Find Nearby Plumbers In Sarasota, Florida

This contractor shows mixed performance across dimensions. Professionalism is moderately strong with evidence of same-day appointments, quick callbacks, and professional demeanor, though one review reports poor responsiveness to a failed repair. Pricing is a significant weakness, with multiple reviews citing outrageous or excessive charges ($400-500/hour rates, inflated estimates). Project completion shows inconsistency: two reviews praise efficient work and follow-up callbacks, but one critical review documents a failed pump repair with no remediation offered. Experience appears solid based on descriptions of skilled work, though the sample size is small. The WW Score is pulled down substantially by pricing concerns and one severe service failure.

• All reviews are older than 12 months (oldest from 2018, most recent from 2020); no recent data available to assess current performance
• Only 5 reviews total — sample size is small and limits confidence in overall assessment
• Significant contradiction between positive reviews (5-star) and negative reviews (1-2 star) suggests inconsistent service quality or possible service model variation
• One review (2020-05-19) documents complete service failure with no remediation — this is a serious red flag for accountability

This score should be treated with caution due to the small sample size (5 reviews), age of data (all pre-2021), and high variability in customer experience. The pricing concerns are well-documented across multiple reviews and appear credible, but the overall WW Score may not reflect current business practices.

Terry's Plumbing exhibits highly inconsistent service quality with significant polarization in customer experiences. While multiple reviews praise professional technicians (Devyn, Jacob, Nathan, John, Keith) who demonstrate expertise and responsiveness, an equally substantial number of reviews document serious failures in professionalism (no-shows, poor communication, unprofessional appearance and behavior), project completion (incomplete repairs requiring multiple visits, unresolved issues), and pricing transparency (unauthorized work, inflated charges, disputed billing). The company shows strength in technical problem-solving when engaged properly, but critical weaknesses in scheduling reliability, follow-up communication, and billing practices significantly undermine overall trustworthiness. Recent reviews (2023-2024) show more negative patterns than older reviews, suggesting potential deterioration in service standards.

• RECENCY CONCERN: Most negative reviews cluster in 2023-2024 (8 of last 10 reviews are 1-star), while positive reviews are predominantly from 2015-2022. This suggests declining service quality over time.
• BILLING DISPUTES: Multiple reviews (2019, 2019, 2021) document unauthorized work, inflated charges, and unresponsive billing department. One 2019 review notes owner Terry R eventually honored a complaint after escalation, but pattern persists.
• NO-SHOW AND COMMUNICATION FAILURES: Two 2024 reviews document complete no-shows and failure to respond to email/phone follow-ups despite promises. One 2023 review documents ignored email inquiry.
• INCONSISTENT QUALITY: Same company produces both 5-star reviews praising specific technicians and 1-star reviews describing unprofessional behavior, suggesting highly variable technician quality or management oversight issues.
• POTENTIAL DISHONESTY: 2023 review documents owner allegedly lying about access to unit and wire location during damage dispute. 2019 review documents billing manager allegedly misrepresenting work performed.
• UNRESOLVED COMPLAINTS: Multiple reviews (2019, 2019, 2023) document management failing to return calls or follow up on complaints despite promises.
• AC/HVAC COMPETENCY QUESTIONS: Multiple reviews (2023, 2024, 2022) suggest misdiagnosis of AC issues, recommending unnecessary replacements when simpler fixes (capacitor, coolant) resolved problems.

This WW Score should be treated with CAUTION. While based on 25 reviews with adequate mention counts, the extreme polarization (12 five-star vs. 11 one-star), clear recency decline, documented billing disputes, and allegations of dishonesty indicate this company is highly unreliable and inconsistent. The score of 62.8 reflects this volatility but may overstate trustworthiness given the severity and pattern of recent failures. Customers should seek multiple references and written estimates before engaging this company.

