Find Nearby Plumbers In Austin, Texas

Clear and Present Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is the standout strength, with 54 mentions highlighting punctuality, responsiveness, courteous demeanor, and communication excellence. Project completion is solid with 48 mentions showing jobs finished properly and on time, though two negative reviews (1-star ratings) indicate occasional incomplete work or follow-through issues. Pricing receives strong marks (82.0) across 24 mentions, with customers consistently praising fair rates and transparent quotes, though a few older reviews note occasional pricing concerns. Experience is well-documented with 42 mentions of skilled technicians, quality workmanship, and problem-solving ability. The company's consistency across multiple team members (Travis, David, Ben, Jesus) reinforces reliability.

• Two significant negative reviews (1-star ratings from 2025-03-11 and 2024-05-10) indicate occasional project completion failures and professionalism lapses that contrast sharply with overwhelmingly positive feedback. The March 2025 review explicitly states incomplete work (toilet unable to flush after service), which is a serious red flag for project completion.
• One duplicate review detected (2024-10-12 and 2024-09-26 contain identical text about David helping with garbage disposal over phone). This suggests possible review manipulation, though the duplicate is minor and does not materially affect scoring.
• Review recency is heavily skewed toward 2024-2025 (approximately 75% of reviews), with older reviews (2016-2020) being sparse. This creates potential recency bias in the overall score.
• One older review (2018-09-26, rating 3.0) raises pricing concerns about labor rates, suggesting pricing consistency may have varied historically, though recent reviews show strong pricing satisfaction.

This WW Score of 87.2 is highly reliable, based on 60 reviews with strong mention counts across all dimensions (24-54 mentions per dimension). However, the two 1-star reviews indicating incomplete work and professionalism issues warrant caution—while statistically small, they represent genuine service failures that customers should be aware of. The score reflects a company with excellent average performance but occasional execution gaps.

Johnny demonstrates strong professionalism across 6 reviews, with consistent praise for punctuality, communication, friendliness, and responsiveness. His experience is well-documented with 5 mentions highlighting 30 years of plumbing expertise and exceptional problem-solving ability. Project completion is solid across 5 reviews, with customers noting thorough work and follow-through on multiple issues. Pricing receives limited mention (1 review) but is described as reasonable. The single 1-star review from 2019 appears to be an outlier involving a refrigerator repair dispute with communication breakdowns, but does not substantially undermine the overall pattern of positive feedback.

• One 1-star review from 2019 (5 years old) describes serious communication and trust issues regarding a refrigerator repair and follow-up work. This is a significant negative outlier but is isolated and predates most positive reviews.
• Five of seven reviews are 5-star ratings with generally positive language. While the positive reviews contain specific details (water damage repair, plumbing fixes, AC installation, apartment complex work), the consistency of 5-star ratings warrants noting. However, the specificity of examples and varied contexts suggest genuine customer experiences rather than fake reviews.
• Most reviews are older than 12 months (5 of 7 reviews are from 2017-2019). Only 2 recent reviews from 2024 and 2022 provide current performance data. Recency is limited.

This WW Score of 87.2 is reliable with HIGH overall confidence, supported by 6 positive reviews with specific, detailed examples across professionalism, experience, and project completion. However, the score should be interpreted with awareness that most data is 5+ years old, and the single serious negative review from 2019 indicates potential issues with certain types of work or customer communication in specific contexts.

A&T Service Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions, driven by a large and detailed review base spanning several years. Professionalism is the most frequently praised attribute, with dozens of reviewers citing courteous technicians, responsive communication, punctuality, and the owner Pierre's personal availability — including after-hours calls. Pricing scores well due to consistent mentions of competitive bids, transparent estimates, and multiple instances of waived or reduced charges for minor work, though a handful of reviewers noted unexpected cost increases or felt the price was higher than expected, preventing a top-tier score. Project completion is solid overall, with most jobs described as finished correctly and on time, and callbacks honored at no charge — but a few notable failures including a technician sent without required equipment, an ignored estimate follow-up, and one job where a worker was reportedly out of his depth pull the score below 90. Experience is well-supported, with reviewers frequently praising diagnostic accuracy, technical knowledge, and problem-solving on complex jobs like tunneling and sewer replacement, though one instance of a poorly credentialed technician and a minor undisclosed faucet damage temper the score slightly.

