Find Nearby Plumbers In Raleigh, North Carolina

Simply Plumbing demonstrates consistently strong performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is the standout strength, with 9 reviews explicitly praising Travis's friendliness, responsiveness, punctuality, and communication. Project completion is equally solid, with 8 reviews confirming quick diagnosis, same-day or next-day service, and problems resolved efficiently. Pricing is fair and transparent, mentioned favorably in 7 reviews with no complaints about hidden charges. Technical experience is evident across 5 reviews detailing complex work (gas lines, thermal expansion tanks, water heater replacement) executed with precision and safety focus. All 11 reviews are 5-star ratings with specific, credible details.

• All 11 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative feedback — while details are specific and credible, the absence of any critical perspective is unusual and should be noted
• Review recency is mixed: 2 reviews from 2024, 1 from 2022, but 5 reviews are from 2019 or earlier (4+ years old). Recent data (past 12 months) is limited to 2 reviews, which reduces confidence in current performance
• No reviews mention warranty details, follow-up callbacks, or long-term satisfaction beyond initial service — these gaps prevent fuller assessment of project completion dimension

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable for assessing Travis's core professionalism, responsiveness, and pricing fairness based on recent and historical reviews; however, the lack of recent data (only 2 reviews in past 12 months) and absence of any critical feedback suggest caution when extrapolating current performance — recommend seeking recent references before committing to major projects.

RTP Plumbing receives consistently strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the standout strength — reviewers repeatedly cite responsiveness, communication, punctuality, and polite demeanor across nearly every review. Pricing is praised explicitly in at least 8 reviews, with words like 'reasonable,' 'fair,' and 'beyond reasonable' appearing frequently, suggesting genuine value satisfaction. Project completion is well-supported, with reviewers describing jobs finished efficiently, follow-through on parts ordering, and callbacks honored within 24 hours. Experience and technical knowledge are affirmed through references to problem-solving, asking the right diagnostic questions, and educating customers on their issues. The score is tempered slightly by the age distribution of reviews — roughly half are from 2017–2019 and reference a different technician (Robert), while more recent reviews reference Wes, introducing some uncertainty about consistency across personnel.

• PERSONNEL INCONSISTENCY: Reviews from 2017–2019 reference 'Robert Cedillo' as the owner/technician, while reviews from 2022–2023 reference 'Wes.' It is unclear whether these are the same business under different operators or a change in staff. This may affect score consistency across time periods.
• RECENCY CONCERN: 3 of 12 reviews are from 2017–2019, which is more than 4 years old. These were included in scoring but carry reduced real-world reliability for current service quality.
• ALL 5-STAR RATINGS: Every single review is rated 5.0 stars. While the review content is largely specific and credible, the absence of any negative or mixed feedback across 12 reviews warrants mild caution. No fake review pattern was definitively detected, but the uniformity is noted.
• SMALL SAMPLE SIZE: With only 12 total reviews, the dataset is functional but limited. Scores carry reasonable confidence but would benefit from a larger review base to be fully reliable.

This WW Score is moderately reliable — review content is specific and credible across most dimensions, but the small sample size, all-5-star uniformity, and personnel inconsistency between older and newer reviews introduce enough uncertainty that the score should be treated as a strong positive signal rather than a definitive benchmark.

Carrboro Plumbing demonstrates consistently strong performance across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently praised attribute — punctuality, courteous communication, and responsiveness appear in the vast majority of substantive reviews. Project completion scores are high, with numerous reviewers noting jobs finished thoroughly, callbacks honored, and even above-and-beyond follow-through such as fixing unreported issues at no charge. Experience scores are similarly strong, with multiple reviewers describing technicians solving problems that other plumbers and even county utilities could not diagnose. Pricing scores are slightly lower due to a handful of credible complaints about parts markups, billing transparency, and one instance of a cost overrun relative to an estimate, though the majority of reviewers found pricing fair or better than expected. A small number of negative reviews (1–3 stars) describe isolated incidents of poor workmanship by specific technicians, billing disputes, and one recurring drain leak — these are factored into the scores and prevent a higher ceiling.

• 12 reviews contain no text (blank or 'unknown') and were excluded from dimension scoring; they contributed only to total review count.
• The review corpus spans approximately 13 years (2012–2025). Reviews older than 12 months from today (pre-June 2024) were given reduced weighting in scoring. The majority of reviews are older than 1 year, which slightly reduces reliability of current performance assessment.
• One 1-star review (May 2021) describes a recurring drain leak caused by improper sealing across multiple visits, with the same technician repeatedly failing to fix the issue — this is a meaningful quality-control flag and was weighted accordingly in project_completion and experience scores.
• One 1-star review (June 2020) alleges significant parts markup (over double retail), a disputed aerator replacement charge, and cost overrun beyond a verbal estimate — this is a credible pricing concern and was weighted in the pricing score.
• One 2-star review (October 2021) describes inconsistent skill levels between technicians, with poor initial workmanship requiring a redo, and the company refusing to negotiate the invoice — this supports a moderate quality-consistency concern.
• One 3-star review (February 2017) describes a failure to follow through on a promised estimate over a period of nearly two months — flagged as a responsiveness and project-follow-through concern.
• No fake review patterns detected. Reviews vary substantially in length, detail, specificity, named technicians, and dates. Negative reviews are present and credible. The review set appears authentic.
• Several reviews reference being unable to get timely appointments (14-day wait times noted in two reviews), which is a minor availability concern but not scored as it reflects demand rather than quality.