Daniel's Plumbing exhibits a deeply polarized customer experience. While older reviews (pre-2018) and recent positive reviews praise technical expertise, reliability, and fair pricing, a significant cluster of negative reviews from 2018–2023 document serious issues: excessive billing, poor communication, unprofessional phone interactions, missed appointments, and failure to stand behind work. Professionalism is undermined by documented rudeness from staff and ownership, late arrivals without notification, and dismissive customer service. Pricing complaints are frequent and specific—customers report being charged $600+ for 15-minute jobs, undisclosed fees, inflated labor rates, and refusal to adjust bills. Project completion suffers from incomplete work, callbacks that are charged as new service calls, and lack of warranty follow-through. Technical skill remains a strength when work is completed, but inconsistent execution and poor follow-up significantly diminish overall value. The company appears to have experienced a decline in service standards during the 2018–2023 period.

• POLARIZED REVIEW PATTERN: Strong clustering of 1-star reviews (2018–2023) vs. 5-star reviews (pre-2018 and scattered recent). This suggests either a significant operational decline or potential review manipulation.
• PRICING COMPLAINTS ARE SPECIFIC AND CONSISTENT: Multiple independent reviews document excessive charges, undisclosed fees, inflated labor rates, and refusal to adjust bills. This is not isolated—it is a pattern.
• PROFESSIONALISM CONCERNS: Documented instances of owner/staff rudeness, verbal altercations, threats, and dismissive attitudes toward customers. Multiple reviews mention being hung up on or spoken to disrespectfully.
• COMMUNICATION FAILURES: Repeated complaints about late arrivals without notification, slow response to follow-up issues, failure to return calls, and lack of transparency about service scope and costs.
• WARRANTY/FOLLOW-UP ISSUES: Multiple reviews report that work failed shortly after completion and the company refused to honor warranty or charged for callbacks. This directly impacts project completion score.
• RECENCY BIAS: Most negative reviews cluster in 2018–2023. Recent reviews (2024–2025) show mixed results. Older reviews (pre-2018) are predominantly positive, suggesting either a historical decline or a shift in business practices.
• EMPTY/MINIMAL REVIEWS: Several reviews contain no text or minimal text (e.g., 'No good!', 'Excellent service!'), limiting data quality for 4 reviews.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW: One review appears twice (identical text about scheduling/communication issues from 2023-06-10 and 2023-02-09), suggesting possible review platform duplication rather than fake reviews.

This WW Score should be treated with CAUTION. While the MODERATE confidence reflects adequate mention counts, the deeply polarized distribution of reviews (strong clustering of 1-star vs. 5-star with few middle ratings) and documented patterns of pricing complaints, professionalism issues, and warranty failures suggest the company's service quality is highly inconsistent and context-dependent. The score of 62.3 reflects a company in decline from its earlier reputation, with significant unresolved customer service and billing practices issues that persist across multiple independent reviews. Prospective customers should carefully review the specific complaints (especially pricing and follow-up) before engaging this company.

Blue Ribbon Plumbing has a deeply mixed record across all four dimensions. Professionalism is significantly dragged down by multiple detailed, credible negative reviews describing no-shows, ghosting by the owner, and poor communication — including a 2025 incident where a technician flooded a kitchen and the company failed to return four separate times. Project completion is the weakest dimension, with several reviews explicitly describing unresolved work, abandoned jobs, and a $350 charge for a drain that remained clogged. Pricing and experience score moderately higher, with several positive reviews praising fair rates and skilled technicians, but these are largely older reviews (pre-2023) and are partially offset by at least one overcharging complaint. The positive reviews, while numerous, are heavily concentrated in the 2015–2022 period, while the most recent reviews (2024–2025) are predominantly negative, suggesting a possible decline in service quality.

