Find Nearby Plumbers In Fort Worth, Texas

A-Tex and Aztec Plumbing reviews collectively paint a strong picture of a reliable, professional, and fairly priced plumbing operation across multiple operators (Jordan, Jay, Tino, Steve). Professionalism scores are high but are tempered by two 1-star reviews citing poor communication and responsiveness, one 2-star review citing inability to troubleshoot a complex repair requiring three visits and a factory rep, and one detailed 1-star review describing a messy, slow, and incomplete faucet installation by a technician named Steve. Pricing is consistently praised as fair, transparent, and below competitor quotes, with multiple reviewers explicitly noting that quoted prices were honored. Project completion is strong overall, with the majority of reviewers confirming jobs were finished correctly and on time, though the negative reviews introduce meaningful drag on this dimension. Experience is broadly praised, with many reviewers highlighting diagnostic skill, technical knowledge, and problem-solving ability, offset slightly by the 2004 spa repair failure and the 2018 faucet installation complaint.

• MIXED BUSINESS IDENTITY: Reviews appear to reference at least two distinct businesses — 'A-Tex Plumbing' (Jordan) and 'Aztec Plumbing' (Jay, Tino, Steve). These may be separate companies. Scores are calculated across all reviews as submitted, but the end user should verify whether these are the same entity before relying on this combined score.
• MULTIPLE TECHNICIANS NAMED: Reviews mention Jordan, Jay, Tino, and Steve. The 1-star complaint about cleanliness and poor workmanship specifically names Steve, suggesting technician-level variance that may not reflect the primary operator's quality.
• REVIEW CLUSTERING: A large number of reviews share the exact date of 2021-06-10 and 2023-06-10, which is unusual and may indicate batch imports from another platform rather than organic Google/Yelp submissions. This does not necessarily indicate fake reviews but warrants caution.
• RECENCY NOTE: Several negative or mixed reviews (1-star in 2018, 2-star in 2004, 1-star in 2015) are older than 5 years. The most recent reviews (2024–2025) are uniformly positive, suggesting possible improvement over time or survivorship bias in recent submissions.
• ONE BLANK REVIEW: One review contained no text (only a 5-star rating dated 2021-06-10) and was excluded from dimension scoring as it provides no usable data.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW FLAG — MINOR: The review dated 2011-03-05 appears to be written in third person as if by the business itself ('Customers called to tell us...'), which is atypical and may not represent a genuine independent customer review. It was included in totals but treated with low evidentiary weight.

This WW Score is based on a large review set (55 reviews) with HIGH mention counts across all four dimensions, making the score mathematically reliable; however, the mixed business identity concern, technician variance, and date clustering introduce meaningful uncertainty that prevents this score from being treated as fully definitive for any single operator.

Master Repair Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all measured dimensions. Professionalism and project completion are particular strengths, with consistently high marks for punctuality, communication, thoroughness, and follow-through across 78-82 mentions respectively. Technical expertise and problem-solving ability are well-documented, particularly in complex slab leak diagnostics and repairs. Pricing presents the only notable weakness, with legitimate concerns raised about flat-rate charges and costs relative to competitors, though many customers still rate value as fair. The company shows exceptional consistency in service quality, with named technicians (Michael, Chad, Jack, Tyler) receiving repeated praise across multiple years of reviews.

• Three 1-star reviews (2016-01-22, 2014-03-20, 2010-09-07) and one 3-star review (2010-09-09) indicate occasional serious service failures including no-shows, unprofessional phone communication, and pricing disputes. These are legitimate negative experiences, not fake reviews.
• Multiple reviews from 2022-2025 cluster on 2024-06-09 and 2025-06-06 with similar positive phrasing, but content is sufficiently specific and varied (different technicians, different problems, different outcomes) to be credible rather than fabricated.
• Pricing concerns appear in approximately 22% of reviews mentioning cost, with some customers describing charges as 'way too high' or 'crooks,' though others find pricing 'reasonable' or 'fair.' This suggests pricing strategy may be aggressive or flat-rate based, creating polarized customer reactions.
• Empty or minimal reviews (3 instances with no text, 3 with 'unknown') reduce data quality slightly but do not suggest fake reviews—likely system artifacts.
• Review recency: Approximately 45% of reviews are from 2022-2025 (recent), 30% from 2010-2021 (older), and 25% from 2004-2009 (very old). Recent reviews show consistent quality, supporting reliability of current score.

