Doodyman to the Rescue

Doodyman to the Rescue shows significant inconsistency across all dimensions. While professionalism scores reasonably well (71) with many positive mentions of punctuality, politeness, and cleanliness, this is heavily undermined by severe pricing concerns (48). Numerous reviews document aggressive upselling, bait-and-switch tactics, and quotes 2-5x higher than competitors for identical work. Projec... Read more

Doodyman to the Rescue shows significant inconsistency across all dimensions. While professionalism scores reasonably well (71) with many positive mentions of punctuality, politeness, and cleanliness, this is heavily undermined by severe pricing concerns (48). Numerous reviews document aggressive upselling, bait-and-switch tactics, and quotes 2-5x higher than competitors for identical work. Project completion (65) is compromised by multiple reports of incomplete work, failed repairs requiring callbacks, and warranty disputes. Experience (68) reflects mixed technical competency—some reviews praise skilled technicians, while others document misdiagnosis, incompetent work, and damage to customer property. The company's pattern of high-pressure sales tactics combined with inconsistent workmanship creates substantial trust issues. Read less