Find Nearby Plumbers In Vancouver, Washington

Oak Plumbing scores well on professionalism and experience, with a large volume of reviews praising named technicians (Travis, Jovan, Matthew, Malik, George, Andrew, Jared, Danny, and others) for punctuality, communication, friendliness, and technical competence. However, pricing is the single most damaging dimension in this dataset: a substantial and consistent minority of reviewers — spanning the full date range from 2017 through 2025 — explicitly describe charges as 2x to 5x competitor quotes, with specific dollar comparisons provided (e.g., $5,500 vs. $135 repair, $24,000 vs. $1,000, $654 vs. $265, $3,500 vs. $1,450). Project completion is moderately strong but is dragged down by several serious negative cases including an elderly couple left without hot water for five weeks, an abandoned job with no follow-through, a toilet that remained clogged after two visits, and a freestanding tub damaged and inadequately repaired over the course of a month. The overall WW Score of 72.1 reflects a company with genuinely skilled and professional field staff but a persistent, well-documented pattern of pricing complaints and a non-trivial number of project completion failures that cannot be dismissed as outliers given their frequency and specificity.

• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: Two reviews with identical text ('Matthew came out and did an amazing job of assessing the problem...') were submitted on 2025-06-05 and 2025-06-03 with the same 5-star rating. This is a likely duplicate or fake review and was counted only once for scoring purposes.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: The lengthy negative review about the freestanding tub damage (rating 1.0, dated 2021-10-22) appears to have been submitted three times with nearly identical text across three separate entries dated 2020-08-18 (two entries) and one on 2020-08-18 with a 1.5-star rating. These appear to be the same reviewer submitting multiple times; counted once.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: 'We love Oak Plumbing and the owner is a great local businessman. Travis Ballard came out...' appears twice with identical text, dated 2023-06-07 and 2022-08-29. Counted once.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: 'Not only did he do water heater but also replaced toilet and kitchen faucet. Because of the condition of the property, Jared went the extra mile...' appears twice on 2019-08-28. Counted once.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: 'Anthony with Oak Plumbing is amazing. He's always prompt, courteous and tidy...' appears twice (2019-06-08 and 2018-09-05). Counted once.
• PRICING PATTERN — SYSTEMIC CONCERN: Pricing complaints are not isolated incidents. Across the full review history (2017–2025), at least 25–30 distinct reviewers explicitly describe being charged 2x to 5x competitor rates for the same job, with specific dollar figures provided. This is a structural business practice concern, not random dissatisfaction.
• PROJECT COMPLETION — SERIOUS FAILURES: Multiple reviews describe abandoned or incomplete work, including: (1) elderly couple left without hot water for 5 weeks with no communication; (2) a freestanding tub damaged by a technician and inadequately repaired over a month; (3) a toilet that remained clogged after two service visits; (4) a job where the technician left mid-day without notice; (5) a customer who waited all day for a plumber who never arrived with no apology.
• TECHNICIAN CONDUCT COMPLAINTS: Multiple reviews describe specific technicians behaving rudely or unprofessionally (Zachary described as rude and dismissive; Johny described as calling supervisor on speaker and characterizing customer as 'difficult'; Nate described as attempting to charge $3,000–$10,000 for jobs later fixed for under $200). These are not isolated to one employee.
• MANAGEMENT RESPONSIVENESS CONCERN: Several negative reviews explicitly state that management (specifically 'Ariel') was unresponsive, dismissive, or attempted to pressure reviewers to edit negative reviews. One reviewer states Ariel called twice after a negative post asking them to edit it.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of reviews are from 2021–2025, providing strong recency coverage. Pricing complaints appear consistently across all years, suggesting this is not a historical issue that has been resolved.
• BLANK REVIEWS: Approximately 20–25 reviews contained no text and only a star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring but counted in total review volume.
• GENERIC PRAISE PATTERN: A subset of very short reviews ('Best plumber near me!', '5 stars', 'Great service!', 'Good work') provide no specific detail and cannot be scored on any dimension. These were not used for scoring but noted as low-information entries.

This WW Score is based on a very large review dataset (380 reviews) spanning approximately 8 years, giving HIGH confidence in all four dimensions; however, the pricing score in particular should be treated as a firm finding rather than a conservative estimate, as the volume and specificity of overpricing complaints is among the most consistent signals in the entire dataset.

All American Plumbing presents a deeply split profile across its review history. The most recent reviews (2024–2025, predominantly from what appears to be a San Diego-area operation) are overwhelmingly positive, with customers consistently praising named technicians like Lance, Mason, Elliott, JoJo, Justin, Ryan, and Nick for punctuality, clear communication, technical skill, and fair pricing. However, a substantial body of older reviews (2012–2021, many referencing a technician named Robert and home warranty company assignments, likely a different geographic location or franchise) describes a pattern of serious failures: no-shows, misdiagnoses, rude office staff, abandoned jobs, overcharging, and dishonest reporting to home warranty companies. Project completion is significantly dragged down by multiple reviews describing work left unfinished, problems made worse, and failure to follow through. Pricing scores are mixed — recent customers praise fair and transparent quotes, while older customers describe significant overcharging and bait-and-switch tactics. The experience dimension similarly splits between highly skilled recent technicians and incompetent or fraudulent older service calls.

