Find Nearby Plumbers In Provo, Utah

K-Tech Plumbing demonstrates consistently strong performance across all measured dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength, with multiple reviews explicitly praising punctuality, communication, responsiveness, and courteous behavior from named technicians (Dane and Jesse). Project completion is equally solid, evidenced by successful kitchen remodels, bathroom renovations, emergency repairs, and multi-phase projects completed on schedule with follow-up support. Pricing is fair and competitive according to three reviews, with one customer noting K-Tech had the best price among multiple quotes. Technical expertise is evident through descriptions of thorough, quality workmanship and knowledgeable problem-solving. All six reviews are recent (within past 3 years, with 3 from 2024) and highly positive.

• All six reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative feedback or complaints—this is atypical and warrants caution. While the reviews contain specific details (named technicians, project types, response times), the universal perfection across all dimensions is unusual.
• Two reviews (from 2021 and 2022) are older than 12 months; however, three recent 2024 reviews provide current validation.
• No reviews mention any problems, delays, cost overruns, or service failures. This could indicate genuine excellence or selective review publication.

This WW Score of 91.3 is reliable for assessing professionalism and project completion (both HIGH confidence), but should be interpreted cautiously given the absence of any critical feedback and the universal 5-star pattern, which may not fully represent the complete customer experience spectrum.

Elite Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is a standout strength, with 15 reviews explicitly praising responsiveness, punctuality, communication, and courteous behavior from Isaiah and his team. Project completion is consistently reliable, with 12 reviews confirming jobs finished on time and thoroughly. Experience is well-documented through 10 mentions of skilled workmanship, problem-solving, and technical knowledge. Pricing receives solid marks from 5 reviews citing fair and reasonable rates, though fewer reviews address this dimension. The contractor shows particular strength in crisis response and going above and beyond expectations.

• Potential fake review pattern detected: 14 of 20 reviews lack dates, and 2 reviews contain only a period (.) as content, suggesting possible review manipulation or placeholder entries. This reduces confidence slightly despite strong narrative content in substantive reviews.
• All dated reviews (2 reviews from June and May 2025) are recent and positive, but the majority of reviews lack timestamps, making recency assessment difficult.
• Suspiciously high concentration of 5-star ratings (18 of 20 reviews are 5-star) with minimal critical feedback. While narrative details are specific and credible, the absence of any 3-4 star reviews is atypical for a contractor with 20+ reviews.

This WW Score of 89.2 should be treated with MODERATE-to-HIGH confidence. While substantive reviews contain specific, credible details about service quality, the prevalence of undated reviews and suspicious review patterns (empty reviews, all 5-stars) suggests possible review curation. The score reflects genuine strengths in professionalism and completion, but the dataset may not represent the full customer experience spectrum.

NE Plumbing and Pepe's team receive overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — reviewers consistently highlight punctuality, communication, friendliness, and responsiveness. Pricing is generally described as fair and reasonable, with one reviewer noting it is 'a bit expensive but totally worth it,' and another specifically praising free estimates that save significant money compared to competitors. Project completion scores are strong, with multiple reviewers describing jobs finished on time, same-day responses, and work completed even into late evening hours to meet customer needs. Experience and workmanship are praised extensively, with reviewers citing Pepe's ability to handle diverse and complex jobs — from sewer replacements to boiler installs to HVAC systems — with skill and clear technical explanation. The volume and consistency of positive reviews across nearly two years lend high reliability to this score.

• A notable cluster of 5 reviews all share the exact same date (2023-08-25), which is unusual and warrants mild scrutiny; however, the review content is varied and specific enough that these do not appear to be fabricated.
• The vast majority of reviews are 5-star with no negative feedback, which could indicate selective review solicitation; however, the specificity of details (job types, names, situations) reduces concern about inauthenticity.
• Several reviews are very short and generic (e.g., 'Awesome', 'Good work. Worth hiring.', 'Recommended Pro', 'they were great !') and contribute limited scoring evidence; these were counted for mention purposes only where a dimension was clearly implied.
• All 29 reviews fall within approximately the past 14 months (August 2023 to October 2024), which is a positive recency signal and means no score discounting for age was necessary.

This WW Score is based on 29 reviews with strong recency, high mention counts across all four dimensions, and sufficient specificity in review content to support HIGH confidence across the board — this score should be considered a reliable representation of NE Plumbing's current service quality.

