Find Nearby Plumbers In Nampa, Idaho

Christopher Bishop of Safeguard Plumbing demonstrates exceptional performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised with 15 mentions highlighting punctuality, communication, cleanliness, and respectful demeanor. Project completion is strong with 13 mentions confirming timely work, follow-through, and successful problem resolution. Experience is well-documented with 9 mentions of skilled workmanship and technical knowledge. Pricing receives 6 mentions as fair and reasonable. The single 1-star review from 2021 regarding slow initial response time is an outlier among overwhelmingly positive feedback spanning over a decade.

• One empty review (5.0 rating, 2022-06-10) with no text content — excluded from analysis but counted in total
• One significant negative review (1-star, 2021) citing failure to meet advertised 10-minute response time — represents legitimate service failure but is isolated among 19 positive reviews
• Most reviews (13 of 19) are from 2024 or recent years, providing strong recency; however, 2 reviews are from 2010-2013, indicating long-term customer retention
• No evidence of fake review patterns — reviews contain specific details (drain pipe repair, toilet flange stabilization, water filter installation, humidifier leak discovery) and vary in length and phrasing

This WW Score of 92.3 is highly reliable, based on 19 substantive reviews with strong mention counts across all dimensions and consistent positive feedback over 15 years, though tempered by one documented service failure in responsiveness.

Standard Plumbing, primarily operated by Braulio and Tony, demonstrates exceptional performance across all four dimensions. The company excels in professionalism with consistently praised responsiveness, punctuality, and courteous communication across 89 reviews. Pricing is fair and transparent, with customers frequently noting reasonable rates and honest assessments that save money (62 mentions). Project completion is reliable with strong follow-through and timely delivery documented in 78 reviews. Technical expertise is evident through skilled workmanship, problem-solving ability, and knowledgeable guidance mentioned in 71 reviews. The WW Score of 88.2 reflects a highly trustworthy contractor with strong execution across all service dimensions.

• MIXED BUSINESS CONTEXT: Reviews span multiple business entities (Standard Plumbing service, Standard Supply retail, and HVAC supplier). Primary focus is Standard Plumbing service by Braulio/Tony, but approximately 8-10 reviews reference retail supply or HVAC operations, which may not be directly comparable to plumbing service quality.
• OUTLIER NEGATIVE REVIEWS: Three 1-star reviews (2023-09-11, 2022-12-05, 2022-11-04) and one 2-star review (2022-11-04) present significant concerns. The 2023-09-11 review alleges misdiagnosis (recommending full water heater replacement when only pilot light relight was needed). The 2022-11-04 review claims repeated no-shows and ignored callbacks. These represent legitimate service failures that warrant caution despite overall positive trend.
• RECENCY DISTRIBUTION: Majority of reviews (approximately 70%) are from 2019-2024, with strong recent activity (2024-2025). However, oldest reviews (2006-2007) are from different era and may reflect different business operations. Analysis weighted toward recent reviews per Rule 6.
• EMPTY/MINIMAL REVIEWS: Approximately 8 reviews contain no text or only ratings/single words ('Good people', '1/2 a star', blank entries). These were excluded from scoring as they provide no usable data per Rule 1.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: While most reviews are detailed and specific, there is a cluster of highly similar positive language (e.g., 'honest, fair, responsive, professional' appearing in 15+ reviews with nearly identical phrasing). However, each review contains unique job details and specific dates, suggesting authentic customer experiences rather than fabricated reviews. Confidence remains HIGH but not absolute.
• BUSINESS TRANSITION CONCERN: One 2022-11-04 review references work done 'at the start of the pandemic' (2020) with ongoing issues, suggesting potential quality control or callback issues in earlier period. More recent reviews (2023-2024) do not reflect similar callback failures.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable, based on 127 reviews with strong data density across all four dimensions (62-89 mentions each). The HIGH confidence rating is supported by consistent positive feedback, specific job details, and recent activity. However, the three documented service failures (misdiagnosis, no-shows, ignored callbacks) indicate this is not a perfect contractor; customers should expect excellent service in most cases but acknowledge a small risk of communication or follow-through issues. The score represents a trustworthy contractor suitable for most plumbing needs, with the caveat that individual experiences may vary.

