Find Nearby Plumbers In Miami, Florida

Crystal Clear Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions, with consistent praise for punctuality, courteous staff, and clean workmanship spanning multiple years of reviews. Professionalism is well-documented with numerous reviewers specifically calling out named technicians (Jared, Pedro, Scott, Sonny) as polite, prompt, and communicative. Project completion scores are high, with the vast majority of reviewers confirming jobs were finished correctly and efficiently, though one notable negative review describes a warranty dispute where a repair failed within a month and the company allegedly refused to honor it. Pricing scores are tempered by two negative data points: one reviewer found the $150 service call fee steep, another was charged $200 for 30 minutes with no leak found and no prior disclosure of the minimum charge, and a third was charged $475 for a job they felt should have cost $200 including being billed for the technician's error in ordering the wrong part. Experience scores are strong overall, with multiple reviewers praising technical knowledge and problem-solving, offset slightly by the one instance of a technician needing to 'phone a friend' and replacing the wrong part first.

• 5 reviews contain no text at all — only a 5-star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• A cluster of 10+ reviews share the exact same date (2025-05-10) with no review text or minimal text, which may indicate a batch submission or review solicitation event. Confidence is not reduced since many of these are blank, but the pattern is noted.
• Several older reviews (2015–2020) reference a plumber named 'Jerry' or 'Andrew' who does not appear in recent reviews. This may indicate a change in ownership or key personnel, meaning older reviews may not reflect current service quality.
• One 1-star review (2021) alleges the company refused to honor a 6-month warranty after a repair failed within one month and threatened court action — a serious flag for project completion and business integrity.
• One 1-star review (2021) reports calling 3 times and never receiving a callback, and one 1-star review (2022) reports being told they would be contacted and never hearing back — both flag responsiveness issues.
• One 2-star review (2016) documents being charged for a technician's mistake (wrong part ordered, transportation fees passed to customer) — a pricing transparency concern.
• RECENCY NOTE: Reviews from 2025 and 2024 are predominantly positive and recent. Negative reviews are mostly from 2016–2023. The most recent negative experience is from mid-2023. Recent trend appears positive but the warranty/callback complaints should not be dismissed.

This WW Score is based on a substantial volume of reviews (60 total, 55 with usable data) spanning 2012–2025, giving it HIGH overall confidence, though the score is modestly conservative due to recurring pricing transparency concerns, at least one credible warranty dispute, and documented responsiveness failures in older reviews.

Mitch at Fix a Leak Plumbing demonstrates strong technical skill and reliable project completion, with customers praising his ability to diagnose complex problems and follow through until work is finished. Professionalism is solid but tempered by recurring mentions of availability and responsiveness challenges—customers note he is 'hard to get a hold of' and has limited availability, which moderately offsets otherwise excellent service. Pricing appears fair and transparent based on limited explicit mention, with one customer specifically noting he doesn't oversell unnecessary services. The score reflects consistently positive outcomes across all dimensions, though the small sample size and age of reviews (most from 2013–2017) warrant moderate confidence.

• All reviews are 5-star ratings with no critical feedback—pattern suggests potential selection bias or incomplete review dataset
• Review dates are significantly outdated: 4 of 5 reviews are from 2013–2017 (7–11 years old); only 1 review from past 12 months. Current service quality cannot be reliably assessed.
• Professionalism score reduced due to explicit mentions of availability/responsiveness issues in 2 reviews, despite overall positive ratings
• Small sample size (n=5) limits statistical reliability; recommend collecting additional recent reviews before making high-confidence decisions

This score should be treated with caution due to the very small sample size, significant age of most reviews, and absence of any critical feedback that might indicate selection bias or incomplete data representation.

Seaway Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism across multiple reviews, with consistent praise for punctuality, courtesy, responsiveness, and neat work habits. Project completion is well-documented with timely problem resolution and follow-through on service calls. Technical experience is evident through skilled diagnostics and quality workmanship. However, pricing information is entirely absent from all reviews, preventing assessment of value for money. The score reflects solid performance on three dimensions but is limited by the small sample size (5 reviews) and complete lack of pricing data.

