Find Nearby Plumbers In Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Warrington Plumbing shows a mixed but generally positive profile with significant reliability concerns offsetting strong pricing and technical competence. Professionalism scores are dragged down by multiple documented no-show and poor communication incidents (at least 7 reviews explicitly cite no-shows or cancellations without notice), though many other reviews praise punctuality and responsiveness. Pricing is consistently praised as fair and competitive across 18 mentions. Project completion is the weakest dimension, with several reviews documenting incomplete work, incorrect installations (wrong pipe sizes, wrong expansion tank), and quality issues that required callbacks or additional plumbers. Experience and workmanship are generally rated highly when work is completed, with customers noting honesty and technical skill. The company's family-run nature and phone-answering mother are mentioned frequently—sometimes positively for warmth, sometimes negatively for communication challenges.

• CRITICAL: Multiple no-show/no-call incidents documented across different time periods (2009, 2013, 2018, 2022, 2023, 2024). At least 7 reviews explicitly cite failure to appear or communicate cancellations, suggesting systemic scheduling/communication problems rather than isolated incidents.
• QUALITY CONCERNS: Two detailed reviews (2017, 2020) document serious workmanship failures—incorrect expansion tank installation, wrong pipe sizing, and charging for work not performed. One customer paid $500 twice for the same tank replacement.
• INCONSISTENT QUALITY: Reviews suggest quality varies significantly depending on which family member performs the work. Father praised; sons criticized in multiple reviews for inadequate work.
• ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES: One review (2021) documents 5-month billing delay and threat of collections action, indicating poor administrative processes.
• RECENCY PATTERN: Most recent reviews (2024-2025) show both strong praise and serious no-show complaints, indicating ongoing reliability issues despite long company history.
• EMPTY/MINIMAL REVIEWS: 4 reviews contain no text or only ratings (2023, 2022, 2021, 2015, 2016), reducing data quality slightly.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW: One review from 2017-03-03 appears twice with identical text, suggesting possible data duplication.

This WW Score of 72.8 should be treated with MODERATE confidence and caution: while pricing and technical skill are genuinely strong, the documented pattern of no-shows, communication failures, and quality inconsistencies across multiple years represents a material risk. Customers should expect competitive pricing and good work when the company shows up, but should build in contingency time and verify completion quality carefully, as follow-up issues appear common.

TSQ Plumbing demonstrates strong technical expertise and generally professional service delivery, with many customers praising responsiveness, politeness, and quality workmanship. However, the company is significantly hampered by inconsistent follow-through on callbacks and commitments, with multiple customers reporting unresolved issues and lack of responsiveness after initial service. Pricing transparency is a notable weakness, with customers reporting arbitrary pricing and lack of upfront quotes. The presence of several detailed negative reviews describing incomplete work and poor owner communication substantially reduces overall confidence despite a high volume of positive historical reviews.

• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: 8 reviews with identical or near-identical text (e.g., two exact duplicates of the sewer line review from 2022-06-10 and 2022-03-30; two exact duplicates of the bathtub drain review from 2022-06-10 and 2022-01-27). Additionally, 4 reviews contain no text content (blank reviews rated 5.0 and one rated 2.0 from 2023-06-10), suggesting data corruption or artificial padding.
• RECENCY CONCERN: Majority of reviews are from 2021 and earlier (pre-2022). Only 4 substantive reviews from 2024-2025. Recent reviews show deterioration in service quality (Feb 2025: no-show pattern; Sept 2024: non-responsive owner; Oct 2024: pricing inconsistency).
• CRITICAL PATTERN: Multiple recent reviews (2024-2025) describe serious follow-through failures: owner non-responsiveness to callbacks, no-shows despite promises, failure to provide quotes, and incomplete work. This contradicts the positive historical narrative.
• OWNER CONDUCT: Two detailed reviews describe rude, dismissive behavior from the owner when addressing customer complaints, suggesting potential management/culture issues.
• CONFIDENCE REDUCTION: Due to fake review detection and recency bias showing service degradation, overall confidence is reduced from HIGH to MODERATE despite adequate mention counts.

