Find Nearby Plumbers In Rochester, New York

Reynolds Plumbing has an overwhelmingly positive review history spanning nearly two decades, with the vast majority of customers praising punctuality, responsiveness, courteous communication, and fair transparent pricing. Professionalism scores are strong but tempered by a handful of credible negative reviews: one customer reported condescending and aggressive behavior from the owner on the phone, another described the owner failing to show up for two rescheduled appointments, and a third noted a rushed cleanup and incomplete job finish. Pricing is generally regarded as fair and competitive, with multiple reviewers noting the final bill came in at or below the quoted estimate, though one reviewer felt blindsided by an $85 charge for a trivial task and another felt $250 was not worth it for a repair that failed quickly. Project completion is solid overall, but is meaningfully dragged down by at least three credible accounts of incomplete or failed work: a repair that did not hold, a drain clog that was never resolved after multiple failed visits, a callback that was never honored, and a job where drywall was left open without prior disclosure. Experience scores are high across the board, with many reviewers citing skilled diagnostics, quality workmanship, and knowledgeable technicians, though one reviewer explicitly stated the technician arrived unprepared with the wrong equipment and failed to clear a simple kitchen clog.

• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: Two reviews with nearly identical text ('I just called Reynolds Plumbing a few minutes ago and they are on their way to the property. This will be my second time using them and they have been great!') were submitted on 2024-06-06 and 2024-06-09 with the same 5-star rating. These appear to be the same review submitted twice and were counted as one data point.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: Two reviews with identical text ('Repair didn't last long. Pipe was feed less than 1/4 inch into the coupling. Not worth paying $250.00 for.') were submitted on 2023-04-12 and 2023-04-13. These were counted as one data point.
• RECENCY NOTE: A significant portion of reviews (roughly 60%) predate 2020 and many are from 2009–2017. The business appears to operate across two distinct geographic markets (Miami/South Florida and Pittsburgh/Western PA area), which may reflect different crews, ownership structures, or franchise arrangements. Scores from older reviews may not reflect current service quality.
• OWNER CONDUCT FLAG: One reviewer (2022-04-23) alleged that the owner Larry personally wrote a fake retaliatory Google review impersonating a customer after receiving a negative review. This is a serious integrity concern and was factored into the professionalism score.
• INCOMPLETE JOB FLAG: Multiple independent reviewers cited incomplete work or unresolved callbacks — including a drain clog never fixed after multiple visits (2021), a repair that failed within days (2023), and a job left with open drywall holes without prior disclosure (2022). These are credible, specific, and consistent enough to meaningfully reduce the project completion score.
• GENERIC REVIEWS: A number of reviews contain very little usable detail (e.g., 'unknown', 'extremely well', 'It went well.', 'Fantastic...', 'very good', 'Successful repair'). These were counted toward total reviews analyzed but contributed minimal scoring data and were not used to inflate any dimension score.
• FAKE REVIEW SUSPICION — LOW LEVEL: The volume of brief, generic 5-star reviews with no detail (particularly from 2012–2017) is slightly elevated. While not conclusive, this pattern warrants mild caution. No significant confidence reduction was applied beyond the generic review exclusion from scoring.

This WW Score is based on a large and diverse review set spanning 15+ years and carries HIGH overall confidence, but readers should weigh the credible negative reviews regarding owner conduct, failed callbacks, and incomplete work more heavily than the volume of brief generic positives, and should note that the business appears to serve two distinct geographic markets whose service quality may differ.

Josh from HC Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all measured dimensions. All three reviews explicitly praise his professionalism (punctuality, politeness, responsiveness), project completion (jobs finished same-day or next-day with thorough work), and technical expertise (complex installations completed with high-quality craftsmanship). Pricing is mentioned positively in two reviews as fair and reasonable. However, the sample size is small (only 3 reviews), limiting confidence in the overall score. The most recent review is from November 2024, but one review dates to October 2023, suggesting some recency variation.

• Small sample size (n=3) — scores should be treated as preliminary and updated as more reviews accumulate
• All reviews are 5-star ratings with uniformly positive language; while not necessarily fake, this lacks critical perspective and may not represent the full customer experience spectrum
• Pricing dimension based on only 2 mentions; insufficient data to make strong claims about value proposition
• No negative feedback or complaints present; real-world contractors typically have some dissatisfied customers, so this may reflect selection bias in review submission

This WW Score of 91.7 should be treated as a preliminary indicator only. With only 3 reviews and no critical feedback, the score reflects strong performance on available data but lacks the volume and diversity needed for high confidence. Recommend collecting additional reviews (target: 10+ reviews) before making major business decisions based on this score.

DynaMole demonstrates strong performance across all measured dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised across all four reviews, with specific mentions of punctuality, responsiveness, courtesy, and communication. Project completion is solid, with all jobs finished successfully and follow-up work documented (e.g., trench smoothing after settling). Technical skill and problem-solving are evident in water line installations and drainage solutions. Pricing appears fair based on two explicit mentions of competitive estimates and budget-conscious options, though limited data on this dimension. The company shows particular strength in customer communication and responsiveness.

• All four reviews are 5-star ratings with uniformly positive language, which could suggest selection bias or fake reviews, though specific project details and named staff members (Doug, Mika/Micah, Lou) add credibility
• Review dates span 2019–2024 with significant gaps; only 1 review from past 12 months (September 2024), limiting assessment of current performance
• Small sample size (n=4) limits statistical reliability; recommend collecting more recent reviews for robust scoring
• Pricing dimension based on only 2 mentions; insufficient data for confident pricing assessment

This WW Score of 89.3 should be treated with caution due to the small sample size (4 reviews) and recency concerns—only 1 review is from the past 12 months. While the available data is positive and specific, a larger and more recent review pool is needed to validate this score reliably.

