Find Nearby Plumbers In Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

A+ Plumbing earns strong marks across nearly all dimensions, with professionalism being the most consistently praised attribute — punctuality, respectful communication, and willingness to explain work were cited repeatedly across the review set. Project completion is also a clear strength, with multiple reviewers confirming same-day or next-day completion, follow-through on promised work, and clean job-site practices. Experience scores well based on specific mentions of problem-solving ability, technical knowledge, and quality of workmanship, including one notable review describing careful technique to protect an aged sewer line. Pricing data is limited to three reviews but is directionally positive, with one reviewer explicitly noting competitive pricing versus competitors and another mentioning ease of negotiation as a repeat customer. The primary caveat is that all reviews are from 2018–2021, meaning no reviews fall within the past 12 months, which reduces confidence in how well these scores reflect current performance.

• ALL 22 REVIEWS ARE OLDER THAN 12 MONTHS: The most recent review is dated 2021-01-04, meaning no reviews fall within the past 12 months. Scores may not reflect current service quality.
• ALL REVIEWS ARE 5-STAR: The complete absence of any negative or mixed reviews across 22 reviews is statistically unusual and warrants mild caution, though most reviews contain specific, credible details that reduce the likelihood of systematic fakery.
• RECENCY GAP: The bulk of reviews (18 of 22) are from 2018–2020, making them 4–6 years old. Business quality, staffing, and practices may have changed significantly since then.

This WW Score carries HIGH dimensional confidence based on mention volume, but should be treated with caution as a predictor of current performance given that all reviews are at least 3 years old and no recent feedback is available to validate consistency.

In & Out Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all four dimensions with consistently high marks from customers. Professionalism is a standout strength, with 13 reviews explicitly praising punctuality, communication, attitude, and politeness—particularly highlighting Tim's responsiveness and friendly demeanor. Project completion is solid with 10 mentions confirming jobs finished on time, within budget, and with thorough follow-through, including callbacks honored without extra charges. Pricing receives strong marks from 8 reviews citing fair quotes, transparency, and excellent value relative to competitors. Experience is well-documented across 9 reviews emphasizing technical knowledge, quality workmanship, and problem-solving ability. However, two negative reviews from late 2023 raise serious concerns about payment disputes and project abandonment that significantly impact overall trustworthiness.

• Two highly negative reviews (1-star, dated 2023-11-21 and 2023-12-19) allege serious issues: unpaid debt ($360), incomplete work on a trailer plumbing project lasting months with repeated broken promises, and a customer dispute. These are recent and specific enough to warrant investigation rather than dismissal as fake reviews.
• The negative reviews contain emotional language and grammatical inconsistencies that differ markedly from the polished positive reviews, but the specific details (dollar amounts, timeline references, named individuals) suggest legitimate grievances rather than fabricated complaints.
• Most positive reviews are older (2018-2021), with only 3 positive reviews from 2023-2024. The recent negative reviews may indicate a change in service quality or business practices.
• Several very brief positive reviews (e.g., 'Fabulous, Tim is the best!' and 'Excellent work') lack specific detail and could suggest generic praise, though they are not numerous enough to indicate systematic fake review activity.

This score should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH caution: while the majority of reviews (22 of 24) are positive and detailed with HIGH confidence across all dimensions, two recent and specific negative reviews alleging payment disputes and project abandonment represent material red flags that contradict the otherwise stellar reputation and suggest potential reliability issues that warrant direct verification before engaging this contractor.

JA Painting demonstrates strong overall performance across all dimensions, with particular strength in professionalism and experience. The company excels at responsiveness, punctuality, courteous behavior, and quality workmanship, as evidenced by 12 reviews explicitly praising these attributes. Project completion is consistently reliable with multiple reviews confirming timely delivery and follow-through on callbacks. Pricing is perceived as fair and reasonable by 5 reviewers. However, one significant 1-star review from 2018 documents serious quality control failures with deck staining (clumping, peeling, chipping) and initial resistance to warranty work, which materially impacts the overall score and suggests occasional execution inconsistencies despite generally positive feedback.

• One highly negative outlier review (1-star, 2018) describing poor stain application, product quality issues, and initial refusal to correct work. This contrasts sharply with 13 five-star reviews and suggests either a specific service line weakness (staining/sealing) or a quality control lapse during that period.
• Recency bias present: 6 of 14 reviews are from 2024, 2 from 2023, and 6 from 2018 or earlier. Most recent reviews are uniformly positive; older reviews include the single negative case. This may indicate service improvements over time or selection bias in recent reviews.
• No suspicious patterns of fake reviews detected. Reviews contain specific project details, varied language, and one authentic negative experience, suggesting genuine customer feedback.

This WW Score of 87.2 is highly reliable based on 14 reviews with consistent data across all dimensions and HIGH confidence levels. However, the single severe quality failure in 2018 warrants caution—potential customers should be aware that while current performance appears excellent, the company has experienced significant execution problems in the past, particularly with staining/sealing work.

Hicks demonstrates strong performance across all four dimensions with consistently high marks. Professionalism is evidenced by punctuality, responsiveness, courteous behavior, and clear communication across multiple reviews. Pricing is a significant strength, with customers repeatedly noting competitive bids and fair quotes compared to competitors. Project completion is solid, with jobs finished on time and follow-through honored, though one review noted a minor parts delay that was handled professionally. Experience and technical knowledge shine through problem-solving examples, such as diagnosing HVAC issues others missed and providing proactive maintenance advice.