This score should be treated with caution. While mention counts support HIGH confidence in individual dimensions, the detection of duplicate and blank reviews, combined with a clear pattern of deteriorating service quality in recent months (2024-2025) versus historical positive reviews, suggests the company's current performance may be significantly worse than the overall WW Score indicates. Recent customers should weight the 2024-2025 negative reviews more heavily than older positive reviews.

Good Plumbing demonstrates strong technical competence and generally professional service delivery, with many customers praising workmanship quality and responsiveness. However, the company is significantly hampered by persistent pricing concerns—multiple reviews document overbilling, unexpected material charges, and hourly rate structures that customers found excessive relative to work performed. Project completion is solid with good follow-through on most jobs, though some callbacks and warranty disputes have created friction. The most recent negative reviews (2022–2024) suggest ongoing customer service and communication issues, particularly around responsiveness to inquiries and dispute resolution.

• PRICING PATTERN: 11 mentions of pricing issues across 28 reviews (39% of reviews). Multiple customers report being charged significantly more than expected, with specific complaints about hourly billing per person, material markups, and charges for travel/dispatch fees. This is the most consistent negative theme.
• RECENCY CONCERN: Most positive reviews are from 2013–2019 (older than 5 years). Recent reviews (2020–2024) are predominantly negative (5 of 6 recent reviews are 1–2 stars), suggesting service quality or customer satisfaction has declined.
• CUSTOMER SERVICE DETERIORATION: Three recent reviews (2022–2024) explicitly cite poor communication, unresponsiveness to calls/texts, and dismissive handling of complaints. This contrasts sharply with older reviews praising responsiveness.
• BILLING DISPUTE PATTERN: Multiple reviews describe post-service billing surprises (materials not mentioned upfront, hourly rates per technician not clearly explained, warranty disputes). One detailed 2013 review documents a 6-hour ordeal with multiple billing disputes and eventual account flagging.
• WARRANTY CONCERNS: At least two reviews mention limited 30-day labor warranty and disputes over what is/isn't covered, creating friction on follow-up issues.
• DAMAGE LIABILITY: One 2022 review describes property damage (bathroom flood) caused by technician negligence, with poor follow-up and dismissive response from management.

This score should be treated with MODERATE confidence. While the company demonstrates genuine technical skill and professionalism in execution, the persistent and escalating pricing complaints (39% of reviews) and recent deterioration in customer service responsiveness (2020–2024) significantly undermine overall trustworthiness. The WW Score of 72.8 reflects a company in decline: strong on experience and project completion, but weakened by pricing transparency issues and recent communication failures. Customers should obtain detailed written estimates including all materials and labor rates before engaging this company.

Joe Walsh demonstrates strong technical expertise and skill in plumbing and HVAC work, with multiple reviews praising quality workmanship and problem-solving ability. Pricing is generally fair and transparent, with customers noting reasonable rates compared to competitors. However, professionalism is significantly undermined by serious follow-up failures: multiple customers report unanswered calls, broken promises for callbacks, no-shows without communication, and incomplete work (gas line leak, missing shut-off valve). While many recent reviews (2021-2023) are highly positive, the pattern of communication breakdowns and accountability issues creates material risk for potential customers.

• CRITICAL: Multiple reviews (2022-2023) document severe follow-up failures including no-shows without notice, unanswered calls sent to voicemail, and broken promises to return for scheduled work. This is a systemic professionalism issue.
• QUALITY CONTROL CONCERN: One review documents substandard installation (gas line leak, missing code-required shut-off valve) that required correction by other plumbers, suggesting inconsistent quality or lack of inspection.
• DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY CONCERN: One review alleges incorrect AC diagnosis recommending $6,000 replacement when only $300 in parts were needed, suggesting either lack of technical knowledge or potential overcharging motive.
• RECENCY PATTERN: Most highly positive reviews are from 2021-2022. Negative reviews cluster in 2022-2023, suggesting possible deterioration in service quality or business management over time.
• PRICING TRANSPARENCY ISSUE: Multiple reviews mention price disputes or surprise charges (e.g., $290 charge without advance communication, $175 diagnostic fee after being told evaluation was free), indicating inconsistent communication about costs.

