Find Nearby Plumbers In Dallas, Texas

Mai Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 82.1, driven by consistently high marks across all four dimensions. Professionalism is the strongest area (87.2), with extensive evidence of punctuality, courteous technicians, and responsive communication. Pricing scores 78.5, reflecting generally fair and transparent rates, though some customers report surprise charges and high labor rates. Project completion (84.3) shows reliable job finishing, though a small number of repeat-issue complaints lower this score. Experience (85.1) is supported by numerous mentions of skilled workmanship and problem-solving ability. The company benefits from strong recent reviews (past 12 months) and long-term customer loyalty, though older reviews reveal historical owner conduct issues that have been mitigated.

• OWNER CONDUCT CONCERNS (Historical): Multiple reviews from 2012-2014 document unprofessional and rude behavior by owner 'Carl/Karl,' including yelling, dismissiveness, and poor conflict resolution. These incidents appear to have diminished in recent years, suggesting possible management changes or improved practices. However, this pattern warrants caution.
• REPEAT ISSUE COMPLAINT: One 2016 review reports the same problem recurring twice within 1.5 weeks after $500 in service, suggesting potential quality control gaps in diagnosis or repair execution.
• INCOMPLETE COMMUNICATION: One 2022 review indicates technicians arrived without knowledge of all scheduled work items, though all items were ultimately completed satisfactorily.
• PRICING TRANSPARENCY GAPS: Multiple reviews mention surprise charges (flood stop device, markups on toilets, high hourly rates) not clearly communicated upfront, indicating inconsistent quoting practices.
• EMPTY/MINIMAL REVIEWS: 8 reviews contain no text or only 'unknown,' reducing data quality slightly but not affecting overall analysis.
• THEFT ALLEGATION (2018): One review alleges the company failed to background check/drug test employees and refused reimbursement for customer theft. This is a serious claim but appears isolated and unverified by other reviews.

This WW Score of 82.1 is highly reliable, based on 122 usable reviews with strong mention counts across all dimensions (42-68 mentions each). The company demonstrates consistent professionalism and competence in recent years (2020-2025), though historical owner conduct issues and occasional pricing/communication gaps prevent a higher score. Customers should expect quality work and fair pricing but should request detailed written quotes upfront to avoid surprises.

Larry Stinson Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with particular strengths in professionalism (87.5) and project completion (85.0), both supported by extensive review mentions. Technicians are consistently praised for punctuality, courtesy, communication, and thorough workmanship. However, pricing emerges as a notable weakness (68.0), with multiple customers citing significantly higher costs than competitors and concerns about diagnostic fees presented as free consultations. While the majority of recent reviews (2025) are uniformly positive, older reviews reveal a pattern of pricing disputes and occasional quality control issues that have been partially addressed but remain a concern.

• PRICING CONCERN: Multiple reviews (2018-2024) explicitly criticize pricing as substantially higher than competitors. Customers report being charged $139-$350 for diagnostics marketed as 'free consultations,' and quotes 100-200% above competitor pricing for identical services. This pattern suggests potential bait-and-switch practices.
• QUALITY CONTROL ISSUES IN PAST: Older reviews (2021-2022) document significant mistakes including cutting sewer line in wrong location, installing parts backwards, and incomplete initial inspections requiring multiple callbacks. While recent reviews show improvement, this history warrants caution.
• RECENT REVIEW CLUSTERING: 37 of 89 reviews are from June 2025 alone, with 45 total from June 2025 and May 2025. This extreme recency clustering combined with uniformly positive 5-star ratings (with minimal detail in many) raises questions about review authenticity or potential review generation campaign. Multiple reviews contain only names and generic praise with no substantive detail.
• EMPTY/MINIMAL REVIEWS: 4 reviews contain no text or only punctuation, yet are rated 5.0. This suggests potential review padding.
• OWNER ACCOUNTABILITY: Multiple negative reviews cite owner Larry Stinson's dismissive attitude, lack of apology for mistakes, and argumentative behavior during dispute resolution, suggesting potential systemic issues with accountability and customer service recovery.
• DIAGNOSTIC FEE DECEPTION: At least 3 reviews explicitly state that 'free consultations' are actually paid diagnostic fees ($139-$144), contradicting marketing claims. This appears to be a recurring complaint pattern.

This WW Score of 82.1 should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH confidence for recent work (2025) but with significant caution regarding pricing expectations and historical quality control. The score is heavily weighted toward recent uniformly positive reviews that lack substantive detail, while older reviews reveal legitimate concerns about pricing practices and past quality issues. Customers should expect professional service and good workmanship but should obtain detailed written quotes and compare pricing with competitors before committing, as cost overruns relative to estimates appear common.

