Find Nearby Plumbers In Nampa, Idaho

This single review paints a deeply negative picture of Peltram across multiple dimensions. Professionalism scored near zero due to explicit reports of disrespectful behavior, sarcastic comments, and condescending treatment of the homeowner and their spouse during a service visit. Project completion scored very low because the plumbing work was described as improperly installed and not functioning correctly, requiring a follow-up visit that still did not fully resolve the issue. Experience also scored low, as the reviewer alleges systemic installation errors across multiple new construction homes in their community, suggesting a pattern of poor workmanship rather than an isolated mistake. No pricing information was mentioned, so that dimension could not be scored.

• Only 1 review is available — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably with fewer than 3 reviews.
• The reviewer claims this is not an isolated incident and that multiple homeowners in their community have experienced similar issues, which may indicate broader systemic quality problems but cannot be independently verified from this single review.
• The review is detailed and specific, reducing fake review concern, but the score should be treated with very low confidence due to the single data point.
• All scored dimensions are based on exactly 1 mention each — all confidence levels are LIMITED and scores should be interpreted with extreme caution.

This WW Score report is based on a single 1-star review and should not be considered a reliable or representative assessment of Peltram's overall performance — significantly more reviews are required before any meaningful conclusions can be drawn.

This single review provides limited but explicit evidence across three dimensions. Professionalism scored very low (28) due to owner non-responsiveness, lack of follow-up after estimate, poor communication about scheduling, inconsistent worker attendance, and inadequate job-site protection despite customer requests. Project completion scored low (35) because the job took three weeks instead of the quoted one week, requiring the customer to manage daily coordination. Experience scored moderately higher (75) because the worker who performed the bulk of the work demonstrated skill despite slow pace, and the final result looks very nice. Pricing was not mentioned. With only one review, a reliable WW Score cannot be calculated.

• Insufficient data: Only 1 review analyzed. WW Score calculation requires minimum 3 reviews for reliability.
• All scores are based on LIMITED confidence (1 mention each). This single negative review may not be representative of typical performance.
• Review is from January 2023 (nearly 2 years old). Recency is limited.

This analysis cannot produce a trustworthy WW Score with only one review. At minimum, 3 reviews are required to establish any meaningful pattern. The single review provided is highly negative and should not be treated as definitive of the contractor's overall performance.

Only one review is available for analysis, which is insufficient to produce a reliable WW Score. That single review speaks positively about Travis Baker's professionalism, noting he was understanding, thoughtful, and considerate during delays caused by city sewer work. Project completion is supported by the mention that drain lines were replumbed and the customer was kept functional throughout, though no explicit timeline or delivery detail was provided. Workmanship quality is referenced briefly as 'excellent,' lending a modest experience score. Pricing was not mentioned at all and cannot be scored.

• Only 1 review analyzed — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably per minimum threshold of 3 reviews.
• All dimension scores are based on a single mention and carry LIMITED confidence only.
• Review is dated October 2020, making it over 4 years old. Recency weighting is a concern — this may not reflect current service quality.
• No pricing or value information was mentioned in any review — Pricing dimension has NO DATA.
• With only one review, fake review detection is not applicable, but the review is specific and detailed enough to appear genuine.

This score report is based on a single review from 2020 and should not be considered a reliable indicator of this contractor's current or consistent performance.