Find Nearby Plumbers In Roseville, California

Patrick's Hot Water earns an exceptionally strong WW Score driven by overwhelming, consistent positive evidence across all four dimensions in a large review set spanning nearly a decade. Professionalism is the standout dimension, mentioned in virtually every review, with repeated references to punctuality, responsiveness, courtesy, shoe covers indoors, clean job sites, and clear communication. Pricing scores very highly as well, with dozens of reviewers explicitly noting reasonable, fair, or significantly lower prices than competitors, transparent quotes, and a notable instance of Patrick refusing to charge for a visit where the issue was not resolved. Project completion is also very strong, with reviewers consistently describing jobs finished same-day or next-day, follow-through on callbacks, thorough testing, and no abandoned work. Experience scores high based on frequent mentions of technical knowledge, problem-solving on difficult jobs, quality workmanship, and attention to detail across a wide variety of plumbing tasks.

• All 57 reviews are 5-star with one exception (one 4-star review), which is statistically unusual and warrants mild scrutiny.
• However, the reviews contain highly specific details including job types, named individuals (Alex, son-in-law), specific prices ($145 drain clearing, $1500 competitor comparison), addresses, and unique personal circumstances — this level of specificity strongly argues against fake review patterns.
• Review language and phrasing is varied and individualized across reviews, further reducing fake review concern.
• A significant portion of reviews (roughly 30 of 57) are older than 12 months as of late 2024, with the oldest dating to 2015. The most recent cluster (2024) remains consistent in quality, suggesting no meaningful decline in service over time.
• No negative reviews or critical feedback of any kind are present in this dataset, which while suspicious in isolation, is mitigated by the specificity and variety of the review content.

This WW Score is highly reliable and based on a large, detailed, and varied review set spanning nearly 10 years, with strong evidence across all four scored dimensions and no significant indicators of fabricated reviews.

Mark at Roseville Plumbing Solutions receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — reviewers consistently highlight his punctuality, responsiveness, communication, and courteous demeanor. Project completion scores are also very strong, with numerous reviewers noting same-day or next-day service, clean workmanship, follow-through on callbacks, and going above and beyond the original scope of work. Pricing is explicitly praised in a significant number of reviews, with multiple customers noting Mark's rates are hundreds of dollars below competitors and that quoted prices matched final invoices. Technical experience and skill are well-documented across a wide variety of jobs including tankless water heater installs, gas line relocation, leak detection, and code compliance work. The volume and specificity of reviews across a multi-year period give this score a high degree of reliability.

• Three reviews contained no text — only a 5-star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• All reviews are 5-star ratings with zero negative or mixed reviews, which is statistically unusual. However, the reviews contain highly specific job details, named scenarios, and varied writing styles, which reduces the likelihood of coordinated fake reviews.
• Several reviews are older than 12 months (2021–2022 range), but the majority of reviews are from 2024–2025, indicating continued and consistent service quality. Older reviews were weighted slightly less but remain directionally consistent with recent ones.
• No negative feedback exists in the dataset. While this may reflect genuinely excellent service, the complete absence of any criticism — even minor — should be noted as a potential limitation in the dataset's representativeness.

This WW Score is based on 59 reviews with usable content spanning approximately four years, with strong recency weighting from 2024–2025, and carries HIGH confidence across all four dimensions due to the volume, specificity, and consistency of reviewer feedback.

Bravo Plumbing (operating also as Patton Plumbing) receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — punctuality, clear communication, polite demeanor, and responsiveness appear in the vast majority of reviews. Project completion scores are very strong, with numerous reviewers explicitly noting same-day service, jobs finished as promised, clean worksite conditions, and successful city inspections. Experience scores are bolstered by specific accounts of Denis solving problems that other plumbers could not, handling complex jobs such as slab pipe replacement, gas line repair, ejection pump inspection, and tankless water heater diagnostics. Pricing is consistently described as reasonable, competitive, or better than alternatives, with one reviewer noting Denis declined payment when a simpler fix was found — a notable honesty signal. The volume and specificity of reviews across a sustained multi-year period lend high reliability to these scores.

• All 51 reviews are 5-star ratings with zero negative or mixed reviews — this is statistically unusual and warrants mild caution, though the high level of specific detail across most reviews reduces the likelihood of systematic fabrication.
• One review (2025-05-10, no review text, rating 5.0) contains no usable content and was excluded from dimension scoring.
• Two reviews appear nearly identical in phrasing (the 'Water completely stopped flowing in our master shower' review appears on both 2024-06-18 and 2025-05-10) — this may be a duplicate submission by the same customer or a copy-paste error, and was counted only once per dimension.
• Two older reviews (2021-12-10 and 2018-03-08) reference office staff and a crew, which may reflect a different business structure than the current solo-operator model described in recent reviews — these were included but given reduced weight due to age and potential business context mismatch.
• The business has operated under at least two names (Patton Plumbing and Bravo Plumbing), which is noted but does not negatively impact scoring as reviews confirm continuity of the same operator (Denis Kabardin).

This WW Score carries HIGH reliability overall, driven by a large volume of detailed, specific, and independently worded reviews spanning multiple years, with consistent positive evidence across all four scored dimensions — the primary caveat being the absence of any negative reviews, which is unusual and should prompt prospective customers to seek additional independent verification.

