Find Nearby Plumbers In San Antonio, Texas

JL Hearn Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with particular strengths in professionalism and experience. The company excels at punctuality, communication, and technical competence, with 98 reviews explicitly praising professional conduct and 58 reviews highlighting skilled workmanship. Project completion is solid with 72 mentions of timely, thorough work. However, pricing emerges as a notable weakness with only 28 mentions and a lower score of 72, driven by multiple complaints about unexpected price increases, bait-and-switch tactics, and charges perceived as excessive. Recent reviews (2024-2025) show both exceptional 5-star ratings and serious concerns about pricing transparency and billing practices.

• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Reviews dated 2025-05-10 and 2025-05-07 contain identical text repeated verbatim across multiple reviews (e.g., 'The guys that came today to clean my dryer vents were extremely friendly and professional...' appears twice; 'Excellent service. I called this morning, they came right out and fixed my leak promptly...' appears twice; 'Had a new water heater installed. Technicians were knowledgeable and friendly...' appears twice; 'Have used JL HEARN SINCE MOVING INTO OUR HOME...' appears twice). This pattern strongly suggests artificially inflated recent ratings and reduces confidence in the 2025 data.
• PRICING INTEGRITY CONCERNS: Multiple reviews (2022-12-12, 2022-12-19, 2016-08-14, 2016-02-02, 2012-05-23) report significant discrepancies between quoted and final prices, unauthorized charges, and aggressive billing practices. One review explicitly uses the term 'bait and switch.' These are not isolated complaints but a recurring pattern across different years.
• QUALITY CONTROL INCONSISTENCY: Several reviews describe poor workmanship outcomes (2012-05-23: sink and dishwasher backed up after service; 2016-08-14: disputed final charges and refusal to reinstall dishwasher; 2014-11-13: poor communication and unprofessional response from management). This suggests inconsistent service quality despite the majority of positive reviews.
• RECENCY BIAS: The bulk of 5-star reviews are concentrated in June 2024 and earlier, with many containing generic praise. The recent spike in May 2025 with identical review text is suspicious. Older reviews (2010-2016) show more detailed, specific feedback and include legitimate critical perspectives.
• MANAGEMENT RESPONSIVENESS: One 2014 review documents extremely unprofessional written communication from management ('Let me spell it out for you ! CALL WHOEVER YOU WANT ! As long as it's not me !JL Hearn'), suggesting potential ownership/management changes or behavioral issues that may not be fully resolved.

This WW Score of 82.1 should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH caution. While the company demonstrates genuine strengths in professionalism and technical skill (supported by 98 and 58 high-confidence mentions respectively), the detected fake review pattern in May 2025 and recurring pricing complaints across multiple years significantly undermine overall trustworthiness. The pricing dimension (72/100) is particularly concerning given only 28 mentions and explicit allegations of bait-and-switch tactics. Prospective customers should prioritize obtaining detailed, itemized quotes in writing and clarifying all costs upfront before engaging this company.

Diamond Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism across 89 mentions, with consistent praise for punctuality, courtesy, communication, and respectful behavior. Project completion is solid (81.5/100) across 52 mentions, though a critical 1-star review from 2021 regarding incomplete excavation work (unfilled hole under bathtub) and a few no-show incidents temper this score. Experience/workmanship scores well (85.0/100) with 48 mentions highlighting technical skill and quality work. Pricing presents the weakest dimension (76.0/100) with only 18 mentions—while many reviews praise fair pricing, several negative reviews cite unexpectedly high costs, aggressive upselling tactics, and pricing significantly above competitors, creating meaningful concern about value consistency.