O'Bryan Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions based on a large and diverse review set spanning 2016–2024. Professionalism is consistently praised — punctuality, communication, courteous technicians, and call-ahead notices appear repeatedly across dozens of reviews — though a handful of negative reviews cite a rescheduled appointment, poor owner communication, and one instance of going dark during a crisis. Project completion is generally strong, with most reviewers reporting jobs finished correctly and promptly, but two notable negative reviews describe a failed first repair attempt that required a return visit and a poor-quality water heater installation with workmanship concerns. Pricing receives mixed signals: many reviewers praise fair or competitive pricing and the absence of a trip fee, while others explicitly criticize a $79 evaluation fee, higher-than-competitor quotes, and being charged the same amount for a repeat visit that failed to fix the original problem — this tension keeps the pricing score conservative. Experience scores well overall, with multiple reviewers highlighting technicians who diagnosed problems others had missed, but one review describes a technician who misdiagnosed a gas water heater issue and another describes substandard installation quality, preventing a top-tier score.

• Two reviews dated 2021-11-30 share identical timestamps (08:09:40 and 08:15:47), nearly identical generic phrasing ('Great service', 'Great staff', 'Great everything'), and no specific details — these are suspected fake or coordinated reviews and were discounted in scoring.
• A small number of reviews are very brief and generic (e.g., 'Great guys', 'Came promptly and resolved my issues') with no specifics, which limits their evidentiary value; they were counted for sentiment but not weighted heavily.
• Several negative reviews raise substantive concerns: a failed first repair with a repeat charge (April 2024), a poor-quality water heater installation with workmanship defects (October 2021), an owner who allegedly hung up on a client and denied warranty claims (November 2017), and a technician who misdiagnosed a gas water heater and suggested the customer source their own parts (February 2023).
• The $79 evaluation fee complaint (August 2023) directly contradicts multiple other reviews praising no trip/visit fee — this inconsistency suggests a possible policy change over time or inconsistent application of fees.
• One review (June 2024) alleges the company's service area map excludes a neighborhood near downtown Dallas in a manner the reviewer characterizes as discriminatory — this is a service access complaint, not a quality complaint, but is noted.
• A significant portion of reviews are older than 12 months (many from 2017–2022); while the review corpus is large, recency-weighted confidence is slightly reduced for dimensions where older reviews dominate.

This WW Score is based on 79 reviews spanning approximately 8 years and carries HIGH overall confidence due to review volume and specificity, though users should note that a cluster of credible negative reviews — particularly around pricing transparency, repeat-visit failures, and at least one workmanship concern — prevents this score from reflecting a uniformly excellent contractor.

Smith and Son Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 82.1. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 52 mentions highlighting punctuality, courteous staff, clear communication, and professional appearance. Project completion is solid with 38 mentions confirming timely work, same-day service, and thorough follow-through. Experience scores well at 86.0 based on 31 mentions of skilled technicians, knowledgeable problem-solving, and quality workmanship. Pricing is the weakest dimension at 76.0, with 13 mentions revealing mixed sentiment—some customers praise fair pricing and transparency, while others report feeling overcharged or gouged on labor and parts. Three negative reviews (1-star and 3-star ratings from late 2024 and 2019) document serious service failures, pricing disputes, and poor follow-up on mistakes, which temper the otherwise strong positive trend.

• Three significant negative reviews (Dec 2024, Dec 2024, July 2019, Sept 2019) document serious issues: water damage from technician error with refused emergency callback, overpricing ($2,500+ for routine work, $283 for 15-min job), failure to complete work properly (hot water heater left on pilot), and poor management follow-up. These are not isolated complaints but pattern evidence of service quality inconsistency.
• Pricing dimension shows material concern: one customer reported $2,500 for 2 garbage disposals + 1 faucet install; another paid $600 for disposal replacement (described as high); yet other reviews praise 'reasonable' and 'fair' pricing. This suggests pricing inconsistency or variable value perception depending on job type and technician.
• Multiple empty/blank reviews (5 instances with 5.0 rating but no text) reduce data quality slightly but do not materially affect scoring since they contain no evaluable content.
• Recency note: Majority of reviews (60+) are from 2024-2025, with strong recent positive trend. However, the Dec 2024 negative review and Dec 2024 3-star review are very recent and suggest ongoing service consistency issues despite overall positive reputation.
• One review (Dec 2024, 3-star) indicates owner did eventually respond and implement checklists, suggesting some accountability, but customer remained dissatisfied with pricing and initial service quality.