This score should be treated with MODERATE confidence. While Joe Walsh demonstrates genuine technical competence and skill, the pattern of communication failures, follow-up breakdowns, and accountability issues across multiple recent reviews represents a material risk that outweighs positive workmanship ratings. Customers should expect quality work but should not rely on responsive follow-up or callbacks.

Turner Bros Plumbing demonstrates strong technical expertise and generally professional service, with many customers praising responsiveness, friendliness, and quality workmanship. However, the company is significantly hampered by serious pricing inconsistencies and follow-through failures. Multiple reviews document dramatic quote discrepancies, overcharging, and failure to honor callbacks or show up to scheduled appointments. While positive reviews emphasize honesty and fair pricing, negative reviews reveal systematic communication breakdowns and accountability issues that undermine trust. The WW Score reflects a business with solid technical capability but problematic operational execution.

• PRICING INCONSISTENCY: Multiple reviews (2018-06-07, 2018-06-21) document drastically different quotes from different employees and significant overcharging. One customer was quoted $200 but charged $375 initially, later reduced to $200. Another customer reported massive overcharging for 3 small jobs.
• NO-SHOW AND ABANDONMENT: Review dated 2018-09-23 reports scheduled appointment never kept with no follow-up communication. Review dated 2018-08-16 reports technician never communicated departure and became unresponsive to multiple contact attempts.
• FOLLOW-UP FAILURE: Review dated 2018-06-21 documents owner Brian promising to personally inspect work but becoming completely unresponsive for over a week, with office phone going to voicemail.
• RECENCY CONCERN: Most reviews are from 2016-2018 (6+ years old). Only 1 review from 2020. Recent review pattern unavailable to assess if issues have been corrected.
• QUALITY CONTROL: Review dated 2018-06-21 reports plumber installed faucet without customer approval and caused hot water loss, with conflicting explanations from staff about responsibility.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Several 5-star reviews (2020-01-25, 2018-10-24) use generic praise language ('excellent service,' 'attention to detail,' 'immaculate care') with minimal specific detail about actual work performed, though not conclusively fake.

This score should be treated with caution due to significant data recency issues (most reviews 6+ years old), serious documented pricing and follow-through failures that directly contradict positive reviews, and insufficient recent data to determine if operational problems have been resolved.

Stimmler GJ & Sons demonstrates strong professionalism and technical expertise, with multiple reviews praising responsiveness, friendliness, and knowledgeable staff. However, the company is significantly hampered by serious project completion failures: two detailed 1-star reviews document incomplete repairs, failure to follow up on damage caused during service, and refusal to honor warranty obligations. Pricing is generally fair when work is completed properly, but the company's inconsistency—ranging from excellent family-owned service to catastrophic job abandonment—creates substantial risk. The WW Score reflects this volatility: strong fundamentals undermined by critical execution failures.

• CRITICAL: Two severe negative reviews (2019, 2018, 2015) document serious project completion failures including: damage caused during diagnosis not repaired, wrong parts ordered, job abandonment mid-project, and warranty refusal. These are not minor complaints but systemic failures.
• RECENCY CONCERN: Most reviews are 6+ years old (2016-2018). Only 2 reviews from 2023-2024. Recent data is limited, making current performance assessment difficult.
• PATTERN DETECTED: Negative reviews involve complex HVAC/boiler work (Bosch tankless heater, furnace issues, toilet installation). Positive reviews also mention HVAC/plumbing but with successful outcomes. Suggests inconsistent quality on technical jobs.
• WARRANTY ISSUE: 2015 review explicitly states company refuses to honor 1-year warranty on toilet installation after 1 year, claiming work is outside guarantee period despite defect appearing within warranty window.
• RESPONSIVENESS INCONSISTENCY: While most reviews praise quick response times, the 2018 Bosch heater review documents significant delays in callback after damage was discovered ('didn't respond for a long time').

This score should be treated with CAUTION. While professionalism and experience scores are solid, the documented project completion failures—particularly the detailed 2018 Bosch heater disaster and 2015 warranty refusal—represent serious red flags that outweigh positive reviews. The age of most reviews (6+ years) and limited recent data further reduce confidence. Potential customers should request references for complex HVAC work and clarify warranty terms in writing before engaging this company.