Find Nearby Plumbers In Los Angeles, California

Mr. Sewer Rooter earns strong marks across all four dimensions, driven by a large volume of detailed, specific reviews spanning nearly a decade. Professionalism is the most frequently praised attribute, with dozens of reviewers explicitly citing punctuality, communication, updates, and courteous behavior from Robert and his crew. Pricing scores well overall — many reviewers noted competitive or reasonable estimates and price-matching — but is tempered by several serious complaints alleging overcharging, unnecessary work, and billing for services not rendered. Project completion is generally strong, with most reviewers confirming jobs were finished on time or ahead of schedule, permits handled, and follow-up honored; however, a meaningful cluster of negative reviews describes failed follow-through, unresolved original problems, and a six-month delay in filing city paperwork, which prevents a higher score. Experience scores well based on explicit praise for technical knowledge, problem diagnosis, and quality of workmanship across complex sewer jobs, though one negative review alleged a plumber arrived without proper tools.

• 6 reviews rated 1-star with substantive, specific complaints — these are credible negative signals and were fully weighted in scoring.
• One reviewer (2020-09-09) alleges overcharging by approximately $900 for a 3-foot pipe replacement compared to a competing plumber's estimate.
• One reviewer (2021-07-17) alleges a $10,000 estimate escalation from $200, charges for services not delivered (traffic guards, sidewalk paving), and a 6-month delay in filing city permits — a serious project completion and pricing flag.
• One reviewer (2023-12-06) alleges the hydro-jetting did not fix the problem, a $150 return charge for the same issue, and suspects intentional misconduct — credible pricing and completion concern.
• One reviewer (2021-07-06) paid $425 for a suspiciously short 10-minute hydro-jet, never received promised video footage despite multiple requests, and received no follow-up after a crack was identified — flags both completion and professionalism.
• One reviewer (2019-01-24) reports a plumber left a joint unglued causing a water leak discovered months later, and the original sink backup problem was never resolved — a direct project completion failure.
• One reviewer (2022-10-29) reports a technician arrived without a snake, left sewage on the floor uncleaned, and never completed the job — a serious professionalism and completion failure.
• One reviewer (2020-05-22) reports Robert came out for an estimate and never delivered it despite multiple follow-up calls over 8 days — a professionalism and responsiveness failure.
• One reviewer (2021-12-21) reports no follow-up and no follow-through after a service visit.
• A large majority of reviews are 5-star with enthusiastic language; however, most contain specific job details, named technicians, and described work types, which reduces fake review suspicion. The reviews appear largely authentic.
• Recency note: The most recent negative reviews are from 2023 and 2022, suggesting some service quality issues may be ongoing rather than historical. The most recent positive reviews are from early 2024, indicating the business is still active with satisfied customers.
• Several reviews are older than 3 years (pre-2022), including some from 2012, 2016, and 2017. These were included but given reduced implicit weight given the recency rule.

This WW Score is based on 75 reviews with a high volume of specific, detailed feedback across all four dimensions, making it one of the more reliable assessments possible; however, the presence of 8–9 credible negative reviews describing overcharging, incomplete work, and poor follow-through introduces meaningful uncertainty, and prospective customers should read the negative reviews carefully before hiring.

Happy Sam's Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 82.1, driven primarily by exceptional professionalism and reliable project completion. The company excels in responsiveness, punctuality, and technical expertise, with numerous customers praising quick response times, friendly demeanor, and thorough problem-solving. However, pricing emerges as a notable weakness, with three separate reviews explicitly alleging overcharging, bait-and-switch tactics, and price gouging in emergency situations. While the majority of reviews (72 of 75) are highly positive and recent, the pricing concerns are serious enough to warrant caution and suggest customers should obtain competitive bids before committing.

• PRICING INTEGRITY CONCERN: Three detailed negative reviews (2024-03-11, 2018-12-15, 2018-06-10) allege overcharging and bait-and-switch pricing tactics. The 2024 review is particularly credible, documenting specific price discrepancies ($900 vs $450 for same work, $3700 vs $1500 for combined work) with corroborating evidence from competing plumber. This pattern suggests systematic pricing issues in emergency/complex situations.
• POTENTIAL REVIEW AUTHENTICITY ISSUE: 68 of 75 reviews are 5-star ratings with highly positive language. While many contain specific details and vary in writing style (suggesting genuine reviews), the concentration of glowing reviews is unusually high. However, one 2017 review explicitly notes that Happy Sam's does NOT buy reviews in exchange for discounts, which adds credibility to the positive reviews.
• RECENCY BIAS: 40 of 75 reviews (53%) are from 2024 or 2023, with only 3 reviews older than 2020. Recent reviews are overwhelmingly positive, but the three pricing-related negative reviews span 2024, 2018, and 2018, suggesting this is a recurring issue rather than a historical problem.
• COMMUNICATION INCONSISTENCY: One 2017 review reports the owner was 'incredibly rude' on the phone and 'raised his voice,' contrasting sharply with the overwhelming majority of reviews praising professionalism and friendliness. This suggests inconsistent customer service quality or possible personnel changes.

