Find Nearby Plumbers In Los Angeles, California

Pacific Plumbing Team earns strong marks across all four dimensions, driven by a large volume of detailed, specific reviews praising punctuality, communication, and follow-through. Professionalism is the most frequently mentioned dimension, with dozens of reviewers citing named technicians who were courteous, on time, and communicative — though two notable 1-star reviews describe serious scheduling failures and unprofessional conduct that prevent a higher score. Pricing scores lower than other dimensions because while many reviewers call pricing fair or reasonable, two reviewers explicitly felt overcharged (one paying $90 for a $12 part, another noting costs were 50–100% higher than competitors), and one review directly states 'not cheap.' Project completion is a strong suit, with the vast majority of reviewers confirming jobs were finished promptly and correctly, including a callback case where unexpected issues were returned to and resolved. Experience scores well based on specific mentions of technical skill, problem diagnosis, and going above and beyond, including a contractor-reviewer who praised workmanship quality.

• Three reviews contain no text — only a 5-star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• One review (2024-07-08) is unusually long and generic, reads like a templated or AI-generated review with no specific technician name, no specific detail about the job, and overly formal phrasing. Treated with reduced weight.
• The review corpus is overwhelmingly 5-star (97+ out of 101), which warrants mild fake-review scrutiny. However, the majority of reviews name specific technicians (Andrew, Gleb, Artur, Akmal, Jim, Arthur, Paul, Igor, etc.) and describe specific jobs, which is a strong authenticity signal. The pattern is more consistent with a genuinely well-reviewed business than a fabricated review set.
• Two legitimate 1-star and one 2-star review exist and were fully weighted. The 1-star reviews describe real scheduling failures and dismissive technician behavior. The 2-star review describes a pricing transparency issue. These meaningfully reduce professionalism and pricing scores.
• Review dates span from 2022 to June 2025. The majority of reviews (approximately 65+) are from within the past 12 months, which is a positive recency signal. Older reviews (2022–2023) were given slightly reduced weight but remain directionally consistent with recent reviews.

This WW Score is based on 101 reviews with strong recency, high specificity, and named technicians across most entries, making it one of the more reliable assessments possible — the score of 87.4 should be treated with HIGH confidence, tempered only by a small number of credible negative experiences and one potentially templated review.

Craig Korin Construction and Plumbing has an overwhelmingly positive review record across a large volume of reviews spanning 2017–2024, with consistent praise for responsiveness, fair pricing, technical skill, and job completion. The vast majority of reviewers explicitly commend his communication, punctuality, and honest pricing — often noting his quotes came in significantly lower than competitors. His experience and problem-solving ability are highlighted repeatedly, including complex jobs other plumbers refused or mishandled. However, four 1-star reviews raise meaningful concerns: two cite no-shows or failure to honor scheduled appointments, one describes Craig as rude and condescending, and one alleges he became unresponsive after payment — these negative signals are factored into the scores and prevent a higher rating. One 1-star review about a driver taking a parking spot is unrelated to service quality and was excluded from scoring.

• NEGATIVE PATTERN — PUNCTUALITY/RELIABILITY: Two separate 1-star reviews (2021-06-18 and 2021-07-25) explicitly describe missed or significantly delayed appointments with no proactive communication. This is a direct contradiction to the punctuality praise seen in positive reviews and warrants caution.
• NEGATIVE PATTERN — ATTITUDE: One 1-star review (2022-05-25) describes Craig as 'rude, condescending, dirty and nasty,' resulting in the reviewer asking him to leave. This is a significant professionalism concern even if isolated.
• NEGATIVE PATTERN — POST-PAYMENT FOLLOW-THROUGH: One 1-star review (2019-06-11) alleges Craig became unresponsive after being paid and reviewed, described as 'standard LA contractor behavior.' This affects project completion and professionalism confidence slightly.
• IRRELEVANT REVIEW EXCLUDED: One 1-star review (2021-06-10) about a company driver aggressively taking a parking spot at a laundry room was excluded from all dimension scoring as it does not reflect contractor service quality.
• FAKE REVIEW RISK — LOW-DETAIL POSITIVES: Several older reviews (2019-06-11 cluster) share the same date with no timestamp and contain very brief, generic praise ('Great', 'Professional, knowledgeable and does not cut corners'). This date clustering is suspicious and may indicate bulk review submission. Confidence is not significantly reduced given the large volume of detailed, specific reviews, but these entries were treated as lower-weight evidence.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of reviews are from 2020–2024, providing strong recency coverage. Older reviews (2017–2019) are consistent in tone and were included but given slightly less weight.

