Find Nearby Plumbers In Dallas, Texas

Leak Geeks demonstrates strong professionalism with consistently punctual, courteous, and communicative technicians across 68 reviews. Project completion is solid at 82, with most jobs finished on time and callbacks honored. Technical expertise is evident with a score of 84 across 45 mentions. However, pricing emerges as a significant weakness at 62, with 32 reviews explicitly criticizing costs as excessive, inflated, or unfair—ranging from complaints about $700+ service calls for minor work to $845 for 1.5 hours of labor. This pricing concern substantially impacts the overall WW Score despite strong performance in other dimensions.

• PRICING PATTERN: Consistent complaints across multiple years (2008-2025) about high service call fees ($59-$288 for diagnostics alone), labor rates exceeding $300/hour, and quotes 2-4x higher than competitors. This is not isolated—32 reviews mention pricing concerns.
• BILLING PRACTICES: Multiple reviews report unexpected charges, aggressive collection tactics (threatening police call within 3 business days of billing), and disputes over service call fees vs. estimate fees. One 1-star review (2024-07-25) describes owner 'Christi' making false theft accusations.
• INCONSISTENT FOLLOW-UP: Several reviews mention promised callbacks that never materialized, ghosting after quotes, and lack of responsiveness to customer concerns.
• ESTIMATE CHARGE CONTROVERSY: Recurring complaint about $49-$59 'service call' or 'estimate' fees that customers feel are unjustified, especially when work is not performed or quotes are deemed unreasonable.
• RECENT REVIEWS SKEW POSITIVE: Most 5-star reviews are from June 2025 (past 2 weeks), while pricing complaints span 2008-2024. Recent reviews show less detail and some appear generic ('Extremely knowledgeable and kind', 'Nice and friendly', empty reviews with 5-star ratings). This may indicate review recency bias or potential review management.
• EMPTY/MINIMAL REVIEWS: 4 reviews contain no text but carry 5-star ratings (2025-06-05, 2025-06-04, 2025-06-02 x2, 2025-04-10), which reduces data quality.
• QUALITY INCONSISTENCY: Some reviews report incomplete work, incorrect diagnoses (false leak claims), and follow-up issues requiring additional service calls at additional cost.

This WW Score of 78.2 is reliable for assessing overall service quality, but the score masks a critical vulnerability: pricing practices are a major pain point that contradicts the strong professionalism and technical competence ratings. Customers consistently report feeling overcharged despite acknowledging good work. The recent surge of minimal/generic 5-star reviews (June 2025) should be weighted less than detailed historical reviews. Prospective customers should expect excellent service delivery but should budget significantly higher than market rates and negotiate aggressively before authorizing work.

KMP Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent praise for courteous, punctual technicians who communicate clearly and explain work thoroughly. Project completion is solid overall, though a few reviews mention incomplete diagnostics or follow-up issues. Experience and technical skill are well-regarded across most reviews. However, pricing is a significant weakness—multiple customers report substantially higher charges than competitors for identical services, with some feeling misled about costs. The company's willingness to upsell expensive solutions without always disclosing cheaper alternatives has damaged trust in several cases.

• PRICING PATTERN: At least 6 reviews explicitly cite pricing concerns—charges 2-3x higher than competitors for same work ($564 vs $295 leak test; $1000+ estimate vs $250 actual cost elsewhere; $270 diagnostic fee). This is a material and recurring issue.
• INCOMPLETE DIAGNOSTICS: Review from 2017-04-27 reports technician initially misdiagnosed problem (used snake instead of camera), requiring callback. Review from 2025-05-10 reports drain was not actually cleared despite service fee charged.
• FOLLOW-UP FAILURES: Review from 2023-05-09 reports promised callback from owner never occurred; review from 2025-06-04 reports installation not completed as promised with no communication.
• WARRANTY/ACCOUNTABILITY: Review from 2016-08-12 reports same problem recurred 3 years later with no warranty or discount offered despite being original contractor.
• MAJOR PROJECT FAILURE: Review from 2014-05-18 describes catastrophic sewer line replacement with wrong location, property damage, improper backfill, and subsequent line failure requiring re-excavation. Customer sued.
• CUSTOMER SERVICE GAPS: Review from 2020-03-21 reports receptionist unable to answer basic questions about weekend hours and COVID precautions.
• RECENCY NOTE: Most recent reviews (June 2025) are predominantly 5-star with minimal detail. Older reviews (2014-2017) contain more substantive criticism and documented problems. Recent positive reviews lack specificity compared to detailed negative reviews.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Multiple empty/blank reviews with 5-star ratings (at least 5 instances) suggest possible review manipulation. Generic praise without detail appears in several recent reviews.

This score should be trusted with caution. While professionalism and experience ratings are well-supported by 60+ mentions, the pricing dimension is based on only 18 mentions and reveals a consistent pattern of overcharging that materially undermines overall trustworthiness. Recent reviews show fewer specific details and more generic praise, raising concerns about review authenticity. Customers should obtain multiple quotes before engaging KMP, as pricing appears to be 50-200% above market rate for comparable work.

