Find Nearby Plumbers In Las Vegas, Nevada

AJ's Sewer & Drain has a strong overall profile built on consistent praise for responsiveness, honesty, and technical competence across multiple reviews spanning 2021–2023. Pricing is a notable strength, with multiple reviewers explicitly calling out affordability and fair quotes compared to competitors. However, the single 1-star review from July 2023 is a significant drag on the project completion and professionalism scores, as it describes a missed appointment, no-show without proper notice, and complete failure to follow up despite multiple attempts — a serious lapse in reliability. The experience dimension is well-supported, with reviewers describing accurate diagnoses, efficient repairs, and going beyond the scope of the job. The recency of the negative review (the most recent in the dataset) warrants particular attention as it may reflect a more current pattern.

• FAKE REVIEW RISK — MODERATE: Three reviews are dated 2021-03-01 (same day), all 5-star, all with similar praise themes (honesty, reliability, problem-solving). While the review content is sufficiently distinct to avoid outright dismissal, the clustering on a single date is suspicious and may indicate coordinated or solicited reviews. Confidence in those three reviews is reduced.
• RECENCY CONCERN: The most recent review (July 2023, 1-star) is the only review from the past 12 months and describes a serious failure in communication and follow-through. This is weighted more heavily and pulls down project completion and professionalism scores.
• FRIEND BIAS: One reviewer (2021-03-02) explicitly states Anthony is 'a dear friend of ours,' which introduces personal bias and reduces the objectivity of that review. It has been treated as lower-weight evidence.
• SMALL SAMPLE SIZE: With only 12 reviews total, individual negative experiences have an outsized impact. The WW Score should be interpreted with this in mind.

This WW Score carries moderate-to-high reliability given the volume of reviews and multi-dimensional coverage, but should be interpreted cautiously due to the suspicious same-day review clustering in March 2021, one confirmed friend-bias review, and a recent 1-star experience that represents the contractor's most current known performance.

Thompson Family Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism (87.5) with consistent praise for punctuality, courteous technicians, and responsive communication across 156 reviews. Technical expertise and workmanship are highly rated (86.0) with 142 mentions of knowledgeable, skilled technicians. Project completion is solid (84.5) with 118 reviews confirming timely, thorough work. However, pricing is a significant weakness (62.0) with 48 explicit complaints about excessive costs, overcharges, and quotes substantially above market rates. The company's WW Score of 78.2 reflects strong execution and professionalism undermined by persistent pricing concerns that damage customer satisfaction and trust.

• PRICING PATTERN: 48 reviews explicitly mention high/excessive pricing. Multiple customers report quotes 2-3x higher than competitors (e.g., $7,000 vs. $1,321 for water heater; $3,591 vs. $1,321; $1,500 for simple sink install; $375/hour labor). This is the most consistent negative theme.
• INCONSISTENT SERVICE QUALITY: Several reviews report failed installations requiring callbacks (water heater installation fiasco, faucet leaks after installation, backflow issues requiring multiple visits). While company generally stands behind work, initial quality is sometimes questionable.
• DIAGNOSTIC FEES & UPSELLING: Multiple complaints about $85 diagnostic fees, high-pressure sales tactics, and unnecessary work recommendations. Pattern suggests aggressive sales approach.
• SCHEDULING RELIABILITY: 3-4 reviews report missed appointments, rescheduling without notice, or technicians not showing up as promised (May 2024 review, May 2025 review).
• FAKE REVIEW RISK - MODERATE: Approximately 40-50 reviews are extremely generic ("Great job!", "Thank you", "Awesome experience") with no specific details, appearing in clusters on same dates (e.g., 2025-06-02, 2025-06-05, 2025-03-11). However, these are balanced by highly detailed, credible reviews with specific technician names and problem descriptions. Overall fake review risk is LIMITED rather than HIGH because substantive negative reviews with specific pricing details are also present and appear authentic.
• RECENCY NOTE: Majority of reviews are from past 12 months (2025, 2024, 2023), with strong recent activity. Data is current and reliable.

This WW Score of 78.2 is highly reliable due to 261 reviews with consistent patterns across all dimensions. The strong professionalism and experience ratings are well-supported by 156+ detailed mentions. However, the pricing weakness (62.0) is equally well-documented with 48 explicit complaints citing specific overcharges. Customers should expect professional, skilled service but should obtain multiple quotes and expect to pay premium prices—potentially 50-200% above market rates for comparable work.

This contractor/plumber business demonstrates strong professionalism and technical expertise, with consistently positive feedback on punctuality, communication, and workmanship quality. However, pricing concerns emerge as a significant weakness, with multiple reviews citing unexpectedly high charges, hidden fees, and aggressive upselling tactics—particularly regarding home warranty work. Project completion is generally reliable, though some callbacks and follow-up issues are documented. The company shows strong family-owned values and customer service orientation, but inconsistency in pricing transparency and occasional service failures prevent a higher overall score.

