Find Nearby Plumbers In Daytona Beach, Florida

Jim Stroh demonstrates consistently strong performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is evidenced by punctuality, courteous demeanor, clear communication, and responsiveness across 15 reviews spanning multiple years. Project completion is reliably documented with 16 mentions of timely work, thorough problem-solving, and follow-through on complex multi-part jobs. Experience is well-supported by 8 mentions of skilled workmanship, technical knowledge, and efficient problem diagnosis. Pricing receives strong marks with 6 mentions of fair, reasonable, and transparent rates, including instances where he reduced costs or added services at no charge. One significant negative review (non-responsiveness) is outweighed by the overwhelming positive pattern.

• Three reviews contain only 'unknown' text with 5-star ratings (2016-01-15, 2015-02-11, 2015-02-04) — these provide no usable data and were excluded from scoring
• Two reviews state 'See above' (2012-08-03, 2009-11-08) — minimal substantive content, treated as low-information but not excluded
• One 1-star review (2016-11-02) citing non-responsiveness stands in stark contrast to the pattern; this is a legitimate negative data point and was included
• Most reviews are older than 12 months (only 1 review from 2017); recency is limited but pattern consistency across 8+ years suggests stable performance
• No evidence of fake review patterns — reviews contain specific details (shower valves, washing machine hookups, ice maker, faucet replacements, drain work) and vary in length and phrasing

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable, supported by 21 usable reviews with strong mention counts across all dimensions (6–16 mentions each). The consistent positive pattern over 9 years, combined with specific technical details and one legitimate negative review, provides a balanced and trustworthy assessment. However, the age of most reviews (pre-2017) means current service quality should be verified with recent references.

Sky Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all measured dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 42 reviews explicitly praising punctuality, communication, politeness, and courteous behavior. Project completion is consistently reliable, with 35 reviews confirming jobs finished completely and efficiently. Technical experience is well-documented across 28 reviews highlighting skilled workmanship and problem-solving ability. Pricing receives moderate support (16 mentions) with most customers describing rates as reasonable and fair, though a few older reviews (2012-2013) cite pricing disputes. The company shows particular excellence in responsiveness, cleanliness, and diagnostic accuracy.

• Three negative reviews (1-star ratings from 2012-2013 and one 1-star from 2025) stand in stark contrast to overwhelmingly positive recent reviews. The 2012-2013 complaints involve pricing disputes and unprofessional behavior; these are significantly older and may reflect past operational issues that have since been resolved.
• The 2025 one-star review ('Irresponsible, greedy and unethical') provides no detail or context, making it impossible to assess validity. This appears anomalous given the consistent 5-star pattern in recent months.
• Most reviews (approximately 80%) are from 2024-2025, indicating strong recent performance. Only 3 reviews predate 2020, suggesting either improved operations or selection bias in review retention.
• Two reviews contain blank text fields but 5-star ratings, reducing data quality slightly but not affecting scoring.
• No evidence of fake review patterns detected. Reviews contain specific names, detailed scenarios, varied language, and authentic problem-solving narratives. Positive reviews are substantiated with concrete examples.

This WW Score of 87.2 is highly reliable, based on 57 reviews with strong data density across all dimensions and predominantly recent evidence (past 12 months). The score is anchored by 42 professionalism mentions and 35 project completion mentions, both at HIGH confidence. The main caveat is that pricing assessment relies on only 16 mentions (MODERATE confidence), and the three negative reviews—while statistically minor—suggest occasional service failures warrant caution on complex or high-value projects.

Integrity Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all dimensions, with particularly high marks for professionalism (87.5) driven by consistent praise for punctuality, communication, and courteous staff. Pricing scores well (82.0) with many customers noting fair, transparent, and competitive rates. Project completion (85.5) reflects reliable follow-through, though a small number of reviews mention delayed callbacks or incomplete follow-up. Technical expertise (83.0) is consistently praised, with customers highlighting knowledgeable technicians and thorough diagnostics. The company's name genuinely reflects its operational values in the majority of reviews.

• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Reviews dated 2025-06-08, 2025-06-05, and 2025-06-03 contain identical text (long, detailed narrative about managing renovation projects, mentioning Emily, James, Josh, Steve, Lyle by name). This repetition across three consecutive dates is highly suspicious and suggests potential review manipulation.
• EMPTY REVIEWS: 18 reviews contain only a 5.0 rating with no text content. While not necessarily fake, these provide no substantive data and inflate review count without evidence.
• RECENCY BIAS: Approximately 60% of reviews are from 2024-2025 (past 12 months), with a sharp increase in volume in recent months. Earlier reviews (2006-2020) show more varied ratings (including 1-3 star reviews), while recent reviews are overwhelmingly 5-star. This pattern warrants caution.
• NEGATIVE REVIEWS CONCENTRATED IN PAST: Most 1-star and 2-star reviews are from 2013-2022. Recent negative reviews (2024-2025) are rare, which could indicate either genuine improvement or selective review removal/suppression.
• MULTIPLE BUSINESS LOCATIONS/OWNERS: Reviews reference different owners/technicians across different regions (Dave, James, Toby, Marc, Sean, etc.) and locations (Rancho Santa Margarita, Vallejo, Omaha, Utah, Brentwood, etc.), suggesting either multiple franchises under one name or significant data mixing. This complicates reliability assessment.
• INCONSISTENT COMPANY IDENTITY: Some reviews reference 'Integrity Plumbing' as a single-owner operation (Dave, James, Toby), while others describe it as a larger company with multiple crews. Geographic and personnel inconsistencies suggest these may be different companies with the same name.

While the WW Score of 84.2 reflects genuinely positive feedback across most dimensions, the reliability is MODERATE-TO-HIGH rather than fully HIGH due to: (1) suspicious identical reviews in June 2025 suggesting potential manipulation, (2) 18 empty 5-star reviews providing no evidence, (3) dramatic recency bias with 60% of reviews from past 12 months and nearly all recent reviews being 5-star, and (4) apparent mixing of multiple businesses/locations under the same name. The score is most trustworthy for recent service quality (2024-2025) but should be viewed with caution regarding historical consistency. Customers should verify they are contacting the correct location/owner before booking.

Cummings Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions, driven by an exceptionally large and predominantly positive review base spanning 2016 to 2025. Professionalism is the most frequently praised attribute, with technicians like Brandon, Nick, Tony, Dan, and Daniel repeatedly cited for punctuality, courtesy, clear communication, and cleanliness — though a meaningful cluster of negative reviews (approximately 10) describes rude office staff, unprofessional technician behavior, and failure to take accountability for mistakes, which tempers the score. Project completion scores well given the overwhelming volume of reviews describing jobs finished on time, same-day service, and thorough follow-through, but is modestly penalized by several credible complaints about incomplete work, abandoned repairs, and failure to honor commitments. Pricing is generally praised as fair and competitive, with multiple reviewers explicitly comparing Cummings favorably to competitors; however, recurring complaints about undisclosed apprentice fees, billing disputes, and unexpected charges prevent a higher score. Experience scores similarly high, with numerous reviewers highlighting skilled diagnostics, creative problem-solving, and technical competence, offset by a small number of reviews describing technicians arriving without proper equipment or failing to diagnose root causes.

• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: The review from Susan in Plymouth Twp. ('Always a good experience when calling CUMMINGS PLUMBING! From the initial contact to job completion...') appears twice with identical text, posted on 2025-06-06 and 2025-06-03. This is a likely duplicate submission and was counted only once for scoring purposes.
• 11 reviews contain no text (only a star rating) and were excluded from dimensional scoring as they provide no usable evidence.
• PRICING CONCERN — RECURRING PATTERN: At least 4 independent reviews across different time periods (2019, 2022, 2023, 2025) specifically mention undisclosed apprentice/second-technician fees charged without prior notice. This is a consistent and credible pattern, not isolated incidents, and meaningfully suppresses the pricing score.
• NEGATIVE REVIEW PATTERN — ACCOUNTABILITY: Multiple 1-star reviews describe the company refusing to take responsibility for damage caused during service visits, rude responses when complaints were raised, and failure to follow through on promised refunds. These are substantive complaints from apparently genuine customers.
• RECENCY NOTE: The vast majority of reviews (approximately 120+) are from within the past 12 months (June 2024 to June 2025), lending strong recency weight to the score. Older negative reviews (2019–2021) describing ownership/management issues may reflect a prior period and are weighted slightly less, though they are not discarded.
• FAKE REVIEW RISK — LOW: While the volume of 5-star reviews is very high, most contain specific technician names, job descriptions, and personal details. Generic praise without specifics is present but not dominant. No significant fake review pattern detected beyond the one confirmed duplicate.

This WW Score is based on 163 reviews with strong recency weighting and high mention counts across all four dimensions, making it one of the more reliable assessments possible — however, the consistent pattern of billing complaints and accountability failures in negative reviews is credible and should be taken seriously by prospective customers, particularly regarding fee transparency before service begins.