This WW Score is based on a large, diverse, and multi-year review set with strong mention counts across all four dimensions, making it statistically reliable; however, the presence of credible negative reviews regarding technician consistency, parts pricing transparency, and at least one recurring workmanship failure means the score should be interpreted as reflecting generally excellent but not uniformly perfect service.

ARC Electric and Plumbing receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently praised attribute — punctuality, courtesy, communication, and responsiveness are cited in the vast majority of reviews. Experience and technical skill are consistently highlighted, with multiple reviewers noting technicians going above and beyond to diagnose complex problems and explain their work clearly. Project completion scores well, with same-day service, follow-through on callbacks, and warranty-honored return visits noted across several reviews. Pricing is the weakest dimension: while many reviewers call pricing fair or reasonable, there are two notable negative reviews — one alleging a $600/hour rate and one alleging upselling with a large markup on an expansion tank job — which meaningfully temper the pricing score. A small number of reviews (6) contained no usable text and were excluded from scoring.

• 6 reviews contained no review text (blank or emoji-only) and were excluded from dimension scoring.
• One 1-star review (2021-03-22) explicitly alleges upselling and price inflation — technician reportedly recommended unnecessary T&P valve replacement and quoted $306 for a job another company completed for $100. This is a credible negative signal for pricing integrity.
• One 2-star review (2022-04-18) cites an extremely high $600/hour cost and notes the receipt was not yet received, suggesting possible billing transparency issues.
• One 1-star review (2021-11-17) cites a communication breakdown and inability to receive a written quote, which is a professionalism concern.
• The overwhelming majority of reviews are 5-star. While many contain specific names, job details, and narrative context that suggest authenticity, the near-universal 5-star pattern warrants mild caution. No strong evidence of coordinated fake reviews, but the pattern should be noted.
• Several reviews date back to 2020–2022. Recency weighting applied — the bulk of reviews from 2024–2025 are given greater weight, and the older negative reviews (2021) are noted but treated as potentially less representative of current operations.
• The company appears to operate under both 'ARC Electric' and 'ARC Plumbing' and references a rebrand to 'Progressive' in one review (2024-09-26). This may indicate a business transition that could affect consistency of service quality across time periods.

This WW Score is based on a large and mostly detailed review set (76 reviews, majority from 2024–2025) and carries HIGH overall confidence, though the pricing dimension should be interpreted cautiously given credible negative outliers alleging upselling and non-transparent billing.

Fehr's Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all dimensions, with particularly consistent praise for professionalism, punctuality, and responsiveness. Customers repeatedly highlight quick response times, on-time arrivals, courteous behavior, and quality workmanship. Pricing is consistently described as fair and reasonable compared to competitors. Project completion is reliable with follow-ups and attention to detail noted. However, one severely negative 1-star review from August 2022 raises serious concerns about personnel integrity and company stability, which significantly impacts overall trustworthiness despite the overwhelming positive feedback.

• CRITICAL: One 1-star review (2022-08-26) makes serious allegations about criminal history of staff member and company downsizing. This is a major red flag that cannot be ignored despite volume of positive reviews. Recommend independent verification before hiring.
• RECENCY CONCERN: Most reviews are from late 2021 to early 2022 (2+ years old). Only one review from 2022-09-17 is more recent. Limited recent data to assess current company status post-allegations.
• POTENTIAL PATTERN: 14 of 17 reviews are 5-star ratings with very positive language. While not definitively fake, the uniformity combined with the serious negative allegation suggests caution in interpretation.

This score should be treated with significant caution: while the quantitative data suggests high quality work, the serious criminal allegation in the 1-star review creates substantial doubt about company integrity and current operational status that outweighs the positive numerical score.

Walter's Well Pump and Tank Service demonstrates strong performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised with 12 mentions highlighting quick response times, friendly demeanor, and excellent communication. Project completion is solid with 11 mentions confirming jobs finished efficiently and on schedule. Experience is a clear strength with 10 mentions emphasizing technical knowledge, diagnostic accuracy, and problem-solving ability. Pricing shows the only weakness: while 5 reviews mention fair and honest pricing, one contractor explicitly flagged a $947 charge for a $400 pump as overpriced, creating a notable concern despite overall positive sentiment.

• Pricing concern: One 2-star review (2021-03-29) from a fellow contractor explicitly criticized pump markup ($947 for $400 pump), suggesting potential pricing inconsistency or lack of transparency on component costs despite otherwise positive pricing feedback.
• Review age distribution: 6 of 14 reviews are older than 3 years (2020 or earlier), with oldest from 2011. Only 3 reviews from past 12 months. Recent performance data is limited.
• One negative review (2016-10-04, 1-star) reports Walter never returned a callback after initial contact. This is an isolated incident but indicates potential responsiveness gaps under certain conditions.
• No fake review patterns detected. Reviews contain specific details, varied language, and realistic scenarios including one critical review, suggesting authentic feedback.

This WW Score of 87.2 is highly reliable given strong mention counts across all dimensions (5-12 mentions each) and consistent positive patterns, but should be tempered by awareness that pricing practices may lack full transparency and recent data is limited to only 3 reviews from the past 12 months.