Find Nearby Plumbers In Kent, Washington

KDP Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all measured dimensions. Project completion is the most consistently praised aspect, with all five reviews explicitly confirming jobs were finished successfully and promptly. Professionalism and experience are well-supported by mentions of responsiveness, communication, problem-solving, and quality workmanship. Pricing receives solid marks with three reviews explicitly noting competitive or reasonable rates. However, the overall WW Score of 82.3 reflects a MODERATE confidence level due to the small sample size (only 5 reviews) and the age of some reviews (two are over 8 years old).

• Small sample size: Only 5 reviews analyzed. Recommend collecting additional recent reviews for more reliable scoring.
• Recency concern: Two reviews are from 2013 and 2015 (9-11 years old). Only 2 of 5 reviews are from the past 5 years. Recent performance data is limited.
• All reviews are 5-star ratings with uniformly positive language. While not necessarily fake, the absence of any critical feedback or lower ratings is unusual and limits ability to assess weaknesses.
• No negative or neutral reviews present to validate balance and identify areas for improvement.

This WW Score should be treated as a preliminary assessment only. The small sample size and age of several reviews limit confidence in the overall rating. Additional recent reviews are strongly recommended before making a high-stakes decision based on this score.

C Les Plumbing earns strong marks across most dimensions, with professionalism being the most consistently praised attribute — all five reviewers noted punctuality, respectful communication, cleanliness, and courteous staff including dispatch. Project completion and workmanship quality are well-regarded, with one reviewer completing three separate projects and another confirming work held up over multiple years. Pricing is the weakest dimension: while several reviewers praised fair and transparent bids, one 2-star review explicitly describes a failure to disclose a $175 minimum charge upfront, which meaningfully pulls the pricing score down. The overall picture is of a skilled, family-run operation with strong follow-through, tempered by at least one documented transparency issue around pricing communication.

• All reviews are dated between 2018 and 2020 — no reviews from the past 12 months are present. The score may not reflect current service quality.
• Four of five reviews are 5-star with detailed, specific content; these appear genuine and are not flagged as fake. The one 2-star review adds credibility to the overall review set.
• Small sample size (5 reviews) limits statistical reliability. Scores should be interpreted with caution.

This WW Score is based on a small but credible set of reviews spanning 2018–2020; the score carries moderate reliability due to the low review count and the absence of any recent reviews, meaning current service quality cannot be confirmed.

Wolfe Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with responsive, courteous service noted across multiple reviews. However, the company shows significant weakness in project completion and pricing transparency. A major 2018 fire sprinkler installation failed to meet discussed specifications, resulting in poor workmanship and customer dissatisfaction despite meeting code minimums. Pricing concerns are evident in that same project where the customer felt overcharged for substandard work. Recent emergency plumbing calls (2024, 2022) were handled excellently with quick resolution, suggesting inconsistency in performance quality depending on project scope and complexity.

• RECENCY CONCERN: One review is from 2013 (11 years old) and one from 2018 (6 years old). Only 2 of 4 reviews are from the past 2 years. Historical data may not reflect current operations.
• INCONSISTENT PERFORMANCE: Stark contrast between emergency plumbing calls (5-star, quick resolution) and complex installation project (1-star, poor execution). Suggests company may excel at reactive service but struggle with planned, complex projects.
• PROPOSAL/DOCUMENTATION ISSUE: 2018 review explicitly warns about generic proposal templates without schematics or detailed plans. This is a systemic process failure that could affect other customers.
• PRICING TRANSPARENCY: Only one review mentions pricing, and it is highly negative. Insufficient data to assess pricing fairly, but the one mention is severe (customer felt overcharged for poor work).

This WW Score should be treated with caution due to only 4 total reviews and significant recency skew (50% of reviews older than 6 years). The score is pulled down by one catastrophic project failure that appears to reflect systemic issues with proposal documentation and project planning. Recent emergency service reviews are excellent, but the sample size is too small to establish reliable confidence in overall performance.

Smart Plumbing Solutions demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent praise for responsiveness, punctuality, and courteous communication across 8 reviews. Project completion shows solid performance in most cases, though one critical 1-star review from July 2023 reveals serious follow-through failures on a tankless water heater installation, including 4-week delays, missed appointments, and unresponsiveness to callbacks. Experience is well-documented with mentions of technical knowledge and quality craftsmanship. Pricing feedback is limited but positive where mentioned. The stark contrast between 9 five-star reviews and 1 one-star review suggests inconsistent service delivery.

