Find Nearby Plumbers In Dallas, Texas

Devard's demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent praise for technicians (Tony, Carlos, Brandon, Carl) regarding punctuality, communication, courtesy, and responsiveness across 26 mentions. Project completion is solid with 18 mentions of timely work, thorough diagnostics, and follow-through, though three negative reviews (2018-2021) indicate occasional failures to complete work properly or charge fairly. Experience scores well at 88 across 20 mentions, reflecting strong technical knowledge and problem-solving. Pricing is the weakest dimension at 68 with only 7 mentions—while some reviews praise reasonable costs and money-saving advice, three older negative reviews cite excessive charges ($170 for a $12 part, $200 for incomplete work, $76 trip charge). The company's 50+ year history and multi-service capability (HVAC, plumbing, electrical) support the experience rating.

• Three negative reviews from 2016-2021 (oldest is 4+ years old) report serious issues: incomplete work with hanging wires, excessive markups on parts, and unprofessional service manager behavior. These are isolated but material.
• One 2021 review reports technician refused to check AC due to rain and charged anyway—suggests possible service quality inconsistency.
• Majority of reviews (40 of 47) are from past 12 months (2024-2025), indicating recent performance is much stronger than historical record.
• Multiple empty review text fields (7 reviews with 5-star ratings but no text) reduce ability to verify claims, though this is minor.
• No pattern of fake reviews detected—detailed reviews contain specific technician names, service types, and contextual details that vary naturally.

This WW Score of 82.1 is reliable and should be trusted, particularly for recent performance (2024-2025). The score is anchored by HIGH confidence across three dimensions based on 20+ mentions each. However, the pricing dimension (MODERATE confidence, 7 mentions) and historical negative reviews from 2016-2021 suggest caution regarding cost transparency and occasional service failures—customers should request detailed quotes and verify work completion before final payment.

Service Squad Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent praise for punctuality, communication, politeness, and appearance across 24 reviews. Project completion is solid with 18 mentions showing timely delivery and follow-through, though a few older reviews (2021-2023) document serious callback failures and incomplete work. Experience scores well at 86 based on 15 mentions of skilled workmanship and problem-solving. Pricing is the weakest dimension (72) with only 6 mentions—while some reviews praise fair pricing and honesty, others from 2021-2023 report significant overcharging and aggressive upselling. Recent reviews (2024) are overwhelmingly positive, but older negative reviews raise concerns about consistency.

• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: Reviews dated 2024-04-12 10:32:14 and 2024-04-12 00:00:00 are identical word-for-word ('Honest and great at their craft...'). This suggests potential review manipulation.
• RECENCY BIAS: Most recent reviews (2024, 2023) are 5-star with glowing praise, while older reviews (2021-2022) contain serious complaints about overcharging, incomplete work, and non-responsiveness. This pattern warrants caution.
• SERIOUS NEGATIVE INCIDENTS: Three 1-star reviews document significant issues: (1) Alleged scamming and incomplete work (2023), (2) Extreme overpricing on sensor replacement ($900+) and water heater ($2,200+) with poor warranty (2021), (3) Technician created a pipe leak, then failed to respond to customer calls, leaving family without water (2021). These are not minor complaints.
• PRICING INCONSISTENCY: One 2021 review notes 'a little pricey for what it was done' (4-star), while 2024 reviews praise 'affordable' pricing. Another 2024 review explicitly states they undercut competitors by $10k. This suggests either significant price changes or selective customer targeting.
• COMMUNICATION FAILURE: 2021 review documents complete non-responsiveness after creating a problem—customer left messages and texts with no callback. This contradicts the strong communication scores in recent reviews.
• GENERIC PRAISE PATTERN: Many 2017-2020 reviews are very brief (e.g., 'Just fine,' 'All of the work went well,' 'Very thorough') with minimal specifics, though these are not identical and appear authentic.

This score should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH caution. While recent 2024 reviews are consistently excellent and detailed, the company has a documented history of serious issues (non-responsiveness, overcharging, incomplete work) in 2021-2023. The duplicate review and recency clustering suggest possible review management. The WW Score of 82.1 reflects strong current performance, but the older negative incidents indicate this company may not be consistently reliable across all customer segments or time periods. Customers should verify current pricing independently and request references from recent large projects.

Sunny Service demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent praise for punctuality, communication, and courteous technicians across 32 reviews. Technical expertise is well-documented with 26 mentions of skilled workmanship and problem-solving. Project completion is solid at 81.0 (28 mentions), though three negative reviews reveal significant execution failures including incorrect rewiring, misdiagnosis, and incomplete follow-up. Pricing presents the weakest dimension at 71.3 (12 mentions), with complaints about high labor rates, double-charging, and inflated estimates, offset by some positive value-for-money feedback. The company excels in soft skills but shows inconsistency in technical execution and pricing transparency.

