Find Nearby Plumbers In Honolulu, Hawaii

Kama Hele Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent praise for punctuality, communication, and courteous staff across 32 mentions. Pricing is a significant strength, with 18 reviews explicitly commending fair, transparent, and reasonable rates compared to competitors. Project completion shows solid performance (28 mentions) with most jobs finished successfully, though three negative reviews detail serious failures including misdiagnosis, incomplete work, and alleged price gouging. Experience is well-documented (22 mentions) with skilled technicians solving complex problems that other companies could not resolve. The company's reputation is built primarily on owner Rick and his team's responsiveness and quality work, though recent negative reviews (2023, 2022) raise concerns about consistency.

• Three 1-star reviews (July 2023, March 2023, May 2022) describe serious failures: alleged $8,000 unnecessary sewer pipe replacement with incomplete work, misdiagnosis of flood source over 1.5 years, and poor workmanship requiring $2,000 in repairs by another company. These are detailed, specific complaints with credible details, not generic criticism.
• One review (Dec 2020) mentions unprofessional employee behavior on the road (attempted altercation), though no plumbing work was performed.
• One review (Sept 2017) is incomplete/unclear: 'Ricky, please text or call. Contacted you three times about water heater' suggests unresponsiveness, though context is limited.
• Recency concern: Most positive reviews are from 2015-2019 (older than 1 year). Recent reviews (2023-2024) are mixed: 2 highly positive (March 2024, March 2024) but 2 highly negative (July 2023, March 2023). This suggests potential quality degradation or inconsistency in recent years.
• No evidence of fake reviews detected. Positive reviews contain specific details (names, job types, comparisons to competitors). Negative reviews are equally detailed and credible.

This WW Score of 81.2 should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH caution: while the overall dataset is large (45 reviews) and dimensions are well-supported, the presence of three detailed, credible negative reviews describing serious failures (misdiagnosis, incomplete work, overcharging) in 2022-2023 contradicts the predominantly positive historical record and suggests either inconsistent service quality or potential issues with specific team members. The score reflects a company with strong fundamentals but recent reliability concerns that warrant verification of current practices before engaging.

JBC Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 79.8, driven primarily by excellent project completion (84/100) and solid experience/workmanship (85/100). Professionalism is also solid at 82/100, with consistent praise for punctuality, responsiveness, and courteous staff. However, pricing emerges as a significant weakness (68/100), with multiple recent reviews (2024-2025) documenting substantial discrepancies between quoted hourly rates and actual charges, bait-and-switch pricing tactics on flat-rate services, and weekend emergency rates perceived as excessive. While older reviews rarely mention pricing concerns, the pattern in recent reviews suggests pricing practices have become more aggressive or less transparent.

• PRICING INCONSISTENCY PATTERN: Multiple 2024-2025 reviews report significant pricing discrepancies. Customers quote $145/hour but are charged $600+ per toilet or $366+ for 1.1 hours of work. Two detailed 1-star reviews (2024-10-30, 2024-05-13) describe bait-and-switch tactics where hourly rates were quoted but flat rates were charged without clear upfront disclosure.
• RECENT DETERIORATION: Pricing complaints are concentrated in 2024-2025 reviews, suggesting a recent shift in business practices. Older reviews (2017-2023) rarely mention pricing as a negative factor.
• COMMUNICATION FAILURES: Multiple reviews document missed callbacks, no-shows, and failure to follow up on emergency requests (2023-06-19, 2023-09-07, 2021-09-14). These represent project completion and professionalism failures.
• QUALITY INCONSISTENCY: Several reviews report incomplete or substandard work requiring callbacks (2023-05-17 kitchen sink repiping leaked within months, 2023-05-08 crooked cabinet cuts and undersized water line, 2019-07-12 twisted hoses and improperly adjusted faucet). One review (2021-06-09) alleges deliberate underperformance to push customers toward private hire.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Two identical reviews appear (2019-07-12 and 2019-07-11) with nearly identical negative text about kitchen faucet installation, suggesting possible duplicate submission or review manipulation.
• WEEKEND PRICING CONCERNS: Multiple reviews flag high weekend/emergency rates ($375/hour mentioned in 2024-09-07) without clear upfront disclosure, creating customer dissatisfaction.

