Kauffman

Insufficient data to calculate a reliable WW Score. Only 2 reviews were analyzed, falling below the minimum threshold of 3 reviews required for trustworthy scoring. The reviews present a stark contradiction: one 5-star endorsement praising experience and reputation, and one 1-star complaint from 2013 citing broken promises, poor follow-up, and abandoned work. The negative review explicitly documen... Read more

Insufficient data to calculate a reliable WW Score. Only 2 reviews were analyzed, falling below the minimum threshold of 3 reviews required for trustworthy scoring. The reviews present a stark contradiction: one 5-star endorsement praising experience and reputation, and one 1-star complaint from 2013 citing broken promises, poor follow-up, and abandoned work. The negative review explicitly documents failures in project completion (unfinished sprinkler system improvements, no estimate delivery) and professionalism (disappearing without follow-up). The positive review provides no specific details about the work performed. The extreme recency gap (2013 vs. 2023) and minimal sample size make any aggregate score unreliable. Read less