Find Nearby Plumbers In Portland, Oregon

Earl Frank and A Apple Plumbing receive consistently strong praise across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism and experience being the most frequently cited strengths. Multiple reviewers highlight his punctuality, responsiveness to emergencies, honest communication, and trustworthy character, driving a high professionalism score. His technical skill is repeatedly validated through complex jobs including re-pipes, crawl space work, rusted galvanized line clearing, and accurate remote diagnosis, supporting a strong experience score. Pricing is explicitly called reasonable or fair by six reviewers, with no complaints about hidden charges or overcharging, yielding a solid price-friendly score. Project completion is well-supported, with reviewers noting jobs finished correctly the first time, callbacks honored, and urgent timelines met, though the dimension was not explicitly discussed in every review.

• All 12 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative or mixed feedback, which warrants mild scrutiny. However, most reviews include specific job details, named individuals, and varied writing styles, reducing the likelihood of coordinated fake reviews.
• Review recency is a concern: only 3 of 12 reviews are from the past 12 months (2023–2024), and 7 reviews are more than 5 years old (2013–2019). The score is weighted toward recent reviews where possible, but the older reviews still carry meaningful influence given the lack of recent volume.
• The review from 2016 describes a phone consultation only, with no in-person work performed. It was counted for professionalism and experience but treated with reduced weight for project completion.

This WW Score carries HIGH overall confidence due to strong mention counts across all four dimensions and specific, credible review content, but users should note that the majority of reviews are more than three years old and the absence of any critical feedback across 12 reviews is statistically unusual.

Black Cat Plumbing demonstrates consistently strong performance across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — reviewers repeatedly praised punctuality, communication, friendly attitudes, and responsiveness across decades of reviews. Pricing received positive mentions in many reviews, with customers noting fair and competitive quotes, though one reviewer explicitly stated 'Black Cat is not the cheapest,' and another noted a competitor quoted $700 versus Black Cat's $170, suggesting value rather than rock-bottom pricing. Project completion is generally excellent, with multiple large repipe and remodel jobs completed on time and on budget, though one significant negative review described a shoddy repipe job with shortcuts and mess left under the house, and another described scheduling inflexibility that prevented a customer from booking. Experience and workmanship are well-documented across complex jobs including full repiping, tankless water heater installs, code-compliant stack rerouting, and emergency repairs — with a city inspector even complimenting the quality of work on one occasion. The score is modestly tempered by three negative reviews: one serious complaint about workmanship quality on a repipe, one about scheduling rigidity, and two about reckless driving by company vehicles.

• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: The review 'Black Cat Plumbing is great. Everybody I dealt with was friendly...' by Rachel K. from Lake Oswego appears twice with different dates (2024-10-09 and 2024-09-18). Only counted once for scoring purposes.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: The review 'Great company that takes pride in its work. The staff is friendly and knowledgeable.' appears twice with different dates (2025-06-07 and 2025-06-04). Only counted once for scoring purposes.
• BLANK REVIEWS: Approximately 12 reviews contain no text — only a 5-star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence per Rule 1 and Rule 2.
• NEGATIVE WORKMANSHIP FLAG: One 1-star review (2021-06-07) describes a seriously substandard repipe job — shortcuts, mess left under the house, and failure to remove old materials as promised after an $8,000 job. This meaningfully impacts the project_completion and experience scores.
• DRIVING COMPLAINTS: Two reviews (2023-06-20 and 2021-12-20) describe dangerous driving by company vehicles. These are not plumbing-related but reflect on company culture and employee conduct. The 2021 reviewer explicitly gave 3 stars solely due to driving behavior.
• SCHEDULING INFLEXIBILITY FLAG: One 1-star review (2021-08-06) describes being turned away for a 'small job' and being told no work is done on Fridays, suggesting possible selectivity in clientele that may disadvantage certain customers.
• RECENCY NOTE: The review dataset spans from 2012 to 2025. Reviews from 2012–2019 are more than 5 years old. However, the volume and consistency of positive reviews across all time periods, including many from 2024–2025, supports sustained performance. Recent reviews (past 12 months) remain predominantly positive.
• FORMER EMPLOYEE REVIEW: One 5-star review (2022-12-31) is explicitly from a former employee praising the company. This review was treated with reduced weight as it may reflect insider bias rather than customer experience.
• GENERIC PRAISE PATTERN: Several reviews use very brief, non-specific language ('Great Company!', 'The Best!', 'Black cat is the best!'). While not conclusively fake, these add limited evidentiary value and were not counted toward dimension mentions.