• PRICING RED FLAG: Multiple reviews (15+) explicitly mention overcharging, hidden fees, and aggressive pricing tactics, particularly on home warranty jobs. Several customers report being quoted inflated prices or discovering parts cost 5-10x less than charged.
• INCONSISTENT SERVICE QUALITY: Wide variance in customer experience—some reviews praise exceptional service while others report unprofessional behavior, missed appointments, and poor follow-up. This suggests inconsistency across different technicians or locations.
• HOME WARRANTY ISSUES: Disproportionate number of negative reviews involve home warranty work, with complaints about refusal to complete jobs, misdiagnosis, and pressure to upsell unnecessary services.
• BEHAVIORAL CONCERNS: Several reviews document aggressive, dismissive, or disrespectful technician behavior, including one report of sexist conduct and management indifference to complaints.
• COMMUNICATION FAILURES: Multiple reviews cite lack of callback, voicemail non-response, and poor scheduling communication, particularly during busy periods.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Cluster of 20+ nearly identical 5-star reviews from June 2025 with generic praise ('excellent service,' 'highly recommend') and minimal specific detail suggests possible review manipulation.
• QUALITY CONTROL VARIANCE: Some reviews report shoddy workmanship (poor caulking, incorrect installations, misdiagnosis) that required rework or correction by other plumbers.

This WW Score of 78.2 is reliable and based on substantial data (248 usable reviews with HIGH confidence across all dimensions), but the score masks significant internal inconsistency: the business excels in professionalism and technical skill yet has serious, documented pricing integrity issues and service reliability gaps that warrant caution, particularly for home warranty work or large jobs.

Loyalty Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent praise for punctuality, communication, and courteous technicians across 127 reviews. Project completion is solid with 81/100, though some reviews mention incomplete work or follow-up issues. Technical expertise and workmanship are well-regarded (82.5/100 across 89 mentions). However, pricing emerges as a significant weakness (68/100), with recurring complaints about hidden charges, overpricing, and deceptive add-on fees—particularly in Costco-contracted dishwasher installations. The company's WW Score of 78.2 reflects strong operational execution undermined by pricing transparency and fairness concerns.

• PRICING INTEGRITY CONCERN: Multiple reviews (at least 8-10) report hidden charges, surprise fees, and deceptive pricing practices, particularly for Costco dishwasher installations. Customers report being charged $200-$360+ in unexpected add-on fees (air gap installation, drilling, etc.) after agreeing to 'included' installation. This pattern suggests systemic business model issues rather than isolated incidents.
• COSTCO CONTRACTOR PATTERN: Loyalty Plumbing appears to systematically exploit the Costco 'included installation' model by charging customers substantial undisclosed fees. Multiple reviews explicitly state they were not informed upfront of these costs and felt coerced into paying on-site.
• OVERPRICING ALLEGATIONS: At least 5-6 reviews allege significantly inflated quotes compared to market rates (e.g., $1500 vs. $600-700 for shower valve replacement; $1300 for gas valve recess vs. small fee elsewhere; $510 vs. $60 DIY cost). Some customers report getting second opinions and discovering Loyalty's quotes were 2-8x higher.
• PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT INCIDENT: One review (2022-10-31) reports sexual harassment by employee 'Koa' during a service call. This is a serious red flag regarding employee vetting and workplace culture, though it appears to be an isolated incident.
• INCONSISTENT SERVICE QUALITY: Several reviews mention incomplete work, no-shows, follow-up failures, and poor communication (e.g., plumber left job unfinished, didn't return for promised follow-up, no communication about delays).
• FAKE REVIEW RISK - MODERATE: While most reviews appear genuine, there is a cluster of very short, generic 5-star reviews with minimal detail (e.g., 'They are the best!!!', 'Best plumbers in town!', 'Everything went well will use again') and several reviews with no dates or minimal text. However, the volume of detailed negative reviews and specific complaints suggests the dataset is largely authentic.
• RECENCY NOTE: Most recent reviews (2025) are uniformly 5-star with generic praise. Older reviews (2018-2023) contain more balanced feedback and specific complaints. This may indicate either improved service or review filtering.
• THIRD-PARTY CONTRACTOR ISSUES: Multiple reviews mention problems when Loyalty is contracted through Costco, Lowe's, or Sears, suggesting potential misalignment between contractor expectations and customer expectations regarding pricing and scope.

This WW Score of 78.2 is reliable for assessing operational professionalism and technical competence, but customers should be aware that pricing practices represent a material risk not fully captured in the overall score. The company excels at punctuality, communication, and workmanship, but the recurring pattern of hidden charges and overpricing—particularly in third-party contractor scenarios—warrants caution and explicit price confirmation before engagement.

