of upfront pricing. At least 3 reviews explicitly state prices were not quoted until after work was completed, creating customer dissatisfaction and trust concerns.
• PROMOTIONAL DEAL DISPUTE: One review (2016-03-19) documents a dispute over a Yelp promotional voucher not being honored after service completion, suggesting potential false advertising or unclear terms.
• DEPOSIT/NO-SHOW INCIDENT: One 1-star review (2017-10-19) reports a plumber never showed up and deposit was not returned, described as 'a scam.'
• CALLBACK/FOLLOW-UP FAILURES: One review (2017-10-19) mentions multiple calls with no response and no deposit refund.
• QUALITY INCONSISTENCY: A few reviews (2017-12-18, 2017-08-31) mention minor quality issues (cleanup, pressure adjustment not holding), though these are exceptions.
• RECENCY NOTE: Most reviews are from 2017-2025, with strong concentration in 2025 (recent) and 2017-2020. Older reviews (2012-2016) show some pricing complaints. Recent reviews (2025) are overwhelmingly positive with minimal pricing complaints, suggesting possible recent business practice improvements or selection bias in recent reviews.
• FAKE REVIEW RISK - LOW: While 5 reviews contain no text (only ratings), the remaining 156 reviews show substantial variation in detail, specificity, and language. No obvious patterns of identical phrasing or suspiciously generic praise detected. Reviews include specific technician names, detailed problem descriptions, and varied complaint types, suggesting authenticity.

This WW Score of 82.1 is highly reliable for assessing overall service quality and professionalism, supported by 127+ mentions across dimensions. However, the pricing score of 71.2 should be treated with caution when making cost-related decisions, as pricing practices appear inconsistent and may vary significantly by job type and individual technician/manager discretion. Customers should request detailed written quotes before authorizing work to mitigate pricing surprises.