Find Nearby Plumbers In Tulsa, Oklahoma

Green Country Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised with 8 mentions highlighting punctuality, responsiveness, and courteous demeanor. Project completion is solid with 7 mentions confirming jobs finished thoroughly and follow-up care. Experience is well-documented across 6 mentions showing skilled problem-solving and technical knowledge. Pricing receives 5 mentions emphasizing fair value and transparency. The company's owner Justin is frequently named and personally commended for honesty and integrity.

• Review age concern: 7 of 11 reviews are older than 5 years (2006-2008), with only 4 reviews from 2015 onward. Most recent substantive review is from 2020. Current service quality cannot be fully assessed from this dataset.
• Two reviews contain only 'unknown' text with 5.0 ratings (2016-04-22 and 2015-05-21), providing no usable data but counted as 5-star ratings. These appear to be placeholder or incomplete entries.
• All 11 reviews are 5-star or 4-star ratings with no negative feedback. While not necessarily fake, the complete absence of any critical comments or lower ratings is atypical and should be noted as a potential limitation in assessing balanced feedback.

This WW Score of 88.2 carries HIGH overall confidence due to consistent positive mentions across all dimensions and adequate mention counts (5+). However, reliability is moderately limited by the age of most reviews—the dataset is heavily weighted toward 2006-2008 and 2015-2017 data, with minimal recent feedback. Current performance may differ from historical patterns. The score should be treated as a strong historical indicator but supplemented with recent customer references for current service assessment.

Tuc's Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength, with consistent mentions of punctuality, politeness, communication, and cleanliness across 9 reviews. Project completion is solid, with 8 reviews confirming timely work, thoroughness, and follow-through on callbacks. Experience is well-supported by 5 mentions of skilled workmanship and problem-solving ability. Pricing shows fair value with 4 mentions, though one review noted a charge lower than quoted. The contractor earns an 87.2 WW Score reflecting reliable, professional service with strong technical competence.

• Review dates are predominantly from 2020–2021; only 2 reviews from 2022 or later. This limits recency assessment and may not reflect current service levels.
• All 12 reviews are 5-star or 4-star ratings with no negative reviews. While not necessarily fake, the absence of any critical feedback is atypical and should be noted.
• One review (2020-09-12) contains a potential pricing inconsistency: 'He did Not charge what he quoted' — unclear if this was favorable or unfavorable, but interpreted as favorable based on 4-star rating.

This WW Score of 87.2 is reliable and should be trusted, supported by HIGH confidence across three of four dimensions and a solid sample size of 12 reviews. However, the age of most reviews (2020–2021) and absence of any critical feedback warrant caution; current performance may differ from historical data.

Integrity Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all dimensions, with particularly high marks for professionalism (87.5) driven by consistent praise for punctuality, communication, and courteous staff. Pricing scores well (82.0) with many customers noting fair, transparent, and competitive rates. Project completion (85.5) reflects reliable follow-through, though a small number of reviews mention delayed callbacks or incomplete follow-up. Technical expertise (83.0) is consistently praised, with customers highlighting knowledgeable technicians and thorough diagnostics. The company's name genuinely reflects its operational values in the majority of reviews.

• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Reviews dated 2025-06-08, 2025-06-05, and 2025-06-03 contain identical text (long, detailed narrative about managing renovation projects, mentioning Emily, James, Josh, Steve, Lyle by name). This repetition across three consecutive dates is highly suspicious and suggests potential review manipulation.
• EMPTY REVIEWS: 18 reviews contain only a 5.0 rating with no text content. While not necessarily fake, these provide no substantive data and inflate review count without evidence.
• RECENCY BIAS: Approximately 60% of reviews are from 2024-2025 (past 12 months), with a sharp increase in volume in recent months. Earlier reviews (2006-2020) show more varied ratings (including 1-3 star reviews), while recent reviews are overwhelmingly 5-star. This pattern warrants caution.
• NEGATIVE REVIEWS CONCENTRATED IN PAST: Most 1-star and 2-star reviews are from 2013-2022. Recent negative reviews (2024-2025) are rare, which could indicate either genuine improvement or selective review removal/suppression.
• MULTIPLE BUSINESS LOCATIONS/OWNERS: Reviews reference different owners/technicians across different regions (Dave, James, Toby, Marc, Sean, etc.) and locations (Rancho Santa Margarita, Vallejo, Omaha, Utah, Brentwood, etc.), suggesting either multiple franchises under one name or significant data mixing. This complicates reliability assessment.
• INCONSISTENT COMPANY IDENTITY: Some reviews reference 'Integrity Plumbing' as a single-owner operation (Dave, James, Toby), while others describe it as a larger company with multiple crews. Geographic and personnel inconsistencies suggest these may be different companies with the same name.

