Overview of Company Customer Sentiment Analysis in May
This single review contains an extremely serious allegation: the contractor allegedly misappropriated advance funds for personal use, including a family dinner and casino visit, and billed 37 hours while security footage documented only 5.5 hours of actual work. Professionalism is scored near zero due to the described deception, broken promises, and the contractor going completely unresponsive aft... Read more
This single review contains an extremely serious allegation: the contractor allegedly misappropriated advance funds for personal use, including a family dinner and casino visit, and billed 37 hours while security footage documented only 5.5 hours of actual work. Professionalism is scored near zero due to the described deception, broken promises, and the contractor going completely unresponsive after being confronted. Pricing and project completion are also scored at the floor, as the reviewer describes fraudulent billing practices and an entirely abandoned, uncompleted engagement. No technical workmanship details were provided, so Experience cannot be scored. Because only one review exists, the WW Score cannot be reliably calculated, but the content of this review is among the most severe possible. Read less