This WW Score of 79.8 should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH confidence overall, but with significant caveats: the score is heavily weighted toward older, consistently positive reviews (2017-2023), while recent 2024-2025 reviews reveal emerging pricing and communication problems that are not yet fully reflected in the aggregate score. The HIGH confidence in project completion and experience is warranted by substantial evidence, but the MODERATE confidence in pricing is conservative and may understate actual customer dissatisfaction given the severity and specificity of recent pricing complaints. Prospective customers should request detailed, itemized quotes in writing and clarify whether rates are hourly or flat-fee before booking, particularly for non-emergency work.

United Drain Techs demonstrates strong performance across professionalism and project completion, with all five reviews explicitly praising punctuality, responsiveness, communication, and job follow-through. Josiah is consistently described as professional, reliable, and willing to go above and beyond—including emergency service at 11pm and diagnostic work beyond the original scope. Technical skill is evident from problem identification and solution quality mentioned in four reviews. However, pricing is never discussed in any review, preventing assessment of value for money. The overall score reflects high marks on documented dimensions but is tempered by the small sample size and complete absence of pricing feedback.

• All five reviews are 5-star ratings with no critical feedback—while not necessarily fake, this perfect rating distribution warrants caution and suggests potential selection bias
• Pricing dimension has zero mentions across all reviews; cannot assess fair pricing or value for money
• Two reviews are from 2021 (over 3 years old); only three reviews from 2024. Recency is limited
• Small sample size (5 reviews total) limits statistical reliability despite high confidence on individual dimensions

This score should be treated with moderate caution: while the documented dimensions show strong performance with good confidence, the tiny sample size, absence of pricing data, and lack of any negative feedback reduce overall reliability. The score reflects what is explicitly stated but may not capture the full picture of contractor performance.

Kraken Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all measured dimensions based on recent customer feedback. Professionalism is consistently praised with mentions of timely service, responsive communication, and courteous conduct. Pricing is described as fair and competitive in multiple reviews. Project completion is evidenced by successful resolution of complex issues including leak detection and rapid service delivery. Technical expertise is highlighted through problem-solving ability (locating difficult leaks) and specialized knowledge (tankless water heater maintenance). However, the small sample size (5 reviews) and uniformly positive ratings warrant moderate confidence in the overall score.

• All 5 reviews are 5-star ratings with no critical feedback — consider whether this represents genuine universal satisfaction or potential selection bias
• Review language contains some informal/playful phrasing ('krackalackin', 'Cranking out') which is authentic but limits data density
• Sample size is small (n=5) — score reliability improves significantly with 10+ reviews
• All reviews are from recent period (May-July 2024), providing good recency but no historical perspective

This WW Score of 88.3 should be treated as a positive indicator but with caution due to the small sample size and absence of any critical feedback; the score would gain substantially more credibility with additional reviews, particularly any negative or mixed feedback that would validate the assessment.

Pipe Masters and Pueo Plumbing (operating under both names across the review set) demonstrate consistently strong professionalism, with the vast majority of reviewers praising punctuality, communication, technician courtesy, and proactive status updates. Project completion scores well overall, with many reviewers noting same-day or next-day resolution of urgent issues, though a small but notable cluster of negative reviews describes incomplete work, damage caused by technicians, and jobs left unresolved — including one reviewer who paid for two toilets but only one was fixed, and another describing significant pipe damage attributed to the crew. Pricing is the weakest dimension, with multiple reviewers explicitly calling out price gouging, unexpected charges, and bills far exceeding quotes — including a $562 charge for a single toilet valve and a $900 charge for incomplete work — which substantially drags down the pricing score despite some reviewers finding costs fair or reasonable. Experience scores moderately well, with many reviewers praising technical skill and diagnostic thoroughness, but offset by at least two reviews describing poor workmanship that required correction by a competing company.

