Ruth Plumbing

This single review from October 2016 describes severe failures across all dimensions. The contractor abandoned work mid-project, left the country for a month without completing the job, failed to fix mistakes upon return, and charged $1,300 for incomplete and defective work. The review explicitly mentions lack of licensure, poor workmanship quality, and non-responsive follow-through. However, a WW... Read more

This single review from October 2016 describes severe failures across all dimensions. The contractor abandoned work mid-project, left the country for a month without completing the job, failed to fix mistakes upon return, and charged $1,300 for incomplete and defective work. The review explicitly mentions lack of licensure, poor workmanship quality, and non-responsive follow-through. However, a WW Score cannot be reliably calculated from a single review, as this represents an extreme outlier case rather than a representative sample of contractor performance. Read less