Find Nearby Plumbers In Murrieta, California

This aggregated review set spans a very large number of contractors and plumbers operating under similar business names (Affordable Plumbing, Abel/Able Plumbing, Joseph's Affordable Plumbing, and others), making it a mixed-entity dataset rather than a single contractor profile. The majority of reviews are strongly positive, praising responsiveness, punctuality, friendliness, and fair pricing across many individual technicians such as Avi, Noe, Angelo, Bob, Chris, Rigo, and others. However, a meaningful minority of negative reviews — roughly 15 to 20 percent of substantive reviews — describe serious issues including incomplete work, no-shows, dishonest pricing, rude owner behavior, property damage left unaddressed, and failure to honor callbacks or warranties. Pricing feedback is mixed: many reviewers praise affordability and transparency, while a notable number describe hidden charges, inflated quotes, or prices that far exceeded estimates. Project completion is similarly split, with many jobs praised as thorough and timely, but a recurring pattern of abandoned work, repeat visits for the same unresolved issue, and jobs left incomplete dragging the score down significantly.

• MULTI-ENTITY DATASET WARNING: Reviews appear to originate from multiple distinct businesses operating under similar names (e.g., Affordable Plumbing in Tucson AZ, West Hollywood CA, Chicago IL, Georgia, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and others). Scores reflect an aggregate and should not be applied to any single contractor without filtering by location and technician name.
• FAKE REVIEW SUSPICION — MODERATE: A subset of reviews, particularly those dated 2017-06-08 through 2017-06-13 and 2018-06-08, share identical or near-identical dates with no review text detail (e.g., 'Excellent workmanship', 'Great job', 'Excellent', 'Very well'). These appear potentially bulk-submitted and have been weighted conservatively.
• NO-TEXT REVIEWS EXCLUDED: Approximately 15 to 20 reviews contained no review text and only a star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence per scoring rules.
• RECENCY NOTE: Reviews span from approximately 2000 to June 2025. A significant portion of reviews predate 2020 and some predate 2015. Recency weighting was applied, giving greater influence to reviews from 2023 to 2025, which remain largely positive but include several serious complaints.
• NEGATIVE PATTERN — OWNER CONDUCT: Multiple independent negative reviews across different apparent business locations describe the owner or manager as rude, argumentative, or retaliatory toward customers who complained. This is a recurring behavioral flag that reduces confidence in professionalism scores.
• NEGATIVE PATTERN — INCOMPLETE WORK AND NO-SHOWS: Multiple reviews across different time periods describe technicians failing to show up for scheduled appointments without notice, jobs left unfinished, and management refusing to return to correct their own errors. This materially reduces the project completion score.
• NEGATIVE PATTERN — PRICING DISPUTES: Several reviews describe quotes that escalated significantly after work began, charges for work not performed, and refusal to itemize costs. One review describes a quote growing from $75 to $7,000. These are serious red flags for pricing transparency.
• PROPERTY DAMAGE COMPLAINTS: At least three reviews describe property damage caused by technicians (scratched toilet, flooded house, broken shower door) with the company refusing to accept responsibility or make repairs.

This WW Score carries HIGH data confidence due to the large volume of reviews, but LOW entity reliability because the dataset aggregates reviews for multiple distinct businesses operating under similar names across different US cities and states; consumers should treat this score as a general industry benchmark rather than a rating for any single contractor, and must independently verify the specific business and technician before hiring.

Prime Plumbing receives strong and consistent praise for professionalism, with the vast majority of reviewers highlighting friendly, courteous, punctual, and communicative technicians across a large and diverse review base spanning many years. Technical experience and workmanship are similarly well-regarded, with numerous reviewers citing knowledgeable technicians who diagnosed and resolved complex issues effectively. Project completion is generally solid, with most jobs described as finished correctly and on time, though a meaningful minority of negative reviews describe abandoned work, unresolved callbacks, misdiagnoses requiring repeat visits, and jobs left incomplete — including at least one case of water damage caused by faulty repair. Pricing is the most significant drag on the score: a substantial and recurring pattern of complaints describes charges perceived as grossly excessive, hidden fees, dispatch charges not rolled into jobs, credit card surcharges, and instances of what reviewers characterize as predatory pricing targeting elderly or uninformed customers — this dimension alone pulls the overall score down considerably.

