Find Nearby Plumbers In Lakewood, Ohio

Only a single review was provided, making any scoring highly tentative. The reviewer explicitly praised punctuality, honesty, and efficiency, supporting a moderate-to-good professionalism score. Pricing was described as 'fair,' warranting a conservative but positive pricing score. Project completion is supported by the reviewer noting two separate jobs were finished successfully, including a follow-up storm door installation. Experience is inferred from the reviewer's satisfaction with workmanship quality and the contractor's proactive measurement step, though no deep technical detail was provided.

• Only 1 review was provided — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably per minimum threshold of 3 reviews.
• The review appears to be a genuine dual-entry update from the same customer across two service visits, which is a positive authenticity signal, but it still represents only one unique reviewer.
• All dimension scores are LOW CONFIDENCE due to a single mention each — treat all scores as directional indicators only, not reliable assessments.

This score is based on a single reviewer's experience and should not be considered a reliable representation of this contractor's overall performance — significantly more reviews are needed before any dimension score can be trusted.

This single review is notably detailed and specific, describing the contractor diagnosing and resolving a drainage tile problem in one day, arriving on time, and providing a one-year guarantee. The reviewer explicitly praised professionalism, noting the contractor explained the scope and cost upfront before proceeding. Pricing was described as reasonable given the volume of work, though the reviewer acknowledged it was a significant job, suggesting value rather than low cost. Workmanship was highlighted through the contractor's decision to fix the root cause rather than apply a surface-level solution. Despite strong positive signals across all four dimensions, the score is based on a single review from 2017, making all findings LOW confidence and insufficient for a reliable WW Score.

• Only 1 review provided — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably per minimum threshold of 3 reviews.
• Review is dated 2017-09-09, which is more than 7 years old. This significantly reduces relevance to current performance.
• All four dimension scores are based on a single mention each — treat all scores as exploratory only, not conclusive.
• No fake review patterns detected — the review contains specific details, named problems (drainage tile), and nuanced pricing commentary, suggesting authenticity.

This score should not be trusted as a reliable indicator of contractor quality — it is based on a single review from over seven years ago, and all dimension scores carry LIMITED confidence.

Only one review exists for this contractor, making a reliable WW Score impossible to calculate. That single review is extremely serious in nature, describing an attempt to enter a home when a minor was alone, followed by a threatening retaliatory remark when access was denied. This constitutes a catastrophic professionalism failure and raises significant safety concerns. No data exists for pricing, project completion, or experience, so those dimensions cannot be scored.

• CRITICAL SAFETY FLAG: Reviewer alleges contractor attempted to enter the home while a 13-year-old child was home alone without a parent or guardian present.
• CRITICAL CONDUCT FLAG: Contractor allegedly made a threatening retaliatory statement ('just remember that when your yard floods out') after being denied entry — suggesting intimidation behavior.
• INSUFFICIENT DATA: Only 1 review is present. WW Score cannot be calculated reliably with fewer than 3 reviews.
• NO FAKE REVIEW CONCERN: The review contains specific, credible detail and a serious allegation — it does not exhibit patterns of generic or fabricated praise.

This score report is based on a single review and cannot produce a statistically reliable WW Score; however, the sole review contains a serious safety and conduct allegation that warrants extreme caution when considering this contractor.