This WW Score of 82.1 is reliable at HIGH confidence due to large sample size (88 usable reviews) and consistent data across dimensions, but should be interpreted with caution: the company delivers strong professionalism and project completion in most cases, but pricing transparency and service consistency issues documented in recent negative reviews suggest customers should obtain detailed written quotes and verify work completion before final payment. The score reflects a generally trustworthy contractor with notable exceptions.

Enco Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with particular strengths in professionalism (87.5) and technical experience (85.0). The company excels at communication, punctuality, and customer service, with numerous reviews praising staff by name (Chris, Cody, James, Luke, Jason). Project completion scores (79.0) are solid but slightly lower due to two significant negative reviews documenting incomplete work and follow-up failures. Pricing (76.0) receives moderate marks—while most reviews praise fair pricing, one detailed 2023 complaint documents substantial markup on parts and service call disputes, suggesting inconsistent pricing practices. The dataset is heavily weighted toward recent positive reviews (2024-2025), which may not fully represent historical performance issues.

• RECENCY BIAS: 54 of 75 reviews (72%) are from 2024-2025. Only 3 reviews predate 2018. Recent reviews are overwhelmingly 5-star with minimal critical detail, while older reviews contain more substantive narratives.
• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Multiple reviews use nearly identical phrasing ('professional,' 'friendly,' 'great job,' 'highly recommend') with minimal specific detail. Examples: 'Professional technicians. Would recommend them for any plumbing job' and 'Always professional, fast and do a great job!' This pattern suggests possible review manipulation or template-based submissions.
• CRITICAL NEGATIVE REVIEWS: Two 1-star reviews (2023 and 2013) document serious failures: (1) incomplete bathtub installation with no-show follow-ups over 8 days; (2) shower cartridge replacement with disputed service charges, parts markup, and product failure 6 months later. These represent genuine project completion and pricing failures.
• PRICING INCONSISTENCY: 2023 review documents $80 markup on a $31 cartridge plus disputed service call charges. This contradicts the 'fair pricing' narrative in most other reviews and suggests either pricing variability or selective customer treatment.
• EMPTY REVIEWS: 5 reviews contain only a 5-star rating with no text, contributing to mention counts but no substantive data.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW: The detailed water leak repair narrative appears twice (2025-05-10 and 2020-03-05) with identical text, suggesting either a system error or intentional reposting.

This WW Score of 82.1 should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH caution: while the HIGH confidence rating reflects substantial mention counts, the dataset is heavily skewed toward recent 5-star reviews with generic language, and two credible negative reviews document serious failures in project completion and pricing transparency that are not adequately represented in the overall score. The company's true performance likely falls in the 78–85 range; scores above 85 are not supported by the evidence.

Intown Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent praise for punctuality, communication, and courteous technicians across 32 reviews. Technical expertise is well-documented with 18 mentions of skilled workmanship and problem-solving. However, project completion shows concerning gaps: while many jobs are completed successfully, three detailed negative reviews (2024-11-11, 2023-12-04, 2023-11-09) describe incomplete work, callback failures, and unresolved issues, significantly lowering this dimension's score. Pricing receives moderate support with 13 mentions emphasizing fair and competitive rates, though two older reviews dispute charges. The company excels in responsiveness and technical knowledge but struggles with follow-through on complex jobs.

• Three serious negative reviews (1-star ratings from 2024-11-11, 2023-12-04, 2023-11-09) describe incomplete work, failed callbacks, and customer dissatisfaction—these are detailed and credible complaints that substantially contradict the overwhelmingly positive narrative
• Multiple empty/blank reviews (8 instances with only 5-star ratings and no text) suggest potential review manipulation or incomplete submissions
• Recency bias detected: 38 of 56 reviews are from 2024-2025, while only 4 reviews are from 2019 or earlier; older reviews (2014-2021) are consistently 5-star with minimal detail
• One 2023 review explicitly warns 'DO NOT USE THIS COMPANY' regarding pricing disputes and failed repairs, indicating systemic issues not reflected in majority sentiment
• Project completion dimension is artificially elevated by absence of negative mentions in recent reviews; the three detailed failure cases suggest real problems that may not be fully captured in current review volume

This WW Score of 82.1 should be treated with caution: while professionalism and experience scores are well-supported by HIGH confidence data, the project completion score is significantly undermined by three credible, detailed negative reviews describing incomplete work and failed callbacks that contradict the predominantly positive recent reviews. The score reflects a company with strong day-to-day service but documented problems with complex job follow-through and accountability.