Find Nearby Plumbers In Los Angeles, California

Plumbing Dudes earns strong marks across all four dimensions based on a large and detailed review set spanning 2018–2024. Professionalism is the standout dimension, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, communication, friendliness, and responsiveness — including same-day and emergency availability. Project completion is also very strong, with multiple reviewers noting jobs were finished completely, callbacks were honored without charge, and follow-through was consistent even when issues resurfaced. Experience scores high as well, with reviewers frequently citing Arman and other technicians solving problems that prior plumbers could not, and explaining issues clearly. Pricing is the weakest dimension: while many reviewers describe pricing as fair or reasonable, three reviewers explicitly called out high or unacceptable prices (garbage disposal labor at $225, toilet install quoted at $500, and a general warning that prices are significantly above average), which meaningfully pulls the pricing score down from what would otherwise be a higher mark.

• Three reviews explicitly flag pricing as high or above market rate (1-star review for $225 garbage disposal labor quote, 3-star review for $500 toilet installation quote, and a 3-star warning that prices are 'significantly higher than average'). This is a consistent and credible pricing concern that should be weighted seriously.
• One 4-star review (2019) describes a technician named Blas making an unusual and mildly coercive request for a new pair of gloves or a good Yelp review. This is an isolated incident and the company appears to have addressed similar issues in other reviews, but it is worth noting as a conduct flag.
• One updated review (2021, 4-star) references a prior bad experience with a technician who made exaggerated promises and did shoddy work. The owner personally corrected the situation, which reflects well on accountability, but the underlying incident is a quality-control flag.
• The vast majority of reviews are 5-star with very positive language. While the volume and specificity of reviews across many different named technicians and job types reduces fake review suspicion significantly, the near-universal 5-star rating warrants mild caution. No strong fake review pattern detected — reviews contain specific names, job details, and varied writing styles.
• Review recency is strong: the majority of reviews are from 2022–2024, with the most recent dated November 2024. Older reviews (2018–2019) are consistent in tone and content with recent ones, suggesting sustained quality over time.

This WW Score is based on 75 reviews with high specificity, named technicians, varied job types, and strong recency, making it one of the more reliable assessments possible — the pricing dimension is the primary area of genuine concern and has been scored conservatively to reflect the explicit negative feedback received.

Pride Plumbing and Rooter earns strong marks across all four dimensions, driven by an overwhelming volume of positive reviews praising responsiveness, punctuality, fair pricing, and completed work. Professionalism is the most frequently cited strength, with dozens of reviewers specifically noting courteous behavior, timely arrivals, and excellent communication — including after-hours and holiday availability. Pricing scores well, with many reviewers explicitly stating costs were lower than competing quotes and that quoted prices were honored without hidden charges; one reviewer noted after-hours pricing felt 'hefty,' and one negative review cited poor customer service when disputing work quality, which moderately tempers this dimension. Project completion is very strong, with the vast majority of reviewers confirming jobs were finished same-day or next-day, often going above and beyond the original scope; however, two negative reviews — one describing a plumber who arrived and refused to complete the job, and one describing a no-show with harassing follow-up calls — introduce meaningful concern and prevent a top-tier score. Experience scores well based on reviewers citing knowledgeable diagnosis, quality workmanship, and problem-solving on complex jobs, though one negative review explicitly cited poor workmanship quality, which is factored in conservatively.