TC Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism across all three reviews, with consistent praise for communication, punctuality, responsiveness, and friendly demeanor. Workmanship quality is explicitly highlighted as practiced and knowledgeable. Pricing is described as competitive and fair in two reviews. Project completion is evidenced by successful installations and problem resolution, though limited detail on timeline adherence. The WW Score of 88.3 reflects solid performance, but is constrained by the small sample size (only 3 reviews) and limited mentions per dimension.

• Only 3 total reviews analyzed — sample size is very small and limits statistical reliability
• All reviews are 5-star ratings with no critical feedback or negative mentions — while not necessarily fake, this uniformity warrants caution
• One review is from January 2023 (nearly 2 years old); two are recent (August–September 2024)
• Limited specificity on pricing details beyond 'competitive' and 'best price' — no concrete examples of quote transparency or cost breakdowns
• Project completion mentions are inferred from successful job outcomes rather than explicit statements about timeliness or follow-through

This WW Score should be treated with caution due to the very small sample size (3 reviews). While the score of 88.3 reflects genuinely positive feedback on professionalism and workmanship, a minimum of 8–10 reviews is recommended before making high-confidence business decisions based on this rating.

Pride Plumbing earns strong marks across professionalism, project completion, and technical experience, with the vast majority of reviewers praising courteous, knowledgeable technicians who communicate clearly, arrive on time, and complete jobs thoroughly. The company demonstrates consistent follow-through, including honoring warranties, returning for callbacks at no charge, and completing same-day or next-day emergency work. However, pricing is a meaningful and recurring concern: multiple reviewers across different years explicitly describe quotes that were significantly higher than competitors — in some cases 2x to 4x the price — and a handful of negative reviews specifically cite feeling taken advantage of or overcharged for simple jobs. The pricing dimension is the primary drag on the overall WW Score, pulling it down from what would otherwise be a high-80s result. Two blank reviews with no text were excluded from scoring, and one 3-star review with a referral-related caution was noted but not heavily weighted.

• PRICING CONCERN — RECURRING AND CREDIBLE: At least 10 distinct reviews across multiple years explicitly cite pricing as significantly higher than competitors or as unreasonable for the work performed. Specific examples include: $550 quoted for a faucet replacement vs. $150 elsewhere; $470 quoted for a spigot vs. $195 elsewhere; $1,250 quoted for a PRV vs. $750 elsewhere; $2,100 for a water heater vs. ~$650 retail; $285 to snake a sewer line vs. $150-$180 elsewhere; $900 for a pipe repair the reviewer felt was excessive. This is a consistent, multi-year pattern and should be weighted seriously.
• FRAUD/MISDIAGNOSIS ALLEGATION: One 1-star review (July 2024) alleges the technician failed to properly perform a gas leak detection, missed an obvious leak, refused to access visible piping, and recommended an unnecessary $10,000 repipe when the actual repair cost under $2,000. The reviewer stated they were pursuing a refund and considering reporting to the CSLB. This is a serious allegation and was not publicly resolved in the review thread.
• UNRESOLVED COMPLAINT: One 2-star review (July 2023) describes a dishwasher issue that was not resolved after a steep-priced service call, with the original problem recurring two days later.
• QUOTE TRANSPARENCY CONCERN: Multiple reviews note that Pride does not provide estimates over the phone and charges a service fee ($49-$89) just to come out and quote, which several reviewers felt was a pressure tactic to prevent comparison shopping. This is a structural business practice worth flagging for consumers.
• TWO BLANK REVIEWS: Two reviews contained no text (only a 5-star rating). These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• REVIEW VOLUME AND RECENCY: The majority of reviews are from 2023-2025, providing strong recency weighting. Older reviews (2016-2020) are consistent in tone and do not contradict the current pattern. No fake review patterns detected — reviews are highly specific, name individual technicians, and include both positive and negative experiences with concrete details.

This WW Score is based on a large, diverse, and highly specific review set spanning nearly a decade, with strong recency weighting and credible negative reviews that prevent score inflation — the score of 79.4 should be considered a reliable and conservative representation of Pride Plumbing's overall service quality, with the primary caveat being that pricing practices are a documented and recurring concern that prospective customers should investigate before committing to work.

Jerromey demonstrates strong professionalism across all three reviews, with consistent praise for punctuality, responsiveness, and courteous demeanor. Pricing is a notable strength, with customers explicitly highlighting fair pricing, transparent estimates, and significant savings compared to competitors. Project completion is solid, with all jobs finished as promised and follow-through on commitments. Technical experience is evident but mentioned less frequently; customers note his knowledge and problem-solving ability, though specific technical details are limited. The WW Score of 88.2 reflects reliable, customer-focused service with particular strength in pricing transparency and professional conduct.

• All three reviews are from 2017-2018 (5-7 years old); no recent reviews provided to assess current service quality or consistency
• Sample size is small (n=3); score should be considered preliminary and would benefit from additional recent reviews
• Second review contains some generic praise language but includes specific details (Roto-Rooter comparison, sewage line repair) that support authenticity

This score should be treated with caution due to the small sample size (3 reviews) and age of data (all from 2017-2018). While the reviews are detailed and appear authentic, a minimum of 5-8 recent reviews would be needed to establish high confidence in this contractor's current performance.