• Three negative reviews (2024-04-27, 2024-03-12, 2023-07-24) describe serious technical failures: repeated AC repairs that failed within weeks, excessive labor charges ($556-$695/hour for thermostat swap), and inflated replacement estimates ($30k-$60k for a 1,500 sqft home). These are not isolated complaints.
• One 1-star review (2022-08-17) documents a multi-day service failure where technician Brandon incorrectly rewired an HVAC unit after drain repair, requiring a second technician (Jeremiah) to fix the error. Customer requested compensation but reported no follow-up from management.
• One 1-star review (2020-07-14) indicates poor phone customer service: 15+ minute hold times, refusal to provide pricing information, and unresponsive manager voicemail.
• Majority of reviews (28 of 40) are from 2020-2022, with only 7 reviews from past 12 months. Recent reviews show mixed quality (5 five-star, 2 two-star, 1 five-star in 2024), suggesting ongoing inconsistency.
• No evidence of fake reviews detected. Reviews contain specific technician names, detailed problem descriptions, and varied experiences including legitimate criticisms.

This WW Score of 82.1 should be treated with moderate caution. While professionalism and experience scores are well-supported by high-mention counts, the pricing dimension is weak and the three recent negative reviews documenting technical failures and billing issues suggest quality control problems that may not be fully captured in the overall score. The company's strength in customer service and initial diagnosis is undermined by execution inconsistencies and lack of accountability for errors.

Live Oak Plumbing demonstrates exceptional professionalism across nearly all reviews, with consistent praise for punctuality, communication, appearance, and courteous behavior (red carpet detail mentioned multiple times). Project completion is strong with most jobs finished on time and follow-through honored, though one significant 2024 review flagged incomplete work on gas line repairs requiring expensive rework elsewhere. Experience and technical skill are well-documented with multiple mentions of problem-solving ability and quality workmanship. Pricing shows mixed signals: several reviews praise fair and competitive pricing with no hidden fees, but two recent 1-star reviews (June and July 2024) cite expensive fees and poor value, creating meaningful tension in the pricing dimension.

• Two recent negative reviews (June-July 2024) contradict the overwhelmingly positive pattern. The July 2024 review specifically alleges incomplete work on gas leak repairs ($2k initial work still leaking, then quoted $7k more for $9k total, customer found alternative for less). This suggests either a genuine service failure or a complex job with legitimate cost escalation—requires caution.
• Majority of reviews (20 of 26) are from 2022-2023, with only 6 reviews from 2024. Recent reviews show deterioration in sentiment (two 1-star ratings in June-July 2024 vs. consistent 5-star pattern in 2022-2023). Recency weighting favors the negative trend.
• Pricing dimension has limited mentions (6 total) and mixed valence. Conservative scoring applied due to conflicting signals and limited data.
• No evidence of fake reviews detected. Reviews contain specific details (red carpet, shoe covers, diagnostic tools, slab leaks, gas line issues, specific technician names), varied sentence structure, and authentic problem-solving narratives. The two negative reviews are detailed and credible, not generic complaints.

This WW Score of 82.1 should be treated with moderate-to-high confidence for professionalism and project completion, but with caution regarding pricing and recent service quality. The sharp decline in sentiment from 2022-2023 (all 5-star) to 2024 (mixed 5-star and 1-star) suggests either a genuine operational change or increased complexity in recent jobs. Prospective customers should request detailed written estimates and clarify scope boundaries, particularly for complex repairs like gas line work.

C&C Slab Leaks & Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions based on a consistent body of reviews spanning 2015 to 2024. Professionalism is the most frequently praised attribute, with reviewers repeatedly highlighting punctuality, courteous staff, responsive office personnel, and respectful on-site behavior — though two 1-star reviews citing a blatant lie by an employee and failure to answer the phone prevent a higher score. Project completion scores well due to multiple accounts of thorough, complete work including going above and beyond the quoted scope, honoring quotes, and returning at no charge to finish overlooked tasks. Experience is well-supported by reviewers describing knowledgeable, skilled plumbers who correctly diagnosed complex slab leaks, gas leaks, and water heater issues that others could not resolve. Pricing is generally viewed as fair and competitive, with several reviewers explicitly noting costs came in well under competitors, though one reviewer felt they may have slightly overpaid, keeping this dimension from scoring higher.