This WW Score is based on a large, multi-year dataset with strong mention counts across all four dimensions and is considered highly reliable, though it should be interpreted with awareness that one serious workmanship complaint, two driving-related complaints, and a scheduling complaint introduce meaningful caveats that prevent a top-tier score.

Aqua Star Plumbing and Justin receive overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — reviewers consistently highlight punctuality, clear communication, courteous attitude, and responsiveness. Pricing is repeatedly described as fair, reasonable, or competitive, with one reviewer noting Justin came in below his original estimate and another citing savings of hundreds of dollars versus competing bids. Project completion is strongly supported, with multiple reviews describing complex multi-day jobs such as whole-house re-pipes completed on schedule, cleanly, and with follow-through on all discussed items. Experience and workmanship are praised in detail across numerous reviews, with specific mentions of technical problem-solving, attention to detail, and high-quality materials. The volume and specificity of reviews across all dimensions support a high-confidence score in the upper-80s range.

• Two reviews contain no text — only a 5-star rating (dates: 2024-06-09 and 2018-06-11). These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• One review appears to be a near-exact duplicate: the review dated 2018-06-11 and the review dated 2018-01-03 are virtually identical in text. Only one instance was counted in dimension scoring to avoid inflating mention counts.
• A significant portion of reviews (roughly 12 out of 37) are older than 3 years, with several dating back to 2013–2020. While these are consistent in tone and content, recency weighting means the most reliable signal comes from the 14 reviews dated 2024–2025.
• All reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative or mixed feedback present. While the specificity and variety of detail across reviews reduces fake review suspicion, the complete absence of any critical feedback is worth noting as a mild caution.
• Several older reviews (2020, 2022) share similar phrasing patterns such as 'hands down no questions' and 'rare find,' which could indicate coached or templated language, though the level of specific detail in most reviews mitigates this concern.

This WW Score is based on 35 reviews with usable data spanning 2013–2025, with strong representation in the past 12–18 months, and carries HIGH overall confidence given the volume, specificity, and consistency of feedback across all four dimensions.

Pacific Crest Plumbing, led primarily by Nick Deleganes, earns strong marks across all four dimensions based on an exceptionally large and detailed review base spanning over a decade. Professionalism is the most frequently cited strength, with reviewers consistently praising punctuality, communication via phone and text, courteous demeanor, and cleanliness on the job site. Project completion scores are high, with the vast majority of reviewers reporting jobs finished on time, on budget, and with follow-through including callbacks honored at no charge. Experience scores are among the highest, with numerous reviewers noting Nick's diagnostic accuracy, creative problem-solving, and ability to tackle complex jobs in older homes. Pricing scores are solid but slightly tempered by a handful of reviewers who found costs higher than expected, including one 2-star review citing a $1,675 water heater install as overpriced and another noting cartridge replacement costs were surprising, though the majority of pricing mentions are positive and emphasize honesty, transparency, and willingness to recommend less expensive solutions.

• Two reviews appear to be near-identical duplicates posted under different dates: the lengthy 'I met Nick after another local outfit fixed the main shut off valve' review appears verbatim in both a 2021-06-07 and a 2020-10-20 entry. Similarly, the 'Customer for life' review appears twice (2021-06-07 and 2020-10-16), the 'Nick did amazing work for us. He repiped our house' review appears twice (2021-06-07 and 2020-10-16), and the 'Second time we've used Nick' review appears twice (2019-06-08 and 2018-08-27). The 'The thing about a plumber' review also appears twice (2016-06-08 and 2015-12-17). These duplicates were counted once each for scoring purposes.
• There are 8 blank reviews with only a star rating and no text (all 5-star). These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence.
• There are 7 negative reviews (1-star or 2-star) in the dataset. Key concerns raised include: alleged harassment via text messages by the owner's wife toward at least two reviewers who left negative feedback (corroborated by multiple independent accounts); one reviewer reporting a missed appointment with no proactive communication; one reviewer citing condescending phone manner; one reviewer citing a perceived overcharge of $1,675 for a water heater install with no itemized bill; one reviewer citing a re-pipe project with poor communication, tile damage, and unfinished work left for weeks; and one reviewer citing an overbilling dispute for a shower faucet job. The harassment pattern across multiple independent negative reviews is a significant conduct flag.
• The alleged pattern of the owner's wife contacting and pressuring negative reviewers via text message is mentioned independently by at least three separate reviewers across different years (2012, 2014, 2018). This is a notable business conduct concern that does not affect workmanship scores but is relevant to overall trust.
• The political screening incident (2020-09-08 review, 1-star) in which the owner allegedly told a customer he would not work for homes with Black Lives Matter signs is noted. This is a business conduct flag unrelated to plumbing quality but relevant to overall business character.
• The overwhelming majority of reviews are 5-star with highly positive language. While the volume and specificity of detail across hundreds of reviews reduces fake review suspicion significantly, the presence of duplicate reviews and the near-absence of 3-star or 4-star reviews (only 4 such reviews exist among 201 total) is a mild flag. The score distribution is unusually polarized between 5-star and 1-star.
• Recency note: The most recent reviews (2024) involve a different plumber named Treven, suggesting Nick may have reduced his direct role. Reviews from 2024 are limited to 2 entries. The bulk of the review base (2016-2022) remains highly relevant but reviewers should note the business may have evolved in staffing.