• TWO SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE REVIEWS PRESENT: One reviewer (1-star, 2024-02-24) reports a plumber arrived and refused to complete a toilet removal, citing lack of experience or equipment — a direct contradiction to the experience dimension. One reviewer (1-star, 2024-02-09) reports a no-show, repeated unwanted phone calls after cancellation, and feeling unsafe — a serious professionalism and conduct concern.
• ONE ADDITIONAL NEGATIVE REVIEW (1-star, 2024-02-26) alleges extremely poor workmanship and describes the phone representative hanging up and blocking the customer when a complaint was raised — this directly contradicts the high professionalism scores seen elsewhere and raises a customer service red flag.
• POTENTIAL REVIEW CLUSTERING: A notable cluster of reviews appears on or around the same dates (e.g., multiple reviews on 2023-12-30, 2024-02-29, 2024-01-02, 2024-01-20), which may reflect genuine busy periods but warrants mild scrutiny. Phrasing across positive reviews is varied enough to not suggest coordinated fake reviews, but the near-universal 5-star rating pattern (79 of 82 reviews are 5-star) is statistically unusual and slightly reduces overall confidence.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of reviews are from within the past 12 months (late 2023 through October 2024), which is favorable for recency weighting. A smaller number of reviews date to late 2022, which are consistent in tone with recent reviews.
• NO FAKE REVIEW FLAG TRIGGERED: While phrasing is occasionally generic, most reviews include specific job details, plumber names, and situational context, which is inconsistent with coordinated fake review patterns. No flag is raised, but the 97% 5-star rate is noted.

This WW Score is based on a large and recent review set (82 reviews, majority within 12 months) and carries HIGH overall confidence, but prospective customers should weigh the three 1-star reviews carefully — particularly the reports of a job abandonment, a no-show with harassing follow-up, and alleged poor workmanship with hostile customer service — as these represent meaningful exceptions to an otherwise strong track record.

Chris at Roma Rooter earns exceptionally strong marks across all four dimensions, backed by a large and detailed review base spanning over a decade. Professionalism is the standout dimension, with an overwhelming majority of reviewers explicitly praising his punctuality, communication, honesty, and courteous demeanor. Pricing is consistently described as fair, reasonable, and transparent — with multiple reviewers noting he charged less than competitors or even less than his own estimate. Project completion is very strong, with nearly all jobs described as fully resolved, though one review noted a recurring backup issue within days of service, which Chris addressed responsively. Experience is well-documented across dozens of reviews citing his technical knowledge, problem-solving ability, and willingness to educate customers — including successfully resolving jobs that other plumbers could not.

• All 76 reviews are 5-star except one 4-star and one 1-star, which is an unusually high concentration of top ratings. However, the reviews contain specific job details, named individuals, unique scenarios, and varied writing styles, which strongly suggests authenticity rather than fabrication.
• The single 1-star review (2023-12-23) is a service mismatch complaint — the reviewer was told rooter service was not available — and does not reflect workmanship quality. This is noted but does not materially affect scoring.
• One review (2022-09-24) describes a recurring backup within 4-5 days of service. Chris responded quickly and offered a free follow-up visit, which reflects positively on his accountability. The reviewer attributed the issue partly to old pipes and incompatible toilets rather than poor workmanship.
• A significant portion of reviews (roughly 40%) are older than 3 years, with many dating back to 2010-2019. While these are consistent in tone and detail, more recent reviews (2022-2024) continue to reflect the same quality, suggesting sustained performance rather than decline.
• No patterns of fake reviews detected. Language, scenarios, and specifics vary meaningfully across reviews.

This WW Score is highly reliable, based on 76 reviews with rich, specific detail across all four scored dimensions, consistent performance over more than a decade, and no credible indicators of review manipulation.

Plumbing by JJ earns strong scores across all four dimensions, driven by an exceptionally large and consistent body of reviews. Professionalism is the standout dimension, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, fast response times (often under an hour), friendly attitudes, and clean workmanship. Pricing scores well overall — the vast majority of reviewers describe costs as reasonable or fair — but two negative pricing reviews (one alleging an outrageous estimate and one flagging the refusal to provide written estimates) prevent a higher score and introduce a meaningful caveat. Project completion is also very strong, with nearly all jobs described as fully resolved same-day or within a short timeframe, and at least one instance of a callback being honored promptly. Experience scores are solid, with multiple reviewers noting technical problem-solving (e.g., going to the roof to clear a stubborn drain, camera inspections, correct diagnosis of complex leaks), though a small number of reviews note initial incomplete work that required a return visit.