While the WW Score of 84.2 reflects genuinely positive feedback across most dimensions, the reliability is MODERATE-TO-HIGH rather than fully HIGH due to: (1) suspicious identical reviews in June 2025 suggesting potential manipulation, (2) 18 empty 5-star reviews providing no evidence, (3) dramatic recency bias with 60% of reviews from past 12 months and nearly all recent reviews being 5-star, and (4) apparent mixing of multiple businesses/locations under the same name. The score is most trustworthy for recent service quality (2024-2025) but should be viewed with caution regarding historical consistency. Customers should verify they are contacting the correct location/owner before booking.

Guaranteed Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all four dimensions, with particularly high marks for professionalism (85.2) and project completion (83.5). The company benefits from extensive positive feedback regarding punctuality, communication, and technical competence. Pricing is generally perceived as fair and reasonable, though some customers report occasional discrepancies between quoted and final invoices. The company shows consistent ability to complete jobs thoroughly and on time, with strong follow-up service. However, a notable minority of negative reviews (approximately 8% of total) reveal serious issues including upfront payment demands, no-shows, incomplete work, and poor responsiveness to complaints, primarily associated with certain technicians or locations.

• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Multiple reviews from 2025-05-10 and 2025-04-10 show suspiciously similar phrasing ('Las Vegas Plumbing' mentioned repeatedly in generic service descriptions with minimal specific detail), suggesting possible review manipulation or bot-generated content. These reviews lack the natural variation and specific customer context found in authentic reviews.
• QUALITY INCONSISTENCY: Significant variance in service quality appears tied to specific technicians. Reviews mentioning 'Robert' contain disproportionately high negative feedback regarding upfront payment demands, no-shows, and poor warranty service. Other technicians (Marcus, Patrick, Johnny, Gary) consistently receive praise.
• UPFRONT PAYMENT CONTROVERSY: Multiple 1-star reviews (2020-06-10, 2020-06-10, 2021-12-08) specifically cite demands for $59-$100 upfront diagnostic fees before service, with customers reporting this as a red flag and potential scam indicator. This practice appears to have generated significant customer dissatisfaction.
• GEOGRAPHIC/OPERATIONAL INCONSISTENCY: Reviews suggest the company may operate under multiple names or have multiple locations (references to 'Guaranteed Plumbing,' 'Las Vegas Plumbing,' 'Robert's Plumbing,' 'High Desert Plumbing'). One 2017-07-05 review explicitly warns that an unlicensed operator was misrepresenting affiliation with 'High Desert Plumbing.'
• COMMUNICATION FAILURES: Multiple reviews from 2013-2019 document failure to follow up on quotes, return phone calls, or honor promised callbacks, suggesting systemic office management issues during certain periods.
• PRICING DISPUTES: Several reviews (2015-06-04, 2023-06-10, 2019-09-11) report significant discrepancies between quoted prices and final invoices, with some customers charged $100-$250 more than initially quoted.

This WW Score of 82.1 is reliable for understanding the company's general performance trajectory, but should be interpreted with caution: the high proportion of 5-star reviews (approximately 85% of total) combined with suspicious clustering of identical phrasing in recent reviews suggests potential review manipulation that may inflate the score. The negative reviews, while fewer in number, reveal consistent patterns of serious issues (upfront fees, no-shows, incomplete work, poor follow-up) that disproportionately affect certain customer segments. Prospective customers should weight recent positive reviews skeptically and specifically inquire about the technician assigned, upfront payment policies, and warranty terms before committing.

The overwhelming majority of reviews across this large dataset praise punctuality, friendliness, and courteous communication, driving a solid professionalism score. Pricing is frequently cited as fair, reasonable, or better than competitors, with multiple reviewers specifically noting transparent quotes and no surprise charges. Project completion is generally strong, with most jobs described as finished on time and thoroughly, though a meaningful cluster of negative reviews — including abandoned work, no-shows, water left running, trash not removed, and a failed callback — prevents a higher score. Experience scores well overall, with many reviewers citing skilled, knowledgeable technicians who solved complex problems, but tempered by a notable 1-star review describing a technician who could not diagnose a basic water heater fault and charged $300 for the failure. The score reflects a genuinely capable operation with recurring but non-trivial service failures.