This WW Score of 82.1 is reliable for assessing technical competence and professionalism (HIGH confidence), but customers should independently verify pricing before engaging Happy Sam's, particularly for emergency or complex jobs, due to credible allegations of overcharging in three separate reviews spanning multiple years.

The Affordable & Licensed Handyman demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 82.1. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 68 reviews explicitly praising punctuality, communication, responsiveness, and courteous demeanor. Project completion is solid across 59 mentions, though one significant negative review (1-star, July 2023) documents project abandonment and poor workmanship that substantially impacts this dimension. Experience and technical skill are well-documented across 51 reviews, with customers consistently noting quality workmanship and problem-solving ability. Pricing receives moderate confidence (32 mentions) with mixed feedback—many customers praise fair and reasonable rates, but several reviews note pricing is higher than competitors, and one customer complaint about estimate fees ($50-$100) suggests potential friction points.

• CRITICAL: One detailed 1-star review (July 26, 2023) documents severe project failure including abandonment after 3 days, poor workmanship (incomplete caulking, unprimed surfaces, failed paint application, poor baseboard joins), and alleged ghosting by owner Raul. Customer claims to have supplied materials and paid deposit but received incomplete work requiring full redo by another contractor. This is a material quality and completion issue.
• SECONDARY NEGATIVE: Another 1-star review (May 31, 2023) alleges rude and condescending communication via copy-paste responses, contradicting the otherwise strong professionalism scores.
• PRICING CONCERN: One 2-star review (July 13, 2022) criticizes $50-$100 estimate fees when competitors offer free estimates, suggesting potential customer friction on pricing transparency.
• NEGATIVE RESPONSE PATTERN: Two 1-star reviews (July 11, 2022 and May 11, 2019) appear to be customer responses to owner rebuttals, suggesting potential conflict resolution issues and defensive communication.
• FOLLOW-UP FAILURE: One 2-star review (January 18, 2020) documents failure to follow up after initial same-day service—customer never received promised invoice or communication.
• RECENCY NOTE: Most reviews are from 2022-2024 (strong recent data), but the July 2023 project abandonment review is recent enough to be material. The pattern of negative reviews is sporadic rather than clustered, suggesting isolated incidents rather than systemic failure.
• REVIEW AUTHENTICITY: The overwhelming majority of reviews (80+ out of 87) are 5-star with detailed, specific, and varied language describing different projects and team members (Raul, Frank, Jesus, Tony, Larry, Sergio, etc.). This diversity and specificity suggests authentic reviews. The negative reviews are also detailed and credible, not generic complaints.

This WW Score of 82.1 is reliable with HIGH overall confidence due to large sample size (87 reviews) and strong data across all dimensions. However, the score masks material risk: while the contractor demonstrates consistent professionalism and experience across the majority of projects, the documented project abandonment and poor workmanship in the July 2023 review, combined with sporadic communication failures, indicate this is not a zero-defect operation. Customers should expect generally strong service but acknowledge non-zero risk of significant project issues. The pricing dimension carries MODERATE confidence and suggests customers should expect rates above market average. Recommend requesting detailed scope documentation and milestone-based payment terms to mitigate completion risk.

M.Y. Handyman Services (Miguel) demonstrates strong overall performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 68 mentions highlighting punctuality, responsiveness, communication, and courteous demeanor. Project completion is equally robust with 71 mentions confirming jobs finished on time, thoroughly, and with follow-through. Experience is well-documented across 52 mentions showing skilled workmanship and problem-solving ability. Pricing is the weakest dimension (72.0) with 22 mentions; while many reviews praise fair pricing, several negative reviews explicitly cite overpricing relative to competitors, creating a mixed perception. The WW Score of 82.1 reflects a reliable, professional contractor with strong execution but pricing concerns that prevent a higher rating.

• PRICING INCONSISTENCY: Multiple 1-star reviews (2023-04-29, 2023-04-09, 2023-05-02) explicitly cite overpricing—one customer reported a $650 dishwasher installation quote when others charged nothing extra; another reported $1,200 for drywall patch when competitors quoted $600. This contradicts the majority of positive pricing mentions and suggests either selective pricing, scope misunderstanding, or legitimate price variation by project complexity.
• COMMUNICATION FAILURES: Three 1-star reviews (2023-05-02, 2023-08-08, 2023-11-04) document communication breakdowns—delayed/missing quotes, vague responses ('I am booked for this time' without context), and failure to follow up after initial contact. These are isolated but serious incidents affecting trust.
• SCOPE/CAPABILITY MISMATCH: One 1-star review (2023-10-16) describes a significant service failure where Miguel agreed to a job (mirror hanging with earthquake safety requirements, ladder needed) but arrived unprepared (no ladder) and refused to complete work, then refused callback to fix crooked coat hanger. This suggests occasional overcommitment or capability assessment failures.
• RECENCY BIAS: 65 of 87 reviews (75%) are from 2024 or late 2023. Older reviews (2020-2022) are uniformly positive with no pricing complaints, suggesting either improved service recently or that dissatisfied customers from earlier periods did not leave reviews.
• REVIEW AUTHENTICITY: The overwhelming majority (78 of 87 reviews, 90%) are 5-star ratings. While many contain specific details and varied project types (reducing fake review risk), the concentration is unusually high. However, the 9 negative reviews are detailed and credible, suggesting the dataset is not artificially inflated.

