Find Nearby Plumbers In Glendale, California

Amado Plumbing has a loyal base of long-term customers who consistently praise Lynn's technical knowledge and ability to handle complex jobs, including older home plumbing and large-scale repipes. However, the review set contains a meaningful number of negative reviews (roughly 5 out of 23) that raise serious concerns across multiple dimensions. Professionalism is the most contested dimension: multiple reviewers cited Lynn yelling at employees, leaving without communicating, and behaving dismissively — while others praised his friendliness and communication. Pricing is similarly mixed, with several reviewers calling him affordable and honest, while others explicitly described overcharging, inflated initial quotes, and opportunistic pricing tactics. Project completion is generally positive but undermined by one review citing a job that took too long, one describing property damage left unaddressed, and one describing a catastrophic workmanship failure involving an unnecessary ceiling hole. Experience scores highest overall, with many reviewers across years noting strong technical skill, but the ceiling and tile-chipping incidents prevent a high score.

• RECENCY WARNING: The majority of reviews are older than 1 year relative to a 2024 analysis date. Only 2 reviews are from 2023, 2 from 2021, and the bulk span 2010–2022. Scores may not reflect current service quality.
• NEGATIVE PATTERN — PROFESSIONALISM: Three separate reviews (2020, 2022, 2021) independently describe unprofessional behavior including yelling at employees, leaving without communicating, and perceived exploitation of a female customer. This is a consistent and credible pattern, not isolated.
• NEGATIVE PATTERN — PRICING: At least three reviews (2014, 2014, 2021) describe overcharging or inflated quotes. One reviewer explicitly advised others to bargain the initial quote down by approximately 50%. This is a recurring concern.
• NEGATIVE PATTERN — WORKMANSHIP/COMPLETION: One review (2013) describes a severe workmanship failure — an unnecessary 3x4 foot hole cut in a ceiling when pipes were already exposed — and a worker accidentally setting a tree on fire. Another review (2022) describes a misaligned installation and damaged plants. These are serious quality-control incidents.
• FAKE REVIEW CHECK: No strong evidence of fake reviews detected. Reviews vary in tone, detail, rating, and date. Negative reviews are specific and credible. Positive reviews include specific names, job types, and personal context. No suspicious clustering of identical phrasing observed.
• LONG REVIEW SPAN WARNING: Reviews span from 2010 to 2023 — a 13-year window. Business quality and staffing may have changed significantly over this period. Older reviews (pre-2018) should be weighted with caution.

The WW Score of 68.4 is based on a moderately sized review set with HIGH mention counts across all dimensions, but reliability is tempered by the wide date range of reviews, a consistent pattern of negative experiences in professionalism and pricing, and several serious workmanship incidents that suggest meaningful quality risk.

USA Plumbing shows strong technical expertise and professionalism from individual technicians (particularly Jacob, Joe, Rylan, and Landry), with many customers praising their knowledge and courteous demeanor. However, the company is significantly hampered by severe operational failures: chronic no-shows and no-calls, missed appointments despite confirmed scheduling, poor follow-up on callbacks, and inconsistent pricing practices. While recent reviews (2025) are predominantly positive, older reviews reveal a persistent pattern of scheduling unreliability and customer service breakdowns. Pricing concerns include hidden credit card fees, price increases mid-job without explanation, and occasional overcharging relative to market rates. Project completion is inconsistent—some jobs are finished promptly and thoroughly, while others are abandoned or require multiple callbacks.

• CRITICAL: Severe no-show/no-call pattern documented across multiple years (2013–2022). At least 12 reviews explicitly mention missed appointments, broken promises, or failure to return calls despite confirmed scheduling windows.
• RECENCY BIAS: Reviews from 2025 (past 6 months) are overwhelmingly 5-star with minimal critical detail, contrasting sharply with 2018–2022 reviews which contain extensive complaints. This suggests either genuine operational improvement or potential review manipulation. Recommend treating recent scores with caution.
• PRICING INCONSISTENCY: Multiple reviews report price increases after initial quotes, hidden credit card surcharges (9%), and charges significantly higher than market rates. At least 8 reviews cite pricing concerns.
• CALLBACK FAILURES: At least 6 reviews document failure to honor callback commitments or return voicemails, particularly for warranty work and emergency services.
• CUSTOMER SERVICE TONE: Several reviews report rude, dismissive, or aggressive behavior from dispatch/ownership (Richard, JW Watson) when customers complained about missed appointments.
• POSSIBLE FAKE REVIEWS: The 2025 cluster contains 30+ reviews with minimal detail, generic praise, and identical 5-star ratings within a 2-week window (June 2–7, 2025). Language is repetitive ('awesome,' 'highly recommend,' 'very professional'). This pattern is atypical and warrants skepticism.
• SAFETY CONCERNS: One review documents lack of safety protocols (no cones for street work); another mentions reckless driving behavior by technicians.
• WARRANTY WORK ISSUES: Multiple reviews indicate poor performance on home warranty assignments, including missed deadlines, incomplete paperwork, and failure to communicate with warranty companies.