This WW Score of 87.2 is highly reliable, based on 122 usable reviews with strong data density across all dimensions (28-82 mentions per dimension). The company demonstrates genuine, consistent excellence in professionalism and project completion, with well-documented technical expertise. However, pricing remains a legitimate concern that prevents a higher score, and the three serious service failures (no-shows, unprofessional communication) indicate occasional operational lapses. Customers should expect high-quality work and professional service but should negotiate pricing upfront and confirm appointments explicitly.

Strain Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all four dimensions with consistent positive feedback spanning multiple decades. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 11 reviews explicitly praising punctuality, communication, politeness, and attitude. Project completion is solid with 10 mentions of successful job delivery and follow-through, though one 2023 review flagged an unresolved issue and defensive owner response. Pricing receives strong marks across 7 mentions for fairness and transparency. Experience is well-documented with 8 mentions of skilled, knowledgeable technicians. The single 1-star review from January 2023 represents a significant outlier and suggests a service failure with poor complaint resolution.

• One critical negative review (2023-01-02, 1-star) reports incomplete work (no water PSI after pipe repair) and owner defensiveness rather than problem resolution. This is a material service failure that contrasts sharply with the overwhelmingly positive pattern.
• Most reviews are older than 2 years (11 of 16 reviews predate 2023). Only 3 reviews are from 2023-2024, limiting recency assessment.
• High concentration of 5-star ratings (15 of 16) with predominantly positive language could suggest selection bias in review platform, though the single 1-star review and specific details in positive reviews reduce concerns about fabrication.

This WW Score of 87.2 is reliable and should be trusted, supported by HIGH confidence across all dimensions and 16 usable reviews. However, the single unresolved service failure in 2023 and the age of most reviews warrant noting that current performance may differ from the historical average presented here.

Cobb & Sons Plumbing receives consistently strong praise across professionalism, pricing, and technical competence, with the majority of reviewers highlighting courteous, timely, and knowledgeable service. Pricing is generally viewed as fair and competitive, with one reviewer noting they paid half the price quoted by a competitor, though one reviewer flagged the cost as 'a little expensive.' Project completion scores are strong but tempered by two notable negative reviews: one describing property damage, an unfixed toilet problem, and rude behavior, and another citing a failure to return calls and a no-show pattern. The experience dimension is well-supported by multiple reviews praising skilled diagnosis and efficient problem resolution. The score is modestly reduced to account for the small number of serious complaints and the presence of many blank or content-free 5-star entries.

• 11 reviews contain no text whatsoever (blank body with a 5-star rating). These provide no usable data and were excluded from dimension scoring. Their presence slightly inflates the apparent rating volume.
• 3 reviews are labeled 'unknown' or contain no meaningful content beyond a rating. Excluded from scoring.
• Several reviews from 2024 share the exact same date (2024-06-09) with no text, which may suggest bulk or imported entries rather than organic reviews.
• One serious negative review (2007) describes property damage, failure to fix the reported problem, rude behavior, and no follow-through on insurance — this directly impacts project_completion and professionalism scores.
• One negative review (2017) describes being stood up multiple times with no returned calls, impacting professionalism and project_completion scores.
• One negative review (2023) describes a delayed callback for an emergency broken pipe, impacting professionalism score.
• A significant number of reviews are older than 3 years (dating back to 2005–2022). While recent reviews (2023–2025) are predominantly positive, older negative reviews are included as they reflect documented service failures. Recency weighting applied in narrative assessment.
• No fake review pattern detected among text-bearing reviews — most contain specific details, named technicians (Craig, Greg), and varied language. The blank 5-star entries are a concern for volume inflation but not classic fake review fabrication.

This WW Score is moderately reliable: the large volume of text-bearing reviews with consistent detail supports HIGH confidence across all dimensions, but the score should be interpreted with caution given the presence of two serious unresolved complaints, multiple blank 5-star entries that inflate review count without adding data, and a review history spanning nearly 20 years with uneven recency.

CR Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most consistently praised attribute — punctuality, communication, courtesy, and responsiveness are mentioned explicitly across dozens of reviews spanning multiple years. Experience and workmanship are also well-supported, with multiple reviewers citing skilled diagnosis, thorough problem-solving, and quality repairs. Project completion scores are solid but tempered by two notable negative reviews: one describing a hot water heater repair that failed within months and a warranty dispute that went unresolved, and another where a drain blockage was not cleared and a full service fee was still charged. Pricing scores are pulled down meaningfully by a 1-star review citing a $300 charge for a $30 part and a 10-minute job, a complaint about a $200 minimum charge that was not disclosed upfront, and a $250 charge for an unsuccessful drain clearing attempt — these are specific, credible pricing complaints that prevent a higher score despite many reviews praising fair or reasonable pricing.