Carey Plumbing has an overwhelmingly positive review history spanning nearly two decades, with consistent praise for responsiveness, after-hours availability, fair pricing, and professional conduct. The majority of reviewers highlight Mike and his crew arriving on time, explaining work clearly, and completing jobs efficiently — including on weekends and holidays. However, a meaningful cluster of negative reviews (1–2 star ratings) raises legitimate concerns: one no-call/no-show, one technician demanding extra payment to fill a hole mid-job, one complaint about poor leak diagnosis, one about a botched repair requiring a second plumber, and one about a prolonged estimate process that was ultimately abandoned. These negative reviews are specific and credible, preventing a higher score. Pricing scores well overall but is tempered by one reviewer who felt the $475 charge was excessive and another who noted Carey's bid was significantly higher than a competitor.

• DUPLICATE REVIEWS DETECTED: Two reviews dated 2024-05-14 are word-for-word identical ('This was the most pleasant experience I have ever had with a plumbing service...'). One appears to be a duplicate entry and was counted only once for scoring purposes.
• THIN/EMPTY REVIEWS: At least 6 reviews contain no text at all — only a 5-star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence.
• GENERIC PRAISE WITH NO SPECIFICS: Several reviews ('Best service ever!!', 'Best, and I mean best plumber in the state!!!!', 'Great work!!', 'I highly recommend Carey Plumbing for reliable plumbing solutions.') offer no detail and were not used for dimension scoring. Their authenticity cannot be verified.
• NEGATIVE REVIEW PATTERN — PROJECT COMPLETION: Multiple distinct negative reviews cite incomplete or poor-quality work: one reviewer had to hire a second plumber to fix Carey's work; one technician attempted to charge extra to fill a hole that was part of the job; one reviewer reported a drain repair tech who did not know how to restore water pressure and caused 80 minutes of wasted time. These are credible, specific complaints that meaningfully reduce the project completion score.
• NEGATIVE REVIEW — NO-SHOW: One reviewer (June 2024) reported a confirmed appointment with no call and no show, resulting in lost business. This is a direct professionalism failure.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of high-quality, detailed reviews are from 2019–2025, which is encouraging. Several reviews date back to 2003–2011 and were given reduced weight in scoring. The negative reviews are spread across multiple years (2021, 2022, 2024, 2025), suggesting these are not isolated incidents.
• OWNER NAME INCONSISTENCY: Most reviews reference 'Mike' as the owner, but one negative review references 'Steve' as the owner. This may indicate a different company or a data error, and that review was treated with slight caution though still included as it references Carey Plumbing explicitly.

This WW Score is based on a large, multi-year review dataset with HIGH confidence across all four dimensions; however, the presence of several specific, credible negative reviews — including a no-show, a mid-job extortion attempt, a botched repair, and a poor diagnostic experience — means the score should be trusted as a realistic mid-to-high rating rather than an endorsement of flawless service.

Rick's Sewer & Drain Service earns strong marks across all four dimensions, driven by a large volume of detailed, specific reviews spanning over a decade. Professionalism is the standout dimension, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, communication, courtesy, and responsiveness — including same-day and weekend availability. Pricing is consistently described as fair, reasonable, and often lower than competitors or initial quotes, with one reviewer saving over $2,000 by choosing Rick over another estimate. Project completion scores well overall, with the vast majority of jobs described as fully resolved, though one significant negative review (1-star, 2015) describes a major installation failure, repeated callbacks, and Rick refusing to accept responsibility — this meaningfully pulls the completion and experience scores down. Experience scores reflect strong diagnostic ability and problem-solving across many reviews, but the 1-star review documents a pattern of poor workmanship on a new home installation that required over $2,200 in repairs by other plumbers, which cannot be ignored.

• Two reviews contain only the word 'unknown' and provide no usable data — excluded from scoring.
• One review contains only a period ('.') and provides no usable data — excluded from scoring.
• One review ('See above') references content not included in the dataset — excluded from scoring.
• The single 1-star review (2015-01-11) is a serious outlier describing faulty new plumbing installation, improper pipe strapping, a disconnected sewer drain, and Rick charging $475 to redo his own defective work. This is a credible, detailed negative review and has been weighted accordingly in project completion and experience scores.
• The majority of reviews are older than 5 years, with only 2 reviews dated within the past 5 years (2019). The most recent review is from May 2019. Current performance cannot be reliably inferred from this dataset.
• Several short reviews ('Great job very professional', 'They did a great job', 'Rick is very prompt, fast and skilled') are generic and low in detail, though they do not appear coordinated or fake — they are consistent with the broader pattern of the review set.
• No reviews mention negative pricing experiences except the 1-star review, which references being charged $475 for remedial work on a defective installation.

This WW Score is based on a substantial volume of reviews (49 total, 47 usable) and carries HIGH overall confidence in the scoring dimensions, but the score should be treated with caution due to the age of the data — the most recent review is from 2019 — and one credible, detailed negative review that raises legitimate concerns about workmanship quality on larger installation jobs.