Find Nearby Plumbers In Fort Collins, Colorado

All six reviews are recent (within the past 12 months) and consistently praise professionalism, punctuality, and respectful communication, giving that dimension strong support. Project completion is well-supported, with specific mentions of a water main leak resolved in one day and multiple successful projects for a repeat customer. Experience is backed by references to knowledgeable, skilled work and effective problem-solving. Pricing data is thin — only one review explicitly confirms charges matched the quoted amount — so that dimension is scored conservatively with limited confidence.

• Small sample size of only 6 reviews limits overall reliability of the WW Score.
• All reviews are 5-star with uniformly positive language; while specifics are present in most reviews, the absence of any critical feedback warrants mild caution.
• Two reviews share the same date (2024-09-17); this is worth noting but not conclusive of manipulation given different content and one names the same technician (Gage).
• Pricing dimension is based on only 1 explicit mention of price transparency; score should be treated as preliminary.

This score carries moderate reliability due to a small but recent and mostly specific review set; additional reviews over time would significantly improve confidence across all dimensions.

Isaac and his team score strongly on professionalism, with all 6 reviews explicitly mentioning punctuality, friendliness, responsiveness, or communication — including prompt Sunday emergency responses and proactive callbacks when running behind. Pricing is described as fair, reasonable, or good across 4 reviews, with one reviewer contrasting Isaac favorably against a previously overpriced plumber, supporting a solid but not exceptional pricing score. Project completion is well-supported, with 5 reviews confirming jobs were finished quickly and correctly, including drain clearing, flooding resolution, and general plumbing repairs. Experience scores moderately — reviewers note problems were resolved effectively and work was done well, but few reviews provide technical detail about the quality of workmanship beyond general satisfaction.

• All 6 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative feedback of any kind — this warrants mild caution, though the reviews do contain specific details (Sunday emergency, basement flooding, schedule changes, drain clearing) that reduce the likelihood of fabrication.
• RECENCY WARNING: All reviews are older than 12 months. The most recent review is from August 2019, and four of the six reviews are from 2018 or earlier, with one dating back to 2012. This score may not reflect current performance.
• Small sample size of only 6 reviews limits statistical reliability. Scores should be treated as directional rather than definitive.

This WW Score carries moderate reliability due to consistent but uniformly positive feedback across a very small and entirely dated review set — the score is directionally trustworthy but should not be treated as a high-confidence assessment of current contractor performance.

Snyder Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent praise for punctuality, friendliness, and responsiveness across multiple reviews. Pricing is generally viewed as fair and reasonable. However, project completion shows significant concern due to one detailed negative review documenting repeated no-shows and incomplete work, which substantially lowers this dimension despite other positive completion mentions. Technical skill and workmanship are praised where mentioned. The overall score reflects a contractor with good fundamentals but reliability issues that warrant caution.

• Two reviews contain only 'unknown' text with 5-star ratings (2015-08-03, 2015-03-11) — these are unusable and suggest possible data quality issues.
• One highly detailed negative review (2006-08-06) documents severe project completion failures including no-shows and incomplete work, creating a significant credibility concern that contradicts the predominantly positive pattern.
• Most reviews are older than 5 years (9 of 10 usable reviews predate 2014), limiting recency and relevance to current service quality.
• The contractor name appears inconsistent across reviews (Jeff, Brad, Joe mentioned as individuals; company is 'Snyder Plumbing'), suggesting possible multiple staff or name variations that could indicate different service quality levels.

This score should be treated with caution due to significant data quality issues (old reviews, unusable entries) and a credible negative review documenting serious project completion failures that directly contradicts the predominantly positive pattern; the MODERATE overall confidence reflects uncertainty about current reliability.

Home Service Solutions demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent praise for punctuality, politeness, and communication across 28 reviews. Technical expertise is well-documented with 18 mentions of skilled workmanship and problem-solving. However, project completion reliability is concerning, with 8 mentions revealing incomplete work, unresolved callbacks, and unfinished installations. Pricing is a significant weakness, with only 4 mentions but all negative—customers report being 30-40% higher than competitors and charging excessive fees ($200 per valve). A critical 1-star review from April 2025 alleges the company is unlicensed and has failed to file required permits for 4 months, which raises serious legal and compliance concerns.