Steve's Service Plumbing demonstrates consistently strong performance across all measured dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 9 reviews explicitly praising punctuality, courtesy, communication, and attitude. Project completion is equally solid, with 8 reviews confirming timely work, thorough job execution, and follow-through on commitments. Technical skill and problem-solving ability are well-documented across 6 reviews, with customers noting diagnostic accuracy and quality workmanship. Pricing receives moderate support from 4 reviews, with customers describing fair value and transparent quoting, though one review noted initial price concerns that were resolved by the final quote matching the original estimate.

• Two reviews contain only 'unknown' text with 5.0 and 2.0 ratings respectively—these are unusable and excluded from scoring
• Review dates span from 2010 to 2020, with most reviews older than 5 years; only 2 reviews from 2019-2020 provide recent data
• High concentration of 5.0 ratings (10 of 11 usable reviews) with minimal negative feedback; while not necessarily fake, the lack of critical detail in some reviews limits depth of analysis
• One 2.0-rated review with 'unknown' text prevents assessment of any legitimate complaints

This WW Score of 88.2 is reliable and should be trusted, supported by HIGH overall confidence driven by consistent mentions across all dimensions and strong agreement among reviewers; however, the age of most reviews (pre-2019) and lack of recent data means current performance may differ from this historical assessment.

King Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all four dimensions with consistently high marks for professionalism, pricing fairness, project completion, and technical expertise. The company excels in communication, responsiveness, and punctuality, with numerous reviews praising Julie's office management and the field technicians' (Josh, Yuri, Aaron, Anthony, Lonnie) professionalism and courtesy. Pricing is frequently cited as competitive and transparent, with several customers noting they received lower final bills than estimates. Project completion is reliable with strong follow-through, though a small number of negative reviews indicate occasional quality control issues and communication lapses. Technical skill and problem-solving ability are consistently praised across the majority of reviews.

• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Multiple reviews dated 2023-06-10 and 2021-06-10 with identical or near-identical phrasing, generic praise without specifics, and empty review text fields suggest potential review manipulation or bulk posting. These represent approximately 25-30 reviews with suspicious clustering.
• QUALITY CONTROL INCONSISTENCY: Six 1-star reviews document serious issues including incomplete work, leaking installations, poor communication, ghosting customers, and refusal to correct mistakes. These are not isolated complaints but represent a pattern of occasional service failures.
• COMMUNICATION BREAKDOWN: Multiple detailed 1-star reviews (2021-11-15, 2021-11-24) describe poor communication between office (Julie) and field staff (Josh), missed appointments, and unprofessional conduct. One review notes Julie 'exploded' when issues were raised.
• WORKMANSHIP DEFECTS: Specific complaints include toilet flange installed at wrong distance (10 inches vs. standard 12 inches), leaking installations within one month, improper drain connections, and incomplete work requiring customer to hire another plumber.
• RECENCY NOTE: Most reviews are from 2019-2023, with a significant cluster from 2021-2023. Recent negative reviews (2024-06-05) suggest ongoing issues have not been fully resolved.

This WW Score of 87.2 should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH confidence overall, but with important caveats: while the company demonstrates genuine strengths in communication, responsiveness, and fair pricing supported by extensive positive feedback, the presence of suspicious review clustering, multiple detailed complaints about quality control and communication failures, and evidence of occasional serious workmanship defects indicate this is a company with inconsistent execution that may deliver excellent service or problematic service depending on which technician is assigned and internal coordination. Prospective customers should expect generally good service but should verify references and be cautious about large or complex projects.

BP Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions, driven by an exceptionally large and consistent body of reviews praising rapid response times, same-day service, courteous staff, and thorough job completion. Professionalism is the standout dimension, with dozens of reviewers explicitly noting punctuality, communication, friendly attitudes, and follow-through — including a notable instance of Bryan texting a customer the next morning to confirm a repair held. Pricing scores well but is tempered by two credible negative reviews: one customer reported feeling charged $620 for roughly an hour of work on minor items and called it 'robbery,' and another noted a $140 troubleshooting fee that felt dismissive. Project completion is strong overall, but a 2-star review describing a plumber who misdiagnosed a sewer line as needing full replacement — when a more experienced contractor simply snaked it — and a 2-star review citing inadequate equipment and an unresolved problem on multiple visits introduce meaningful deductions. Experience scores well based on numerous specific accounts of skilled diagnosis and efficient repair, but the misdiagnosis incident and one older review citing substandard snake equipment prevent a higher score.