This WW Score of 82.1 is highly reliable for assessing professionalism and project completion (both HIGH confidence with 68+ mentions), but pricing perception should be treated with caution due to conflicting evidence and moderate mention count (22). The contractor appears genuinely skilled and responsive but may have inconsistent pricing practices or communication lapses on complex/large projects. Recommend requesting detailed written quotes and clarifying scope before engagement.

Sal's Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 82.1, driven primarily by exceptional professionalism and reliable project completion. The company excels in responsiveness, punctuality, and technician courtesy, with 58 mentions of professional conduct and 62 mentions of timely job completion. Technical competence is well-documented across 35 reviews, with technicians consistently demonstrating problem-solving ability and knowledge. However, pricing emerges as a notable weakness with only 16 mentions but a concerning pattern: while many customers praise fair pricing, four reviews explicitly cite aggressive initial quotes, pressure to pay above estimates, or pricing disputes that damaged trust. This pricing inconsistency is the primary factor preventing a higher overall score.

• PRICING CONCERN: Four reviews (2024-04-20, 2023-11-21, 2023-05-31, 2022-03-28) document pricing issues including initial quotes of $700+ for simple jobs, pressure to pay above original estimates, and lack of transparency. One customer reported being charged $1,300 more than the original $1,200 estimate for the same scope of work.
• PROFESSIONALISM INCONSISTENCY: Two reviews (2023-05-31, 2023-02-14) report unprofessional execution despite job completion—one technician left a bathroom covered in black water and left a cleanout open; another bent a washer during a free estimate, resulting in $2,400 in damage.
• NO-SHOW INCIDENTS: Two reviews (2023-11-21, 2023-02-14) document missed appointments or late arrivals without proper communication, with one customer rating this as 1.0 star.
• RECENCY NOTE: Most reviews are from 2021-2024 with strong concentration in 2023-2024 (60+ reviews), indicating current performance data is reliable. Only 5 reviews predate 2021.
• FAKE REVIEW RISK - LOW: While many reviews mention the same technicians (Thomas, Geno, Brian, Wilson) repeatedly and use similar positive phrasing, this appears consistent with a real business with repeat customers and reliable staff rather than fabricated reviews. Specific details, varied scenarios, and the presence of legitimate negative reviews support authenticity.

This WW Score of 82.1 is highly reliable, based on 75 reviews with strong data across all dimensions. The HIGH overall confidence is justified by 58+ mentions per dimension for professionalism and project completion. However, the score should be interpreted with awareness that pricing practices show material inconsistency—customers should request detailed written estimates and clarify scope before work begins, as the company's pricing reputation is mixed despite strong execution quality.

Santos Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent responsiveness, punctuality, and courteous behavior across 28 reviews. Project completion is reliable with same-day service and thorough follow-through documented in 26 reviews. Technical experience is solid with skilled diagnostics and problem-solving evident in 18 reviews. However, pricing presents a notable concern: while most reviews praise fair pricing, two detailed 2024 reviews (March and April) describe aggressive upselling tactics and questionable diagnostic practices, with one customer reporting $500 in unnecessary charges. This pricing inconsistency significantly lowers the pricing dimension despite positive mentions in other reviews.

• Two recent negative reviews (March 2024 and April 2024) describe potential upselling and misdiagnosis, suggesting possible inconsistency in service quality or pricing practices. The March 2024 review is particularly damaging, alleging either incompetence or deliberate deception to a female homeowner.
• Majority of reviews (30 of 37) are from 2020-2023, with only 7 reviews from 2024. Recent reviews show deterioration in pricing practices compared to historical pattern.
• April 2024 review explicitly states customer was asked for a Yelp review after service, which may indicate review solicitation bias in the dataset.
• Pricing dimension shows high variance: most reviews cite 'fair' or 'reasonable' pricing, but two detailed recent reviews document significant overcharges ($120 for 2-minute task, $500 for work customer completed in 10 minutes). This suggests either inconsistent pricing or targeting of certain customer demographics.

This score should be treated with moderate caution. While the overall WW Score of 82.1 reflects genuinely strong professionalism and project completion across a large sample, the recent emergence of serious pricing and diagnostic integrity concerns (2024 reviews) suggests the company may be experiencing quality degradation or inconsistent service delivery. The score is reliable for historical performance but may overstate current trustworthiness.