• CRITICAL: One severe project completion failure (2021-09-07, 1-star): excavation work left a hollow void under bathtub after digging; company refused to complete backfill despite contract language, creating structural hazard. This is a material breach of contract and safety issue.
• PRICING CONCERN: Multiple reviews (2020-12-10, 2-star; undated review, 1-star) report pricing substantially above market—one water heater install quoted at $1,200 when competitors were significantly lower. Another review warns of aggressive upselling and payment plans for simple repairs.
• SERVICE RELIABILITY: Two 1-star reviews (2021-04-09, 2014-08-25) document no-shows and failure to return calls, leaving customers waiting days without communication.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Approximately 15 reviews (mostly dated 2025-04-10 and 2025-06-02) are extremely brief, generic, or empty (blank text with 5-star rating). Examples: empty review text, single-word reviews ('Toilet repair'), minimal detail. This cluster of suspiciously generic praise with no specifics raises authenticity concerns, though the majority of reviews contain substantive detail.
• RECENCY BIAS: Most recent reviews (2025, past 6 months) are predominantly 5-star with minimal detail. Older reviews (2020-2021) contain more critical feedback and specificity. Recent data may be skewed toward positive sentiment.
• ETHICAL CONCERN: One review (undated, 1-star) alleges the company attempted to exploit an insurance inspection request by refusing to provide the requested inspection and instead pushing a full pipe replacement upsell.

This WW Score of 82.1 is moderately reliable but should be interpreted with caution: professionalism and experience dimensions are well-supported by high-mention counts, but pricing reliability is limited (only 18 mentions) and shows material inconsistency. The cluster of generic/empty recent reviews and documented service failures (no-shows, incomplete work, upselling) suggest the company's consistency has declined or quality varies significantly by technician. Customers should verify pricing independently and confirm service completion terms in writing before engaging.

Tuttle Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 68 mentions highlighting punctuality, courteous staff, and responsive communication. Project completion is consistently praised with 71 mentions of timely work and follow-through, though a few callbacks were not honored. Pricing receives solid marks (81.4) from 32 mentions, with customers frequently noting fair pricing compared to competitors, though some perceive costs as moderately high. Experience is well-documented across 45 mentions, with customers consistently praising technical knowledge and quality workmanship. The company shows particular strength in honest diagnostics and avoiding unnecessary upsells.

• Multiple empty or minimal-text reviews (marked 'unknown', '.', or blank) totaling approximately 20 reviews—these provide no substantive data and inflate review count without adding analytical value
• Significant recency bias: approximately 60% of reviews are from 2013-2015, with only ~25 reviews from 2020 onward; older reviews may not reflect current operations
• Four negative reviews (1-2 stars) reveal concerning patterns: (1) service charge without parts/service provided; (2) failure to return callback on sewer auger work; (3) misdiagnosis and billing for unnecessary leak detection; (4) poor AC service with billing disputes and unprofessional staff interaction. These suggest occasional operational lapses despite overall positive trend
• One review (2013-08-21) describes a detailed negative experience with billing disputes, incomplete inspection, and dismissive staff behavior, indicating potential customer service issues under pressure
• Duplicate or near-identical reviews from 2013-07-18 (multiple reviews with identical or near-identical text) suggest possible data entry errors or review manipulation
• One review explicitly states company 'went down the drain' after original owners retired, suggesting possible quality decline post-ownership change

This WW Score of 82.1 is reliable with HIGH overall confidence due to substantial mention counts across all dimensions (32-71 mentions each), but should be interpreted cautiously: the dataset is heavily weighted toward reviews from 2013-2015 (10+ years old), and recent reviews (2024-2025) show mixed signals including at least one serious service failure. The company demonstrates strong baseline professionalism and project completion, but the presence of negative reviews involving billing disputes and missed callbacks suggests inconsistent execution. For current service expectations, weight recent reviews more heavily than the historical average.

Andre's Pro Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions, with the majority of reviewers praising punctuality, friendly communication, and transparent upfront pricing. The experience dimension is well-supported by numerous accounts of skilled diagnostics, quality workmanship, and technicians going above and beyond the scope of work. However, four negative reviews — including one abandoned mid-project, one no-show without communication, one unresolved toilet repair with a scheduling failure, and one instance of repeated unanswered calls — meaningfully suppress the professionalism and project completion scores. Pricing is consistently described as competitive and reasonable, with multiple reviewers noting no hidden charges and honored estimates. The volume and span of reviews (2019–2025) provide high confidence in the overall picture, though the negative incidents are credible and cannot be dismissed.

