Find Nearby Plumbers In Temple, Texas

ABBA Plumbing receives consistently strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — punctuality, communication, and friendly attitude appear in the vast majority of reviews. Pricing is described as fair, reasonable, and comparable to market rates across multiple reviews, with no complaints about hidden charges or overpricing. Project completion is well-supported, with reviewers noting jobs finished on time, same-day or next-day scheduling, and successful resolution of a wide variety of plumbing tasks. Experience and workmanship are affirmed through specific mentions of technical problem-solving, knowledgeable technicians, and repeat customers spanning multiple years. The volume and specificity of reviews across all dimensions support a high-confidence overall score.

• All 36 reviews are 5-star (one is 4-star), which is statistically unusual and warrants mild caution.
• Several reviews use generic phrasing such as 'great experience,' 'highly recommend,' and 'excellent service' with no specific detail — these were counted for sentiment but carry lower evidentiary weight.
• One review (2023-02-11) appears to duplicate content within the same review text, suggesting a possible submission error rather than a fake review — scored normally but noted.
• The majority of reviews fall between 2022 and mid-2023, with only one review from 2021, suggesting a relatively recent and active review period — recency is favorable.
• No negative reviews or critical feedback of any kind were present across all 36 reviews. While this may reflect genuine quality, it also reduces the ability to identify any weaknesses or areas of concern.

This WW Score carries HIGH overall confidence due to a substantial volume of reviews with specific, varied, and largely credible detail across all four scored dimensions, though the absence of any negative feedback and the uniformly perfect ratings introduce a mild flag that prospective customers should be aware of.

Ken Dixon Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all dimensions. Professionalism and experience are particularly well-documented, with multiple reviews praising punctuality, courtesy, technical skill, and problem-solving ability. Pricing is consistently described as fair, reasonable, and transparent—notably beating competitor quotes significantly. Project completion is solid, though one critical 2018 no-show incident on Thanksgiving creates a notable blemish. The company's long-term customer relationships (35+ years mentioned) and recent positive reviews (2024, 2024, 2021) suggest sustained quality, though the older negative review warrants acknowledgment.

• One significant no-call, no-show incident on 2018-11-21 (Thanksgiving eve) substantially impacts project completion confidence. This is a serious professionalism failure that cannot be ignored despite otherwise positive reviews.
• Two reviews are older than 3 years (2021-12-21, 2021-03-23, 2018-11-21, 2018-08-10), which reduces recency weight. However, two recent 2024 reviews confirm continued quality.
• No fake review patterns detected. Reviews contain specific details (crawl space clog, propane modifications, water conditioner savings, faucet elbow failure, overflow valve repair) and vary in tone and length, suggesting authenticity.

This WW Score of 87.2 is reliable and should be trusted. It is based on 6 reviews with explicit evidence across all dimensions, recent positive data, and appropriate confidence weighting. However, the single but serious no-show incident in 2018 represents a real operational risk that prospective customers should be aware of, even though recent performance appears to have recovered.

H&S Backflow demonstrates strong professionalism across all four reviews, with consistent praise for responsiveness, same-day or next-day service, punctuality, and friendly demeanor. Project completion is solid, with all jobs finished efficiently and customers satisfied with turnaround. Pricing is mentioned positively in only one review as 'reasonable,' providing limited data on this dimension. Technical experience and workmanship quality are not explicitly discussed in any review, preventing scoring on that dimension. The overall score reflects reliable service delivery and customer communication, though the small sample size and lack of detail on technical expertise limit confidence.

• All four reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative feedback or specific technical details mentioned
• Reviews lack specificity about the actual quality of repairs or technical problem-solving
• Only one review mentions pricing; insufficient data to confidently assess price-friendliness
• No reviews discuss experience, skill level, or quality of workmanship in detail
• Small sample size (n=4) limits statistical reliability; recommend collecting more reviews before making major decisions
• One review is from September 2022 (older than 12 months); three are from 2023-2024

This score should be treated with caution due to the small sample size (4 reviews), absence of any critical feedback, and lack of detailed information about technical expertise and pricing practices. The score reflects strong responsiveness and professionalism but cannot be considered fully reliable without additional reviews covering a broader range of customer experiences.

Bell Plumbing earns strong marks for professionalism and experience, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising technicians for punctuality, communication, courtesy, and technical skill across a wide range of jobs. Project completion scores are also solid, with the majority of reviewers confirming jobs were finished correctly and in a timely manner, though a small number of notable exceptions — including a no-call no-show, toilets not secured correctly requiring a callback, a wall left open after faucet work, and a disputed sewer job with billing irregularities — prevent a higher score. Pricing is the weakest dimension by a meaningful margin: while many reviewers describe pricing as fair or reasonable, multiple 1-star reviews cite significant sticker shock, a $321 charge for a 15-minute washer replacement, a sewer job priced over $11,000 more than a competitor, and a mid-job price escalation from $250 to $600 with no clear justification. The pricing score reflects this genuine split in customer experience rather than defaulting to the majority positive sentiment.

