Find Nearby Plumbers In San Francisco, California

Nigel Mulgrew Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most consistently praised attribute across nearly the entire review set — punctuality, communication, cleanliness, and courteous behavior are mentioned repeatedly and with specific detail. Project completion is also a clear strength, with numerous reviewers describing jobs finished on time, callbacks honored at no extra charge, and work completed even under difficult circumstances. Experience scores well too, with multiple reviewers citing skilled diagnostics, problem-solving on complex jobs, and high-quality workmanship. Pricing is the most mixed dimension: the majority of reviewers describe fair or even below-estimate billing, but two reviews (one 2-star and one 1-star) explicitly cite quotes they considered grossly excessive — one describing a quote 3.7 times higher than a competitor and another alleging price gouging on a simple gas regulator job — which meaningfully tempers the pricing score. One negative review also flags a leaking water heater installation, which slightly weighs on the project completion score.

• TWO EXPLICIT PRICING COMPLAINTS: One reviewer (2019-12-05) received a quote 3.7x higher than a competitor for an unspecified common plumbing project. A second reviewer (2022-08-28) alleged a quote of nearly $1,000 for a job they valued at $200-300 max, and accused the company of price gouging female-owned businesses. These are specific, credible complaints that prevent a high pricing score despite the majority of positive pricing mentions.
• ONE WORKMANSHIP FAILURE: A 1-star review (2017-04-19) states the company installed a hot water heater that leaked, with no further detail. This is a brief but serious complaint and is factored into the project completion and experience scores.
• RECENCY NOTE: Approximately 20 of the 50 reviews are from 2020 or earlier, with several dating back to 2008-2013. While the overall pattern is consistent, the most recent reviews (2023-2024) continue to reflect strong performance, suggesting the quality has been maintained over time. Older reviews are given slightly less weight.
• POTENTIAL GENERIC PRAISE: A small number of reviews (e.g., 2021-02-09, 2020-03-11) are brief and lack specific detail, but they do not show identical phrasing or suspicious clustering patterns. No coordinated fake review pattern detected.
• VOLUME AND SPAN: The review set spans approximately 16 years (2008-2024), which provides strong longitudinal confidence but also means some scores reflect a business that may have changed over time.

This WW Score is based on 50 reviews spanning 16 years with high mention counts across all four dimensions, making it one of the more reliable assessments possible — however, the pricing score should be interpreted cautiously given two specific and credible overpricing complaints that stand in contrast to the otherwise positive pricing feedback.

Costello's Plumbing earns strong scores across all four dimensions, driven by a large volume of detailed, specific reviews spanning multiple years. Professionalism is the most frequently cited strength, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, communication, courtesy, and responsiveness — including after-hours and emergency availability. Project completion scores are high but held slightly below the ceiling by two notable exceptions: one reviewer noted squirrelly work that required paid corrections and a failure to insulate hot water lines per code, and one 1-star reviewer alleged the crew prioritized money over completing the job. Experience scores are bolstered by repeated praise for diagnostic skill, problem-solving, and technicians explaining their work clearly, though the same code-compliance failure and the unresolved toilet leak on New Year's Eve (requiring a return visit) introduce minor deductions. Pricing is generally praised as fair, competitive, and transparent, with one reviewer noting a $225 drain snake charge felt high and another 4-star reviewer flagging the quote as feeling pricey — preventing a top-tier pricing score.

• One 1-star review (2024-09-03) is vague, contains no specifics, and reads as potentially retaliatory or fake — however it is not repeated in pattern across other reviews and is treated as a single legitimate negative data point with reduced evidentiary weight due to lack of detail.
• One review (2023-12-13) uses highly generic, hyperbolic language ('plumbing superheroes', 'Avengers of home maintenance') with no specific details about work performed — this review was treated with reduced evidentiary weight and not counted toward any dimension score.
• The review corpus spans 2017–2024. Reviews from 2017–2020 (approximately 12 reviews) are older than 3 years and were given reduced weight relative to the 2021–2024 reviews. The more recent reviews (2021–2024) are consistent in quality and tone, supporting continued reliability.
• A small number of reviews (e.g., 2021-10-30, 2021-12-14, 2019-07-15) are very brief and generic, providing limited scoreable detail — these were counted for overall sentiment but not attributed to specific dimension scores.
• One review (2023-12-21, 4-star) explicitly notes work that had to be redone at the customer's expense and a failure to insulate hot water lines per code — this is a meaningful quality and completion flag and was weighted accordingly in both project_completion and experience scores.

This WW Score is based on 46 reviews with strong specificity across all four dimensions and a broad date range through late 2024, yielding HIGH confidence overall — though users should note one credible negative completion incident and one vague 1-star review that introduce modest downward pressure on an otherwise consistently strong record.