Colburn Enterprises demonstrates strong professionalism and technical expertise, with consistent praise for punctuality, politeness, and knowledgeable staff across 89 and 71 mentions respectively. However, the company shows significant operational inconsistency: while many reviews highlight fair pricing and honest service, 32 mentions reveal concerns about unexpected charges, service call fees, and pricing transparency. Project completion reliability is mixed—numerous reviews confirm timely, thorough work, but several recent reviews (2022-2024) document serious follow-through failures including no-shows, ghosting after initial contact, and unresponsiveness to callbacks. The company appears to have experienced ownership/management changes that negatively impacted service consistency.

• OWNERSHIP TRANSITION IMPACT: Multiple reviews from 2022-2024 explicitly note company degradation after John sold the business. Recent reviews show no-shows, ghosting, and poor communication contrasting sharply with historical excellence.
• RECENCY CONCERN: Most 5-star reviews cluster in 2013-2021. Recent reviews (2022-2024) are predominantly 1-2 stars citing service failures, suggesting current operations do not match historical reputation.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Approximately 15-20 reviews from 2023-06-09 contain minimal text (empty or single generic phrases like 'Great!' or 'Very professional and excellent work') all with identical timestamp, suggesting possible bulk upload or artificial inflation. These were counted but treated conservatively.
• COMMUNICATION BREAKDOWN: Multiple recent complaints about unanswered calls, texts, and voicemails; one customer reported being blocked after scheduling dispute.
• PRICING INCONSISTENCY: Several reviews document unexpected charges, service call fees not clearly disclosed upfront, and price variations for similar work, undermining 'fair pricing' claims.
• SERVICE QUALITY REGRESSION: Historical reviews (pre-2022) consistently praise John's personal involvement and attention to detail. Post-2022 reviews indicate new technicians and management lack same standards.

This WW Score of 78.2 reflects a company in transition with HIGH confidence in historical performance but SIGNIFICANT CAUTION regarding current reliability—the company's recent operational failures (2022-2024) suggest the score may overstate present-day trustworthiness, and customers should verify current ownership and recent reviews before engaging.

Silver State demonstrates strong professionalism and technical expertise across most reviews, with technicians consistently praised for knowledge, politeness, and thoroughness. Project completion is generally reliable with most jobs finished as promised. However, pricing emerges as a significant weakness, with multiple customers reporting substantial overcharges, hidden fees, and aggressive upselling tactics. Several reviews allege deliberate system sabotage to justify expensive replacements, though these claims are unverified. The company shows inconsistency in service quality and customer care, particularly in emergency response and management interactions.

• PRICING CONCERNS: Multiple reviews (at least 8) report excessive charges—$800 for $250 service, $400 for $35 part, $3,000+ for standard water heater installation, $1,200 for routine AC service followed by unit failure. Pattern suggests systematic overpricing.
• SABOTAGE ALLEGATIONS: Three reviews explicitly allege technicians deliberately damaged systems (tilted AC condensation tray, altered plumbing to cause leaks, damaged damper) to justify expensive replacements. While unproven, the consistency of these claims warrants caution.
• MANAGEMENT ISSUES: Multiple reports of rude, dismissive, or aggressive management behavior—sharp tone over warranty policy, sarcastic emergency response, pressure tactics during estimates, refusal to honor warranties.
• SERVICE INCONSISTENCY: Missed appointments without apology (commercial fridge booking), no-shows, delayed callbacks on emergency calls, inconsistent warranty honoring.
• BAIT-AND-SWITCH TACTICS: Radio ad for $29 inspection denied to customers with home warranties; free estimate charged $165 when home warranty mentioned; aggressive upselling of unnecessary parts.
• FAKE REVIEW RISK: Approximately 40 reviews (32%) contain no substantive detail—only generic praise ('great company,' 'highly recommend,' 'top notch') with identical phrasing patterns. Many are 5-star with single sentences. This suggests possible review padding, though some may be legitimate brief positive experiences.
• RECENCY BIAS: Most detailed negative reviews (pricing, sabotage, management) are from mid-2024 (June-September). Recent reviews (June 2025) are predominantly generic 5-star with minimal detail, raising authenticity concerns.
• WARRANTY DISPUTES: Multiple reports of warranty denial or refusal to honor manufacturer warranties, leaving customers liable for repeat repairs.

This WW Score of 78.2 should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH caution. While professionalism and experience scores are well-supported by 78+ mentions, the pricing dimension is based on only 18 mentions and shows extreme variance (some praise value, others report 3-4x overcharges). The presence of unverified sabotage allegations, management complaints, and a high proportion of generic 5-star reviews (likely padding) suggests the overall score may be artificially inflated. Customers should prioritize obtaining detailed written estimates, requesting specific technicians with positive detailed reviews, and seeking second opinions before major work. The company's pricing practices and warranty handling present material financial risk.