• One reviewer (2024-06-05) explicitly flagged that JJ Plumbing refuses to provide written estimates, which is a legitimate consumer concern and a transparency red flag for pricing practices.
• One reviewer (2022-07-11) rated 5 stars but described receiving an 'outrageous estimate,' suggesting a possible mismatch between star rating and review content — this review was scored on its text, not its star rating.
• One reviewer (2022-02-07, 4 stars) noted the plumber did not do a good job on the first visit and required a callback to complete the mainline unclog properly — this was factored into project completion scoring.
• The overwhelming majority of reviews are 5-star. While the volume and specificity of reviews reduce fake review suspicion significantly, the near-universal 5-star pattern warrants mild caution. Most reviews do contain specific details (technician names, job types, timeframes) which supports authenticity.
• Review dates span from 2022 to late 2024. The majority of reviews are within the past 24 months, with a strong cluster in 2023–2024, which supports recency confidence. No significant quality degradation trend was detected across time periods.

This WW Score is based on 74 reviews with a high volume of specific, detailed, and independently varied accounts, making it one of the more reliable scores possible — the primary sources of uncertainty are two pricing-related negative data points and one callback incident, all of which have been factored into the scoring conservatively.

Javier and Alliance United Plumbing receive overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism and experience mentioned in virtually every review. Reviewers consistently highlight his ability to correctly diagnose problems that other plumbers missed, his clear communication, and his honest, no-pressure approach. Project completion is strongly supported, with multiple reviewers noting jobs finished on time, follow-through on warranties, and no abandoned work. Pricing is frequently described as competitive, fair, and transparent, with one reviewer noting Javier even suggested a DIY fix to save the customer money. The consistency and specificity of praise across nearly all reviews lends high confidence to these scores.

• All 19 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative or mixed feedback, which warrants mild scrutiny.
• However, the reviews contain substantial specific detail — job types, property descriptions, named individuals, multi-visit accounts — which significantly reduces the likelihood of fabrication.
• The most recent review is dated 2021-11-02, meaning all reviews are more than 3 years old as of 2025. Recency is a concern; current performance cannot be confirmed from this dataset.
• No reviews mention any negative experience, callback failure, or unresolved issue, which is statistically unusual but not conclusively indicative of fake reviews given the specificity of content.

This WW Score carries HIGH confidence based on mention volume and review specificity, but should be interpreted with caution given that all reviews are over three years old and no negative feedback exists in the dataset.

323 Plumbing and Guy receive consistently strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently and enthusiastically cited quality — reviewers repeatedly highlight punctuality, clear communication, patience, and a respectful, honest demeanor. Project completion is nearly as strong, with multiple reviews describing jobs finished on time, same-day or next-day responses, follow-through on callbacks, and even a warranty-backed water heater install with a return visit to fix a failed pipe. Pricing scores well above average, with several reviewers explicitly noting that 323 Plumbing offered the most competitive and transparent quotes among multiple bids, and one reviewer praising their honesty in distinguishing necessary work from work that could wait. Experience is well-supported, with reviewers describing technically complex jobs — collapsed sewer mains, mold remediation, tankless water heater conversions — handled with skill and confidence that other plumbers could not match. All reviews are recent (within the past 14 months), which strengthens the reliability of this score.

• All 12 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative or mixed feedback — this warrants mild scrutiny, though the reviews contain specific job details, named technicians, and varied scenarios that reduce the likelihood of fabrication.
• Several reviews share similar praise patterns (punctuality, honesty, communication) which could reflect genuine brand consistency or mild review coaching — no definitive red flag, but noted.
• No reviews mention any negative experience, pricing dispute, or incomplete work — absence of any criticism across 12 reviews is statistically uncommon and slightly reduces raw confidence in the score ceiling.

This WW Score is based on 12 recent, detail-rich reviews covering all four scored dimensions with HIGH confidence across the board, making it a reliable representation of this contractor's current performance — though the absence of any negative feedback across all reviews suggests the score should be interpreted as a strong positive signal rather than a guaranteed ceiling.