Find Nearby Plumbers In Charleston, South Carolina

This single review paints a strongly positive picture of Rich from RL Plumbing across multiple dimensions. Professionalism is well-supported: he arrived promptly, communicated clearly about drying time, offered a follow-up callback, and left the work area cleaner than he found it. Project completion is also well-evidenced — the job was finished within the session, the valves worked perfectly upon testing, and the reviewer notes a long history of never needing callbacks. Experience is implied through careful, steady workmanship and correct execution of the sprinkler valve replacement. Pricing was not mentioned at all, so no score can be assigned for that dimension. All scores are conservative due to the single-review basis.

• Only 1 review provided — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably per minimum threshold of 3 reviews.
• Review is dated 2015-06-29, making it approximately 9-10 years old. This significantly limits its relevance to current service quality.
• No pricing information mentioned in any review — Pricing dimension has no data.
• All dimension scores carry LIMITED confidence due to single-review basis and should not be treated as representative of overall contractor quality.

This score is based on a single review from 2015 and should be considered highly unreliable as a representation of current or consistent service quality — significantly more recent and numerous reviews are needed before any meaningful conclusions can be drawn.

This single review paints a severely negative picture across multiple dimensions. The contractor accepted payment, made promises, and signed an agreement but then became unreachable and failed to complete the work — a serious breach of both professionalism and project completion. Pricing received a marginally higher score only because money was taken under a formal agreement, suggesting some initial transparency, but the failure to deliver makes this effectively a negative financial outcome for the customer. No information was provided regarding the contractor's technical skill or workmanship quality, so Experience cannot be scored. With only one review available, no reliable WW Score can be calculated.

• Only 1 review available — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably per minimum threshold of 3 reviews.
• Review is from 2017 (over 7 years old) — recency is very low and this data may not reflect current contractor behavior.
• Contractor allegedly took payment, signed an agreement, and then stopped returning calls — potential fraud or abandonment pattern flagged.
• Customer explicitly stated willingness to retract the review if work was completed, suggesting the dispute may have been unresolved at time of posting.

This score is based on a single review from 2017 and should be considered extremely unreliable — no meaningful conclusions about this contractor's current quality or practices can be drawn from this data alone.

This single review paints a positive picture of Jeff and 1st Choice Heating and Air across several dimensions. Professionalism is clearly evidenced by prompt arrival, courteous communication, and a transparent working style where the technician explained his process throughout. Experience is supported by the reviewer's note that Jeff was knowledgeable and diagnosed the AC issue quickly, though no detail is given about the complexity of the repair. Project completion is implied — the job appears to have been resolved — but the review lacks explicit confirmation that all work was fully finished or followed through on, warranting a conservative score. Pricing is entirely absent from this review and cannot be scored.

• Only 1 review provided — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably per minimum threshold of 3 reviews.
• No pricing information mentioned in any review — Pricing dimension scored as null.
• All scores carry LIMITED confidence due to single-review data set. Treat all dimension scores as directional only, not definitive.

This score is based on a single review and should not be considered a reliable representation of this contractor's overall performance — significantly more review data is needed before any WW Score can be trusted.

Only a single review exists for this contractor, making any scoring highly provisional. The reviewer speaks positively about Scott's follow-through — he honored his commitment to inspect the home upon returning from vacation and completed a sewer line replacement the following week. Pricing is described as 'reasonably priced,' and the work is characterized as 'fast' and 'efficient,' suggesting satisfactory workmanship. However, with just one review from 2020, none of these scores carry meaningful statistical weight and should be treated with significant caution.

• Only 1 review available — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably per minimum threshold of 3 reviews.
• Review is dated 2020-11-21, which is more than 3 years old. No recent performance data is available.
• Single review with generic positive praise and no granular detail (e.g., no mention of specific techniques, materials, or itemized pricing). Confidence in all dimensions is LIMITED.
• Cannot assess fake review risk meaningfully with only one data point, but the review lacks highly specific detail which slightly reduces confidence.

This score report is based on a single review from over three years ago and should not be considered a reliable indicator of current contractor performance — prospective customers are strongly advised to seek additional references before hiring.