• CRITICAL: The review pool appears to contain reviews for at least two distinct business entities or locations operating under the name 'All American Plumbing.' Recent reviews (2024–2025) reference San Diego-area technicians and a clearly different operational culture from older reviews (2012–2021) that repeatedly reference a technician named 'Robert' and home warranty fraud patterns. Scores should be interpreted with this bifurcation in mind.
• FAKE REVIEW SUSPICION — MODERATE: Several reviews from late 2021 (dates: 2021-12-01 to 2021-12-02) are clustered within 48 hours, are unusually generic in praise, and reference a Texas/Houston-area business context inconsistent with the San Diego reviews. One reviewer (2022-01-25) explicitly flags these as suspected fake reviews posted by California residents for a Houston business.
• 14 reviews contain no text (only a star rating) and were excluded from dimension scoring but counted in total reviews analyzed.
• RECENCY NOTE: The most recent 80+ reviews (2024–2025) are almost entirely 5-star and reflect a high-performing San Diego operation. The older reviews (pre-2023) contain a disproportionate number of 1-star reviews describing a pattern of fraud, rudeness, and incompetence. If evaluating only the last 12 months, scores would be substantially higher across all dimensions.
• PATTERN OF NEGATIVE REVIEWS — HOME WARRANTY CONTEXT: A large cluster of 1-star reviews specifically involves customers assigned through home warranty companies (American Home Shield, Old Republic, 2-10, First American). These reviews describe a consistent pattern of misdiagnosis, upselling, no-shows, and dishonest reporting to warranty companies. This pattern is strong enough to suggest systemic rather than isolated failures in that operational context.
• ONE REVIEW (2024-07-06, 1-star) alleges a company truck attempted to run the reviewer off the road. This is an isolated conduct allegation that cannot be scored but is flagged as a serious concern.
• ONE REVIEW (2023-06-23, 1-star) contains an allegation of spying on an elderly customer and reporting personal activities to an HOA. This is an isolated but serious allegation flagged for awareness.
• OFFICE STAFF COMPLAINTS: Multiple reviews across different years cite a receptionist named 'Jennifer' as rude, condescending, and argumentative. This is a recurring named pattern suggesting a systemic customer service issue at the office level, not isolated to field technicians.

This WW Score of 72.1 carries HIGH data confidence due to the large review volume, but should be interpreted cautiously because the review pool almost certainly spans two distinct business entities or operational eras — the recent San Diego operation (2024–2025) would score approximately 88–92 on its own, while the older review corpus (pre-2023, likely a different location) would score approximately 35–45, and consumers should research which entity they are engaging before relying on this blended score.

All County Plumbing has a strong base of loyal, satisfied customers who frequently praise responsiveness, punctuality, and friendly technicians — with multiple reviewers citing them as their go-to plumber for years. However, a meaningful cluster of negative reviews raises serious concerns: repeated no-shows and failure to follow through on scheduled appointments, at least one instance of faulty workmanship causing water damage to hardwood floors, a complaint about upselling unnecessary work, and a complaint about opaque emergency pricing practices. Pricing feedback is mixed — several reviewers praised fair or below-estimate billing, while others found the company very expensive for minor work. The volume of blank or content-free 5-star reviews (9 reviews with no text) slightly inflates the apparent rating and reduces confidence in the raw star average. The most recent substantive reviews (2020–2025) are generally positive but thin, making it difficult to assess current performance with high certainty.

• 9 reviews contain no text whatsoever — only a 5-star rating. These provide no usable qualitative data and were excluded from dimension scoring.
• 2 reviews appear to be near-identical duplicates (same text about a missed appointment window, one dated 2020 and one dated 2018), suggesting a possible copy-paste error or duplicate submission. Treated as a single incident for scoring purposes.
• 2 reviews appear to be near-identical duplicates (same text about calling ACP for a quick assessment, one dated 2020 and one dated 2018). Treated as a single incident.
• Several generic 5-star reviews contain only 1–2 sentences with no specific details (e.g., 'Amazing!!', 'Great team and great people', 'Awesome service!'). These were given reduced evidentiary weight.
• One review (1-star, 2012) alleges the company fabricated a code violation to upsell an unnecessary $900 job — a serious integrity concern that was verified by a second licensed plumber and inspector.
• One review (1-star, 2021) describes significant property damage (hardwood floor and carpet) caused by improper installation of an overflow drain — a serious workmanship failure.
• One review (1-star, 2018) describes opaque emergency upcharge pricing with no estimate provided upfront — a transparency concern.
• One review (1-star, 2022) describes being referred to a dishonest affiliated company — a business practice concern.
• The majority of reviews are older than 3 years. Only 3 reviews are dated within the past 12 months (2024–2025), and only 1 of those contains substantive text. Current performance cannot be assessed with high confidence.
• RECENCY NOTE: Most reviews date from 2018–2020. Only one review from 2025 and one from 2022 contain usable content. Scores are weighted toward the larger historical dataset.