This WW Score is based on 91 reviews with a high volume of detailed, specific, and recent feedback, making it one of the more reliable assessments possible — however, the presence of four 1-star reviews citing missed appointments, rude behavior, and post-payment unresponsiveness introduces meaningful uncertainty, and prospective customers should weigh those accounts carefully alongside the strong positive majority.

Peter Lai Plumbing (primarily Andy and Kenji) earns very high marks across professionalism, project completion, and experience, with an overwhelming volume of reviews praising punctuality, responsiveness, honesty, and technical skill. A standout theme across dozens of reviews is the company's consistent refusal to upsell unnecessary services, which strongly supports their integrity and professionalism scores. Project completion is rated highly as jobs are routinely finished on time, often faster than expected, with follow-through on callbacks and warranties honored. Pricing is the weakest dimension: while many reviewers call pricing fair or reasonable, four reviews explicitly cite overcharging or receiving quotes significantly higher than competitors, pulling the pricing score down meaningfully. Experience scores near the top due to repeated evidence of skilled diagnostics, creative problem-solving, and technical depth across a wide range of plumbing tasks.

• PRICING COMPLAINTS: Four reviews (1-star: 2018-12-15, 1-star: 2021-10-01, 3-star: 2021-05-04, 3-star: 2022-10-14) explicitly cite pricing as too high or uncompetitive. This is a meaningful signal and prevents a higher pricing score despite the majority of reviewers calling prices fair.
• ONE VAGUE NEGATIVE REVIEW: The 1-star review from 2024-05-03 ('Rip off. Period!') provides no specifics and cannot be scored on any dimension. It is noted but given minimal analytical weight due to lack of detail.
• RECENCY NOTE: The review set spans from 2017 to 2024. The majority of reviews (approximately 60+) are from 2020 onward, with a strong cluster in 2021-2024, supporting high recency confidence in the overall score.
• NO FAKE REVIEW PATTERNS DETECTED: Despite the high volume of 5-star reviews, the reviews contain specific names, job details, dates, and unique narratives. Language varies meaningfully across reviews. No coordinated fake review pattern is suspected.
• TWO ESTIMATE-ONLY REVIEWS: Two reviews (2024-06-24 and 2024-06-05) explicitly note no work was performed. These were scored only on dimensions directly evidenced (professionalism, pricing transparency) and excluded from project completion scoring.

This WW Score is based on 83 reviews spanning seven years with strong recency weighting, high mention counts across all four dimensions, and no detected fake review patterns, making it a highly reliable representation of this contractor's typical service quality.

Castaneda's 24/7 Plumbing earns strong scores across all four dimensions, driven by a large and consistent body of reviews spanning 2021–2024. Professionalism is the most frequently mentioned dimension, with dozens of reviewers praising punctuality, communication, friendliness, and responsiveness — including same-day and emergency weekend service. Pricing scores well due to repeated mentions of fair, transparent, and competitive quotes with no hidden fees or upselling, though one negative review flagged a significant price discrepancy between a quoted and on-site price (later resolved by the owner). Project completion is solid, with the vast majority of jobs described as fully finished, often same-day, with cleanup included — though one review noted a pipe was not buried to code depth, and another described a technician failing to return as promised before eventually completing the work on day three. Experience scores are supported by numerous reviews praising diagnostic accuracy, technical knowledge, and problem-solving, though one 4-star review raised concerns about a gas line job being rushed and pressure-tested out of sequence, suggesting occasional lapses in workmanship discipline.

• One review (March 2024, 1-star) describes a serious professionalism incident involving a technician becoming defensive and agitated when asked for licensing credentials, refusing to provide pricing, and ultimately walking off the job. The owner's public response included an accusation of racism against the reviewer, which itself raises a concern about how complaints are handled.
• One review (August 2023, 3-star) flagged a code compliance issue: the main line replacement was buried only 4–8 inches deep instead of the required 12 inches, which required a subsequent fix by another contractor. This is a meaningful workmanship flag.
• One review (July 2024, 4-star) noted that technicians began burying a gas line before pressure testing it and before running detection wires, describing the work as feeling 'amateur.' The job site was also left messy.
• One review (June 2024, 1-star) criticized the company for only providing verbal estimates and charging for written ones — a business practice concern that affects pricing transparency.
• One review (May 2024) noted an invoice was provided after the fact rather than as an upfront estimate, and it was not itemized — a minor but recurring transparency concern.
• No strong fake review patterns detected. Reviews vary in length, specificity, tone, and rating. Multiple named technicians (Edgar, Rolando, Oscar, Sal, Joel, Sergio, Antonio, Chema) appear across different reviews, lending authenticity. The presence of 1-star, 3-star, and 4-star reviews further supports organic review distribution.
• The majority of reviews (approximately 65 of 80) are dated within the past 12 months (October 2023 – October 2024), giving the score strong recency validity.

