Find Nearby Plumbers In Plano, Texas

1st Class Plumbing receives strong praise across pricing, workmanship, and technical knowledge, with multiple reviewers explicitly noting competitive quotes, thorough explanations, and high-quality repairs. Professionalism scores are pulled down significantly by a recurring pattern of no-shows and failure to call back, documented across at least four separate reviews spanning 2015 to 2019. Project completion is similarly impacted — while the majority of completed jobs are described positively, several reviewers report jobs that were committed to but never started or finished, with no communication from the contractor. The pricing dimension is one of the strongest, with multiple reviewers independently noting that quotes came in well below competitors and that final charges sometimes came in under the quoted amount. Overall, the business shows genuine capability when it shows up, but reliability is a documented and repeated concern.

• RELIABILITY CONCERN: At least 4 reviews (2015, 2018, 2018, 2019) independently describe the same pattern — contractor commits to a job, fails to show up, and does not call to reschedule or explain. This is a structural reliability issue, not isolated incidents.
• RECENCY NOTE: The no-show complaints are concentrated between 2015 and 2019. Reviews from 2020 onward are predominantly positive, suggesting possible improvement in operations, but the older negative reviews still reflect real documented failures and are included in scoring.
• RECENCY NOTE: Several high-scoring reviews are from 2020 or earlier (some as far back as 2015–2018), meaning a portion of the positive data may not reflect current service quality. Reviews from 2024 are present and positive, which is encouraging.
• POSSIBLE MULTI-OPERATOR ISSUE: Reviews reference different named plumbers (Travis, Scott, Brandon, Dustin, Mario, Sergio, Donny, Joe, Cody), suggesting this may be a franchise name, a business that changed hands, or a DBA used by multiple operators in different regions. Scores may reflect inconsistent service across different individuals operating under the same brand name.
• NO FAKE REVIEW PATTERNS DETECTED: Reviews vary meaningfully in language, detail level, specificity, and rating. Negative reviews are substantive and credible. No artificial inflation pattern identified.

This WW Score is based on 22 reviews with high mention counts across all four dimensions, giving it strong statistical grounding, but the score should be interpreted cautiously due to a documented and repeated pattern of no-shows and non-communication that meaningfully offsets the otherwise positive workmanship and pricing feedback.

Aubrey Plumbing receives consistently strong feedback across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently and enthusiastically cited quality — reviewers specifically noted punctuality, pre-arrival text notifications with technician photos, professional appearance, and courteous communication. Pricing was described as fair, reasonable, and transparent, with one notable instance of a no-charge policy if the job could not be completed. Project completion feedback was positive, with one reviewer deliberately waiting weeks post-service to confirm lasting quality before writing their review. Experience and workmanship were highlighted in detail, particularly in the sewer line reroute review which described exceptional technical skill, attention to detail, and pride in work. The primary caveat is that 6 of 8 reviews are more than 3 years old, with only 2 reviews from the past 12 months, which limits confidence in how well these scores reflect current performance.

• RECENCY WARNING: Only 2 of 8 reviews are from the past 12 months (2024). The remaining 6 reviews span 2016–2021, with 3 reviews being 4 or more years old. Scores may not reflect current service quality.
• REVIEW VOLUME: Only 8 total reviews analyzed. This is a small sample size and all dimension scores should be interpreted with caution despite HIGH confidence labels derived from mention counts.
• ALL 5-STAR RATINGS: Every review is rated 5.0 with no negative or mixed feedback. While the reviews contain specific, credible details that reduce fake review suspicion, the uniformity of perfect ratings across a multi-year span is worth noting.
• NO NEGATIVE DATA POINTS: The absence of any criticism across all reviews is statistically unusual. This does not confirm fabrication, but consumers should seek additional sources to validate this pattern.

This WW Score carries moderate overall reliability — the reviews are specific and credible in detail, but the small sample size of 8 reviews and the fact that 75% of reviews are older than 3 years meaningfully limit confidence in how accurately this score reflects Aubrey Plumbing's current performance.

Fred demonstrates strong professionalism across punctuality, communication, and attitude, with 7 reviews explicitly praising his courteous, punctual, and respectful demeanor. His technical expertise is well-documented with 6 mentions of quality workmanship and problem-solving ability. Pricing is generally perceived as fair and transparent (4 mentions), though one review from 2017 raised concerns about follow-through when Fred declined a project due to prior commitments. Project completion shows mixed signals: most reviews confirm finished work, but one customer experienced unresolved leaks after Fred declined the job, reducing confidence in this dimension. The oldest reviews date to 2012–2015, with only one recent review from 2019, limiting recency validation.

• Review age: 5 of 8 reviews are older than 5 years (2012–2015). Only 2 reviews from 2019 or later. This limits confidence in current service quality.
• One negative review (2017, 3-star) explicitly contradicts the overwhelmingly positive pattern. Customer reported Fred declined work due to prior contract, offered no referrals, and left customer's leak unresolved. This is a material service failure that cannot be ignored.
• Potential review authenticity concern: 5 consecutive 5-star reviews (2018–2019) use similar superlative language ('amazing,' 'joy and blessing,' 'unbelievably personal') with minimal specific technical detail. However, the 2017 negative review and older reviews (2012–2015) provide sufficient diversity to avoid flagging as entirely fake.
• Project completion dimension is weakened by the 2017 review demonstrating non-completion and lack of professional referral network.

This WW Score of 82.1 should be treated with caution due to limited recency (most reviews 5+ years old) and one documented service failure that contradicts the predominantly positive pattern. The score reflects strong historical professionalism and experience, but the 2017 incident and age of data reduce overall confidence to MODERATE. Current service quality cannot be reliably assessed from this review set.