• Two reviews (2021 and 2023) contain no text — only a 5-star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• One 1-star review (2019) alleges an employee named Miles lied to cover up laziness or incompetence and caused needless damage to the home. This is a serious professionalism and experience flag and was weighted accordingly.
• One 1-star review (2021) specifically cites failure to answer the phone, which is a direct professionalism/responsiveness concern.
• Several reviews are older than 3 years (2015–2021). While the most recent reviews (2023–2024) remain positive, the negative reviews are from 2019 and 2021. Recency weighting was applied to favor 2023–2024 reviews but the older negatives were not dismissed.
• The review set is relatively small (17 total, 15 usable). Scores carry reasonable confidence but a larger review base would improve reliability.

This WW Score is moderately reliable given 15 reviews with usable data spanning nearly a decade, strong consistency in positive feedback, and two credible negative reviews that were factored into scoring — however, the relatively small total review count and presence of two blank 5-star submissions mean this score should be treated as a solid directional indicator rather than a definitive assessment.

JRS Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all dimensions, with particular strength in professionalism (85.3) and experience (84.6). The company excels at punctuality, communication, and technical competence, as evidenced by extensive positive feedback on responsiveness, friendliness, and knowledgeable workmanship. Project completion scores (82.1) reflect generally reliable follow-through, though a small number of callbacks and one no-show incident slightly temper this dimension. Pricing (76.8) is the weakest dimension, with legitimate concerns about cost fairness in several cases, though most reviews praise competitive rates. The WW Score of 81.2 reflects a solid, trustworthy contractor with minor vulnerabilities in pricing consistency and occasional service lapses.

• PRICING INCONSISTENCY: Multiple reviews cite unexpectedly high charges or price gouging, particularly during emergencies (2021 winter storm reviews, $800 quote vs. $30 DIY fix). Several customers report being charged for service calls or full hours when minimal work was required. This suggests inconsistent pricing practices or opportunistic charging during high-demand periods.
• ANGRY CUSTOMER INCIDENTS: Two reviews (Jan 2024, Aug 2023) describe aggressive, threatening behavior from technicians/owner when customers questioned charges or requested refunds. One customer reported the technician 'yelled,' 'undid work,' and the customer feared physical assault. Another reported the owner and technician 'screaming' and being 'threatening.' These are serious red flags for customer safety and professionalism.
• QUALITY CONTROL ISSUES: Several reviews report work that had to be redone by other plumbers (Dec 2012, Feb 2013), incorrect installations requiring callbacks (Jan 2024 garbage disposal), and poor problem diagnosis (attic water line job in July 2014 rated 2.0 stars—customer had to hire another plumber to redo work correctly at lower cost). One review notes plumber lacked familiarity with expensive faucet installation.
• NO-SHOW AND COMMUNICATION FAILURES: One review (Oct 2013) reports a complete no-show with no callback after two voicemails left. Another review (Aug 2023) describes missed first appointment with no call, requiring customer to reschedule. These are significant reliability failures.
• BILLING DISPUTES: Multiple reviews cite unexpected charges, lack of transparency, or refusal to provide itemized receipts (Aug 2023 review—technician refused to provide receipt for parts, customer suspected price inflation). One review (July 2014) describes a $2,234 job that another plumber completed for significantly less, suggesting overcharging or poor assessment.
• INCONSISTENT COMPANY STANDARDS: Reviews span multiple technicians (Jim, Jason, Caleb, Dexter, Joe, etc.) with highly variable quality. Some technicians receive glowing praise while others generate serious complaints. This suggests inconsistent hiring, training, or oversight.
• RECENCY CONCERN: Most negative reviews (pricing gouging, angry incidents, no-shows, quality issues) are from 2012–2024, with several from 2023–2024. Positive reviews are heavily concentrated in 2014–2018 and 2015–2017. This temporal pattern suggests potential recent decline in service quality or company culture.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Approximately 40 reviews contain only a rating with no text or minimal text ('unknown,' 'N/A,' blank, single words like 'Great!' or 'Good Work!'). While not conclusive, this high volume of low-detail 5-star reviews (many from 2013–2018) may inflate the overall rating. However, the majority of substantive reviews are detailed and credible.

This WW Score of 81.2 should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH caution. While the company demonstrates genuine strengths in professionalism and technical skill, the recent pattern of serious incidents (aggressive customer interactions, billing disputes, no-shows, quality rework) and pricing inconsistencies—particularly in 2023–2024—suggests the company may not be as reliable as historical averages indicate. Customers should obtain detailed written estimates, clarify pricing upfront, and be prepared to escalate disputes if service quality or behavior becomes problematic. The company's best work appears to have been delivered in the 2014–2018 period; recent reviews warrant skepticism.