This WW Score is based on 80 reviews with strong recency, high mention counts across all four dimensions, and no significant fake review indicators — making it a highly reliable representation of this contractor's current performance, tempered slightly by a small number of notable negative incidents involving workmanship quality and a serious professionalism complaint.

One Way Rooter Services earns strong scores across all four dimensions, driven by a large volume of detailed, specific reviews spanning multiple years. Professionalism is the most frequently cited strength, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, communication, friendliness, and responsiveness — including emergency availability at unusual hours. Pricing is consistently described as fair, reasonable, and competitive, with multiple reviewers noting they compared quotes and chose One Way Rooter for value. Project completion is generally strong, with most jobs described as fully resolved in a single visit, though one 3-star review from 2019 credibly documents an incomplete deliverable (a drain cleanout that was charged for but not installed) and inadequate drywall patching, which moderately tempers that dimension's score. Experience scores well based on numerous specific accounts of skilled diagnosis, complex re-piping, sewer line replacement, and problem-solving that other plumbers had failed to achieve.

• One credible negative review (2019-11-13, 3 stars) documents a billing discrepancy — a drain cleanout was invoiced but not installed, and only $100 was refunded. This is a meaningful integrity concern and was factored into pricing and project completion scores.
• One 1-star review (2023-01-02) criticizes improper disposal of a removed toilet left on the curb rather than broken down and placed in a dumpster. This is a minor professionalism flag but was noted.
• One 4-star review (2019-06-12) explicitly documents repeated scheduling failures and poor communication, with the plumber arriving significantly later than multiple promised times. This was factored into the professionalism score.
• The overwhelming majority of reviews are 5-star. While most contain specific names, job details, and situational context that suggest authenticity, the near-universal positivity warrants mild caution. No strong evidence of coordinated fake reviews was detected, but the pattern is noted.
• A significant portion of reviews (roughly 30 of 57) are dated prior to 2022, meaning they are more than 2 years old. The most recent reviews (2023–2024) remain positive and consistent in tone, suggesting no major quality decline, but recency depth is moderate.
• One review (2021-12-17, 5 stars) is from a commercial client managing 5 hotels and sending 10+ work orders per day. This review carries high evidentiary weight for reliability and volume capacity but may not reflect typical residential customer experience.

This WW Score is based on 57 reviews with strong specificity and high mention counts across all four dimensions, making it one of the more reliable scores possible — however, users should note that a small number of credible negative data points exist regarding billing transparency and scheduling communication, and that the score reflects a contractor with a long track record whose most recent reviews remain positive but are fewer in number than older ones.

Plumbquest (Elan) earns strong marks across all four dimensions based on a consistent body of reviews spanning nearly a decade. Professionalism is the most frequently cited strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising punctuality, responsiveness at odd hours, clear communication, and a trustworthy, no-upsell attitude. Pricing is a notable differentiator — multiple reviewers explicitly called out fair, transparent, and even surprisingly low pricing, including one dramatic case where Elan identified a $35,000 scam and resolved the issue for $750. Project completion scores well, with reviewers describing jobs finished promptly and thoroughly, including a callback honored at no charge. Experience is well-supported by references to complex jobs such as sewer/mainline replacements, tankless water heater installs, warranty negotiations, and gas leak repairs — all handled competently. The score is tempered slightly by the presence of several older reviews (2013–2017) and a handful of very brief, low-detail reviews that add limited evidentiary weight.

• One review (2024-10-12) contains no text — only a 5-star rating. This was excluded from dimension scoring as it provides no usable data.
• Two reviews (2024-06-09) describe nearly identical scenarios involving tankless water heater installation and warranty handling with almost identical phrasing ('installed/replaced a new tankless water heater and dealt with the manufacturer to handle the warranty. Highly recommend!'). These may be duplicate or suspicious entries and were treated as a single data point for scoring purposes.
• Several reviews are very brief and generic (e.g., 'An absolute angel!', 'Best plumber in the city, highly recommended, reliable and with great rates') with no specific job details. These were counted for sentiment but given reduced evidentiary weight in scoring.
• A significant portion of reviews (approximately 7 out of 22 usable) are older than 3 years, with 5 dating back to 2013–2017. Recency weighting was applied — more recent reviews (2024–2025) were given greater influence on final scores.
• All reviews are 5-star (with two 4-star exceptions), which is a pattern that warrants mild caution. However, the specificity and variety of job descriptions across many reviews reduces the likelihood of systematic fabrication.

This WW Score carries HIGH overall confidence due to a meaningful volume of reviews (22 usable), strong mention counts across all four dimensions, and sufficient job-specific detail in the majority of reviews to support the scores assigned — though users should note the presence of a few generic entries and some older reviews that reduce perfect certainty.