• Two reviews contain only 'unknown' text with 5.0 ratings (2015-09-11 and 2015-02-25), reducing usable data from 11 to 9 reviews
• Review dates span from 2013 to 2023; most reviews (7 of 9) are older than 2 years, with only 2 reviews from 2022-2023. Recent data is limited.
• All 9 usable reviews are 4.0 or 5.0 stars with no negative feedback, which is atypical. However, reviews contain specific details (names, situations, technical issues) that suggest authenticity rather than fake reviews.

This WW Score of 87.2 is reliable with HIGH overall confidence, supported by consistent positive mentions across all dimensions. However, the score should be interpreted with awareness that most reviews are 2+ years old and recent performance data (past 12 months) is limited to only 2 reviews.

Giesbrecht Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all dimensions with consistent positive feedback. Professionalism scores 82 based on 8 mentions highlighting punctuality, communication, and friendly demeanor, though one significant 2021 no-show incident tempers this score. Pricing is rated 88 across 5 mentions emphasizing fair, transparent, and reasonable costs. Project completion scores 85 based on 9 mentions showing reliable job finishing and follow-through, with the same 2021 incident creating a notable exception. Experience scores 90 based on 6 mentions reflecting strong technical knowledge, problem-solving ability, and quality workmanship. The company benefits from multiple repeat customers and strong word-of-mouth referrals.

• One significant negative incident from March 2021: customer was stood up for emergency frozen pipe repair, forced to take multiple days off work, and experienced poor scheduling communication. Customer explicitly noted this may not reflect current practices but it materially impacts professionalism and project completion scores.
• Most reviews are 3+ years old (7 of 10 from 2019-2021). Only 2 reviews from 2024 and 2022. Recency is limited; current service quality cannot be fully assessed.
• All reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative reviews in dataset. While individual reviews contain specific details and vary in length/content, the absence of any critical feedback is atypical and may indicate selection bias in review collection.

This WW Score of 87.2 is reliable for historical performance but should be treated with moderate caution due to limited recent data (only 2 reviews from past 2 years) and the absence of any critical feedback, which may not fully represent current service quality or potential weaknesses.

Rapid Water Heaters demonstrates consistently strong professionalism across a large review base, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, communication, courtesy, and responsiveness — including same-day and emergency service. Project completion scores are high, with the vast majority of jobs described as finished quickly and thoroughly, though two serious negative reviews allege post-installation flooding and a disputed upsell, which meaningfully temper the completion score. Pricing is generally viewed favorably, with multiple reviewers noting competitive or below-market quotes, though a handful of reviews flagged high prices or a disputed upsell charge, keeping this dimension from scoring higher. Technical experience and workmanship are frequently praised, particularly for tankless water heater installations, with named technicians like Jacob Parnell and Devin receiving repeated commendation for knowledge and skill. The two severe 1-star and 0.5-star reviews describing a post-installation flood causing over $50,000 in damages and a disputed upsell are significant red flags that prevent higher scores in project completion and pricing.

• TWO SEVERE NEGATIVE REVIEWS: One reviewer (0.5 stars, April 2021) and what appears to be the same reviewer posting again (1.0 star, June 2021) describe a post-installation flood causing over $50,000 in damages, with the company allegedly refusing responsibility and attributing fault to the customer. These reviews include specific invoice numbers and check amounts, lending credibility. This is a serious workmanship and liability concern.
• UPSELL COMPLAINT: One reviewer (1.0 star, February 2024) alleges being told they needed a PCB board and gas valve, then being charged $425 for a gas valve after the PCB board was deemed unnecessary — suggesting possible upselling or diagnostic inaccuracy.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: The flooding complaint appears to have been posted twice by the same reviewer (April 2021 and June 2021) with nearly identical text. This has been counted as a single incident but two separate review entries.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: The review 'Prompt, courteous, professional, and reasonably priced service. John recommended a better solution for our leaky valve than we expected. Highly recommend and would use RWH again.' appears twice with the same date (2019-10-02), suggesting a duplicate submission. Counted once for scoring.
• 27 REVIEWS CONTAIN NO USABLE TEXT: A significant number of reviews consist of only a star rating with no written content, blank text, or single words like 'Good' or 'Awesome.' These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no verifiable evidence.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of substantive reviews are from 2019–2025, with strong recent activity in 2024–2025. Reviews older than 3 years (pre-2022) were given reduced weight. The two flooding complaints are from 2021 and may reflect a past issue that has since been addressed.
• MILD FAKE REVIEW CONCERN: A large proportion of reviews are 5-star with generic praise and no specifics. While many do include named technicians and specific job details (which reduces fake review suspicion), the volume of content-free 5-star ratings slightly inflates the overall positive signal. Confidence is maintained at HIGH due to the large volume of detailed, credible reviews.

This WW Score is based on a large and diverse review set spanning multiple years, with sufficient detail across all four dimensions to support HIGH confidence ratings; however, the two credible severe negative reviews describing post-installation flooding and a disputed upsell introduce meaningful risk that the score alone does not fully capture, and prospective customers should review those complaints carefully before hiring.