• DUPLICATE REVIEWS DETECTED: The review 'Thank you Brandon for the great service!' (5-star) appears verbatim on 2025-06-07 and 2025-06-04. The review 'My plumber Bobby C was friendly and highly skillful...' appears verbatim on 2025-06-06 and 2025-06-03. These are likely fake or bot-submitted duplicate reviews and have been flagged; confidence in the 5-star cluster from early June 2025 is reduced.
• SUSPICIOUS GENERIC REVIEWS: A significant number of reviews consist of a single sentence or less with no specific detail (e.g., 'Great job', 'He did a great job', 'Awesome service'). Several blank-text reviews with 5-star ratings are present and provide no usable data.
• ONE REVIEW REFERENCES A DIFFERENT COMPANY NAME: One review explicitly praises 'Modern Septic Plumbing in Ocala' rather than Prime Plumbing, suggesting it may have been posted to the wrong business profile or is fabricated.
• PRICING COMPLAINTS ARE NUMEROUS AND SPECIFIC: At least 20+ reviews across multiple years describe overcharging, including $554 to snake a drain, $847.60 to unclog two toilets, $3,000 for a 40-gallon water heater, $600+ for simple snaking jobs, and $475 for an outdoor spigot. Multiple reviewers explicitly state the company targets elderly customers.
• FOLLOW-THROUGH AND CALLBACK FAILURES: Multiple independent reviews describe the company failing to return calls for weeks or months, not honoring quotes, not completing jobs after initial visits, and in one case abandoning an emergency repair mid-job. This is a systemic pattern, not isolated incidents.
• RECENCY NOTE: Reviews span from 2012 to 2025. The scoring gives appropriate weight to the large volume of recent reviews (2024-2025), which are more representative of current operations. Older reviews (pre-2020) reference specific technicians and owners (e.g., Dana) who may no longer be with the company, suggesting possible ownership or operational changes over time.
• UNRESOLVED DAMAGE CLAIM: At least one reviewer (January 2024) describes a botched toilet repair that caused water damage to ceilings and walls, with the company admitting human error but then failing to follow up or provide resolution — a serious project completion and liability concern.

This WW Score is based on a very large review set (290 reviews) spanning over a decade, giving HIGH statistical confidence in the dimensional scores; however, the presence of confirmed duplicate reviews, numerous generic or blank reviews, and a strong recurring pattern of pricing complaints and follow-through failures means the score should be treated as a realistic mid-range assessment — Prime Plumbing delivers competent and professional service in many cases but carries meaningful and well-documented risk around pricing transparency and job completion reliability.

Prestige Plumbing has a large and predominantly positive review base spanning many years, with recurring praise for responsiveness, punctuality, technical skill, and fair pricing across dozens of detailed reviews. However, a meaningful cluster of negative reviews — including serious allegations of price gouging, bait-and-switch pricing, no-shows, abandoned jobs, rude behavior, and poor workmanship — significantly tempers the overall score. Pricing in particular is a split dimension: many customers praised affordability and transparency, while several others explicitly described being charged double quoted amounts, overcharged for unrendered services, or pressured into expensive unnecessary work. Project completion is similarly mixed, with multiple reviews describing technicians who failed to return to finish jobs, ghosted customers after quoting, or left work incomplete. The experience dimension scores highest, as the majority of detailed reviews affirm genuine technical competence, but a handful of reviews describe incorrect diagnoses, faulty repairs, and property damage during work.