This WW Score is based on one of the largest and most detailed review sets analyzed, with 193 reviews containing usable data spanning over a decade, yielding HIGH confidence across all four dimensions; however, the score should be interpreted alongside the conduct flags regarding alleged reviewer harassment and the political screening incident, which do not affect workmanship quality scores but are material to overall trust in the business.

AAA Drain Cleaning earns a strong WW Score driven by consistently high marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism and experience being the most frequently praised attributes across dozens of reviews spanning nearly a decade. Technicians — primarily Steve, Rick, and Austin — are repeatedly described as punctual, communicative, courteous, and technically skilled, with multiple reviewers noting they were walked through the diagnostic process in real time. Pricing is frequently called reasonable or fair, with several reviewers specifically noting flat fees, no holiday surcharges, and no upselling, though the score is tempered slightly by two negative reviews. Project completion is very strong overall, with the vast majority of jobs described as fully resolved in a single visit, often same-day; however, two negative reviews — one describing a no-show with no callback, and one describing a technician who walked off the job demanding prepayment — prevent a higher score in this dimension. The negative reviews are credible and specific enough to warrant meaningful score reductions rather than dismissal.

• Two credible 1-star reviews exist: one from 2016 describing a no-show and no returned calls (unprofessional behavior), and one from 2020 (with a follow-up in 2021) describing a technician who refused to begin work without upfront payment and walked off the job. The owner's public response disputing the 2020 review was itself rebutted by the reviewer in 2021, adding credibility to the complaint.
• The 2020 and 2021 negative reviews appear to describe the same incident from two perspectives (original post and follow-up clarification). They have been counted as one incident but two review entries, both factored into scoring.
• A large portion of reviews (roughly 25 of 46) are dated prior to 2022, meaning they are more than 3 years old. While the pattern of quality appears consistent through 2024, older reviews carry reduced recency weight.
• No strong fake review patterns detected. Reviews vary in length, detail, specificity, and writing style. Named technicians (Steve, Rick, Austin) appear across different time periods, lending authenticity. No artificial inflation flags raised.

This WW Score is based on 46 reviews with strong dimensional coverage and HIGH confidence across all four scored dimensions, making it a reliable representation of this contractor's performance, modestly tempered by two credible negative reviews and a significant proportion of reviews older than 12 months.

Kevin and Mountain View Drain receive consistently strong praise across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — reviewers repeatedly highlight his punctuality, friendliness, responsiveness, and clear communication. Pricing is explicitly called out as reasonable and affordable by multiple reviewers, including one who noted he charges less than expected even for last-minute emergency calls. Project completion is well-supported, with reviewers describing jobs finished quickly and thoroughly, including one notable case where Kevin resolved a problem three other plumbers could not. Experience and technical skill are affirmed across multiple reviews, with customers noting his ability to diagnose and explain issues clearly. The one 1-star review pertains solely to a vehicle driving complaint and contains no information about the quality of plumbing work, so it was excluded from dimension scoring.

• One review (1-star, dated 2024-09-10) is entirely about reckless driving behavior of a company vehicle and provides no usable data about plumbing services — it was excluded from all dimension scoring but counted in total reviews analyzed.
• The majority of reviews (10 out of 12 usable) are older than 12 months, with most dating from 2018–2021. Only two reviews fall within the past 12 months (2024-01 and 2023-10). Scores should be interpreted with awareness that recent performance data is limited.
• No strong fake review patterns detected — reviews vary in length, detail, and phrasing, and include specific job descriptions, names, and personal context. Confidence in authenticity is reasonable.
• Scope limitation noted: multiple reviews explicitly state Kevin only handles drain clearing and clogs, not broader plumbing repairs. This is a specialty service context and scores reflect that narrower scope.

This WW Score is moderately reliable given a reasonable review count and strong dimension coverage, but should be treated with some caution due to the recency gap — the bulk of reviews are 3–6 years old, and only two reviews reflect performance within the past 12–15 months.