Find Nearby Plumbers In Austin, Texas

Lakeway Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 81.2, driven by consistently high marks in professionalism (82.5), pricing (85.0), and experience (84.0). The company excels at responsiveness, fair pricing, and technical competence, with owner Eric and technicians like Carlos, Jose, and Freddy frequently praised for courtesy and efficiency. However, project completion scores are notably lower (76.5) due to multiple documented instances of ghosting clients, abandoned projects, and failure to follow through on commitments—including a 10-day kitchen sink installation delay and a critical emergency water heater call that went unanswered. These completion failures significantly impact overall trustworthiness despite strong individual service quality.

• CRITICAL: Multiple project abandonment incidents documented. At least 4 reviews (2023-01-21, 2020-10-01, 2022-06-16, 2018-04-12) describe ghosting, failure to follow up, or incomplete work after initial commitment. This pattern suggests systemic issues with project management and accountability.
• SAFETY CONCERN: Two separate 1-star reviews (2023-12-24 and 2023-06-13) describe reckless driving behavior by company vehicles, including aggressive lane changes, tailgating, and attempted road rage. While not directly related to plumbing quality, this reflects on company culture and employee conduct.
• OWNER CONDUCT: One review (2022-06-16) describes owner Eric threatening to report a negative reviewer to his 'friends' after initially ghosting an emergency call. Another review (2020-09-07) describes the owner as 'incredibly rude' and 'snappy.' This suggests potential interpersonal issues at leadership level.
• QUALITY INCONSISTENCY: One review (2018-12-05) documents a serious incident where Lakeway's work caused a $17,000 flood damage claim that was denied by their insurance, suggesting either poor workmanship or liability issues.
• RECENCY CONCERN: Most negative reviews (ghosting, abandonment, safety) occurred in 2020-2023, suggesting ongoing issues rather than isolated incidents. Positive reviews are distributed across all time periods but negative patterns cluster in recent years.
• SCHEDULING RELIABILITY: Multiple reviews mention missed time windows or lack of communication about delays (2017-11-17, 2018-10-05), indicating inconsistent appointment management despite generally positive service quality.

This WW Score of 81.2 should be interpreted with caution: while Lakeway Plumbing demonstrates genuine technical competence and fair pricing, the documented pattern of project abandonment, ghosting, and poor follow-through in recent years (2020-2023) represents a material risk that is not fully captured by the overall score. The company appears capable of excellent work when engaged, but reliability in commitment and communication is questionable. Prospective customers should be aware that positive reviews often come from straightforward, single-visit jobs, while negative reviews cluster around complex projects requiring sustained engagement or emergency response.

Absolute Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions, driven by an exceptionally large and predominantly positive review base spanning over a decade. Professionalism scores are bolstered by hundreds of mentions of punctuality, courtesy, and communication, but are meaningfully dragged down by a recurring pattern of no-shows, missed appointments without notification, and several accounts of rude or combative behavior from staff and owners — a pattern that appears across multiple years and multiple reviewers. Pricing receives the lowest score due to a notable minority of reviewers explicitly calling out overcharging, non-itemized invoices, hidden fees, inflated service call charges, and pricing that felt inconsistent or deceptive; while many reviewers praise fair pricing, the negative pricing complaints are specific and credible enough to suppress the score. Project completion is generally strong, with most jobs described as completed efficiently and thoroughly, though a handful of reviews describe incomplete work, callbacks needed, or jobs that failed within days. Experience scores well, with many reviewers citing skilled diagnostics, problem-solving, and technical knowledge across a wide variety of plumbing tasks.

• APPOINTMENT RELIABILITY PATTERN: At least 15 reviews across multiple years describe no-shows, missed appointments without any call, or plumbers arriving significantly late without notice. This is a persistent and credible operational weakness, not isolated incidents.
• PRICING COMPLAINTS — SPECIFIC AND CREDIBLE: Multiple reviewers across different years cite non-itemized bills, unexpected charges for drive time, inflated parts markups, high service call fees, and pricing that felt inconsistent or deceptive. One reviewer was quoted $3,200 for a water heater; another paid $162 for a 15-minute repair. These are not vague complaints.
• RUDE STAFF COMPLAINTS: Several reviews describe rude, dismissive, or combative behavior from staff or owners — including hanging up on customers, refusing to answer questions, and making racially charged comments. These are serious professionalism flags.
• POSSIBLE MULTI-ENTITY REVIEW POOL: The review set references a very large number of different technician names (Jose, Howard, Bill, Edwin, Josh, Larry, Steve, Raul, Sean, Brett, Andy, Jared, Matthew, Nick, John, Justin, etc.) and spans geographies including California (Bay Area, San Diego, Lodi, Castro Valley), Texas (Flower Mound, DFW), and Illinois (Chicago suburbs). This strongly suggests these reviews are aggregated from multiple distinct business locations or franchises operating under the 'Absolute Plumbing' name. Scores should be interpreted with caution as they may not reflect any single location's performance.
• RECENCY NOTE: The review set spans from approximately 2008 to June 2025. Reviews from 2025 and 2024 are heavily weighted in this analysis. Older reviews (pre-2020) are present in large numbers and show similar patterns — both positive and negative — suggesting the operational issues are long-standing rather than recently resolved.
• FAKE REVIEW RISK — LOW TO MODERATE: The majority of 5-star reviews contain specific technician names, job descriptions, and situational details, which reduces fake review suspicion. However, a subset of very short, generic 5-star reviews with no detail (e.g., 'Great work', 'Hard worker gets the job done right', blank text with 5 stars) are present and contribute minor concern. Overall fake review risk is assessed as low to moderate.
• INCOMPLETE WORK INSTANCES: At least 3 reviews describe work that was left incomplete, required a return visit, or failed within days of completion — including a drain that re-blocked within 48 hours and a tankless water heater installation left unfinished for a month.