This WW Score is based on a moderately large review set with high mention counts across all dimensions, but reliability is reduced by a significant number of blank reviews, two sets of duplicate reviews, several vague generic reviews, a sparse recent review record, and a recurring pattern of no-show and follow-through failures that represent a systemic — not isolated — concern.

Anspach Plumbing (Mark) receives consistently strong praise across all four scored dimensions from all five reviewers. Professionalism stands out clearly, with multiple reviewers noting prompt communication, responsiveness, friendliness, and organized preparation before arriving on-site. Project completion is also well-supported, with reviewers describing multi-task jobs completed in a single visit, short-notice availability, and no abandoned or incomplete work. Experience is affirmed through specific technical details — complex crawl space work, PEX lines, valve repairs, and solving long-standing issues quickly — lending credibility to the high experience score. Pricing received limited but positive mentions, with one reviewer explicitly noting the final cost came in under a competitor's quote for a single job, and another describing honest, no-upsell service.

• Small sample size of only 5 reviews limits statistical reliability across all dimensions.
• Two of the five reviews are dated 2019 and 2020, making them 4–5 years old; these were given reduced weight relative to the three more recent reviews (2023–2024).
• All reviews are 5-star ratings, which warrants mild caution; however, reviews contain specific job details, named individuals, and varied language, reducing the likelihood of fake or incentivized reviews.
• Pricing confidence is LIMITED — only 2 reviews explicitly mention cost or value, so the pricing score should be treated cautiously.

This WW Score is moderately reliable given the small but detail-rich and largely recent review set; the score would carry significantly more weight if supported by 15 or more reviews.

United Water + Air demonstrates strong professionalism with polite, respectful technicians who communicate well and walk customers through systems. Technical expertise is evident in their ability to diagnose and correct previous faulty work. Project completion is generally solid with follow-through on callbacks and system repairs. However, pricing raises significant concerns: one review explicitly warns of aggressive upselling ($5,200 replacement quote later deemed unnecessary after a $100 service fix), which substantially undermines trust. The company's willingness to provide free filter changes and persistent troubleshooting in older reviews is positive, but the pricing dimension is severely limited by this credibility issue.

• PRICING CONCERN: 2013 review explicitly warns of potential overcharging/aggressive upselling. Rep quoted $5,200 replacement; independent service provider fixed issue for $100. This is a major red flag for pricing practices.
• RECENCY ISSUE: Two reviews are from 2012-2013 (11+ years old). Only three reviews from 2023-2024. Older reviews may not reflect current business practices.
• LIMITED SAMPLE SIZE: Only 5 reviews total. Score reliability is constrained by small dataset.
• COMPANY TRANSITION: Review from 2023 notes company recently acquired EcoWater contract from Wolfer's. Practices may have changed; older reviews may be less relevant.

This WW Score of 82.3 should be treated with caution due to small sample size (5 reviews), significant recency gaps, and a credible pricing concern that directly contradicts the positive professionalism ratings. The pricing dimension is particularly unreliable and warrants independent verification before engaging this contractor.

Gordon Family Plumbing demonstrates strong project completion and experience across multiple reviews, with customers consistently praising timely work, quality craftsmanship, and responsiveness. Professionalism is generally high, though significantly undermined by one detailed 2022 review documenting unprofessional and disrespectful behavior from the owner (Rodger) during a billing dispute. Pricing is a concern based on limited explicit mentions—one customer reported a $1,700 charge for a $630 water heater plus installation, which the reviewer deemed unjustifiable. The company's responsiveness and willingness to take jobs other plumbers refuse are notable strengths.

• One 1-star review (2022-07-18) provides detailed, specific criticism of owner behavior and pricing practices. This is not a fake review—it contains verifiable details (names, dates, amounts, locations) and describes a genuine service failure. This significantly impacts the professionalism score.
• Pricing dimension based on only 2 mentions; one is highly negative. Score is conservative and should be treated with caution.
• Most positive reviews lack specific pricing details, making it difficult to assess overall pricing fairness comprehensively.
• Oldest review is from 2017; most recent cluster is 2023–2024. Recency is mixed but recent reviews are predominantly positive.

This score should be treated with moderate caution. While project completion and experience are well-supported by multiple recent reviews, the professionalism score is significantly dragged down by credible evidence of owner misconduct, and pricing data is too sparse to be fully reliable. The company appears competent and responsive but has documented customer service and billing transparency issues that warrant consideration.