• BLANK REVIEWS: 9 reviews contained no text (only a star rating). These were excluded from dimension scoring but counted in total reviews analyzed. Their uniformly high ratings (4–5 stars) with zero content slightly inflate the overall impression.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: Two reviews dated 2023-06-10 and 2022-12-07 are nearly word-for-word identical ('Called Bryan to schedule a drain cleaning. He picked up on 1st ring...'). This may indicate a copy-paste error or a duplicated submission. Only one instance was counted in scoring.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: Two reviews dated 2021-06-20 describe the same Father's Day emergency in nearly identical language from what appears to be the same customer. Only one instance was counted.
• UNDATED REVIEWS: 14 reviews have no date. These were included in scoring but given slightly reduced weight as recency cannot be confirmed. Several reference a plumber named 'Bayo' or 'Adebayo' rather than 'Bryan,' which may indicate a different technician or a second operator under the B&P brand — this could not be confirmed from review text alone.
• POSSIBLE DUAL-OPERATOR AMBIGUITY: A subset of undated reviews reference 'Bayo,' 'Adebayo,' or 'B&P Plumbing' rather than 'Bryan' or 'BP Plumbing.' It is unclear whether these reviews are for the same business entity. If they represent a different contractor, the score pool may be mixing two separate service providers.
• NEGATIVE SIGNALS: Three reviews (ratings of 1–2 stars) raise legitimate concerns: one describes a misdiagnosis of a sewer line requiring full replacement that was resolved by a competitor with a simple snake; one describes a $620 charge for minor work described as 'robbery'; and one describes inadequate equipment, an unresolved problem, and a poor external drain recommendation. These are credible, specific, and detailed complaints that meaningfully affect pricing and experience scores.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of substantive, detailed reviews are from 2023–2025, which is a positive signal. Several older reviews (2015–2018) are sparse in detail. Recency weighting favors the current score.

This WW Score is based on a large and diverse review pool with strong recency, and is considered moderately reliable — the high volume of detailed positive reviews provides genuine confidence, but the presence of credible negative reviews regarding pricing transparency and diagnostic accuracy, combined with blank reviews, a possible duplicate submission, and ambiguity around whether all reviews refer to the same operator, prevent a fully unconditional endorsement.

Infinite Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across professionalism, project completion, and technical experience, with consistently positive feedback on punctuality, responsiveness, politeness, and quality workmanship. However, pricing presents a notable weakness, with two explicit complaints about overcharging (one faucet install at $275, one overcharge on parts/labor) offsetting numerous mentions of fair and reasonable rates. The company excels at diagnosing problems accurately, completing jobs quickly, and maintaining clean work sites. Most reviews are from 2021–2024, providing recent and reliable data. The WW Score of 84.2 reflects strong overall capability tempered by pricing inconsistency.

• Pricing dimension shows internal contradiction: 7 reviews praise fair/reasonable/affordable pricing, but 2 reviews explicitly criticize overcharging. This suggests either inconsistent pricing practices or selective application of rates. Conservative scoring applied.
• Two reviews from 2022-05-30 and 2022-10-08 indicate potential pricing disputes; both predate most other reviews, but pattern warrants attention.
• High concentration of 5-star reviews (23 of 25) is typical for small contractor reviews but limits ability to identify systemic weaknesses. No fake review indicators detected (reviews contain specific details, varied language, named technicians, different job types).
• Recency: 16 of 25 reviews are from 2021–2024 (within 3 years); 9 reviews are from 2022 or earlier. Recent data is strong.

This WW Score of 84.2 is highly reliable for professionalism, completion, and experience dimensions (all HIGH confidence with 12+ mentions each), but pricing confidence is MODERATE (9 mentions with conflicting signals). The overall score should be trusted for general contractor quality assessment, but customers should explicitly discuss pricing structure and request itemized quotes to mitigate pricing risk.