This WW Score carries HIGH statistical confidence due to the very large review volume, but should be interpreted with caution given strong evidence that the review pool aggregates multiple distinct business locations operating under the same name, and given persistent credible complaints about appointment reliability, pricing transparency, and occasional staff conduct that meaningfully offset the otherwise strong positive sentiment.

Kimco Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all measured dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised across all four reviews, with explicit mentions of punctuality, responsiveness, and courteous behavior from named technicians (Jason, Sam, Levi, David). Project completion is solid, with all jobs finished on time and issues fully resolved. Technical skill and problem-solving ability are evident in three reviews, particularly the ability to diagnose and handle complex plumbing issues. Pricing receives limited mention but is described as fair in one review. The overall WW Score of 89.3 reflects reliable, professional service delivery, though the small sample size (4 reviews) and limited pricing data warrant moderate confidence.

• Small sample size (4 reviews) limits statistical reliability; recommend collecting additional reviews before making major business decisions
• All reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative feedback; while not necessarily indicative of fake reviews, the absence of any critical comments is atypical and should be noted
• Pricing dimension based on only 1 mention; insufficient data to confidently assess value proposition
• Review dates span 2022-2024 with one review from 2022 (over 2 years old); most recent reviews (2023-2024) show consistent quality

This WW Score should be treated as a preliminary assessment. While the available reviews are detailed and specific, the small sample size (4 reviews) and absence of any critical feedback limit confidence. Recommend collecting at least 10-15 additional reviews before relying heavily on this score for major decisions.

FreeFlow Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all four dimensions based on four reviews spanning from February 2023 to October 2024. Project completion is the strongest area, with all reviews confirming jobs were finished properly and on time, including complex work like pipe replacement and flange rebuilding. Professionalism is consistently praised, with explicit mentions of punctuality, clear communication, and courteous behavior. Pricing is noted as fair and competitive compared to larger competitors, with no hidden charges reported. Technical skill is evident across diverse job types from simple faucet installation to complex slab work requiring specialized problem-solving.

• All four reviews are 5-star ratings with no critical feedback, which is atypical. However, each review contains specific, distinct details (Thanksgiving timing, pipe burst response, flange rebuilding, slab work) that suggest genuine experiences rather than fabricated praise.
• Sample size is small (n=4). Confidence in overall score is limited by low review volume. Recommend collecting additional reviews before making high-stakes decisions.
• One review (2023-02-21) is older than 12 months; three reviews are recent (2024 and late 2023). Recency is generally favorable.

This WW Score of 89.3 should be treated with moderate caution due to the small sample size (4 reviews) and absence of any negative feedback, which limits confidence despite specific, credible details in each review. Additional reviews would significantly strengthen reliability.

All three reviews explicitly praise Greengo Plumbing across all four dimensions. Professionalism is consistently highlighted through descriptions of friendly, efficient, and communicative service. Pricing is noted as reasonable and fair compared to competitors, with no overcharging reported. Project completion is evidenced by timely work, cleanup, and successful installations including complex gas line runs. Technical expertise is demonstrated through skilled workmanship and problem-solving on unique installations. However, the sample size of only 3 reviews limits confidence; all are recent (within 12 months) and uniformly positive, which warrants cautious interpretation.

• Small sample size (n=3) — scores should be treated as preliminary and may not be representative of typical customer experience
• All reviews are 5-star ratings with uniformly positive language — while not necessarily fake, this lack of variance limits confidence in the overall assessment
• No negative or mixed reviews present to provide balance or identify potential weaknesses

This WW Score of 89.3 is based on limited data and should be considered preliminary; additional reviews are needed to establish a reliable baseline for this contractor.

CG Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all measured dimensions based on three recent reviews (Jan–Mar 2024). Professionalism is the standout strength, with all three reviews explicitly praising punctuality, communication, politeness, and responsiveness—including proactive updates and tracking notifications. Project completion is consistently solid, with jobs finished quickly and cleanly, including value-add work (outdoor hose bibs). Pricing receives positive mention in one detailed review citing competitive quotes and warranty. Technical skill is evident in rapid diagnosis and repair across multiple plumbing scenarios. However, the small sample size (3 reviews) limits confidence in these scores.

• Sample size is very small (n=3). Scores should be treated as preliminary and updated as more reviews accumulate.
• All three reviews are 5-star ratings with no critical feedback. While the detailed first review provides specific evidence, the pattern warrants monitoring for potential selection bias.
• Pricing dimension based on only 1 mention—insufficient for reliable assessment.
• No explicit mention of timeline adherence or callback follow-through in most reviews, though completion quality is affirmed.

This WW Score should be treated as a preliminary indicator only. With only 3 reviews, confidence is moderate at best. The score is likely reliable for professionalism and project completion, but pricing and experience assessments are based on limited data and should be updated as more customer feedback accumulates.