Steven's Irrigation and Repair demonstrates strong technical expertise and fair pricing, with most customers praising his knowledge, quick diagnostics, and reasonable rates. However, a significant pattern of responsiveness failures undermines the overall score. While approximately 70 reviews are highly positive (5-star ratings praising same-day service, professionalism, and quality work), 9 reviews explicitly document serious communication breakdowns: customers report unanswered calls, unreturned voicemails, ghosting after initial contact, and no-shows despite confirmed appointments. This inconsistency suggests operational capacity or prioritization issues that create a two-tier experience—excellent service for some clients but complete non-responsiveness for others. The work quality and pricing remain consistently praised, but reliability in follow-through and communication significantly impacts the overall trustworthiness score.

• CRITICAL PATTERN: Nine 1-2 star reviews explicitly document non-responsiveness and no-shows. Reviews from 2024-07-03, 2024-01-23, 2023-10-07, 2023-09-26, 2023-08-28, 2022-04-12, 2022-02-25, 2019-10-22, and 2019-07-25 all report unanswered calls, unreturned messages, or failure to appear for scheduled appointments. This is not isolated—it represents a recurring operational issue.
• INCONSISTENCY ALERT: Multiple reviews (2022-07-27, 2018-06-19) indicate excellent initial service followed by complete communication failure on follow-up work, suggesting the business may struggle with workload management or callback systems.
• QUALITY CONCERN: One 3-star review (2021-08-11) documents substandard workmanship (improper wire connections using electrical tape instead of waterproof wire nuts, bare wires left exposed, unfilled holes), contradicting the otherwise consistent quality narrative. This suggests occasional lapses in professional standards.
• RECENCY NOTE: Most reviews are from 2021-2024, with the most recent being October 2024. Non-responsiveness complaints appear throughout the timeline (2019-2024), indicating this is a persistent issue, not a recent anomaly.
• FAKE REVIEW RISK: LOW. While many reviews use similar positive phrasing ('highly recommend,' 'fair pricing,' 'same day service'), they contain specific details (valve types, leak locations, tree root damage, wire issues, customer names) and vary in length and tone. No evidence of coordinated fake reviews detected.

This WW Score of 78.2 should be trusted with caution: while the technical expertise and pricing dimensions are well-supported by 28-52 mentions each, the project completion score is significantly dragged down by a documented pattern of communication failures and no-shows affecting approximately 11% of reviews. Prospective customers should expect high-quality work and fair pricing but should be prepared for potential delays in initial contact and callback responsiveness. The score reflects a business with strong technical capabilities but inconsistent operational reliability.

Speake's Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent punctuality, courteous communication, and respectful service across the majority of reviews. Technical expertise and workmanship quality are notably high, with many customers praising skilled problem-solving and thorough repairs. However, pricing presents a significant concern—multiple reviews document instances of perceived overcharging, minimum labor hour enforcement on quick fixes, and parts marked up substantially above retail. Project completion is generally reliable, though a few cases show delayed callbacks and unresolved issues. The company's performance is notably inconsistent across different employees and time periods, with some negative experiences involving unprofessional conduct and communication breakdowns.

• PRICING INCONSISTENCY: Multiple reviews (2017-2018 era) report aggressive minimum labor charges ($95-130) for work completed in under 5 minutes, creating customer perception of price gouging. Parts marked up significantly above retail (e.g., $35 for items costing $9.98 at Home Depot).
• EMPLOYEE CONDUCT ISSUES: One detailed 2023 review documents alleged discriminatory language and disrespectful comments toward a long-term customer by employee 'Garlan,' including racial undertones. This is a serious professionalism red flag.
• INCONSISTENT SERVICE QUALITY: Negative reviews span multiple years (2009-2023), suggesting systemic issues rather than isolated incidents. Some employees (Garlan, Rusty) appear in both positive and negative reviews, indicating highly variable performance.
• FOLLOW-UP AND WARRANTY CONCERNS: Multiple reviews cite poor callback responsiveness, refusal to warranty work, and charging for repairs of their own mistakes (2021 shower repair issue, 2018 gas line work).
• RECENCY PATTERN: Most recent reviews (2024, late 2023) are highly positive, but 2023 included a serious discrimination complaint. Earlier reviews (2017-2018) show more pricing complaints. This suggests either improved practices or potential review filtering.
• FAKE REVIEW RISK - MODERATE: While not all reviews are fake, the 2024 reviews show suspiciously generic praise with minimal specifics compared to detailed negative reviews. However, the presence of substantive negative reviews with specific details (dates, employee names, dollar amounts) suggests the review set is not entirely fabricated.

This WW Score of 78.2 should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH caution: while the company demonstrates genuine strengths in technical skill and professionalism, the pricing dimension is significantly dragged down by documented overcharging practices, and serious employee conduct issues (including alleged discrimination) create reputational risk. The score reflects a company with real capability but inconsistent execution and customer respect, particularly regarding transparency and fair pricing. Customers should request detailed written estimates before work begins and clarify labor charges for quick fixes.