• DUAL BRAND CONCERN: Reviews reference both 'Pipe Masters' and 'Pueo Plumbing' as distinct business names. It is unclear whether these are the same entity, affiliated companies, or separate businesses whose reviews have been commingled. This significantly affects score reliability as the review pool may represent two different operational teams and quality standards.
• PRICING COMPLAINTS — SIGNIFICANT: At least 4 reviews explicitly allege price gouging, hidden fees, or charges far exceeding quotes. One reviewer was charged $562 for a single toilet valve (a ~15-minute job), another paid $900 for incomplete work on two toilets (only one fixed), and a third alleged a $2,100 toilet quote with an offer to do it 'on the side' for $400 less — a serious ethical red flag.
• WORKMANSHIP FAILURE — NOTABLE: One detailed 1-star review (2023-11-17) describes a crew that damaged a pipe, left tenants without water for days, refused to fix their own damage without additional payment, and was later identified by a competing plumber as having done the job incorrectly. This is a serious project completion and experience concern.
• RESPONSIVENESS FAILURE: One 1-star review (2022-07-08) describes being told to email for a quote, having the email read but ignored for over a week despite two follow-up calls, and never receiving a response. This contradicts the many positive communication reviews.
• BLANK/EMPTY REVIEWS: At least 4 reviews contain no text — only a star rating (all 5 stars). These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• RECENCY NOTE: The review set spans from 2017 to 2025. Reviews older than 2 years (pre-2023) were given reduced weight. The majority of negative pricing and workmanship reviews appear in the 2023–2024 window, which may indicate a decline in quality or pricing ethics in more recent operations.
• GENERIC PRAISE PATTERN: A subset of 5-star reviews use very brief, non-specific language ('Great service!', 'Awesome', 'Amazing work done professionally') with no operational detail. While not conclusive of fake reviews, these add limited evidentiary value and were weighted minimally.
• STRUCTURED SUMMARY FORMAT: One review (2025-05-10, pipe bursting) uses a formatted '## Summary ##' header structure atypical of organic customer reviews, suggesting possible AI-generated or templated content. Confidence in that review's authenticity is reduced.

This WW Score carries HIGH data confidence due to the large volume of reviews, but should be interpreted cautiously given serious unresolved concerns about pricing transparency, at least one documented workmanship failure, the ambiguity of dual business names in the review pool, and a pattern of pricing complaints concentrated in recent reviews.

535 Plumbing earns strong marks for professionalism and experience across a large, detailed review base, with dozens of reviewers specifically praising technician punctuality, courteous communication, and technical competence on complex jobs like pipe lining, water heater replacement, and sewer diagnostics. However, professionalism is meaningfully dragged down by recurring complaints about scheduling failures, no-shows, office miscommunication, and at least one report of a technician using profanity and bullying a coworker on the job. Pricing is the weakest dimension: while many reviewers call costs fair or reasonable, a notable cluster of negative reviews describes charges that escalated unexpectedly, incomplete work billed at full price, double emergency fees, and one instance of a duplicate invoice sent to an HOA — patterns that suggest inconsistent pricing integrity rather than isolated incidents. Project completion scores reflect a solid majority of jobs finished correctly and on time, offset by several documented cases of incomplete repairs requiring return visits, a mishandled water heater wiring job, and at least two instances where the company failed to show up at all. Overall, 535 Plumbing performs well when the right technician is dispatched but shows systemic weaknesses in office coordination and pricing transparency that prevent a higher score.

• PRICING INTEGRITY CONCERN: Multiple independent reviewers describe unexpected cost escalation, charges for incomplete work, double emergency fees, and one duplicate invoice sent to an HOA — this is a recurring pattern, not isolated complaints.
• PROJECT COMPLETION CONCERN: At least three reviews describe jobs that were not completed correctly on the first visit, including a water heater wired incorrectly and a kitchen sink leak that required three service calls without resolution.
• SCHEDULING/OFFICE FAILURES: Multiple reviews (1-star and 2-star) describe technicians arriving hours late with no proactive communication, a no-show requiring cancellation, and one reviewer who called three times and was never served.
• PROFESSIONALISM CONCERN: One detailed review reports a technician using excessive profanity and visibly bullying a coworker during a job visit — this is a serious conduct flag.
• POSSIBLE REVIEW VOLUME SKEW: The review set is heavily weighted toward 5-star ratings with named technicians and specific job details, which is generally a positive authenticity signal. However, a small number of generic 5-star reviews with no specifics (e.g., 'Great work and cares about the client. Best plumbing company out there.') were treated as low-weight data points.
• RECENCY NOTE: All reviews analyzed fall within the 2022–2024 window. The most recent negative reviews (October and July 2024) indicate that pricing and professionalism issues are not historical — they are ongoing.

This WW Score is based on 80 reviews spanning approximately two years, with strong mention counts across all four dimensions, and should be considered a reliable representation of 535 Plumbing's current service quality — though prospective customers should weigh the documented pricing inconsistencies and scheduling failures seriously before booking.