• Two reviews contain no text and only a 5-star rating (dates: 2024-06-09 and 2022-06-10) — these were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• One review (2024-03-06, rated 5 stars) appears to be spam or a fake/corrupted submission — it contains Taco Bell promotional text unrelated to plumbing. This review was excluded from all scoring.
• Several reviews dated 2024-06-09 share the same date and are all 5-star, which is a mild clustering flag. However, the review content is varied enough that mass fabrication is not strongly indicated. Confidence is not reduced but noted.
• One review (2023-10-15) is nearly word-for-word identical to another review (2024-06-09) about a sink/faucet change by the General Manager. This is a likely duplicate and was counted only once in dimension scoring.
• Similarly, the review dated 2023-07-08 ('Been using andres since before the pandemic and they have always been very professional and priced well') is nearly identical to a 2024-06-09 review ('Been using andres since before the pandemic and they have always been great in price and quality of work'). Treated as a likely duplicate and counted once.
• Four credible negative reviews exist: (1) project abandoned mid-way with no callback (2024-08-07), (2) no-show without communication for a scheduled appointment (2022-06-10), (3) charged $250 for a toilet that still did not work, with scheduling failures (2020-01-08), and (4) repeated unanswered calls after a quote was provided, with a call returned only from an unknown number (2020-03-02). These are factored into dimension scores.
• One reviewer (2022-08-10) noted the company is 'a little pricey' — this is a mild negative pricing signal and was factored into the pricing score.

This WW Score is based on a large, multi-year review set with high mention counts across all four dimensions, making it statistically reliable; however, the presence of four credible negative reviews — particularly the abandoned project and no-show incidents — introduces meaningful risk that the score may overstate consistency of service delivery.

Purpose Plumbing has a strong and well-documented track record across all four dimensions, with the vast majority of reviewers praising responsiveness, punctuality, courteous behavior, and fair pricing. Pricing is consistently described as reasonable, fair, or even significantly cheaper than competitors, with one reviewer noting a $1,500 savings over another quote. However, five negative reviews — spanning 2018 through 2022 — introduce meaningful penalties across all dimensions: these include a no-show appointment, failure to honor an original estimate, incomplete pipe repair work left unresolved for weeks, and a deeply problematic multi-visit tankless water heater installation that was never correctly completed. Project completion is the most penalized dimension because multiple negative reviews describe abandoned work, unresolved callbacks, and jobs left half-done. The score reflects a genuinely strong operator with a real but non-trivial pattern of service failures that prospective customers should be aware of.

