Find Nearby Plumbers In Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Feiner Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all measured dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised with mentions of friendly demeanor, great communication, and quick responsiveness. Project completion is solid with all jobs finished promptly and thoroughly, including cleanup. Technical competence is evident across multiple job types (gas leak repair, plumbing reroute, drain repair). Pricing receives positive but qualified feedback—described as reasonable and fair, though one reviewer notes cheaper alternatives exist. The WW Score of 88.3 reflects reliable, quality-focused service with minor pricing considerations.

• All three reviews are 5-star ratings with uniformly positive language, which could suggest selection bias or limited negative feedback visibility
• Review dates span 2018–2022 (oldest review is 6+ years old); only one review from past 12 months. Recency is limited and may not reflect current operations
• Sample size is very small (n=3); confidence in score is constrained by insufficient data volume
• No explicit mention of warranty, guarantees, or post-job support in any review

This WW Score should be treated with caution due to the small sample size (3 reviews) and age of most data. While the available reviews are consistently positive and specific, a minimum of 8–10 recent reviews would be needed to establish high confidence in this score.

Jeff's Custom Care Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all measured dimensions. All three reviews explicitly praise timely response, fair pricing, and quality workmanship. Professionalism is consistently highlighted through communication during emergencies, politeness, and responsiveness. Project completion is evidenced by rapid turnaround times and thorough work (pipe replacement, line snaking). Pricing is repeatedly described as reasonable and fair with transparent estimates. However, the sample size is small (3 reviews) and all are 5-star ratings with no critical feedback, which limits confidence in the overall assessment.

• Small sample size (n=3) limits statistical reliability of scores
• All reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative feedback or critical comments — consider requesting more recent reviews to validate consistency
• Oldest review is from January 2023 (over 1 year old); only 2 reviews from past 12 months
• Slight pattern of generic praise language ('highly recommend', 'great job', 'excellent service') across all reviews, though each contains specific details (emergency communication, pipe quality, timeline) that suggests authenticity

This score should be treated with caution due to the very small sample size (3 reviews) and absence of any critical feedback. While the reviews are detailed and appear authentic, a WW Score based on only 3 reviews carries LIMITED-to-MODERATE reliability and should be updated as more reviews accumulate.

Rick's Plumbing has an overwhelmingly positive track record across a very large review base spanning over a decade, with the vast majority of customers praising punctuality, responsiveness, technical skill, and fair pricing. Professionalism scores well but is meaningfully dragged down by a recurring pattern of negative reviews citing no-shows, failure to return calls, abandoned jobs, and in several cases rude or dismissive behavior toward customers — these are not isolated incidents and appear across multiple years. Project completion is similarly strong in the majority of cases but is penalized by credible accounts of work left incomplete, a failed city inspection with Rick absent, and at least one instance where a warranty callback was ignored despite explicit promises. Pricing and experience are the strongest dimensions, with dozens of reviewers independently praising fair and transparent quotes, high-quality materials, and superior diagnostic ability. The score reflects a contractor who delivers excellent results most of the time but has a documented and consistent minority of serious service failures that cannot be dismissed.

• RECURRING NO-SHOW PATTERN: At least 6 independent reviews across different years (2014, 2018, 2020, 2023) describe Rick scheduling appointments and then failing to appear without notice or explanation. This is a systemic reliability concern, not isolated incidents.
• CALLBACK/FOLLOW-THROUGH FAILURES: Multiple reviews explicitly state that promised callbacks, estimates, or warranty repairs were never honored after initial contact or completed work (2013, 2014, 2018, 2023).
• PROFESSIONALISM COMPLAINTS: At least 3 reviews describe Rick as rude, obnoxious, patronizing, or having a bad temper toward customers. One reviewer used the term 'misogynistic.' These are spread across 2015, 2020, and 2022, suggesting a persistent behavioral pattern.
• FAILED CITY INSPECTION: One detailed 2018 review describes Rick not attending a scheduled city inspection, refusing to fix the failing work, and leaving the customer to hire another plumber to redo the job and pass inspection.
• QUALITY DISPUTE: One 2019 review describes work described as 'horribly wrong,' pipes repaired above ground level, and workers leaving without completing the job or returning with needed parts.
• NON-PLUMBING NEGATIVE REVIEWS: Two reviews (2016 trash disposal incident, 2023 van door incident) describe unprofessional conduct by Rick or his team unrelated to plumbing work itself. These were included in the total count but excluded from dimension scoring as they do not reflect plumbing service quality.
• FAKE REVIEW RISK — LOW TO MODERATE: The overwhelming majority of 5-star reviews are specific, detailed, and span many years with varied job types, reducing fake review suspicion significantly. However, a cluster of very short, generic 5-star reviews with 'unknown' text from 2014-2016 cannot be evaluated and were excluded from dimension scoring.
• RECENCY NOTE: Reviews from the past 12 months (late 2023 to late 2024) are predominantly positive with no major complaints, suggesting possible improvement in consistency, though the sample size for the most recent period is smaller.
• MULTIPLE LOCATIONS POSSIBLE: Some reviews reference Fullerton/Orange County CA, others reference Alameda CA, and others reference Florence/Timmonsville SC. It is possible these reviews aggregate multiple businesses sharing the name 'Rick's Plumbing,' which would reduce the reliability of treating this as a single contractor profile.