• DUPLICATE REVIEWS DETECTED: Multiple reviews appear to be exact or near-exact duplicates posted on the same or adjacent dates (e.g., two identical 'Poor quality of work' reviews on 2024-08-22, two identical 'Chico and crew did amazing work' reviews on 2023-01-16 and 2023-01-17, two identical 'Nick was great to deal with' reviews on 2024-05-29, two identical 'Very good job with good workmanshif' reviews on 2024-05-31, two identical 'Did excellent job' reviews on 2024-05-30, two identical 'Everything was fine' reviews on 2024-06-05, two identical 'So professional' reviews on 2024-06-03, two identical 'The plumber did a good job' reviews on 2024-07-22, two identical 'I spoke with Nick' reviews on 2024-08-04, two identical 'I had a great experience with Prestige Plumbing, thanks to Chico' reviews on 2024-09-03 and 2024-09-12, and two identical 'Shout out to Scott' reviews on 2023-12-01). These duplicates inflate the positive review count and reduce reliability.
• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN SUSPECTED: A large cluster of reviews dated exactly 2025-05-10 and 2025-06-02 through 2025-06-08 contain very short, generic, low-detail praise (e.g., 'LUIS IS THE BEST', 'Amazing Work by Luis great service', 'A good job y professional', 'Thank you Christian Correa!'). Several of these contain no substantive detail about the job performed, which is consistent with solicited or incentivized review patterns. Confidence in this recent cluster is reduced.
• BLANK REVIEWS: At least 5 reviews contain no text at all (only a 5-star rating). These were excluded from dimension scoring but counted in total reviews analyzed.
• SERIOUS NEGATIVE ALLEGATIONS: Multiple 1-star reviews allege bait-and-switch pricing (quoted $450, charged $3,550+), double-charging after seeing a veteran's license plate, charging for services not rendered, no-shows on multiple scheduled appointments, ghosting customers after quoting, a technician who refused to complete work and left a mess, and a plumber who called a customer's husband a liar and treated a woman disrespectfully. These are not isolated incidents and span multiple years.
• ROAD CONDUCT COMPLAINTS: At least 3 separate reviews (2020, 2024, 2024) describe reckless or aggressive driving behavior by company vehicle operators, including speeding at 90mph with unsecured loads, cutting lanes, and road rage incidents. While not directly related to plumbing quality, these reflect on company culture and employee conduct.
• MULTI-ENTITY CONCERN: Reviews reference many different named technicians and locations (Hawaii, Florida, California, North Carolina), suggesting this may be a franchise, aggregated listing, or name-shared business rather than a single contractor. Scores should be interpreted with caution as they may reflect multiple distinct operations under one brand name.
• RECENCY NOTE: The most recent reviews (May-June 2025) are disproportionately short and generic, while the most detailed and credible reviews — both positive and negative — span 2019 through 2024. The 2025 cluster shows hallmarks of a review solicitation campaign and should be weighted lower.

This WW Score carries moderate-to-high data confidence due to the large review volume, but the score itself should be treated with caution given confirmed duplicate reviews, a suspected solicited-review campaign in the most recent period, serious and recurring negative allegations across multiple years, and strong evidence that this listing may aggregate reviews from multiple distinct business entities operating under the same name.

AM PM Plumbing has a large and broadly positive review base spanning over a decade, with many customers praising punctuality, friendliness, and technical competence across numerous technicians including Jose, Brian, Dax, Frankie, Clint, and others. However, a significant cluster of negative reviews — many specifically tied to home warranty (AHS) jobs — describes a consistent pattern of inflated 'modification' charges ranging from $525 to $675+ for work customers and independent contractors deemed unnecessary or grossly overpriced, which materially drags down both the pricing and project completion scores. Communication failures, including no-shows, unreturned calls, and unresponsive office staff, appear repeatedly across multiple years and represent a genuine operational weakness. The professionalism score is tempered by multiple credible accounts of rude technicians, threatening behavior over payment, and poor follow-through on estimates and callbacks. Experience scores remain relatively higher because many positive reviews specifically cite skilled diagnostics and quality workmanship, but shoddy work complaints from a minority of reviewers prevent a top-tier score.

