Find Nearby Plumbers In Nashville-Davidson, Tennessee

Number 1 Plumbing receives consistently positive feedback across all four dimensions from a small but specific review set. Professionalism stands out strongly, with all three reviewers explicitly noting punctuality, courteous behavior (shoe covers, respectful communication), responsiveness, and weekend availability. Project completion is also well-supported, with reviewers describing work that was finished efficiently and correctly. Pricing is mentioned favorably in two reviews, with one describing estimates as 'very affordable compared to other plumbers' and another calling the project 'fairly priced.' Experience is touched on in two reviews through references to clear explanations of work and effective problem resolution, though no deep technical detail is provided.

• Only 3 reviews total — WW Score should be treated as preliminary and not fully reliable.
• All reviews are 5-star with no negative feedback of any kind; while the reviews contain specific details that reduce fake review suspicion, the uniformly perfect ratings warrant mild caution.
• Two of the three reviews are dated 2023; only one review is within the past 12 months (September 2024), limiting recency confidence.
• Review from 2023-10-02 (Maria M) is emotionally positive but light on specific detail, which slightly reduces its evidentiary weight for scoring purposes.

This WW Score is based on only 3 reviews and should be considered a preliminary signal rather than a definitive assessment; more reviews are needed before high confidence can be assigned to any dimension.

All three reviews are recent (within the past 12 months) and consistently praise Jim's professionalism, including prompt communication, punctuality with advance call-ahead, friendly attitude, and trustworthy demeanor. Two reviews explicitly mention fair or reasonable pricing and a no-upsell approach, supporting a solid but conservatively scored pricing dimension. Project completion is well-supported across all three reviews, with jobs described as finished same-day or next-day with clear follow-through. Experience is evidenced by quick diagnosis, quality workmanship, and knowledgeable product selection, though the small review pool limits confidence across all dimensions.

• Only 3 reviews total — WW Score should be treated as preliminary and not fully reliable.
• All reviews are 5-star with uniformly positive sentiment; while the reviews do contain specific details (names, products, scenarios), the small sample size makes it impossible to rule out selection bias.
• One review includes a Nextdoor referral link, which may indicate a solicited or prompted review rather than an organic one.
• No negative or mixed feedback present — this may reflect genuine quality or simply an incomplete review picture given the very small sample.

This WW Score is based on only 3 reviews and should be considered a very early-stage signal; significantly more reviews are needed before this score can be trusted as a reliable indicator of consistent contractor performance.

Across four usable reviews, Jeremiah and Ascension Services receive consistently strong praise for technical expertise, with multiple reviewers noting his ability to diagnose problems that other contractors missed, including wiring issues and subcontractor errors. Project completion scores well because reviewers describe jobs finished on time, follow-up visits to verify quality, and a willingness to correct subcontractor mistakes without excuses. Pricing is described as reasonable and competitive, with one reviewer noting his bid was $500 lower than competitors while offering a higher-spec unit. Professionalism scores are tempered by one review describing Jeremiah as 'a little gruff,' and critically, one review (excluded from scoring) describes a witnessed incident of aggressive behavior toward a retail employee, which raises a conduct concern that cannot be ignored even though it did not occur on a job site.

• CONDUCT FLAG: One reviewer (1-star, 2020-12-03) reports witnessing Jeremiah screaming at a Home Depot employee. While this did not occur during a job, it is a direct behavioral observation and represents a legitimate professionalism concern. This review was excluded from dimension scoring as it contains no on-the-job data, but it meaningfully suppresses confidence in the professionalism dimension.
• RECENCY WARNING: All reviews are dated between 2014 and 2020. The most recent review is from June 2020, meaning no reviews fall within the past 12 months relative to a typical analysis window. Performance and business practices may have changed significantly since these reviews were written.
• LOW SAMPLE SIZE: Only 5 total reviews were provided, with only 4 containing usable job-performance data. This is a very small sample and the WW Score should be treated with caution.
• NO FAKE REVIEW PATTERNS DETECTED: Reviews vary in length, writing style, specificity, and rating. No suspicious repetition or generic phrasing was identified.