This WW Score should be treated with MODERATE-TO-LOW confidence despite HIGH confidence labels on individual dimensions. The company exhibits a stark bifurcation: recent reviews (2025) suggest operational improvement, but historical data (2013–2022) documents chronic systemic failures in scheduling, follow-up, and customer communication. The recent 5-star cluster is suspicious and may inflate the overall score. Customers should verify current operational reliability independently before booking, as past performance suggests significant risk of appointment cancellation or no-show.

Torres Home Services presents a deeply polarized review profile spanning over 15 years. Positive reviewers consistently praise responsive scheduling, courteous technicians, and quality workmanship on complex jobs in older homes. However, a substantial and recurring pattern of serious negative reviews — spanning multiple years — describes systematic price gouging, refusal to provide itemized invoices, dishonest diagnostics (fabricating gas leaks, claiming non-existent problems), and dismissive or rude office staff. Pricing is the most damaged dimension, with numerous reviewers documenting charges 3x–10x market rates and a company policy of refusing to disclose parts or labor breakdowns. Project completion is mixed: some jobs are praised as thorough and timely, while others document incomplete work, no-shows, incorrect installations, and return visits that failed to fix original problems. Professionalism scores are dragged down significantly by multiple credible accounts of condescending behavior, deceptive practices, and poor communication from office staff, particularly in negative reviews that are highly specific and detailed.

• SUSPECTED FAKE REVIEWS: Several 5-star reviews are generic, brief, and lack specific detail (e.g., 'Fantastic family business - they helped me with many projects', 'Great work on my new tankless water heater. The guys were nice'). These are consistent with the pattern flagged by at least one negative reviewer who explicitly stated the 5-star reviews appear fabricated or paid-for.
• RECENCY NOTE: The review set spans from 2007 to 2023. The most recent reviews (2021–2023) include some of the most severe negative accounts, including BBB reporting, CSLB complaints, and allegations of fraud. This suggests the problematic behavior is not historical but ongoing.
• PATTERN OF DECEPTIVE PRICING: Multiple independent reviewers across different years (2011, 2013, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021, 2023) describe the same behavior — inflated charges, refusal to itemize invoices, and markups of 300%–1000% on parts. This is a systemic pattern, not isolated incidents.
• PATTERN OF DISHONEST DIAGNOSTICS: At least three separate reviews (2019, 2021 x2) describe technicians claiming problems existed that were independently verified by other companies to not exist, including a fabricated gas leak and a non-existent need for major pipe replacement.
• POLICY OF WITHHOLDING INVOICE BREAKDOWNS: Confirmed by multiple reviewers and acknowledged by company staff ('we never give that out'), this practice is flagged as potentially illegal under California contractor law and is a significant trust and transparency concern.
• NAME CHANGE FLAG: At least one reviewer alleges the company has changed business names to avoid prior complaint records — this could not be verified from reviews alone but warrants caution.
• CLUSTER OF SAME-DATE 5-STAR REVIEWS: Two 5-star reviews share the exact same date (2021-12-03) and two others share the same date (2016-03-10 and 2020-03-10), which may indicate coordinated or incentivized review posting.
• SCORE CONFIDENCE CAVEAT: Despite HIGH confidence labels due to mention volume, the polarized nature of the review set means the scores reflect genuine controversy rather than a settled consensus. The WW Score should be interpreted as reflecting a company with serious unresolved integrity concerns.

This WW Score is based on a large and diverse review set spanning 16 years, giving it statistical weight, but the score should be treated with significant caution due to credible, specific, and recurring allegations of price fraud, diagnostic dishonesty, and invoice concealment that form a clear systemic pattern rather than isolated complaints.

Don Lollar Plumbing shows a dramatic quality decline following its merger with Valley Plumbing around 2023. Pre-merger reviews (2012–2022) consistently praise professionalism, fair pricing, and excellent workmanship, with ratings predominantly 5 stars. Post-merger reviews (2023–2024) are overwhelmingly negative (mostly 1 star), citing aggressive upselling, inflated pricing (2–3x higher than before), poor responsiveness, incomplete work, and lack of follow-through. The company's experience level remains solid based on technical competence mentioned in earlier reviews, but this is severely undermined by current operational failures. Pricing emerges as the weakest dimension, with multiple recent complaints about deceptive practices and hidden fees.

• CRITICAL: Temporal bifurcation detected. Reviews before mid-2023 are predominantly 5-star with genuine, specific praise. Reviews from late 2023 onward are predominantly 1-star with consistent complaints about the Valley Plumbing merger. This is NOT a fake review pattern but rather evidence of a real, dramatic business deterioration.
• Post-merger reviews (Jan–Sep 2024) show coordinated complaints about identical practices: $68 diagnostic fees, aggressive upselling, inflated quotes 2–3x market rate, poor responsiveness, and incomplete work. This consistency reflects genuine systemic problems, not fabrication.
• Pre-merger reviews (2012–2022) mention specific technicians by name (Manny, Albino, Jamie) with detailed, contextual praise. Post-merger reviews lack this specificity and focus on corporate practices, suggesting a real organizational change.
• One older negative review (2015-01-07) mentions damage to property and refusal to compensate—isolated incident in otherwise positive pre-merger period.
• Recency heavily favors negative data: 10 of last 12 reviews (Jan 2023–Jan 2024) are 1-star. This company's current reputation is severely damaged.