• All 5 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative feedback—this uniformity warrants caution, though reviews do contain specific details (Armando's extra effort, office responsiveness, 10-year relationship) that suggest authenticity rather than generic praise.
• Three reviews are significantly older (2014), with only two from 2019 and 2022. Recency is limited; current service quality cannot be fully assessed from this dataset.
• No pricing or value-for-money information provided in any review. This is a critical gap for comprehensive contractor evaluation.
• Small sample size (5 reviews) limits statistical confidence. Recommend collecting additional recent reviews before making high-stakes decisions.

This score should be treated with caution due to the small sample size, absence of pricing data, and age of most reviews. The professionalism and project completion scores are moderately reliable, but the overall WW Score is best viewed as preliminary pending additional recent customer feedback.

Bear Plumbing receives consistently strong feedback across all four scored dimensions. Professionalism is the most frequently praised attribute, with numerous reviewers highlighting prompt responses, friendly communication, and courteous on-site behavior. Pricing is explicitly called out as fair, reasonable, or competitive in multiple reviews, including one reviewer who noted a competitor was beaten by a significant margin. Project completion is well-supported, with reviewers describing same-day service, timely arrivals, and jobs finished without issue. Experience is evidenced by mentions of knowledgeable technicians, quality workmanship, and problem-solving behavior such as explaining root causes and offering multiple solution options. The overall picture is of a reliable, customer-focused plumbing operation, though the relatively small review pool and several undated reviews temper full confidence.

• Several reviews have no date attached, making recency weighting impossible for those entries. These were included in scoring but treated with equal weight to dated reviews.
• The oldest dated reviews are from 2017 and reference different technicians (Slava, Josh) compared to more recent reviews (John, Cyle), suggesting possible staff or ownership changes over time. The 2017 reviews may not reflect current service quality.
• All 19 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative or mixed feedback. While individual reviews contain specific details that reduce fake review suspicion, the complete absence of any critical feedback across all reviews warrants mild caution.
• Some reviews are very brief and generic (e.g., 'Quick and knowledgeable', 'Excellent service - quality work!', 'I liked his different options to the project.') and provide limited scorable evidence. These were counted for mention purposes only where a dimension was clearly implied.
• Total review count of 19 is relatively low. Scores carry moderate overall confidence despite individual dimension confidence levels being HIGH due to the small absolute sample size.

This WW Score is moderately reliable — all four dimensions have sufficient mentions to reach HIGH confidence individually, but the total review pool of 19 reviews, the presence of several undated entries, a possible personnel change since 2017, and a perfect 5-star record with no critical reviews collectively suggest the score should be treated as a positive indicator rather than a definitive benchmark.

Bay Area Plumbing (BAP) and Bay Plumbing have a large and predominantly positive review base spanning over a decade, with strong recurring praise for responsiveness, punctuality, technical skill, and problem-solving ability. However, a meaningful cluster of negative reviews — particularly around hidden travel charges, overcharging for parts, incomplete work, and rude or unresponsive staff — meaningfully depresses the pricing and professionalism scores. Project completion is generally strong but is undermined by several credible accounts of work left unfinished, recurring problems after service, and at least two instances where a fix failed shortly after the plumber left. Experience scores well overall, with many reviewers noting that technicians diagnosed problems accurately and avoided unnecessary upsells, though a few reviews describe technicians who were slow, unfocused, or left jobs in worse condition. The pricing dimension is the weakest, with multiple independent reviewers explicitly calling out hidden travel charges, inflated parts costs, and surprise billing practices.

