Find Nearby Plumbers In Plano, Texas

GPS Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all four dimensions with a WW Score of 88.2. Professionalism is the standout strength (91.5), with extensive evidence of punctuality, courteous communication, and respectful conduct across 89 reviews. Pricing scores well at 87.0 (68 mentions), with customers consistently praising fair rates and transparent quotes. Project completion (84.5, 72 mentions) shows solid follow-through, though a few callbacks and one major abandonment issue slightly temper this score. Experience is strong at 89.0 (65 mentions), reflecting skilled workmanship and effective problem-solving. The company's long track record and multiple named technicians (Steve, John, Justin, etc.) reinforce reliability.

• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Three reviews contain identical or near-identical text (reviews dated 2021-11-06 appear twice with minor variations), suggesting possible duplicate submissions or review manipulation.
• CRITICAL NEGATIVE OUTLIER: One 1-star review (2020-05-05) alleges major project abandonment with $4,000 upfront payment and attorney involvement. This is a serious allegation that contradicts the overwhelmingly positive pattern. A follow-up 5-star review (2020-07-25) suggests the owner's spouse apologized, but the original issue was not fully resolved in the review text.
• SECOND CRITICAL NEGATIVE: One 1-star review (2020-08-26) documents poor follow-up on a failed service attempt, with the plumber ignoring multiple messages over 4-5 days. This directly contradicts claims of responsiveness.
• THIRD NEGATIVE: One 1-star review (2013-05-18) cites unreliability and cancellation that left the customer in a bind.
• FOURTH NEGATIVE: One 1-star review (2019-12-15) is about parking etiquette only, not service quality—minimal relevance.
• FIFTH NEGATIVE: One 2-star review (2022-02-08) documents excellent initial service but complete non-responsiveness to a follow-up issue (dripping faucet) after installation.
• REVIEW AGE DISTRIBUTION: Majority of reviews (approximately 70%) are from 2013-2017, with fewer recent reviews (2024: 2 reviews, 2023: 3 reviews). This age skew may not reflect current service quality.
• GENERIC REVIEWS: Several reviews contain minimal detail (e.g., 'Great company. Great service. 5 stars.' and 'unknown' text fields), which reduces confidence in their authenticity.
• INCONSISTENCY: The overwhelming 5-star dominance (154 out of 161 reviews = 95.7%) combined with serious documented failures suggests either selective review posting or genuine service variability by technician.

The WW Score of 88.2 is supported by HIGH confidence across all dimensions due to substantial mention counts (65-89 per dimension). However, this score should be interpreted with caution: the dataset shows a suspicious concentration of 5-star reviews with some duplicate text, and there are credible documented failures (project abandonment, non-responsiveness to callbacks) that contradict the overall positive narrative. The score reflects historical performance (mostly 2013-2017) and may not accurately represent current service quality. Prospective customers should weight the positive professionalism and pricing evidence heavily but remain aware of documented project completion and responsiveness failures, particularly regarding callback follow-through.

Garrison Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is a standout strength, with 8 reviews explicitly praising responsiveness, communication, politeness, and quick arrival times—including emergency callbacks within minutes. Project completion is consistently reliable, with 7 reviews confirming jobs finished same-day or quickly without abandonment. Experience and technical skill are well-documented across 6 reviews, with customers noting problem-solving ability and competent workmanship. Pricing receives positive mention in 3 reviews, with customers appreciating fair rates and resistance to overcharging despite opportunities to do so. The WW Score of 88.2 reflects a trustworthy, competent contractor with strong execution.

• All 9 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative feedback—this is unusual and warrants caution. While reviews contain specific details (names, timeframes, problem types) that suggest authenticity, the complete absence of any critical feedback or lower ratings is atypical.
• Review dates span 2013–2023 (10-year range). Most recent reviews (2023) are strong, but 4 of 9 reviews are older than 2 years, which may not reflect current service quality.
• No reviews mention warranty, guarantees, or follow-up callbacks for issues—these gaps in coverage are notable but not necessarily indicative of problems.

This score is reliable and should be trusted, supported by HIGH confidence across three of four dimensions and a substantial mention count. However, the absence of any critical feedback across 9 reviews suggests either exceptional consistency or potential review bias; prospective customers should seek independent verification or recent references before committing to major work.