• FAKE REVIEW CONCERN: A notable cluster of reviews dated 2025-02-09 and 2025-03-11 show highly similar patterns — short, generic praise with initials appended (e.g., 'JG', 'G'), repetitive phrasing ('top notch', 'knowledgeable'), and several blank 5-star reviews with no text. Multiple reviews reference 'Brian and his team' with nearly identical language and the same appended initials, suggesting possible coordinated or incentivized review activity. Confidence in the most recent review cluster is reduced.
• BLANK REVIEWS: Approximately 30+ reviews contain no text and only a 5-star rating. These have been excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence per scoring rules.
• HOME WARRANTY SCAM PATTERN: At least 7 independent negative reviews (spanning 2023–2024) describe a near-identical scheme involving inflated 'modification' charges ($525–$675+) on AHS/home warranty jobs for parts customers and independent contractors deemed unnecessary or worth a fraction of the quoted price. This is a serious and credible pattern, not isolated complaints.
• RECENCY NOTE: The most recent reviews (2025) are predominantly 5-star and include suspected coordinated reviews. The negative reviews are concentrated in 2023–2024 and represent a meaningful share of substantive feedback. Reviews older than 3 years (pre-2022) are given reduced weight but still inform long-term patterns.
• COMMUNICATION FAILURES: Multiple reviews across different years cite unreturned calls, no-shows, unresponsive office staff, and failure to follow up on estimates — indicating a systemic issue rather than isolated incidents.
• BBB RATING: One reviewer explicitly states the company holds an 'F' rating on the Better Business Bureau, which corroborates the pattern of complaints about deceptive billing practices.
• IRRELEVANT REVIEWS: At least 2 reviews appear to reference a different company or service entirely (e.g., an HVAC technician named Fernando at a veterinary hospital, and a reference to 'PM Plumbing and Mechanical' with HVAC services). These were excluded from scoring.

This WW Score of 72.1 is based on a large review set and carries HIGH data confidence, but should be interpreted cautiously due to a credible and recurring pattern of deceptive billing on home warranty jobs, suspected coordinated positive reviews in the most recent period, and documented communication failures — consumers using home warranty services in particular should exercise significant caution.

This review set spans multiple years and appears to cover at least two distinct business entities — 'American Plumbing Service' (associated primarily with William Llamas in the Menifee/Sun City, CA area) and 'America's Plumbing and Drains' (associated with Chris Pratt in what appears to be a Midwest/East Coast market) — as well as a third entity that handled home warranty work and generated a large cluster of extremely negative reviews centered on a rude female owner/receptionist named Chris or Christine Kastanos. The positive reviews (predominantly 2021–2025) paint a picture of skilled, punctual, honest technicians — particularly William — who deliver quality workmanship at fair prices. However, the large volume of 1-star reviews (roughly 40+ reviews) describing no-shows, rude staff, abandoned jobs, bogus charges, and outright hostile customer service interactions significantly drags down the professionalism and project completion scores. Pricing feedback is mixed: several reviewers praised fair and competitive pricing while others cited excessive charges (e.g., $630 to snake a drain, $1,400 for a garbage disposal, $1,006 for a flange and wax ring). The experience dimension scores highest because the on-site technicians — across all entities — were consistently described as knowledgeable and skilled even in negative reviews.

• ENTITY CONFUSION WARNING: Reviews appear to cover at least two or three distinct businesses sharing similar names ('American Plumbing Service,' 'America's Plumbing and Drains,' and possibly a Michigan-based entity). Scores are therefore a blended average across potentially unrelated companies and should not be attributed to any single contractor without verification.
• FAKE REVIEW SUSPICION — MODERATE: A cluster of reviews dated 2025-05-10, 2025-04-10, 2025-03-11, and 2025-02-09 contain multiple blank-text 5-star entries (no review body). Blank 5-star reviews with no content are a known pattern of review padding and reduce confidence in the positive score cluster.
• RECENCY SPLIT: Positive reviews are heavily concentrated in 2021–2025 (primarily for William/American Plumbing Service CA). Negative reviews span 2011–2021 and appear concentrated around a different operator or ownership period. The score reflects this full historical record; the current operator (William) may perform significantly better than the blended score suggests.
• SEVERE CUSTOMER SERVICE PATTERN IN OLDER REVIEWS: Approximately 40 reviews (primarily 2013–2021) describe an identical pattern — a rude female owner/receptionist (named Chris, Christine, or Cindy), repeated no-shows, abandoned jobs, and hostile phone interactions. This is a systemic operational failure, not isolated incidents, and materially impacts the professionalism and project completion scores.
• PRICING OUTLIERS: At least three reviews cite specific charges that multiple reviewers and even a second-opinion plumber described as excessive or fabricated (e.g., unnecessary parts charges, $630 drain snake, $1,400 garbage disposal). One review explicitly documents a second plumber confirming that recommended parts were unnecessary. This warrants caution on the pricing dimension.
• ONE REVIEW explicitly states that American Plumbing Service (the CA entity) performed a water heater installation with at least 9 major code violations identified by a city inspector, requiring complete reinstallation by a competitor. This is a serious workmanship flag even though it is a single data point.
• BLANK REVIEWS EXCLUDED FROM SCORING: 10+ reviews contained no text and only a star rating. These were counted in total reviews analyzed but not used to score any dimension, per scoring rules.