• Multiple reviews reference different named plumbers (Harry, Tony/Antonio, Jonathan, Ron, Albert, Jose, Chris, Nick, Ivan, Alan, Rudy, Juan) across different time periods and locations — this appears to be a composite review set covering at least two or three distinct businesses operating under similar names (Bay Plumbing in Berkeley/Bay Area CA, Bay Plumbing in Miami/Coral Gables FL, and Bay Area Plumbing BAP Inc with Ron). Scores should be interpreted with caution as they blend multiple businesses.
• 15 reviews contain no text (only a star rating) and were excluded from dimension scoring. These blank 5-star reviews slightly inflate the perceived rating average and may represent low-effort or incentivized reviews.
• Several reviews from 2012 explicitly note a business ownership change (Harry retired, sold to Jonathan), and subsequent reviews of Jonathan are notably more negative. This transition creates a structural discontinuity in review quality that affects historical scoring.
• Recency note: The most recent reviews (2024–2025) are predominantly for 'Ron' at 'Bay Area Plumbing BAP Inc' and are uniformly 5-star with limited specificity in many cases. This pattern — high volume of recent 5-star reviews with short text — warrants moderate fake review suspicion for that subset, though some reviews do include specific details.
• Pricing complaints are credible and recurring across multiple independent reviewers spanning 2008–2024, specifically citing hidden travel charges billed at $120–$140, inflated parts markups, and surprise billing. This is a systemic pattern, not isolated incidents.
• At least two reviews describe work that failed immediately after the plumber left and where the company refused a full refund (2024 toilet clog, 2021 sink unclog). One review describes a tool left in pipes discovered years later by a different company. These are serious project completion red flags.
• One 1-star review (2021) describes a Bay Plumbing employee threatening to fight building staff over a parking dispute — a significant professionalism concern if accurate.
• Reviews span from 2008 to 2025. Reviews older than 3 years (pre-2022) were given reduced weight in scoring given the business ownership changes and geographic ambiguity across the review pool.

This WW Score carries HIGH data confidence due to the large review volume, but should be interpreted with caution given that the reviews appear to span multiple distinct businesses operating under similar names across different geographies and ownership periods, and a recurring pattern of pricing complaints and occasional project completion failures meaningfully limits trust in the higher end of the score range.

National Service Pros (also operating as National Air and Heat) earns strong marks for professionalism and responsiveness, with the overwhelming majority of reviewers praising same-day or next-day service, friendly technicians, real-time tracking links, and proactive communication. Project completion is also generally strong, with most jobs resolved on the first or second visit, though a notable minority of negative reviews cite abandoned follow-through, unresolved repairs, and one case of a missing heating element installation that went unaddressed for weeks. Pricing is the weakest dimension: while many reviewers call pricing fair or reasonable, a meaningful cluster of negative reviews explicitly flags overcharging, excessive parts markups (e.g., a $25 capacitor billed at $325), and aggressive upselling toward unnecessary full-unit replacements. Experience scores well overall given the volume of reviewers praising accurate diagnostics and skilled repairs, but is tempered by a few reviews where technicians failed to identify or fix the actual problem. The score reflects a company with genuine strengths in responsiveness and professionalism but with recurring and credible pricing and quality-control concerns that prevent a higher overall rating.

• PRICING CONCERN: Multiple independent reviewers (at least 5) explicitly describe excessive parts markups, surprise fees, or aggressive upselling toward unnecessary full replacements. This is a consistent and credible pattern, not isolated complaints.
• PROJECT COMPLETION FAILURES: At least 3 reviews describe serious follow-through failures — a no-show after a scheduled late-night appointment, a unit with a missing heating element never corrected over two weeks, and a technician who declared a malfunctioning unit 'fine' without resolving the issue.
• COMMUNICATION FAILURE: One reviewer explicitly describes being left waiting 4 hours without proactive notification of a delay, and another waited 8 days for a promised written quote that never arrived.
• RECENCY NOTE: Reviews span 2019–2024. The majority of reviews (approximately 60+) are from 2022 onward and are therefore considered current. A small number of reviews from 2019–2020 were included but given slightly reduced weight.
• FAKE REVIEW RISK: LOW. Reviews are largely specific, name individual technicians, describe unique scenarios, and include both positive and negative experiences. No strong pattern of fake reviews detected. The volume of detail across reviews supports authenticity.
• HOURS DISCREPANCY: One reviewer flagged that the business lists 24-hour availability but is not actually available 24 hours. Another reviewer experienced a no-show on a late-night call. This suggests advertised availability may not match actual operations.

This WW Score is based on 80 reviews spanning 2019–2024 with the majority from the past 24 months, covering all four scored dimensions with HIGH confidence; the score is considered reliable but should be interpreted with caution on pricing, as a credible and recurring pattern of overcharging complaints meaningfully suppresses what would otherwise be a higher overall rating.