• 26 reviews contain no text — only a star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence.
• The dataset appears to aggregate reviews from at least two distinct businesses: 'York Plumbing' (recent reviews, 2024–2025) and 'Rose Plumbing' (older reviews, 2006–2023). Scores reflect the combined pool but the businesses may not be the same entity. Treat with caution.
• Several negative reviews describe serious failures: a technician leaving water running and trash behind (May 2025), a no-show with no callback (2019), an abandoned sump pump repair with no communication (2017), a $300 charge for a failed diagnosis (2011), unprofessional conduct including foul language in front of a child (2020), refusal to serve a customer due to a stutter (2021), and arrogant/belittling behavior with damage left unaddressed (2008).
• The majority of Rose Plumbing reviews are older than 3 years (many from 2006–2014), significantly reducing their relevance to current service quality. York Plumbing reviews are recent (2024–2025) and more reliable for current assessment.
• No strong fake review pattern detected, though several York Plumbing reviews are very brief and generic (e.g., 'Always a 5 star experience', 'Great job!'). These were scored conservatively.
• One review (2012) gave 1 star solely because the company did not serve the reviewer's area — this is not a service quality complaint and was excluded from dimension scoring.
• One review (2024) appears to describe a different company entirely ('Rose Plumbing' in NoVa/Northern Virginia context with HomeServe) and may be a misattributed review. Scored conservatively.

This WW Score is based on a large review pool (136 total, 110 with usable data) spanning nearly two decades and likely covering more than one business entity, which significantly limits direct applicability to any single current operator; the score should be treated as a general directional indicator rather than a precise measure of today's service quality.

Davis Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with particular strengths in project completion (87.0) and professionalism (86.5), both supported by extensive positive mentions. The company excels at responsiveness, punctuality, communication, and technical problem-solving. However, pricing emerges as a notable weakness (71.0), with multiple customers reporting significantly overcharged quotes and refusals to provide itemized receipts or explain pricing rationale. While most reviews are highly positive, the pricing concerns and a handful of negative experiences (particularly around the $39 diagnostic fee and inflated quotes) prevent a higher overall score. Recency analysis shows most reviews cluster in 2023 and earlier, with limited recent data from 2025.

• PRICING INCONSISTENCY: Multiple reviews (2021-12-27, 2022-10-28, 2021-12-27) report significantly overcharged quotes. One customer was charged $430 for a 30-minute valve installation (other quotes: ~$210), and another was quoted $879 for faucet replacement (market rate: $250-350). Owner Raymond refused to provide itemized receipts or explain hourly rates in at least one case.
• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: 16 reviews dated 2023-06-10 contain only 5-star ratings with minimal or no text content (empty review fields or single-word descriptions like 'Reverse Osmosis system filter change'). This clustering of identical dates with generic/empty content suggests potential review manipulation.
• NEGATIVE OUTLIERS: Two 1-star reviews (2021-12-27 and 2021-03-23) with no detail provided, and one 2-star review (2023-02-28) alleging the company collects $39 fees without performing work. One detailed 2-star review (2022-06-23) documents missed appointments, lack of follow-up, unprofessional behavior (work boots in home, profanity), and failure to identify a leaky sink during inspection.
• RECENCY CONCERN: 75% of reviews are from 2023 or earlier. Only 1 review from 2025 and 2 from 2024 provide current performance data. Historical pricing complaints and service inconsistencies may not reflect current operations.
• INCONSISTENT SERVICE QUALITY: While most reviews praise Ray/Raymond, one detailed negative review (2022-06-23) describes unprofessional conduct including putting down apprentice, making rude comments, and walking through home in work boots without permission. This suggests potential variability in service delivery or customer interaction style.

This WW Score of 82.1 is moderately reliable but should be interpreted with caution due to suspected review manipulation (16 empty/minimal reviews on same date), significant pricing complaints from credible detailed reviews, and limited recent data. The score reflects strong technical competence and responsiveness but is tempered by documented overcharging practices and inconsistent professionalism. Customers should request itemized quotes and compare pricing before engaging Davis Plumbing.