Find Nearby Plumbers In Tampa, Florida

Only a single review exists, which limits the reliability of any scoring. That said, the one review is substantive and specific: it mentions fast response time, a named technician (Jimmie), positive attitude, technical competence, and a successful repair outcome. Pricing was described as 'more than reasonable,' suggesting good value. Project completion is implied by the AC being restored to working order. All four dimensions received positive signals, but scores are intentionally conservative given the single data point.

• Only 1 review analyzed — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably with fewer than 3 reviews.
• Single review caution: all dimensions are scored at LIMITED confidence. These scores should not be treated as representative of overall contractor quality.
• No fake review patterns detected in this single review — language is specific, includes a named technician, and describes a concrete situation.
• Review is from June 2023, which is over 12 months old depending on current date. Recency weighting noted.

This score report is based on a single review and should be considered highly preliminary — no meaningful conclusions about this contractor's overall quality can be drawn until at least 3 to 5 additional reviews are analyzed.

Only a single review was available for analysis, which severely limits the reliability of any scoring. The one review mentions professionalism positively, describing the technician as 'very professional' and the service as 'outstanding,' but provides no specific details to substantiate these claims. No information was provided regarding pricing, project completion, or technical experience. A conservative professionalism score of 72 was assigned due to the vague, generic nature of the praise and the complete absence of supporting specifics.

• Only 1 review analyzed — far below the minimum threshold of 3 required for a reliable WW Score.
• Review language is generic and lacks specific details (no job type mentioned, no description of what made the service outstanding, no context provided). This is consistent with patterns seen in low-detail or potentially inauthentic reviews.
• Three of four scoring dimensions have NO DATA due to the single review providing no information on pricing, project completion, or technical experience.
• Score should not be used for any meaningful contractor evaluation at this time.

This score is not reliable and should not be used to evaluate this contractor — only 1 review was analyzed, it contains generic praise with no verifiable specifics, and three of four key dimensions have no data whatsoever.