• RECENCY CONCERN: The three most recent reviews (2024–2025) are all 1-star with detailed complaints. This is a significant negative trend. Older positive reviews should be weighted less heavily.
• POSSIBLE REVIEW PADDING: Several older 5-star reviews contain no usable text (blank, '.', or 'unknown' entries dated 2014–2018). These were excluded from scoring but inflate the raw review count.
• GENERIC PRAISE PATTERN: A cluster of 5-star reviews dated exactly '2023-06-10' with minimal detail ('Thank you Donald...', 'Awesome experience!', 'We had a plumbing problem...') share identical dates and vague language, raising a mild concern about authenticity.
• OWNER ACCOUNTABILITY ISSUE: Two separate negative reviews (2025 and 2022) explicitly name the owner 'Don/Bob' as failing to follow through on personal commitments, suggesting a systemic leadership problem rather than isolated technician errors.
• PROJECT COMPLETION RISK: At least 3 reviews describe work that was started or paid for but not completed, which is a serious flag for any prospective customer.

This WW Score carries MODERATE overall reliability — the mention counts are sufficient for statistical grounding, but the sharp negative trend in recent reviews (2024–2025) and the presence of several blank or suspiciously dated older 5-star reviews mean prospective customers should weight the most recent experiences most heavily when making a hiring decision.

Andrews Plumbing has a mixed track record across reviews. Several customers praised responsiveness, politeness, and technical knowledge, particularly for smaller jobs like water heater replacement and sink installation. However, two significant negative reviews — one describing an abandoned rough-in job with a disputed invoice of $1,300 for minimal work, and another detailing a two-month overrun, poor tile workmanship, persistent leaks, and difficulty getting warranty work honored — substantially drag down the project completion and pricing scores. The positive reviews are largely older (pre-2020) with only one recent review from 2023, limiting confidence in current performance. The contractor appears more reliable on small, straightforward jobs than on larger remodeling projects.

• Most reviews are older than 3 years; only 1 review is from the past 12 months (2023). Current performance cannot be reliably assessed from this dataset.
• One review marked 'unknown' with no text content was excluded from scoring as it provides no usable data.
• Two serious negative reviews describe abandoned work, billing disputes, warranty non-compliance, and poor subcontractor quality — these are significant red flags for larger projects.
• The 1-star review from 2014 describes a pattern of upfront payment followed by delays and refusal to honor warranty work, which is a consumer protection concern.
• Positive reviews, while genuine in tone, are largely brief and lack specific detail, which slightly limits their evidentiary weight.

This WW Score carries moderate reliability due to a small review pool, a wide date range spanning 15 years, and two substantive negative reviews that reveal serious project management and warranty concerns that prospective customers should carefully consider.

Cy Blue Plumbing has two strong positive reviews praising responsiveness, politeness, technical knowledge, and fair pricing — particularly highlighting technician Alex and plumber Kenny by name. However, a significant negative review from 2021 describes a complete breakdown in communication after a service visit that may have caused a backflow leak, with multiple unanswered calls and emails over several days despite an emergency. This single negative review carries substantial weight given the small review pool and directly impacts professionalism and project completion scores. The fourth review contains no usable text and was excluded from scoring. Overall, the contractor shows genuine strengths but also a documented failure in follow-through and responsiveness that cannot be ignored.

• One review (Rating: 5.0, Date: 2002-01-10) contains only the text 'unknown' and was excluded from scoring as it provides no usable data.
• The 2002 review date is over 20 years old and carries no meaningful weight even if it had contained content.
• The 2017 positive review is more than 7 years old and is given reduced weight relative to more recent reviews.
• Only 3 reviews contain usable data — this is the absolute minimum threshold for a WW Score calculation, and results should be treated with significant caution.
• The negative 2021 review describes a potential service-caused issue (backflow leaking after technician visit) combined with complete non-responsiveness, which is a serious flag for project completion and professionalism.
• With only 3 usable reviews spanning 2021–2022, there is insufficient data to assess the contractor's current operational quality with any confidence.

This WW Score is based on only 3 usable reviews across a 5-year span and should be considered highly unreliable — prospective customers should seek additional references or more recent reviews before making a hiring decision.