Kelly Plumbing demonstrates strong project completion and technical expertise across all reviews, with work consistently finished and problems solved effectively. Pricing is fair and competitive, with transparent quotes and reasonable costs relative to the work performed. However, professionalism is a significant weakness, with one detailed review documenting serious lapses in customer service etiquette—lack of introduction, unprofessional appearance, and boundary violations that created safety concerns for a homeowner alone in her house. The WW Score of 79.2 reflects solid technical capability undermined by inconsistent professional conduct.

• PROFESSIONALISM CONCERN: Review from 2019-02-23 documents serious professional conduct issues including failure to introduce themselves, unprofessional appearance (dirty jeans, camo jacket), and entering customer's home without proper greeting. This created legitimate safety concerns for a homeowner alone with a dog.
• RECENCY: All reviews are older than 3 years (oldest from 2015, most recent from 2019). No recent data available to assess current performance or whether issues have been addressed.
• SAMPLE SIZE: Only 4 reviews analyzed. Confidence in overall score is limited by small sample size.

This score should be treated with caution due to small sample size (4 reviews) and age of data (all pre-2020). While project completion and pricing are well-supported, the professionalism dimension is based on only 2 mentions with conflicting signals, and there is no recent evidence of whether documented professional conduct issues have been corrected.

Gary's Quality Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent punctuality, responsiveness, and courteous communication across multiple reviews. Technical skill and workmanship are generally praised, with plumbers showing problem-solving ability and attention to detail. However, pricing is a significant concern—multiple reviews cite unexpectedly high charges, aggressive markups on parts (40% above wholesale cost), and what one customer perceived as inflated invoicing. Project completion is solid overall, though one older review flagged missed appointments and incomplete follow-through on line capping. The company's 10+ year relationship with some customers suggests reliability, but recent pricing complaints and one 1-star review citing dishonest practices create material doubt.

• RECENCY ISSUE: 9 of 16 reviews are older than 10 years (2007–2010). Only 2 reviews from past 5 years. Recent data is limited.
• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Reviews dated 2016-09-21 contain only '.' as text (2 instances), and 2015-10-09 contains only '.'. Review dated 2016-03-29 contains only 'unknown'. These 3 reviews provide zero usable information and suggest possible review padding.
• PRICING COMPLAINTS: Two detailed negative reviews (2013, 2010) explicitly cite excessive charges and poor value. One 1-star review (2007) alleges dishonest invoicing practices. This pattern is material and not offset by positive pricing mentions.
• CONFLICTING SIGNALS: Long-term customers praise reliability and honesty; however, detailed complaints from other customers contradict this narrative, suggesting inconsistent service quality or selective honesty.
• INCOMPLETE REVIEWS: Review dated 2017-08-25 is vague ('I wasn't there') and provides minimal detail. Review dated 2017-03-29 contains only 'Excellent... really excellent...' with no specifics.

This score should be treated with caution. While professionalism and experience scores are supported by multiple mentions, the pricing dimension is undermined by serious, detailed complaints that are not adequately offset by positive pricing evidence. The heavy skew toward old reviews (9 of 16 pre-2011) and presence of fake/empty reviews reduce overall confidence. The 1-star and 2-star reviews raise credibility concerns that cannot be dismissed. A score of 78.2 reflects genuine strengths in service delivery but material weaknesses in pricing transparency and consistency.

Donny's Parkway Plumbing shows strong professionalism with consistent punctuality and courteous service across multiple reviews. Experience is well-documented with 15+ years of client history and demonstrated technical capability. However, significant concerns emerge around project completion and pricing integrity: two detailed 1-star reviews from 2015 and 2023 describe serious failures including installation of a used/defective water heater charged as new, incomplete problem resolution, and poor follow-through on complex jobs. Pricing appears fair in most cases but the 2015 review raises ethical concerns about transparency. The score is pulled down by these critical failures despite numerous positive older reviews.

• RECENCY CONCERN: 10 of 15 reviews are from 2009-2012 (12+ years old). Only 3 reviews from 2023-2024. Recent reviews show polarized outcomes (5-star and 1-star), suggesting potential service inconsistency or deterioration over time.
• CRITICAL FAILURES: Two detailed 1-star reviews (2015, 2023) describe serious ethical and quality issues: installation of used/defective equipment charged as new, incomplete diagnostics, pressure tactics on insurance claims, and refusal to complete work. These are specific, credible complaints with concrete details.
• SUSPICIOUS PATTERN: Two reviews marked 'unknown' with 5-star ratings (2014) lack any substantive content and cannot be verified. These may be placeholder or fake reviews.
• POLARIZATION: 12 five-star reviews vs. 2 one-star reviews with no middle ground. The 1-star reviews are highly detailed and credible; the 5-star reviews from 2009-2012 lack specificity. This pattern suggests either significant service degradation or selective review posting.
• INSURANCE/LICENSING DISPUTE: One 2011 review mentions Angie's List reference to being uninsured, though reviewer claims to have verified licensing. This historical concern warrants caution.

This score should be treated with MODERATE caution. While professionalism and experience dimensions are supported by multiple mentions, the two detailed negative reviews describing serious failures (defective equipment, incomplete work, ethical concerns) significantly undermine confidence in overall reliability. The heavy weighting of reviews from 12+ years ago and the absence of recent positive reviews (only 2023-2024 data shows one 5-star and one 1-star) suggest the business may have experienced quality or service changes. Potential customers should request recent references and clarify warranty/equipment sourcing practices before engaging.