This WW Score carries LIMITED overall reliability due to a very small review sample (5 reviews), all reviews being more than 3 years old, and a credible third-party behavioral concern that introduces uncertainty around professionalism — prospective customers should seek more recent references before hiring.

Kyle Jordan/Jordan Plumbing receives consistent praise for professionalism and responsiveness across multiple reviews, with explicit mentions of quick turnaround, professional demeanor, and honest communication. Pricing is mentioned positively in two reviews as 'cheap' and 'reliable,' though detail is limited. Craftsmanship and problem-solving ability are noted in one detailed review. However, the dataset is very small (4 reviews), with one review from 2011 and another from 2020, limiting recency. No reviews explicitly address project completion, timeliness of delivery, or callbacks.

• Only 4 total reviews analyzed — sample size is very small and limits statistical reliability
• One review is from 2011 (13+ years old) and another from 2020 (4+ years old); only 1 review from past 12 months
• Generic praise in Review 4 ('Everything was great. I have no complaints') provides no specific evidence of any dimension
• No reviews explicitly address project completion, follow-through, or callback fulfillment
• Pricing dimension based on only 2 mentions with limited detail ('cheap' and 'save money' are subjective)
• Inconsistent naming across reviews (Kyle Jordan, Dave, Jordan Plumbing) — verify these refer to same entity

This score should be treated with caution due to very limited sample size (4 reviews), significant age of some reviews, and lack of explicit data on project completion. The score reflects positive sentiment but cannot be considered reliable for high-stakes decision-making without additional recent reviews.

Two of the three reviews contain usable detail and paint a consistently positive picture across all four dimensions. Professionalism is supported by mentions of promptness, politeness, and proactive communication such as advising on winterizing outdoor spigots. Pricing is noted as competitive or lower than other quotes in both reviews. Project completion is affirmed by jobs being finished in a single day and follow-through on the work scope. Experience is evidenced by the septic technician identifying a long-standing issue that no prior company had caught in nearly 20 years, suggesting genuine technical knowledge.

• One review contains only the word 'unknown' with no usable content and was excluded from scoring.
• Only 2 reviews contained usable data — this is an extremely small sample size and scores should be treated with significant caution.
• The two usable reviews are both 5-star ratings from 2022; while they contain specific details that reduce fake review suspicion, the sample is too small to rule out selection bias.
• RECENCY NOTE: The two usable reviews are from late 2022, making them over 2 years old at time of analysis. No recent reviews are present to confirm current service quality.
• The third review dated 2016 is both unusable and over 8 years old, contributing nothing to the score.

This WW Score is based on only 2 usable reviews and should be considered highly preliminary — it reflects a promising but statistically insufficient signal that requires significantly more review data before it can be trusted as a reliable indicator of contractor quality.

Brooks Plumbing scores strongest on professionalism, with all five reviews explicitly mentioning positive communication, punctuality, courtesy, and responsiveness — including proactive arrival notifications and accommodating emergency requests. Project completion is well-supported across four reviews, with reviewers confirming that all requested work was completed without issue. Experience is backed by three reviews, most notably a detailed account praising technician Tim's deep knowledge and problem-solving ability. Pricing is mentioned in only two reviews, both positively noting fair costs and a lack of upselling, but the limited data warrants conservative scoring. Overall, the picture is consistently positive but the small review pool and age of most reviews significantly limit reliability.

• RECENCY WARNING: Only 1 of 5 reviews is from the past 12 months (October 2023). Three reviews are from 2013–2018, making them 6–11 years old. Business practices, staff, and quality may have changed significantly since then.
• SMALL SAMPLE WARNING: Only 5 reviews total. The WW Score cannot be considered statistically reliable with this volume of data.
• MILD GENERIC PRAISE PATTERN: Two reviews (2013 dates) are brief and lack specific detail, which slightly reduces confidence in those data points. However, the remaining reviews contain enough specifics to avoid a fake review flag.

This WW Score should be treated as a preliminary indicator only — the small review pool and predominantly dated reviews (most from 2013–2018) mean the score reflects a limited and potentially outdated picture of this contractor's current performance.