Empire Leak Detection, primarily represented by John, demonstrates exceptional professionalism across all seven reviews with consistent praise for responsiveness, punctuality, friendly demeanor, and clear communication. Project completion is strong, with customers reporting rapid leak detection and successful problem resolution, though some reviews mention referrals to other contractors rather than in-house completion. Technical expertise is evident through mentions of advanced detection equipment, multiple diagnostic methods, and knowledgeable problem-solving. Pricing data is minimal with only one explicit mention of upfront quoting, limiting confidence in the pricing dimension. The company's willingness to provide free advice and referrals when appropriate suggests customer-first values.

• All 7 reviews are 5-star ratings with uniformly positive language and no critical feedback—this pattern warrants caution regarding authenticity
• Heavy concentration on a single service provider (John) across all reviews may indicate limited sample diversity
• Most reviews are older than 12 months (5 of 7 from 2021-2022); only 2 reviews from 2023, suggesting potential recency bias
• Pricing dimension based on only 1 mention; insufficient data to reliably assess value proposition
• No negative or mixed reviews present to validate balance and credibility of feedback

While the WW Score of 89.3 reflects genuinely strong performance in professionalism and project completion, the uniformly perfect ratings, limited recency, and minimal pricing data suggest this score should be treated with moderate caution—it likely reflects genuine quality but may not capture the full range of customer experience or current pricing practices.

States Plumbing demonstrates exceptional performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is the strongest area, with 47 reviews explicitly praising punctuality, responsiveness, courteous demeanor, and communication. Project completion is consistently reliable with 45 mentions of jobs finished properly, often with extra attention to detail and follow-through on callbacks. Experience and technical skill are well-documented across 38 reviews, with customers noting knowledgeable problem-solving and quality workmanship. Pricing is fair and competitive according to 28 reviews, with transparent quotes and no hidden charges. The single negative review (2.0 stars) regarding a toilet installation issue is an outlier; while Curtis was responsive and professional, the underlying problem (uneven floor) was ultimately beyond his scope, and the customer was left dissatisfied despite his efforts.

• One significant negative review (Feb 2023) regarding a toilet replacement that resulted in persistent leaks and $825 in charges. While Curtis was responsive and attempted multiple solutions, the customer felt abandoned when the root cause (uneven floor) required external contractor involvement. This suggests potential gaps in diagnostic thoroughness or managing customer expectations on complex jobs.
• Review dates span from 2010 to 2024, with the majority (40+ reviews) from 2018 onwards. Most recent reviews are from 2021-2024, providing strong current data. Only one review is older than 5 years.
• No patterns of fake reviews detected. Reviews contain specific details (job types, prices, names, timelines), varied language, and authentic customer voices. The single 2-star review adds credibility to the dataset by showing genuine critical feedback rather than universal 5-star inflation.

This WW Score of 89.2 is highly reliable, based on 50 usable reviews with strong mention counts across all dimensions (28-47 mentions each), consistent positive feedback spanning 14 years, and one substantive negative review that provides realistic context. The score reflects a genuinely excellent contractor with minor risk factors related to complex diagnostic situations.

Blake Pipeline, led by Joe Blake, receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four scored dimensions. Professionalism is a standout theme, with the vast majority of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, communication, friendliness, and responsiveness — including callbacks, follow-up contact, and on-site explanations. Project completion is equally strong, with reviewers consistently describing jobs that were fully resolved, often in situations where other contractors had already failed. Experience and technical skill are highlighted in nearly every review, with specific mentions of specialized leak-detection equipment, hydrogen/nitrogen pressurization, gas sniffers, and pipeline locating tools that produced precise results. Pricing is mentioned positively in seven reviews, with terms like 'reasonable,' 'affordable,' and 'worth every penny,' though it is the least-discussed dimension and thus carries slightly less weight.

• One review (2021-06-10) contains no text — only a 5-star rating. It was excluded from usable data and dimension scoring.
• Two reviews share the identical text ('Blake Pipeline was fantastic. Responded quickly, showed up as scheduled, and promptly found our leak. Joe was fantastic to work with. Really went above and beyond what I expected and at a reasonable cost. I highly recommend!!') posted on different dates (2021-06-10 and 2020-12-08). This is a potential duplicate or copy-paste review and warrants mild suspicion. Confidence has not been significantly reduced given the large volume of detailed, unique reviews, but this pattern is flagged.
• All 28 usable reviews are 5-star ratings with zero negative or mixed reviews. While the detailed and specific nature of most reviews reduces fake-review concern, the complete absence of any critical feedback across 29 reviews is statistically unusual and should be noted.
• Several reviews are older than 12 months (dating back to 2019–2022). Recency weighting was applied, giving greater emphasis to the 10 reviews from 2023–2024, though the older reviews were consistent in tone and content.

This WW Score is based on a substantial volume of 28 usable reviews with rich, specific detail across all four dimensions, yielding HIGH confidence ratings across the board; however, the all-5-star pattern and one confirmed duplicate review introduce a minor reliability caveat that prevents a perfect trust assessment.