• CRITICAL: April 2025 review alleges company is unlicensed and has not filed required permits with City of Fort Collins for furnace installed in November 2024. Reviewer claims to have proof from city that company has 'NEVER been licensed.' This is a major red flag requiring immediate verification.
• PATTERN OF INCOMPLETE WORK: Multiple reviews (2017, 2015) describe unfinished jobs, failed callbacks, and incomplete installations (e.g., furnace hookup left incomplete, toilets not properly repaired).
• AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR: December 2015 review describes employee Jake exhibiting rage, swearing, and stomping on property; owner Bill allegedly offered bribe (free AC cleaning) to suppress negative review and became aggressive when refused.
• PRICING COMPLAINTS: Consistent pattern of overcharging—30-40% above competitors, $200 per shutoff valve, $587 for incomplete toilet repairs vs. $100 elsewhere.
• RESPONSIVENESS ISSUES: January 2016 review documents 3-hour delay in dispatch response during emergency ceiling leak, forcing customer to pay after-hours rates.
• SUSPICIOUS REVIEW CLUSTERING: 24 of 51 reviews are 5-star with minimal detail, many from April-June 2025 with generic praise ('Chad is amazing!!', 'Good!!!!'). Several reviews contain no text. This clustering pattern warrants caution.
• RECENCY BIAS: Most recent reviews (April-June 2025) are uniformly 5-star with limited detail. Older reviews (2014-2018) show more balanced feedback with specific incidents. Recent reviews may not reflect current operational issues.

This score should be treated with CAUTION. While professionalism and experience scores are supported by substantial evidence, the April 2025 licensing/permit allegation is a critical unresolved issue that could invalidate the entire business legitimacy. The pattern of incomplete work, pricing complaints, and aggressive behavior in older reviews, combined with suspicious clustering of generic 5-star reviews in 2025, suggests the overall score may not be reliable. Verification of licensing status and permit compliance is essential before engaging this company.

Pryor Plumbing and Heating receives consistently strong marks for professionalism, with multiple reviewers praising responsiveness, punctuality, clear communication, and courteous behavior — including same-day emergency service and technicians wearing booties to protect homes. Project completion scores are also high, with jobs described as fully resolved, timely, and followed through without issue. Experience scores reflect solid technical competence across plumbing, HVAC, and heating work, with reviewers noting accurate diagnosis and thorough workmanship. However, pricing confidence is tempered by one detailed negative review alleging a significant markup on a water heater unit ($325 retail billed at $875 total, with no response to the customer's concern), which meaningfully offsets the otherwise positive pricing feedback and prevents a higher pricing score.

• One review (Rating: 5.0, Date: 2015-10-26) was written by a self-identified employee of Pryor Plumbing. This review has been excluded from usable data as it represents a conflict of interest and cannot be treated as an independent customer review.
• The negative pricing review (Rating: 2.0, Date: 2012-04-10) is over 12 years old and may not reflect current pricing practices, but it is the only negative review and contains specific, credible detail — it has been retained and weighted accordingly.
• Most reviews are older than 1 year; the most recent review is from July 2022. There is a gap in recent review data which limits confidence in current service quality.
• The majority of reviews are 5-star with positive language, but most contain specific details (names, situations, dates, prices) that reduce the likelihood of fake review patterns. No significant fake review concern detected, though the small sample size limits certainty.

This WW Score is based on a small sample of 7 usable reviews spanning 2012 to 2022, with no reviews in the past 12 months, which moderately limits the reliability of the score as a reflection of current service quality.

Emerson Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent praise for punctuality, responsiveness, and clean work across 8 reviews. Project completion is generally solid with 9 mentions, though one detailed 2024 review documents multiple failures including wrong property access, incorrect repairs, and repeated fixture failures within short timeframes. Pricing presents a significant concern: while some reviews cite reasonable rates, a detailed 2024 complaint explicitly describes overpricing, use of cheap unknown-brand fixtures, and refusal to address poor workmanship. Experience is rated favorably at 82 based on 7 mentions of quality work, but this is undermined by the 2024 review detailing mistakes and code violations. The company appears to have experienced quality degradation post-expansion, with newer crew members making errors the original owner did not.

• RECENCY CONCERN: One highly detailed 1-star review from February 2024 contradicts the predominantly positive older reviews (2017-2022). This suggests potential quality decline after business expansion.
• QUALITY INCONSISTENCY: The 2024 review documents systematic failures (wrong property access, repeated fixture failures within 10 months, incorrect repairs, code violations) that are absent from all other reviews. This pattern suggests either inconsistent crew quality or a fundamental shift in service standards.
• PRICING CONTRADICTION: Recent review explicitly states overpricing and use of cheap fixtures to cut costs, contradicting 'reasonable price' claims in older reviews. This may reflect price increases without corresponding quality maintenance.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Multiple 5-star reviews from 2017-2022 use generic praise ('fantastic,' 'highly recommend,' 'great guy') with minimal specific detail. However, the detailed 1-star review provides extensive specifics, suggesting it is likely authentic and the positive reviews may be less detailed by nature rather than fabricated.
• SAMPLE RECENCY BIAS: 6 of 11 reviews are from 2021 or earlier (55%). Only 2 reviews from 2024 (18%). The WW Score may not reflect current service quality.

This score should be treated with caution. While professionalism and project completion show HIGH confidence, the detailed 2024 negative review documenting systematic failures, pricing concerns, and quality degradation suggests the company's current performance may be significantly lower than the overall score indicates. The score is heavily weighted by older reviews; recent data is limited and contradictory.