• Two reviews (1-star, dated 2018-12-10 and 2022-03-11) describe significant operational failures: a technician arriving without required camera equipment twice and a no-show, and a customer receiving 6 spammy confirmation texts followed by a 2-hour late arrival. These are weighted as genuine negative signals.
• One 1-star review (2022-02-08) describes A&T refusing to honor a 'never expires' estimate and then failing to provide a replacement estimate despite ~20 follow-up emails. This is a meaningful project completion and professionalism failure.
• One 1-star review (2022-09-27) describes a technician who avoided an honest conversation about not wanting to do a difficult job and instead ghosted on a quote request. Flags a communication and professionalism concern.
• One 2-star review (2021-04-05) describes being charged $75 above the estimate without discussion, and faucets replaced with unapproved parts. This is a transparency and pricing concern.
• One 3-star review (2021-06-16) describes $225 charged for 10 minutes of work, which the reviewer found very expensive.
• One 4-star review (2019-03-12) describes a recently hired technician who was unqualified and made the problem worse before a supervisor intervened. Flags inconsistent technician quality.
• One 5-star review (2021-12-07) mentions 'some of his employees are hard to work with' despite praising the owner, suggesting inconsistency in crew quality.
• One 5-star review (2024-01-26) notes a crack or scratch on a faceplate that may have been caused by the installer and was not disclosed — a minor but notable transparency issue.
• One review (2020-01-10) notes a 4-hour delay before arrival despite an otherwise positive experience — flagged as a punctuality concern.
• The review set is heavily skewed toward 5-star ratings (approximately 90%+ of reviews). While the volume and specificity of positive reviews suggest authenticity, this skew warrants acknowledgment. Most positive reviews include specific names, job details, and scenarios, which reduces fake review suspicion significantly.
• Review dates span from 2018 to 2024. The majority of reviews (approximately 55 of 78) are from 2020 onward, with a strong cluster in 2021–2024, providing reasonable recency. Older reviews (2018–2019) are consistent in tone and were weighted slightly less.

This WW Score is based on 78 reviews with a high volume of specific, detailed accounts across all four dimensions, making it one of the more reliable scores possible — however, a recurring minority of negative reviews citing operational failures, pricing surprises, and inconsistent technician quality prevent full confidence and should be reviewed carefully by any prospective customer.

Biggs Plumbing receives consistently strong feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently praised attribute — reviewers repeatedly highlight courteous technicians, prompt communication, and responsive office staff. Pricing is a notable strength, with multiple reviewers explicitly comparing Biggs favorably against competitors and noting costs significantly below rival quotes. Project completion scores well due to numerous accounts of jobs finished quickly and thoroughly, including complex emergency repairs and multi-step bureaucratic coordination. Experience is supported by specific accounts of skilled diagnostics and technical problem-solving on non-standard equipment. One negative review exists but concerns driver behavior on the road rather than any plumbing service quality, and carries limited weight against the volume of positive evidence.

• 5 reviews contain no text at all (blank body with only a star rating) and cannot contribute usable data to any dimension — these were excluded from scoring.
• A cluster of reviews dated 2021-06-10 with identical dates and minimal or no text may suggest bulk-imported or solicited reviews; however, several of these do contain specific detail and are not identical in phrasing, so no strong fake review pattern is confirmed.
• A significant portion of reviews are older than 12 months (many from 2013–2021), which reduces recency confidence. The most recent substantive reviews (2024) remain consistent in tone and quality, suggesting no meaningful decline.
• One 1-star review (April 2021) references dangerous driving behavior by a company vehicle — not a service quality complaint, but a professionalism flag worth noting for fleet/driver conduct.

This WW Score is based on 30 reviews with usable content spanning over a decade, with sufficient mention counts across all four dimensions to produce HIGH confidence ratings; the score is considered reliable but should be interpreted with mild caution given the age of many reviews and the presence of several content-free submissions.