This WW Score should be treated with caution because it blends two distinct business entities: the original Don Lollar Plumbing (highly trustworthy, 2012–2022) and the post-merger Valley Plumbing operation (severely compromised, 2023–2024). For prospective customers in 2024, the score underrepresents current risk because it includes 20+ years of positive legacy data. A score based solely on post-merger reviews would be approximately 25–35. The company is NOT recommended for new customers.

American Leak Detection of North Central Los Angeles presents a deeply polarized review profile. Positive reviews — many of which are older (2015–2021) — consistently praise individual technicians like Daniel, Augie, and Nickolas for professionalism, skill, and thoroughness, with several customers describing excellent end-to-end experiences. However, a significant cluster of negative reviews — several concentrated around 2022–2023 — describe serious failures across all dimensions: rude and combative office staff (specifically named 'Kelly'), inability to reach the company by phone, missed appointments, inaccurate leak diagnoses, incomplete or ineffective repairs, and pricing disputes including charges for work that was not performed or made problems worse. The project completion dimension is particularly damaged by multiple accounts of leaks not being found or fixed, customers being charged and then needing to hire competitors to complete the job, and a pattern of not honoring guarantees. Pricing concerns are also notable, with multiple reviewers citing overpriced estimates, changing quotes, and charges for no results.

• Several 1-star reviews from June 10, 2022 share the exact same date, which may indicate a coordinated negative review campaign or a platform batch-import artifact — these should be interpreted cautiously but are not dismissed as the content is specific and varied.
• Three reviews dated 2023-06-10 share the same date and all reference poor customer service from the same staff member ('Kelly'), suggesting a possible coordinated posting, though the specificity of complaints lends some credibility.
• One review (Rating: 1.0, Date: 2022-06-10) contains no text and was excluded from scoring as it provides no usable data.
• The most recent reviews (2022–2024) skew heavily negative, suggesting a possible decline in service quality over time. Older reviews (2015–2018) are more positive but are given reduced weight due to recency rules.
• Multiple reviewers explicitly state they hired competing companies after American Leak Detection failed to find or fix leaks — this is a strong signal of project completion failures and is weighted accordingly.
• The first review (2024-09-30) is notable: the technician (Richard) honestly referred the customer to a competitor rather than taking the job — this is scored positively for professionalism but reflects no completed project for this company.

This WW Score is based on 24 reviews with usable data spanning 2014–2024, with HIGH mention counts across all four dimensions, making the score statistically meaningful — however, the strong recency trend toward negative reviews and possible coordinated review activity on certain dates introduce uncertainty, and the score should be treated as a fair but cautious representation of current service quality.

L&S Plumbing/Mechanical exhibits significant inconsistency in service quality and customer satisfaction. While some customers report excellent workmanship, professionalism, and fair pricing (particularly in 2017-2019), a substantial number of recent and older reviews document serious failures in professionalism (rude staff, poor communication, unresponsiveness), project completion (incomplete repairs, repeated failures, warranty disputes), and pricing transparency (hidden charges, inflated fees, warranty denial). The company demonstrates technical competence in specific jobs but struggles with follow-through, accountability, and customer service. Multiple customers report the same issues across different time periods, suggesting systemic problems rather than isolated incidents.

• PATTERN ALERT: Multiple reviews (2018-2023) describe identical problems with new home installations failing within warranty period, suggesting potential systemic quality control issues in original installation work.
• CUSTOMER SERVICE CONCERN: At least 5 reviews explicitly mention rude, dismissive, or unresponsive staff (blocking customers, hanging up, ignoring callbacks), indicating a persistent organizational culture problem.
• PRICING TRANSPARENCY ISSUE: Multiple customers report being quoted one price and charged another, or discovering hidden trip fees and inflated labor charges after service completion.
• WARRANTY DISPUTE PATTERN: Numerous reviews describe the company refusing to honor warranties or claiming warranty has expired while customers dispute the timeline, suggesting aggressive warranty denial practices.
• RECENCY BIAS: Most negative reviews cluster in 2018-2023 (recent), while positive reviews are concentrated in 2017-2019, suggesting service quality may have declined over time.
• BUILDER RELATIONSHIP CONCERN: Multiple reviews note the company prioritizes builder relationships over residential customer satisfaction, potentially explaining poor follow-up and warranty handling.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: Reviews dated 2021-10-16 and 2021-10-19 are nearly identical (plumbing clog, blocking customer), suggesting possible duplicate submission or coordinated complaint.

This WW Score of 54.8 should be treated with MODERATE confidence due to the high volume of data (30 reviews) and consistent patterns across multiple dimensions, but the score reflects a genuinely problematic company with serious systemic issues in customer service, warranty practices, and follow-through rather than data uncertainty. The company appears to deliver acceptable technical work in some cases but fails significantly in professionalism, accountability, and pricing transparency.