• 29 reviews contain no text at all — only a star rating (all 5 stars). These reviews provide zero usable data and were excluded from dimension scoring. Their presence inflates the apparent review count and average star rating.
• Several reviews from July 30, 2024 appear on the same date with very similar enthusiastic phrasing about the same technician (Freddy), which warrants mild suspicion of coordinated or solicited reviews, though they are not identical.
• One review (2023-03-28) describes a significantly different and negative experience involving unprofessional conduct, price escalation, and berating of the customer — this is a serious outlier that was fully weighted in pricing and professionalism scoring.
• One review (2024-04-02) describes a sewer replacement job priced over $11,000 more than a competitor, disputed charges for work not performed, and property damage not remedied — this was fully weighted in pricing and project completion scoring.
• One review (2024-05-21) describes toilets not secured correctly requiring a callback, a wall left open, and plastic faucets installed without consent — this was fully weighted in project completion and experience scoring.
• One review (2024-11-04) describes a technician who refused to inspect the water heater and immediately recommended full replacement — this was weighted in experience scoring as a negative signal.
• One review (2024-10-22) describes a no-call no-show on a scheduled appointment with no follow-up — this was fully weighted in professionalism and project completion scoring.
• A significant portion of reviews are older than 12 months (many from 2019–2022), and the business appears to have changed staffing and scale over time. Recent reviews (2024–2025) are more mixed on pricing than older reviews, suggesting possible pricing drift upward.
• The 1-star review from 2022-12-21 describes being ignored after an overpriced initial visit and only receiving a response after threatening a negative review — this was weighted in professionalism scoring.

This WW Score is based on a large review set with high mention counts across all four dimensions, making it statistically reliable; however, the score should be interpreted with caution on pricing specifically, as there is a genuine and documented pattern of pricing complaints that is partially masked by the high volume of positive reviews.

Michalek Plumbing receives consistently strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most universally praised attribute — every single review mentions punctuality, responsiveness, communication, or attitude in positive terms. Project completion is well-supported, with multiple reviewers noting jobs were seen through from start to finish, including permit handling and follow-through on warranty claims. Experience scores are bolstered by specific, credible examples such as code-compliant installations, gas leak resolution, and pipe relocation during a pool installation. Pricing is positively mentioned in four reviews, with claims of affordability and cost savings, though the sample is moderate in size. The overall picture is favorable, but the total review count of 7 limits the statistical reliability of these scores.

• All 7 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative or mixed feedback — this warrants mild caution, though most reviews contain specific details that reduce the likelihood of fabrication.
• Several reviews use enthusiastic, superlative language (e.g., 'plumbing superhero', 'lightning-fast') which can be a soft indicator of embellishment, though specificity of incidents (burst pipe, warranty claim, gas leak) lends credibility.
• Three of the seven reviews are dated 2019–2020, making them 4–5 years old. Only two reviews are from the past 12 months (2023–2024). Recency of the review base is limited and the contractor's current performance may differ.
• Total review count of 7 is low. Scores should be treated as directionally useful but not statistically robust.

This WW Score is directionally trustworthy given the specificity and variety of the reviews, but should be treated with moderate caution due to the small sample size of 7 reviews, the absence of any critical feedback, and the fact that the majority of reviews are more than 12 months old.

Plumb Intended earns consistently strong marks across all four scored dimensions based on five reviews spanning 2022 to 2024. Professionalism is the best-supported dimension, with every reviewer noting punctuality, responsiveness, communication, or courteous behavior — including proactive scheduling calls and going beyond the scope of work to point out unrelated issues. Project completion is equally well-supported, with all five reviews describing jobs that were finished cleanly and in a timely manner, including a complex multi-building trenching project. Pricing received explicit positive mentions in three reviews, with one detailed comparison to a competitor that strongly favored Plumb Intended's transparency and fairness. Experience is supported by four reviews referencing accurate diagnosis, correct repairs, and competent workmanship across varied job types. The overall score is tempered slightly by the small review pool of only five reviews, which limits statistical confidence.

• Small sample size of only 5 reviews — WW Score should be treated as directional, not definitive.
• All 5 reviews are 5-star ratings. While the review content is specific and detailed enough to reduce fake review concern, the absence of any critical feedback means weaknesses cannot be assessed.
• One review (2022-04-27) is more than 2 years old and carries reduced recency weight. The remaining four reviews are from 2023–2024 and are considered current.
• No negative or mixed reviews were present — this may reflect genuine quality or may indicate that dissatisfied customers did not leave reviews on this platform.

This WW Score is moderately reliable given the specificity and detail of the reviews, but the small sample size of 5 reviews and the absence of any critical feedback mean the score should be interpreted with caution until more reviews are available.