Mike Krischke Plumbing scores strongly across all four dimensions, with particularly high marks for pricing transparency and technical experience. Reviewers consistently praise his honesty — including instances where he charged less than quoted or declined to upsell unnecessary services — which drives the pricing score near the top of the range. His professionalism score is high but tempered by one significant negative review in which he canceled a confirmed appointment the morning of service and refused to reschedule, citing being too busy. Project completion scores well overall, with most reviewers confirming jobs were finished thoroughly and on time, but that same cancellation incident — where a customer waited two weeks without a working water heater only to be abandoned — and one other review noting a two-week availability delay meaningfully reduce the completion score. Experience is rated very highly, with multiple reviewers referencing his master plumber credentials, 35+ years of experience, and strong diagnostic ability across a range of plumbing issues.

• One serious negative review (2021-07-22) describes a confirmed appointment cancellation the morning of service with refusal to reschedule — this is a meaningful project completion and professionalism concern and is weighted accordingly.
• A second review (2017-08-24) notes a two-week scheduling delay that caused the customer to use a different plumber for the actual installation — a mild availability/completion concern.
• The majority of reviews (approximately 15 of 22) are older than 12 months, and 12 are older than 3 years. Only 2 reviews are from the past 12 months (2024). Recency is limited and the score may not fully reflect current service quality.
• No strong fake review patterns detected. Reviews vary in length, specificity, and detail. Phrasing is sufficiently distinct across reviews to suggest authenticity.

The WW Score carries HIGH overall confidence due to a strong mention count across all four dimensions, but users should note that most reviews are more than two years old and only two reviews are from the past 12 months, which limits certainty about Mike Krischke Plumbing's current performance level.

Stellar Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all four dimensions, earning a WW Score of 84.2. The company excels in professionalism (87.5), with extensive evidence of punctuality, responsiveness, and courteous technicians across 287 reviews. Experience is also a clear strength (86.0), with 201 mentions highlighting skilled, knowledgeable technicians who solve complex problems efficiently. Project completion scores well at 85.5 with 198 mentions confirming timely, thorough work. Pricing is the relative weak point at 81.0, though still solid, with 156 mentions showing generally fair rates but occasional complaints about unexpected charges or estimates that increased significantly during work. The company's consistency across multiple technicians (Duane, Curtis, Gus, Carlos, Jeff, and others) and geographic locations suggests a strong operational foundation.

• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Multiple reviews from June 2025 (future dates) with suspiciously generic praise and identical 5-star ratings with minimal detail suggest potential review manipulation or data entry errors. These 6 reviews lack specificity compared to authentic reviews.
• PRICING CONCERNS: 8 reviews (1-star and 2-3 star ratings) explicitly mention overcharging, unexpected price increases mid-job, or bills 40-60% higher than initial estimates. One review documents a bill 60% higher than agreed price; another reports $1,600 charged for work another plumber completed in 30 minutes.
• PROFESSIONALISM GAPS: 5 reviews document poor follow-up (no callbacks for days/weeks), one instance of threatening legal action over a quote dispute, and one report of technician arriving with dirty boots and laying dirty tools on customer's counters.
• LICENSING/COMPLIANCE ISSUES: One 2020 review explicitly states 'Not a licensed contractor' appears on company website; another 2015 review documents illegal gas line work and permit violations that resulted in gas company shutoff.
• QUALITY CONTROL INCONSISTENCY: Multiple reviews (2014-2015) document significant rework required due to code violations, improper fittings, and poor workmanship by certain technicians, suggesting variable quality depending on which technician is assigned.
• RECENCY NOTE: Majority of reviews are from 2018-2025 with strong concentration in 2024-2025, indicating recent high volume of business. However, the 6 future-dated reviews from June 2025 are anomalous and reduce confidence slightly.

This WW Score of 84.2 is highly reliable based on 515 usable reviews with strong data across all dimensions, but customers should be aware that pricing transparency and consistency appear to be genuine weak points, and technician quality varies—requesting specific experienced technicians (Duane, Curtis, Gus) by name may improve outcomes based on review patterns.