Michael's Master Plumbing earns strong scores across all four dimensions based on a large and detailed review base spanning 2017 through mid-2025. Professionalism is consistently praised — punctuality, communication, friendliness, and responsiveness appear in the vast majority of reviews, with multiple reviewers specifically noting same-day or next-morning service. Pricing is a standout strength, with dozens of reviewers explicitly calling out fair, transparent, below-estimate, or even no-charge outcomes, and several directly comparing favorably against competitors. Project completion scores slightly lower due to four negative reviews: one involving a no-show and ignored calls, one involving a disputed driveway concrete repair with alleged subcontractor negligence, one involving unreturned calls after initial contact, and one citing a rude phone hang-up — these meaningfully temper an otherwise excellent completion record. Experience scores highest, with reviewers repeatedly citing technical knowledge, problem-solving on complex jobs, and the ability to fix what other plumbers could not.

• NEGATIVE REVIEWS PRESENT: Four 1-star reviews exist among the dataset. One describes a complete no-show with alleged call screening based on perceived ethnicity (2022). One describes a disputed driveway concrete repair where the subcontractor allegedly did substandard work and Michael's refused to accept responsibility or provide permit information (2023). One describes unreturned calls and failure to follow through on scheduling (2023). One describes a rude phone hang-up (2018). These are serious professionalism and project completion concerns that have been factored into scoring.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of reviews are from 2025 and 2024, which is positive. However, the negative reviews span 2018 to 2023, suggesting these issues are not isolated to a single period.
• BLANK REVIEWS: Four reviews contained no text (only a 5-star rating). These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence per scoring rules.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: A moderate number of reviews use very similar superlative language ('best plumber ever', 'will never use anyone else', 'highly recommend') without specific job details. However, the majority of reviews do include specific names, job types, and situational details, which reduces the likelihood of systematic fake reviews. No significant fake review flag is raised, but the pattern is noted.
• OWNER RESPONSE CONCERN: One reviewer (April 2022) quoted an owner response that included a personal insult directed at the customer ('weak personality'). This is a professionalism concern at the business-owner level and has been factored into the professionalism score.

This WW Score is based on a large, multi-year review dataset with strong mention counts across all four dimensions and is considered highly reliable, though the presence of four substantiated negative reviews — including a no-show, alleged call screening, a disputed subcontractor repair, and a documented owner insult — introduces meaningful risk that the score does not fully capture for all customer segments.

Robert at RHD Primary Plumbing receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the standout strength — nearly every reviewer explicitly praised his responsiveness, punctuality, communication, and courteous attitude. Pricing is consistently described as fair, reasonable, or better than competitors, with multiple reviewers noting he waived charges or declined to bill for minor additional work, which is a strong positive signal. Project completion is also very strong, with jobs routinely finished same-day or within hours of the call, and Robert demonstrated a pattern of going beyond the original scope to check for additional issues at no extra cost. Experience is well-evidenced through reviewer comments about his diagnostic speed, technical knowledge, honest assessments, and the quality of his workmanship being praised even by a third-party inspector. The primary caveat is that all reviews are dated between 2013 and 2018, meaning there is no data from the past several years to confirm current performance levels.

• ALL REVIEWS ARE OUTDATED: The most recent review is from April 2018 — over 6 years ago. No reviews from the past 12 months are present. Current performance cannot be assessed from this data.
• ALL RATINGS ARE 5-STAR: Every single review is rated 5.0 out of 5.0, which warrants mild scrutiny. However, the reviews contain specific details, named individuals, unique scenarios, and varied writing styles, which reduces the likelihood of fabrication.
• ONE UNINFORMATIVE REVIEW: The review dated 2013-04-11 contains only the text 'I included it all in the above.' and provides no usable data. It was excluded from dimension scoring.
• PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP DISCLOSURE: One reviewer (2013-03-11) explicitly states they knew Robert personally through church, which introduces a potential bias in that review. The review was still counted but noted as a potential conflict of interest.
• SMALL BUSINESS / SOLO OPERATOR PATTERN: Several reviews reference Robert personally handling calls and jobs, suggesting a very small or solo operation. Performance consistency may vary more than with a larger firm.

This WW Score is based on a solid volume of detailed, specific reviews and carries HIGH confidence in its directional accuracy, but should be treated with caution given that all reviews are more than 6 years old and no recent data exists to confirm whether current service quality matches historical performance.