HC Edwards Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with particular strengths in project completion (85.0) and technical experience (87.0), supported by extensive positive feedback on responsiveness, punctuality, and workmanship quality. Professionalism scores solidly at 82.5, with consistent praise for communication and courteous service. However, pricing emerges as a significant weakness (68.0), with multiple explicit complaints about high hourly rates ($200-$395/hour), premium charges for attic work, and unexpected final bills substantially exceeding estimates. The company excels at emergency response and same-day service but struggles with transparent upfront pricing and cost management expectations.

• PRICING VOLATILITY: Multiple reviews (at least 8) explicitly criticize pricing as excessive, with complaints ranging from $200-$395/hour rates, $2,500 water heater quotes, and unexpected premium charges. This is the most consistent negative pattern in the dataset.
• COMMUNICATION INCONSISTENCY: Two reviews (2022-05-12, 2022-12-26) report poor responsiveness and unprofessional communication (ignoring calls, delayed emergency response despite 24/7 claim, dismissive tone). This contradicts the majority pattern of quick response.
• ESTIMATE TRANSPARENCY: Multiple reviews indicate customers were not given clear upfront quotes before work began, leading to sticker shock. This suggests a systemic issue with pricing communication.
• RECENCY NOTE: Most reviews are from 2019-2021 (older than 12 months). Only 8 reviews are from 2024 or late 2023. Recent reviews show mixed sentiment on pricing, suggesting the issue persists.
• NO FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: While many 5-star reviews exist, they contain specific details (water heater failures, drain clogs, emergency timing, family member names) and vary in language/phrasing. No evidence of coordinated fake reviews.

This WW Score of 78.2 is reliable and should be trusted. It is based on 67 reviews with strong data density across all dimensions (22-52 mentions per dimension). The score accurately reflects a company with excellent technical skills and responsiveness but significant pricing concerns that materially impact customer satisfaction. The HIGH overall confidence is warranted, though customers should specifically negotiate and confirm pricing in writing before work begins.

Goad Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 78.2, driven by consistent professionalism, fair pricing, and solid technical expertise across 56 reviews spanning 14 years. The company excels in responsiveness, punctuality, and customer communication, with multiple mentions of same-day or next-day service and friendly demeanor. However, project completion scores are tempered by several serious incidents: a customer dispute over undisclosed pricing ($85 diagnostic fee increased to $100), a no-show appointment without advance notification, and a significant confrontation over sewage cleanup refusal. These negative experiences, while fewer in number, represent material failures in follow-through and professionalism that prevent a higher score.

• RECENCY BIAS: 39 of 56 reviews (70%) are from 2021 or earlier; only 8 reviews from past 12 months. Recent reviews show mixed sentiment (5 five-star, 1 one-star in 2025), suggesting ongoing service variability.
• EMPTY REVIEWS: 7 reviews contain no text, only ratings (all 5-star except one 1-star from 2021). These provide no evidentiary value and may indicate platform artifacts.
• PATTERN OF NEGATIVE INCIDENTS: Five 1-star reviews reveal consistent themes—pricing disputes (2 reviews), communication failures (1 no-show, 1 hang-up), and confrontational behavior (1 sewage cleanup refusal, 1 defensive response to customer concerns). These are not isolated complaints but suggest systemic issues with conflict resolution and transparency.
• CREDIBILITY CONCERN - 2024-10-15 REVIEW: Detailed complaint alleging Mr. Goad became defensive, made false statements, and dismissed customer concerns about grandson's work quality. Customer explicitly states they tried to resolve privately before posting. This contradicts the 'honest man' narrative in positive reviews and suggests potential communication/integrity issues.
• PRICING TRANSPARENCY ISSUE: 2023-04-12 review documents $85 quoted price increased to $100 without explanation or detailed report provided. Customer was not allowed to speak with owner to challenge. This directly contradicts 'fair pricing' and 'transparent' claims in other reviews.
• GENERIC PRAISE PATTERN: Multiple reviews use nearly identical phrasing ('Highly recommend,' 'very professional,' 'fair pricing,' 'on time') without specific details. While not necessarily fake, this limits ability to distinguish between genuine experiences and template-based praise.
• OPERATIONAL INCONSISTENCY: Stark contrast between reviews praising Mr. Goad's personal service (pre-2020) and recent reviews mentioning grandson Garrett. Quality and professionalism appear to vary significantly depending on which family member performs the work.

This WW Score of 78.2 should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH caution: while based on substantial data (56 reviews, HIGH confidence across all dimensions), the score masks significant operational inconsistencies, unresolved pricing disputes, and documented communication failures that are not fully captured by the numerical average. Recent reviews (past 12 months) show deteriorating sentiment and renewed complaints about the same issues flagged in older negative reviews, suggesting problems are recurring rather than resolved. Prospective customers should prioritize obtaining detailed written quotes and clarifying pricing terms in advance, and should be aware that service quality may vary depending on which family member is assigned to their job.