• NEGATIVE REVIEW — INCOMPLETE WORK (2022): One reviewer (1-star, June 2022) reports that Purpose Plumbing fixed only half the leaking pipes despite being shown documentation of the full scope, and then failed to follow up for over 3 weeks after returning to assess the issue. This is a serious project completion failure.
• NEGATIVE REVIEW — ESTIMATE NOT HONORED (2022): One reviewer (1-star, Nov 2022) paid $49 for an estimate that a subsequent technician refused to honor, charging a higher price instead. Attempts to reach the company resulted in disconnected or unanswered calls. The $49 was never refunded.
• NEGATIVE REVIEW — CHRONIC INSTALLATION FAILURES (2021): A detailed 1-star review describes a multi-month ordeal with two incorrectly installed tankless water heaters (Pink/Purpose Plumbing), including a failed motherboard on a new unit, improper factory settings never corrected, missing parts, and a drainage configuration that was damaging pipes. The company repeatedly failed to resolve the issue and the owner never followed through on promised callbacks.
• NEGATIVE REVIEW — MULTIPLE QUOTES NEVER DELIVERED (2022): A 1-star reviewer paid $49 for an estimate visit and received only 1 of 4 requested quotes. Despite multiple follow-up emails over several weeks, the remaining quotes were never provided. This reflects a pattern of poor follow-through on non-emergency or complex scoped work.
• NEGATIVE REVIEW — NO-SHOW APPOINTMENT (2018): One reviewer (1-star) reports the plumber never arrived for a noon appointment and never called. This is a direct professionalism failure.
• RECENCY NOTE: The five negative reviews are clustered between 2018 and 2022. Reviews from 2023 and 2024 are uniformly positive (13 reviews), suggesting possible operational improvement in recent years. However, the negative reviews are substantive enough that they cannot be dismissed.
• POSSIBLE FAKE REVIEW PATTERN — LOW CONCERN: The majority of positive reviews are specific, name individuals, describe distinct jobs, and include unique details. No strong evidence of coordinated fake reviews. However, a small number of very short generic reviews (e.g., 'Great service and communication... highly recommend') contribute marginally less signal. Overall fake review risk is LOW.
• RECENCY WEIGHTING APPLIED: Reviews from the past 12 months (late 2023–2024) were given higher weight. All 13 such reviews are positive, which partially offsets the older negative reviews in the final score calculation.

This WW Score is based on 72 reviews spanning approximately 8 years and carries HIGH overall confidence due to the large volume of detailed, specific reviews; however, prospective customers should carefully read the five negative reviews, which document real and serious failures in project completion, estimate integrity, and follow-through that are not fully captured by the aggregate score alone.

George Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance driven by consistently high marks in professionalism, experience, and project completion. Across 75 reviews spanning 2015–2025, the company shows exceptional punctuality, courteous staff, technical expertise, and reliable job completion. However, pricing emerges as a significant weakness, with multiple customers citing costs as excessive or unfair relative to competitors. While most recent reviews (2025) are uniformly positive, older reviews (2015–2023) reveal recurring complaints about high pricing, occasional diagnostic errors, and warranty disputes. The company's strength lies in skilled technicians and customer service; its vulnerability is pricing transparency and consistency.

• PRICING CONCERN: 12 explicit mentions of pricing issues across the dataset. Multiple customers report George Plumbing's quotes as significantly higher than competitors (e.g., $3,000+ vs. $183 repair; $1,400 shower tower install). This is a material weakness.
• RECENCY BIAS DETECTED: Reviews from 2025 (most recent 40+ reviews) are uniformly 5-star with highly positive language. Reviews from 2015–2023 show more critical feedback and lower ratings (1–2 stars). This temporal clustering suggests either genuine service improvement or potential review curation.
• NEGATIVE REVIEWS PATTERN: Five 1-star reviews (2023–2015) cite: misdiagnosis of plumbing issues, poor warranty handling, billing disputes, rude customer service, and quality concerns. These are substantive complaints, not isolated incidents.
• DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY QUESTIONED: At least 3 reviews explicitly mention George Plumbing's diagnosis being incorrect or incomplete, requiring second opinions or follow-up work by competitors.
• WARRANTY & BILLING DISPUTES: Multiple reviews (2020, 2023) report unexpected charges, unclear warranty terms, and travel fees not disclosed upfront.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW SIGNAL: The 2025 reviews show remarkably consistent phrasing ('professional,' 'friendly,' 'knowledgeable,' 'efficient') with minimal variation in complaint patterns. However, reviews do name specific technicians and describe distinct job types, reducing suspicion of wholesale fabrication. Recommend treating 2025 reviews with slight caution.

This WW Score of 82.1 is reliable for assessing George Plumbing's current service quality (2025), supported by HIGH confidence across three dimensions based on 50+ recent mentions. However, the score masks a material pricing concern and historical service inconsistency. Customers should expect professional, skilled work but should obtain multiple quotes and clarify pricing upfront before committing. The company's reliability has improved significantly in the past 12 months, but older reviews warrant consideration for risk assessment.