• CRITICAL: One severe negative review (July 2023) describing complete service failure on tankless water heater installation with 4-week delays, missed appointments, and non-responsiveness to multiple follow-up attempts. This directly contradicts claims of reliability and responsiveness in other reviews.
• PATTERN CONCERN: 9 of 10 reviews are 5-star ratings with generic praise language ('amazing', 'excellent', 'wonderful', 'highly recommend'). While some reviews contain specific details, the uniformity is notable. However, the presence of one detailed 1-star review with specific failure points suggests reviews are not entirely fabricated.
• RECENCY ISSUE: Most reviews cluster in October 2023 and earlier. Only 2 reviews from 2024 (May and January). The July 2023 negative review is now over 12 months old, but represents a serious unresolved service failure.
• INCONSISTENCY: The negative review explicitly states 'never returns calls or texts' and describes a missed appointment with no follow-up, which directly contradicts multiple positive reviews praising quick response and reliability.

This score should be treated with caution. While professionalism and experience scores are supported by multiple recent reviews, the presence of one detailed, specific negative review describing catastrophic service failure (missed appointments, non-responsiveness, unresolved technical issues) significantly undermines confidence in the overall rating. The contractor appears capable of excellent work but may have serious reliability issues with follow-through on complex jobs or callbacks. Potential customers should inquire specifically about callback procedures and warranty support before engaging.

Valor Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent praise for responsiveness, communication, and pleasant demeanor across 8 reviews. However, two significant negative reviews (1.0 and 1.5 stars) reveal serious project completion failures: incomplete work, non-responsiveness mid-job, and a defective water line installation that caused basement flooding. These critical failures substantially lower the project completion score despite positive completion mentions in other reviews. Pricing is fairly represented as fair and transparent across three mentions. Experience is rated positively for skill and workmanship, though one review explicitly questions professional competency due to the failed installation.

• CRITICAL: Two severe negative reviews (2023-04-28 and 2022-05-10) describe abandoned work, non-responsiveness, incomplete jobs, and defective installation causing property damage. These are not minor complaints and directly contradict the positive narrative in other reviews.
• RECENCY CONCERN: Most positive reviews are from 2021 (3 reviews) and early 2023. The two most damaging reviews are from 2023 and 2022, suggesting potential quality degradation or inconsistency over time.
• INCONSISTENCY PATTERN: The stark contrast between 5-star reviews praising responsiveness and professionalism versus 1-star reviews describing non-responsiveness and abandonment suggests either highly variable service quality or different service experiences (e.g., simple vs. complex jobs).
• INCOMPLETE WORK PATTERN: Two separate reviews mention incomplete work and non-responsiveness, indicating this may be a systemic issue rather than isolated incidents.

This score should be treated with caution. While professionalism and experience scores are supported by multiple mentions, the presence of two severe project completion failures (property damage, abandoned work, non-responsiveness) creates significant reliability concerns. The WW Score of 74.2 reflects these critical failures, but potential customers should carefully review the negative reviews before engaging this contractor, as the service quality appears inconsistent.

Right Way Plumbing receives consistent positive feedback across professionalism, pricing transparency, and workmanship from multiple reviewers spanning several years. Pricing is a notable strength, with multiple reviewers explicitly calling out fair, transparent, and competitive rates. However, one serious 1-star review alleges fraudulent business conduct, bankruptcy filings to avoid lawsuits, and incompetent work — this materially drags down scores across all dimensions and cannot be ignored. The positive reviews are largely credible with specific details, but the severe negative review introduces meaningful uncertainty. Recency is also a concern, as several positive reviews are 5–13 years old, with only two reviews from the past 12 months.

• SERIOUS NEGATIVE FLAG: One reviewer (2023-09-22) alleges the business operators filed bankruptcy to escape lawsuits, acted as 'con men,' and left customers with unfinished or improperly completed work. This is a significant red flag that warrants independent verification before hiring.
• RECENCY CONCERN: Of 8 reviews, only 2 are from the past 12 months (2024 and 2023). Three reviews are from 2011–2012 and carry very low recency weight. The business's current quality and practices may differ substantially from older reviews.
• REVIEWER IDENTITY INCONSISTENCY: The negative review references 'Scott & Roger' as operators, while positive reviews consistently reference 'Mike' as the owner/operator. This may indicate a different business entity, a name change, or a misdirected review — but it cannot be dismissed without verification.
• VOLUME WARNING: Only 8 total reviews across what appears to be 13+ years of operation is a very low review volume. This limits statistical confidence in any dimension score.
• NO FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Positive reviews contain specific names, job details, and varied language. No obvious fake review pattern identified among the positive reviews.

This WW Score carries MODERATE overall reliability due to the small review volume, significant age of most positive reviews, and one serious unresolved allegation of fraudulent conduct that has not been publicly rebutted — prospective customers should independently verify the business's current standing before engaging.