Find Nearby Plumbers In Altoona, Pennsylvania

This single review is strongly positive across all four dimensions. The reviewer explicitly praised lower-than-competitor pricing, prompt project completion within days of selection, and professional courteous behavior including cleanup beyond expectations. Workmanship quality is inferred from the sewer project being completed satisfactorily and the basement being left in better condition than found, though no deep technical detail was provided. All scores are held conservative due to the extremely limited sample size of one review.

• Only 1 review analyzed — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably with fewer than 3 reviews.
• Review is from 2021-03-05, which is more than 1 year old. Recency weighting is a concern as this may not reflect current performance.
• With only a single 5-star review, there is no way to assess consistency, pattern of behavior, or detect potential fake review signals. Treat all dimension scores with caution.

This score report is based on a single review over three years old and should be considered highly unreliable — additional reviews are strongly needed before any meaningful conclusions can be drawn about this contractor.

Only a single review is available, making any reliable scoring impossible across most dimensions. The one review explicitly describes a failure in communication and responsiveness — the contractor did not return two phone messages left several days apart, which is a direct and serious professionalism concern. No work was ever performed, so project completion, experience, and pricing cannot be assessed at all. The professionalism score of 10 reflects the explicit complaint about being ignored entirely, with a small buffer acknowledging that a contractor referral was in place and the reviewer acknowledged the job may have been too small.

• Only 1 review available — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably per minimum threshold of 3 reviews.
• Review is dated 2014 — this is over 10 years old and carries very low recency weight. Business practices may have changed significantly since then.
• No data available for pricing, project completion, or experience dimensions — three out of four scoring dimensions are entirely unscored.

This score report is based on a single review from 2014 and should not be considered a reliable indicator of this contractor's current quality or overall performance.

Insufficient Data — cannot calculate WW Score reliably. Only 1 review was analyzed, which falls below the minimum threshold of 3 reviews required for a trustworthy WW Score calculation. The single review mentions professionalism (punctuality and communication), project completion (on-time delivery), and experience (quality of work), but pricing is not addressed. Individual dimension scores are provided for reference only and should not be considered reliable.

• Only 1 review available — minimum 3 reviews required for reliable scoring
• No pricing information mentioned in the review
• All confidence levels are LIMITED due to insufficient sample size

This report cannot be trusted as a reliable assessment of contractor performance. A minimum of 3 reviews is required to produce a valid WW Score; only 1 review was provided.

Insufficient Data — cannot calculate WW Score reliably. Only one review was analyzed. The single review mentions project completion (job finished without leaving early) and experience (knew what he was doing), both scored conservatively at 85 based on limited explicit detail. No data exists for professionalism or pricing dimensions. A minimum of 3 reviews is required for reliable WW Score calculation.

• Only 1 review provided — statistically insufficient for reliable scoring
• Review is generic praise with minimal specific details about work quality, timeline, or pricing
• No pricing information mentioned
• No explicit professionalism markers (punctuality, communication, responsiveness) mentioned

This score cannot be calculated reliably due to insufficient review volume (n=1). At least 3 reviews are required to produce a trustworthy WW Score.

Insufficient Data — cannot calculate WW Score reliably. Only one review was provided. While this single review is positive and mentions professionalism (very professional), experience (extremely knowledgeable), and project completion (high quality service, no problems), a WW Score requires a minimum of 3 reviews to be statistically meaningful. Pricing is not addressed in this review.

• Only 1 review provided — below minimum threshold of 3 reviews required for reliable WW Score calculation
• Review is from 2021 (3+ years old) — recency is a concern for current contractor assessment
• Generic praise language without specific project details or challenges overcome
• No pricing information mentioned — cannot assess price friendliness dimension

This score cannot be calculated or trusted with only one review; additional recent reviews are essential before making a contractor decision.

Insufficient data — only 1 review provided. The single review explicitly praises professionalism (politeness, responsiveness, quick service) and project completion (job done quickly, site kept clean). However, pricing is not mentioned, and experience/workmanship quality is not explicitly discussed. A WW Score cannot be reliably calculated from a single review.

• Only 1 review analyzed — insufficient for reliable scoring
• Review is from January 2022 (over 2 years old) — recency is a concern
• No pricing information provided in review
• No explicit mention of technical skill or workmanship quality

This score cannot be calculated reliably. A minimum of 3 reviews is required to produce a trustworthy WW Score.