Venture Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all measured dimensions. Professionalism scores highest (89.5) with 67 mentions emphasizing punctuality, communication, courtesy, and responsiveness from both office staff (particularly Norah) and technicians. Project completion is equally strong (90.0) with 58 mentions confirming jobs finished on time, issues resolved completely, and follow-through honored. Experience scores 88.0 based on 52 mentions of technical skill, problem-solving ability, and quality workmanship. Pricing is the weakest dimension (76.0) with 18 mentions; while many reviews praise fair and transparent pricing, several customers explicitly noted overcharging, job-based pricing concerns, and costs significantly higher than market rates. The company maintains high confidence across three dimensions but moderate confidence on pricing due to fewer mentions and conflicting feedback.

• PRICING INCONSISTENCY: Multiple reviews (2023-02-11, 2022-11-13, 2022-01-18, 2021-04-29) explicitly criticize pricing as excessive or unfair. One customer stated $460 was 'double what the bill should have been' for 30 minutes work. Another reported paying double the mid-point Bay Area price due to unclear estimates and lack of paperwork. A third received a $5000 bid for a $1250 job. These are not isolated complaints and suggest pricing practices warrant scrutiny.
• QUALITY INCONSISTENCY: One 1-star review (2023-02-11) alleges the company failed to properly fix a leak, then charged $150 to re-examine the same area, calling it a 'scam.' Another 2-star review (2022-01-18) describes incomplete camera inspection work and double-charging for overlapping services. These suggest occasional quality control or ethical issues despite overwhelmingly positive reviews.
• REVIEW RECENCY BIAS: Approximately 60% of reviews are from 2025 (most recent) and 2024, with a sharp decline in reviews from 2021 and earlier. This temporal clustering may reflect selection bias or review platform changes rather than consistent historical performance.
• GENERIC PRAISE PATTERN: Several reviews (particularly from 2025-03-11 and 2025-04-10) contain minimal detail and generic language ('Best company ever,' 'Except servics E.G,' 'Best plumbing company ever thanks Eliott'). While not definitively fake, these lack specificity and may inflate the overall score.
• STAFF VARIABILITY: Reviews mention multiple technicians (Nick, Sarah, Derek, Skyler, Paul, Eliott, Adolfo, Gonzales) with notably different customer experiences. One review (2021-08-12) explicitly warns against 'Paul' as a 'scammer,' while others praise him highly (2021-07-28, 2021-07-07). This suggests significant variability in service quality depending on assigned technician.

This WW Score of 87.2 is reliable for assessing overall professionalism and project completion quality, supported by high-confidence data from 67 and 58 mentions respectively. However, the pricing dimension (76.0) should be treated with caution due to moderate confidence and explicit contradictions in customer feedback regarding fairness and transparency. Prospective customers should request detailed written estimates and clarify pricing structure before committing, as several reviews document significant cost overruns. The company's strong recent review volume is encouraging but should be weighted against documented pricing concerns and occasional quality issues that persist despite the predominantly positive rating.

Integrity Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all dimensions, with particularly high marks for professionalism (87.5) driven by consistent praise for punctuality, communication, and courteous staff. Pricing scores well (82.0) with many customers noting fair, transparent, and competitive rates. Project completion (85.5) reflects reliable follow-through, though a small number of reviews mention delayed callbacks or incomplete follow-up. Technical expertise (83.0) is consistently praised, with customers highlighting knowledgeable technicians and thorough diagnostics. The company's name genuinely reflects its operational values in the majority of reviews.

• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Reviews dated 2025-06-08, 2025-06-05, and 2025-06-03 contain identical text (long, detailed narrative about managing renovation projects, mentioning Emily, James, Josh, Steve, Lyle by name). This repetition across three consecutive dates is highly suspicious and suggests potential review manipulation.
• EMPTY REVIEWS: 18 reviews contain only a 5.0 rating with no text content. While not necessarily fake, these provide no substantive data and inflate review count without evidence.
• RECENCY BIAS: Approximately 60% of reviews are from 2024-2025 (past 12 months), with a sharp increase in volume in recent months. Earlier reviews (2006-2020) show more varied ratings (including 1-3 star reviews), while recent reviews are overwhelmingly 5-star. This pattern warrants caution.
• NEGATIVE REVIEWS CONCENTRATED IN PAST: Most 1-star and 2-star reviews are from 2013-2022. Recent negative reviews (2024-2025) are rare, which could indicate either genuine improvement or selective review removal/suppression.
• MULTIPLE BUSINESS LOCATIONS/OWNERS: Reviews reference different owners/technicians across different regions (Dave, James, Toby, Marc, Sean, etc.) and locations (Rancho Santa Margarita, Vallejo, Omaha, Utah, Brentwood, etc.), suggesting either multiple franchises under one name or significant data mixing. This complicates reliability assessment.
• INCONSISTENT COMPANY IDENTITY: Some reviews reference 'Integrity Plumbing' as a single-owner operation (Dave, James, Toby), while others describe it as a larger company with multiple crews. Geographic and personnel inconsistencies suggest these may be different companies with the same name.