This WW Score carries LOW-TO-MODERATE reliability as a guide to any single contractor because the review pool almost certainly blends multiple distinct business entities across different geographies and ownership periods, making it impossible to cleanly attribute the negative or positive signals to one operator without independent verification.

Jason at CD Mobile RV Service has a strong base of positive reviews praising his technical knowledge, fair pricing, and willingness to help customers over the phone without charging — a recurring and credible pattern across many years of reviews. However, professionalism is the most contested dimension: a significant minority of reviews (roughly 10 out of 68) describe Jason becoming hostile, dismissive, or unresponsive when customers ask too many questions, negotiate pricing, or request rescheduling — and these complaints span multiple years including as recently as October 2024, suggesting a persistent behavioral pattern rather than isolated incidents. Project completion is generally strong but is tempered by one serious safety-related failure (wheel bearings repacked but both right-side wheels departed the rig shortly after), one abandoned AC installation, and multiple complaints about unresponsiveness or failure to follow through on quotes. Pricing scores well overall, with many reviewers explicitly praising fair or below-expected charges, though two reviewers found rates high and one received a dismissive response to a counter-offer. Experience scores highest, with consistent and specific praise for diagnostic skill, technical breadth across electrical, plumbing, HVAC, and appliance systems, and problem-solving ability.

• BEHAVIORAL PATTERN — HOSTILITY: At least 6 reviews across 2017–2024 independently describe Jason becoming rude, dismissive, or hostile when customers ask questions, negotiate, or push back. This is a consistent and credible pattern, not isolated incidents, and materially lowers the professionalism score.
• SERIOUS SAFETY INCIDENT: One reviewer (March 2019) reports that wheel bearings serviced by Jason failed catastrophically within 5 miles, with both right-side wheels departing the rig and causing significant damage. This is an unresolved and serious workmanship concern that weighs heavily on project completion and experience scores.
• RESPONSIVENESS FAILURES: Multiple reviews (2016, 2019, 2023) cite Jason failing to return calls, respond to messages, or follow through on quotes over extended periods — sometimes weeks. This is a recurring operational weakness.
• REVIEW SPAN: Reviews span 2014–2024 (10 years). The majority of positive reviews are from 2016–2021. More recent reviews (2022–2024) include a higher proportion of negative experiences, suggesting possible decline in service consistency. Recency weighting slightly reduces confidence in the positive score base.
• NO FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Positive reviews contain specific job details, named systems repaired, and varied writing styles. No significant fake review pattern identified, though some very brief 5-star reviews (e.g. 'Amazing work!!!') lack specifics and were weighted conservatively.
• ONE REVIEW REFERENCES 'HOWARD' NOT JASON: The December 2021 review mentioning 'Howard' appears to be a misplaced review for a different contractor and was excluded from dimension scoring but counted in total reviews analyzed.

This WW Score is based on a large and diverse review set spanning 10 years and carries HIGH statistical confidence, but the score should be interpreted cautiously given a documented pattern of hostility toward certain customer types, at least one serious safety-related workmanship failure, and recurring responsiveness issues — factors that make Jason a high-variance service provider whose quality of experience may depend significantly on the nature of the job and the customer interaction style.