Find Nearby Plumbers In Rockwall, Texas

This single review is extremely negative, describing the contractor as using unskilled day laborers and causing damage to the customer's home that required a separate qualified company to repair. Professionalism is scored very low due to the implication of unvetted, unqualified workers being sent to the job. Project completion is scored near zero as the work was not only incomplete but actively harmful, leaving the customer worse off. Experience is scored near zero based on the explicit claim that workers lacked the skill to perform foundation work correctly. With only one review, no reliable WW Score can be calculated.

• Only 1 review available — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably per minimum threshold of 3 reviews.
• No pricing information was mentioned in any review — Pricing dimension has no data.
• The sole review is a 1-star rating describing property damage and use of unskilled labor, which is a serious quality and liability concern.
• Insufficient review volume to detect fake review patterns, but the single review contains specific negative detail (foundation damage, Home Depot day laborers) that lends it credibility.

This score report is based on a single review and should be considered highly unreliable as a general assessment of this contractor — far more reviews are needed before any confident conclusions can be drawn.

Only one review is available, making any reliable scoring impossible. The sole reviewer explicitly complained about a quote exceeding $500 for a Moen shower cartridge replacement — a job the reviewer completed themselves in 20 minutes — indicating severely inflated pricing. No data exists for professionalism, project completion, or experience, as the reviewer never hired the contractor and the job was never performed. The pricing score of 5 reflects an egregiously high quote for a minor, well-known repair, but carries very limited confidence given it is a single data point.

• Only 1 review analyzed — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably per minimum threshold of 3 reviews.
• The reviewer did not hire the contractor, so no work was actually performed. The pricing complaint is based solely on a quoted price, not a completed job.
• Pricing score is based on a single mention and should be treated with extreme caution.
• No data available for Professionalism, Project Completion, or Experience dimensions.

This report is based on a single review describing only a price quote, not completed work — the score is effectively unreliable and should not be used to make any meaningful judgment about this contractor.

Only one review is available, making any scoring highly unreliable. The single reviewer reported a significant punctuality issue — the plumber arrived one hour early when no one was home — and then took four hours to follow up, indicating poor communication and scheduling. Pricing was the most explicitly criticized dimension, with the customer finding the $255 charge for a sink clog drain cleaning grossly excessive compared to their baseline expectation of $85. Project completion and experience were not mentioned at all in this review, so those dimensions cannot be scored. Overall, the available data paints a negative picture across the two scoreable dimensions, but the extremely limited sample size means these scores should not be treated as representative.

• Only 1 review analyzed — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably per minimum threshold of 3 reviews.
• Review is dated December 2014, making it over 10 years old. This data is significantly outdated and may not reflect current business practices.
• No data available for Project Completion or Experience dimensions — two of the three highest-weighted dimensions are unscored.
• Professionalism score of 30 is based solely on 1 mention of early arrival with no one home and a 4-hour communication delay — treat with extreme caution.
• Pricing score of 10 reflects explicit customer complaint about pricing being approximately 3x their expected rate, though no hidden fees were specifically alleged.

This WW Score report is not reliable — it is based on a single review that is over a decade old, covers only 2 of 4 dimensions, and falls well below the minimum review threshold required for a meaningful assessment.