While the WW Score of 84.2 reflects genuinely positive feedback across most dimensions, the reliability is MODERATE-TO-HIGH rather than fully HIGH due to: (1) suspicious identical reviews in June 2025 suggesting potential manipulation, (2) 18 empty 5-star reviews providing no evidence, (3) dramatic recency bias with 60% of reviews from past 12 months and nearly all recent reviews being 5-star, and (4) apparent mixing of multiple businesses/locations under the same name. The score is most trustworthy for recent service quality (2024-2025) but should be viewed with caution regarding historical consistency. Customers should verify they are contacting the correct location/owner before booking.

My Buddy the Plumber earns strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism and experience being the most consistently praised attributes across a large volume of reviews. The vast majority of reviewers highlight punctuality, courteous behavior, shoe covers, clear communication, and technician-specific expertise. Pricing is generally viewed as fair and competitive, with multiple reviewers noting they shopped around and found MBTP to be the best value — however, a handful of negative reviews cite overcharging, misleading billing descriptions, and a deceptive membership subscription reactivation, which meaningfully drag the pricing score down. Project completion is strong overall but is penalized by a notable failure: one review describes a sewer line that was only 80% replaced with the remaining 20% failing a year later, and another describes a no-show appointment, an incomplete job, and a CO meter incident with no promised follow-through or refund. These are serious execution failures that prevent a higher score in this dimension.

• BILLING ETHICS CONCERN: One reviewer (2024) reports that a cancelled membership subscription was silently reactivated and billed for nearly a year without notice — described as 'totally unethical, dishonest behavior.' This is a significant trust and integrity flag.
• INCOMPLETE WORK: One reviewer (2017) reports paying over $16,000 for a full sewer line replacement, only to discover a year later that 20% was never replaced and failed — the company then quoted an additional $5,000 to fix it. This is a serious project completion failure.
• NO-SHOW INCIDENT: One reviewer (2021) reports a technician was marked as having visited when no one actually showed up, and no replacement was sent by 8:30 PM despite promises.
• MISLEADING INVOICE: One reviewer (2017) reports being charged $160 for a 'Rebuild Toilet' when only a fill valve was replaced — a part available for ~$10 at retail. Pricing transparency concern.
• PRESSURE TACTICS AND OVERCHARGING: One reviewer (2020) describes being charged $250 for a 10-minute snake job, then pressured into a $450 pipe repair after the technician's work caused a drain failure — totaling $700 for what began as a simple call.
• CO METER INCIDENT: One reviewer (2018) describes a technician's CO meter reading as potentially fabricated or faulty, causing significant alarm and disruption. The promised follow-up and refund from the owner never materialized.
• UNQUALIFIED WORK REFERRAL: One reviewer (2020) notes a plumbing company was sent to do electrical work, resulting in a large ceiling cutout left in disarray — suggesting scope-of-work management issues.
• REVIEW VOLUME AND PATTERN: The overwhelming majority of reviews are 5-star with specific technician names and detailed praise. While this is generally authentic, the volume of near-identical positive sentiment warrants mild scrutiny. No strong fake review pattern detected, but the ratio of 5-star to negative reviews is notably high.
• RECENCY NOTE: Only 3 reviews are dated within the past 12 months (2024 and 2021). The majority of reviews are from 2017–2020, meaning recent performance data is limited. The most recent review (2024) is a serious negative flag regarding billing ethics.

This WW Score is based on a large and detailed review set (100 reviews) with HIGH confidence across all four dimensions, making the score statistically robust — however, consumers should weigh the serious negative flags around billing ethics, incomplete work, and follow-through failures before making a hiring decision, as these represent meaningful risks despite the otherwise strong overall record.