Starnes Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all four dimensions with consistently high marks for professionalism, pricing, project completion, and technical expertise. The company excels in responsiveness, punctuality, and courteous service, with 28 reviews explicitly praising professional conduct. Pricing is perceived as fair and competitive, with 13 mentions of good value and honest estimates. Project completion is reliable with 26 reviews confirming timely, thorough work. Technical skill is evident across 18 reviews highlighting knowledgeable technicians and effective problem-solving. However, two significant negative reviews from 2020 and 2022 reveal serious lapses in communication and follow-through on refunds, which temper the otherwise exceptional rating.

• Two critical negative reviews (1-star ratings from 2020 and 2022) describe serious failures: one involving a $500 unreimbursed charge for unauthorized work on gas company infrastructure with 30+ unanswered contact attempts; another involving complete communication breakdown over 3+ months with promised follow-up never delivered. These represent material integrity and accountability issues.
• The 2022 communication failure review is particularly concerning as it contradicts the company's otherwise strong responsiveness reputation, suggesting possible operational capacity issues during that period.
• Most reviews are 5-star with enthusiastic language, but this appears genuine rather than fabricated—reviews contain specific details (names of technicians, types of repairs, pricing comparisons, timeline specifics) and span 23 years with consistent themes rather than repetitive generic praise.
• Recency note: 17 of 35 reviews (49%) are from 2018 or earlier; only 8 reviews (23%) are from 2022 onward. The most recent reviews are from 2024 and are positive, suggesting possible recovery from 2020-2022 issues.

This WW Score of 87.2 is reliable for understanding the company's typical performance but should be interpreted with caution: the score reflects predominantly excellent service delivery, but the two serious negative reviews—particularly the unresolved $500 refund and 3-month communication blackout—indicate real risks in accountability and follow-through that are not fully captured by the numerical score. Prospective customers should expect high-quality work and professionalism in most cases, but should establish clear communication protocols and payment terms upfront given documented instances of communication failure and disputed charges.

Ardent Plumbing receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — reviewers consistently praise punctuality, courteous communication, and thorough explanations of work performed. Pricing is frequently described as fair, reasonable, and competitive, with one detailed review noting their quote was half the price of a competitor. Project completion scores are strong but modestly tempered by one 2-star review describing significant collateral damage caused by a whole-house filtration installation, and one 1-star review citing the worst customer service ever experienced. Experience and technical skill are well-supported by multiple reviews referencing advanced diagnostics, high-tech equipment, tankless water heater expertise, and effective problem-solving. The presence of two substantive negative reviews — one involving workmanship damage and one involving a hostile employee interaction — prevents a top-tier score and warrants attention.

• 7 reviews contain no text at all — only a 5-star rating. These blank reviews provide no usable data and were excluded from dimension scoring. Their presence slightly inflates the raw star average.
• One 2-star review (2023-04-12) explicitly states that a whole-house filtration system installed by Ardent caused damage to other plumbing and appliances, with two independent repair professionals confirming the cause. This is a meaningful workmanship concern and was factored into the project_completion and experience scores.
• One 1-star review (2023-02-20) cites 'absolute worst customer service' with no further detail. While vague, it is a genuine negative signal and was factored into professionalism.
• One 1-star review (2019-03-29) describes an Ardent service van driver giving the reviewer the middle finger and speeding. This reflects on employee conduct and was factored into the professionalism score.
• Several reviews use similar positive language patterns (e.g., 'professional,' 'courteous,' 'highly recommend'), but the majority include specific details, named technicians, and unique scenarios — this does not appear to be a coordinated fake review pattern. No significant fake review flag raised.
• A notable portion of reviews (approximately 15) are dated 2022 or earlier, some as far back as 2016. While the most recent reviews (2024–2025) remain positive, older reviews carry reduced weight per recency rules. The score is primarily anchored by the strong volume of 2024–2025 reviews.

This WW Score is based on 50 reviews with usable content spanning 2016–2025, with strong representation in the past 12 months, yielding HIGH overall confidence — however, the score should be interpreted with awareness of two substantive negative reviews, including one citing direct workmanship damage, which represent meaningful risk signals despite the otherwise strong track record.