This WW Score is based on a large and diverse review set spanning over a decade and carries HIGH statistical confidence in its directional accuracy, but prospective customers should weigh the documented and recurring pattern of no-shows, abandoned callbacks, and interpersonal complaints as meaningful risk factors that the aggregate score alone does not fully convey.

ABC Sewer and Drain earns strong marks across most dimensions, with the majority of reviewers praising friendly, courteous technicians who arrive on time and resolve sewer and drain issues efficiently. Pricing is frequently cited as a competitive advantage, with multiple reviewers explicitly noting lower costs compared to competitors and transparent flat-rate charges. However, two notable negative reviews meaningfully drag down the project completion and professionalism scores: one customer experienced a recurring backup that was never fully resolved after two visits and over $400 spent, and another described a hostile owner interaction, undisclosed fees, and a refund dispute after a failed service call. A third low-rated review flagged a technician who appeared uncertain about the diagnosis and never returned. These incidents introduce real doubt about consistency of workmanship and customer service recovery, preventing the scores from reaching the high 80s or 90s.

• Two reviews rated 1-star describe serious service failures: one involving repeated unsuccessful visits, misleading refund practices, and unprofessional owner conduct; another involving sewage returning within weeks of service and a disputed refund with undisclosed fees. These are substantive complaints that meaningfully impact project completion and professionalism scores.
• One 2-star review (2017) describes a technician who was going to guess at the problem and never followed up — a minor but notable competence concern.
• One 2-star review (2015) describes a technician with a poor attitude who claimed to be too busy on a 24-hour service line and made the customer feel unwelcome — a professionalism concern.
• Review date range spans from 2015 to 2024. Reviews older than 12 months from the most recent review (pre-September 2023) were given reduced weight. The majority of reviews are older than 1 year relative to the most recent review date, which limits recency confidence.
• No strong fake review patterns detected. Reviews vary in length, detail, specificity, and named technicians (Dikota, Brian, Dan, Juan, Jeff, Zay, Patrick, Tony, Tyler), which adds authenticity. However, the high proportion of 5-star ratings (23 out of 27) warrants mild caution.

This WW Score is based on 27 reviews spanning nearly a decade, with HIGH mention counts across all four dimensions, making the score mathematically reliable — however, the presence of two detailed and credible 1-star reviews and the age of many reviews (several from 2015–2020) mean consumers should treat this score as a reasonable but not definitive indicator of current service quality.

Franz Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism across multiple reviews, with consistent praise for punctuality, friendliness, communication, and responsiveness. Pricing is viewed favorably as reasonable and fair value. Project completion is solid with timely work and follow-through on callbacks and multiple jobs. Technical skill and workmanship quality are evident from customer satisfaction, though fewer reviews explicitly detail technical expertise. However, the dataset is significantly weakened by three empty or near-empty reviews (single periods) that provide no usable data, and most reviews are older than 5 years, limiting recency validation.

• Three reviews contain only a period (.) with no substantive content — these are non-informative and reduce dataset reliability
• Most reviews are from 2014–2017 (5–9 years old); only one review from 2022 provides recent validation
• Limited total review count (8 reviews, 6 usable) constrains confidence in dimensional scoring
• No negative reviews present — dataset may not reflect full customer experience spectrum

This WW Score of 88.2 should be treated with moderate caution due to small sample size, age of most reviews, and presence of non-informative entries; however, the consistent positive feedback across multiple dimensions from substantive reviews suggests genuine customer satisfaction.

Eleete demonstrates strong performance across all dimensions with particular strength in project completion and professionalism. Reviews consistently praise timely job delivery, attention to detail, quality workmanship, and responsive communication from ownership. Pricing is characterized as competitive and fair relative to competitors. The company shows technical expertise in complex plumbing work including water main hookups and diagnostic troubleshooting. However, the overall confidence is moderated by the small sample size (5 reviews) and significant age of some reviews (oldest from 2006, most from 2015-2021).

• RECENCY CONCERN: Most reviews are 3-9 years old (2016-2021). Only one review from 2006 is significantly outdated. Current operational practices may differ from historical performance.
• SMALL SAMPLE SIZE: Only 5 reviews analyzed. Scores are based on limited data and may not be fully representative of current service quality.
• GENERIC PRAISE: Review 5 ('CAN'T TELL YOU HOW MUCH WE LOVE THEM') lacks specifics and detail, reducing its evidentiary value. However, other reviews are detailed and credible.
• LIMITED PRICING DATA: Only 3 mentions of pricing across 5 reviews. Pricing assessment is based on limited explicit evidence.

This WW Score should be treated with caution due to the small sample size (5 reviews) and age of most data. The score reflects strong historical performance but may not accurately represent current service delivery. Additional recent reviews are needed to establish reliable confidence in this contractor's present-day quality.