• FAKE REVIEW RISK — MODERATE: Approximately 15-20 reviews contain no substantive detail (e.g., 'Great service', 'Amazing work', 'Good job', 'The best of the best!', blank text with 5 stars). These reviews contribute no scorable data and inflate the overall star rating without providing verifiable evidence of quality.
• UNDATED REVIEWS: Roughly 20 reviews have no date attached. These cannot be assessed for recency and were treated as lower-weight background signal. They skew heavily positive and generic.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: Two reviews from 2021-01-27 appear to be near-identical submissions describing the same shower leak experience with Clayton and Phil. Only one was counted for scoring purposes.
• EMPLOYEE REVIEW SUSPECTED: One review explicitly states 'Very proud to be working for the company and along side. With my co workers. You couldn't ask for a better company than CR Plumbing.' This appears to be a review written by an employee and was excluded from scoring.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of detailed, substantive reviews are from 2025 and 2024, which is a positive signal. The three negative reviews span 2020–2024, suggesting isolated but recurring issues with pricing transparency and warranty follow-through rather than a systemic recent decline.
• PRICING TRANSPARENCY CONCERN: Three separate reviewers across different years raised specific complaints about undisclosed fees, charges for unsuccessful work, and overpricing for minor repairs. This is a recurring pattern that warrants a conservative pricing score.

This WW Score is based on a large and diverse review set with strong recency, and is considered moderately reliable overall — the professionalism and experience scores carry HIGH confidence, but the pricing score reflects a genuine mixed signal that prospective customers should investigate before hiring.

Big Blade Plumbing & Rooter earns strong marks across all four dimensions, with the majority of reviewers praising punctuality, courteous staff, and thorough communication throughout the job. Project completion is well-supported by numerous accounts of jobs finished same-day or within hours, including after-hours and weekend calls, though one notable 4-star review flags an unresolved water pressure issue that was never followed up on, and a 1-star review describes a no-show situation with disrespectful behavior upon arrival. Pricing is generally viewed as fair and transparent, with multiple reviewers explicitly noting no hidden fees and competitive rates compared to other companies, though one detailed 1-star review from 2020 alleges significant overcharging and dishonesty, and a 2015 review also cites overcharging. Experience scores are supported by technically detailed reviews describing skilled diagnostics, multi-step problem-solving, and quality workmanship on complex jobs. The score is modestly tempered by three 1-star reviews citing serious concerns around honesty, no-shows, and unprofessional conduct, which represent a meaningful minority signal that cannot be ignored.

• Three 1-star reviews exist: one alleges deliberate overcharging and dishonesty toward a female customer (2020), one describes a complete no-show with disrespectful technicians upon late arrival (2018), and one simply states 'Completely Overcharged for a relatively simple Plumbing Repair' (2015). These are credible negative signals and have been factored into scoring.
• Several reviews are very brief and generic (e.g., 'Great Company that does quality work.', 'These guys are amazing!!', 'Quick and easy!', 'Great People, prompt service.'). While not conclusively fake, the cluster of short, undetailed 5-star reviews — particularly the group dated 2024-09-12 — warrants mild suspicion of review padding. Confidence is not reduced to LOW but this pattern is noted.
• Three reviews contain no text — only a star rating (4.0, 1.0, and 5.0). These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence.
• A significant portion of reviews predate 2024 (some as far back as 2014–2018). While these are consistent in tone, recency weighting was applied and more recent reviews (2024–2025) were given greater influence on scores.
• The 1-star no-show review (2018) and the 1-star overcharging review (2020) are older than 3 years. However, they describe serious conduct issues and are not dismissed — they are weighted conservatively given their age but remain part of the record.

This WW Score is based on 54 reviews with usable content spanning 2014–2025, with strong mention counts across all four dimensions, yielding HIGH confidence overall; however, three credible 1-star reviews describing overcharging and unprofessional conduct, combined with a cluster of suspiciously brief generic 5-star reviews, mean the score should be treated as a solid but not unconditional endorsement.