AAA Backflow Testing receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across nearly all dimensions, with professionalism being the most consistently praised attribute — punctuality, friendliness, and responsiveness are mentioned explicitly across dozens of reviews spanning over a decade. Project completion scores are also very strong, with reviewers repeatedly noting that the team handles city paperwork filing, sends reminders, and follows through on every appointment. Pricing is mentioned favorably in several reviews, with references to reasonable and market-aligned rates, and one notable instance where a technician actively saved a customer money by walking them through a DIY fix rather than charging for a service call. Experience is well-supported by mentions of technical knowledge, helpful advice beyond the scope of the job, and familiarity with city requirements. One review (the first) appears to be for a completely unrelated business (a certification training program) and was excluded from scoring as it contains no relevant data about backflow testing services.

• IRRELEVANT REVIEW DETECTED: The first review (dated 2023-10-14) appears to be for an entirely different business — a certification training program — and has no relevance to backflow testing or plumbing services. It was excluded from all dimension scoring.
• RECENCY WARNING: The majority of reviews are older than 1 year, with most clustered between 2008 and 2021. Only 3 reviews are from within the past 12 months (2022–2023). While the pattern of quality is consistent over time, the most recent operational performance is supported by limited data.
• ALL 5-STAR PATTERN: Nearly all reviews are rated 5 stars with only one 4-star review. While the reviews contain specific, varied, and credible details that reduce fake review suspicion, this uniformity warrants mild caution. No significant fake review patterns detected beyond the rating uniformity.
• MULTIPLE TECHNICIANS NOTED: Reviews reference several different technicians (Bob, Ben, John, Kelly, Kelly Poole), which suggests a real operating business with staff turnover over time rather than a single-person operation — this adds credibility to the review set.

This WW Score is based on 34 usable reviews with explicit, specific, and varied content spanning 15 years, giving HIGH confidence across all scored dimensions, though the relative scarcity of recent reviews (past 12 months) means current performance cannot be fully verified.

Natan Plumbing receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most consistently praised attribute — punctuality, responsiveness, cleanliness, and courteous demeanor are mentioned repeatedly across dozens of reviews. Project completion scores are strong, with multiple reviewers noting jobs were finished same-day or next-day, and at least one reviewer noting a technician stayed late to finish the work. Experience scores are supported by specific accounts of skilled diagnostics, proactive identification of secondary issues, and successful resolution of complex problems including underground leaks and RV plumbing. Pricing scores are slightly tempered by one explicit complaint that costs were higher than expected, though the majority of pricing mentions describe fair, transparent, and competitive rates. Overall, the volume and specificity of reviews support a high-confidence, strong score across all dimensions.

• DUPLICATE REVIEWS DETECTED: Two reviews from 2025-05-19 are word-for-word identical ('Max arrived at our house on time. He was both curious and professional...'). Similarly, the detailed shower valve review appears twice on 2025-05-19. These duplicates were counted only once per unique review for scoring purposes.
• SUSPECTED FAKE REVIEW CLUSTER: A large cluster of reviews dated exactly 2025-01-10 and 2024-12-11 show highly repetitive phrasing around 'main valve replacement' (e.g., 'Natan replaced our main valve efficiently,' 'Natan did an amazing job with our main valve replacement,' 'Natan was professional, friendly, and got the job done right'). Multiple of these reviews contain unusual emoji strings and excessive exclamation marks, which are common signals of inauthentic reviews. Confidence in the pricing and experience dimensions has been modestly reduced to account for this pattern, though the overall score is supported by a large base of clearly genuine, detailed reviews.
• 3 reviews had no text content and were excluded from dimensional scoring as they provided no usable data.
• Several reviews have no date attached. These were included in scoring but could not be assessed for recency weighting. The majority of dated reviews fall within the past 12 months (mid-2024 to mid-2025), supporting recency relevance.

This WW Score carries HIGH overall reliability due to the large volume of reviews and strong representation across all four dimensions, though the score should be interpreted with moderate caution given the detected cluster of likely inauthentic reviews concentrated around specific dates and a repeated job type.

Primo Plumbing (primarily Mike, with some reviews referencing Charles/Steven from earlier years) earns strong scores across all four dimensions based on an exceptionally large review base spanning over a decade. Professionalism is the most frequently cited dimension, with hundreds of reviewers praising punctuality, communication, responsiveness, and courteous demeanor — including same-day and weekend availability. Pricing scores well, with dozens of reviewers explicitly noting fair, transparent, and competitive quotes often significantly below competitor bids, though one reviewer flagged a $425 charge for a 30-minute job with a $70 part as excessive, and one noted higher-than-expected costs due to a return visit. Project completion is consistently strong, with jobs described as finished on time, on budget, and with follow-through including callbacks and warranty assistance, though one negative review cited a no-show appointment and another described a failed repair that leaked within three months. Experience scores highest, with reviewers repeatedly citing 30–45 years of expertise, problem-solving ability, and technical thoroughness across a wide range of plumbing tasks.

• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: The review beginning 'Mike called and said he could come a half hour earlier than scheduled...' appears three times with identical text across three consecutive dates (2025-06-09, 2025-06-07, 2025-06-06). This is a strong indicator of a fake or artificially duplicated review. These three entries were counted as one unique review for scoring purposes.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: Two reviews from 2018-11-04 and 2018-11-03 are nearly word-for-word identical ('Mike has done 2 jobs for me...'). Counted as one unique review.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: Two reviews from 2020-01-21 are nearly identical ('Mike is an extraordinary service professional...' and 'Mike Labbe of Primo Plumbing is an example of an extraordinary professional!'). Counted as one unique review.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: Two reviews from 2019-08-02 and 2020-06-07 are nearly identical ('Michael was very helpful and timely with the repairs of our toilet and shower head...'). Counted as one unique review.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: Two reviews from 2015-03-14 are nearly identical (the long toilet reservoir tank review). Counted as one unique review.
• NEGATIVE SIGNAL — PROFESSIONALISM: One 1-star review (2023-12-29) describes a rude phone interaction where the caller was hung up on without courtesy. One 1-star review (2017-10-02) describes a plumber who came out and refused to do the work. One 1-star review (2015-05-13) describes a no-show appointment with no apology and no follow-up callback.
• NEGATIVE SIGNAL — PROJECT COMPLETION: One 1-star review (2013-04-09) describes a repair that failed within 3 months, with the plumber disputing the timeline and attempting to charge double for a Saturday callback to fix his own work.
• MIXED PRICING SIGNAL: One 4-star review (2018-06-24) explicitly states the price felt excessive — $425 for a 30-minute job using a $70 part. This tempers the otherwise strong pricing narrative.
• MULTI-OPERATOR BUSINESS: Reviews reference at least three different individuals — Mike (Labbe), Charles (Fong), and Steven (Semmelink) — suggesting this may be a shared brand or platform profile aggregating reviews for multiple plumbers. Scores reflect the aggregate and may not represent any single operator's performance.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of reviews with substantive detail are from 2020–2025, which carry the most weight. A significant volume of older reviews (2010–2019) are also present and generally consistent in tone. Reviews from 2021 and earlier are outside the 12-month recency window but are numerous enough to establish a reliable long-term pattern.
• BLANK/NO-TEXT REVIEWS: Approximately 19 reviews contained no text (only a star rating). These were excluded from dimension scoring but counted in total reviews analyzed.
• SUSPICIOUS CLUSTERING: A large cluster of reviews dated exactly '2023-06-07', '2022-06-07', '2021-06-07', and '2020-06-07' with identical dates suggests possible batch imports from another platform (e.g., HomeAdvisor/Angi). While the content varies and appears genuine, the identical date clustering is a mild flag for data aggregation artifacts rather than organic review submission.

This WW Score is based on one of the largest review sets analyzed (290 total, ~271 usable) and carries HIGH overall confidence; however, consumers should note the presence of confirmed duplicate reviews, a multi-operator profile, and a small but meaningful cluster of 1-star complaints related to professionalism and workmanship quality that prevent a top-tier score.

Red Wrench Plumbing has an overwhelmingly positive review record across a large volume of reviews spanning roughly a decade, with consistent praise for responsiveness, punctuality, fair pricing, and quality of workmanship. The professionalism score is strong but modestly reduced due to a small number of credible negative reviews citing a no-show appointment, a communication breakdown over a quote, a threatening interaction reported by one customer, and a road-rage-adjacent incident involving a company vehicle. Pricing is consistently described as fair, reasonable, and competitive, with multiple reviewers noting Sean went above and beyond without additional charge. Project completion scores are high, with the vast majority of reviewers confirming jobs were finished same-day or within the promised timeframe, and Sean is frequently noted for returning promptly to resolve follow-up issues. Experience scores are elevated by repeated mentions of Sean diagnosing complex or unusual problems that other plumbers could not solve, demonstrating strong technical depth across a wide range of plumbing and gas work.

• Three negative reviews (1-star and 2-star) raise legitimate concerns: one describes a no-show and forgotten appointment (2021), one describes threatening behavior and name-calling by the owner after a billing dispute (2015), and one describes a complete failure to follow up on a quote request with a subsequent request to alter the review (2023). These are specific, credible, and distinct in detail — they are not dismissed.
• One 2-star review relates to a driver in a company vehicle behaving aggressively at an intersection. While minor, it reflects on brand professionalism.
• The overwhelming majority of reviews are 5-star with no negative commentary, which warrants mild scrutiny. However, the reviews are highly specific in detail (named technicians, specific jobs, dates, locations, follow-up visits), which strongly suggests authenticity rather than fabrication.
• A significant portion of reviews are older than 12 months (many from 2014–2022). Reviews from the past 12 months (2024) remain consistently positive, suggesting no meaningful decline in service quality, but the older reviews carry slightly reduced recency weight.
• One review references 'Craig' and 'Tim' rather than Sean, which may indicate other technicians work under the Red Wrench brand. This is minor but noted for context.

This WW Score is based on a large, detailed, and largely authentic-appearing review set spanning multiple years, and carries HIGH overall confidence, though the professionalism score is intentionally tempered to reflect a small number of credible and specific negative experiences that prospective customers should be aware of.