Find Nearby Plumbers In Reno, Nevada

Sean Lynch demonstrates strong performance across all four dimensions with consistent positive feedback. Professionalism is particularly strong, with multiple reviews highlighting punctuality, courtesy, and careful attention to customer property. Pricing is competitive and transparent across five mentions. Project completion is uniformly excellent with all seven reviews confirming work was finished thoroughly and on time. Technical skill and problem-solving ability are evident, particularly in the window restoration and specialized handyman work described. The high WW Score of 89.3 reflects reliable, professional service delivery.

• All seven reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative feedback or critical comments—this uniformity warrants caution. While the reviews contain specific details (ladder cloth protection, furniture handling, window haze removal, same-day scheduling), the absence of any mixed or critical feedback is atypical and may suggest selection bias or incomplete review representation.
• Review dates span 2017–2020 (4+ years old). No recent reviews from the past 12 months are present, limiting ability to assess current service quality or any potential changes in performance.
• One review (2018-04-06) references 'Lynch Maintenance Service' and mentions electrical work and garbage disposal installation, which differs from the window-cleaning and handyman focus of other reviews. This may indicate service scope expansion or a different business entity, creating minor inconsistency.

This score should be treated with moderate caution: while all four dimensions have HIGH confidence based on mention counts and specific evidence, the absence of any critical or mixed reviews, combined with review age (all 4+ years old) and potential selection bias, suggests the true current performance may differ from this historical snapshot.

Tom's Septic demonstrates consistently strong performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is a standout strength, with multiple reviews highlighting responsiveness (crews arriving within 10-30 minutes), courteous communication, and transparent explanations of work. Project completion is reliable, with jobs finished promptly and follow-through on additional issues (concrete repair, toilet resolution). Pricing is fair and transparent, with customers noting reasonable rates and honest cost-saving suggestions. Technical skill is evident across emergency response, equipment operation, and problem-solving. The company shows genuine care for customer satisfaction, even going beyond typical service scope.

• All 7 reviews are 5-star ratings with uniformly positive language and no critical feedback. While the reviews contain specific details and vary in narrative style, the absence of any mixed or negative reviews is unusual and warrants caution.
• Two reviews are older than 3 years (2017, 2018), reducing their relevance to current service quality. However, 5 of 7 reviews are from 2022-2024, providing adequate recent data.
• Review from 2023-01-19 contains excessive punctuation (multiple exclamation marks) and generic phrasing ('AMAZING SERVICE'), which could suggest enthusiasm rather than authenticity, though specific details are provided.

This WW Score of 89.3 is reliable for assessing professionalism, project completion, and experience, but should be interpreted with awareness that the all-positive review pattern limits critical perspective; the score reflects strong performance on available evidence but may not capture potential weaknesses not mentioned in reviews.

All Good Plumbing and Drains receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently praised attribute — reviewers consistently highlight rapid response times (often within minutes to hours), courteous communication, punctuality, and respectful demeanor from both Brian and his crew. Pricing is a notable strength, with dozens of reviewers explicitly calling out fair, reasonable, or surprisingly low rates, and multiple instances of no-charge visits or free estimates being highlighted as exceptional value. Project completion scores are very high, with the vast majority of reviews confirming jobs were finished promptly, often same-day or next-day, with no reports of abandoned or incomplete work. Technical experience and problem-solving ability are well-documented, including complex diagnostics such as camera inspections, well system repairs, propane line installations, and leak detection, all described as handled with skill and confidence. The only minor detractor is a single 3.5-star review referencing a multi-day pipe replacement job at a cost of $2,880, which was neutral in tone rather than negative.

• DUPLICATE REVIEWS DETECTED: A significant number of reviews appear to be exact or near-exact duplicates posted on the same or consecutive dates (e.g., multiple pairs with identical text dated 2024-07-28, 2024-05-18, 2024-04-30, 2023-12-11, 2023-12-09, 2023-12-08/07, 2023-12-01, 2023-10-29, 2023-09-27/26, 2023-09-24, 2023-09-21, 2023-09-09, 2023-09-08, 2023-07-13, 2023-07-01, 2023-06-04, 2023-05-17, 2023-05-15, 2023-05-10, 2023-05-06, 2023-04-22, 2023-04-13, 2023-04-06, 2023-02-17, 2023-01-31, 2022-12-09, 2022-11-29, 2022-11-22, 2022-11-12, 2022-10-22, 2022-10-17, 2022-09-29, 2022-09-24, 2022-09-21, 2022-08-19, 2022-08-04, 2022-08-01, 2022-07-26, 2022-07-25, 2022-07-07, 2022-07-05). These duplicates appear to be the same review submitted across multiple platforms (e.g., Google and Yelp) and then aggregated, rather than fabricated fake reviews. The underlying sentiment and detail are consistent and specific enough to suggest genuine customers. Scores have been calculated using deduplicated unique review content to avoid artificial inflation of mention counts.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of reviews span from mid-2022 through June 2025, with a strong cluster of recent reviews in 2025 and late 2024, indicating the business remains active and consistently well-reviewed. No significant decline in quality is observed over time.
• ALL 5-STAR PATTERN: Nearly all reviews are 5-star ratings with only one 3.5-star and two 4.5-star reviews noted. While this could suggest selective review solicitation, the specificity and variety of detail across reviews (named technicians, specific job types, unique scenarios) reduces the likelihood of systematic fabrication.
• NAMED TECHNICIAN 'BILL' AND 'MARCUS PENDLEY': Two reviews reference technicians not otherwise mentioned (Bill and Marcus Pendley). These may reflect different service areas or time periods and do not undermine overall scoring but are noted as anomalies.
• MINOR: One review appears to be written in third-person as if submitted by the business on behalf of a customer ('Customer stated that the job was great and it was done to his satisfaction'). This is a minor concern and does not materially affect scoring.

This WW Score is based on a large volume of reviews spanning approximately three years with strong recency, and despite the presence of duplicate cross-platform submissions, the deduplicated evidence base is extensive and highly consistent, making this score highly reliable as a representation of actual customer experience.

Jeff at Sagebrush Plumbing demonstrates exceptional performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is the strongest area, with 24 reviews explicitly praising punctuality, responsiveness, communication, and courteous demeanor—Jeff frequently responds within minutes and arrives within an hour. Project completion is consistently reliable, with customers reporting jobs finished promptly and thoroughly, including proactive problem-solving (e.g., discovering and fixing a frozen pipe during a valve replacement). Pricing is fair and transparent, with multiple reviews noting reasonable rates compared to competitor quotes. Technical expertise is evident through knowledgeable diagnostics, preparedness with correct parts, and ability to handle complex or unfamiliar installations. The WW Score of 89.2 reflects strong, evidence-based performance with high confidence across all dimensions.

• Four reviews contain minimal or no substantive text (empty, single character, or generic single words: '5.0 Date: 2022-06-10', '.', 'th', 'unknown'). These were excluded from scoring as they provide no usable data.
• One review (2018-02-01 and 2018-06-11) appears to be a duplicate with identical text: 'Jeff answered our call on Christmas right away, came out immediately, saved the day and was actually reasonable! I will never use another service as long as these guys are in business. A+++'. This was counted once in mention totals.
• Review dates span from 2013 to 2025, with most reviews (approximately 20 of 31 usable reviews) from 2021 onwards, indicating strong recent performance. Older reviews (2013–2018) are consistent in tone and content with recent reviews, suggesting sustained quality over time.
• All 35 reviews are 5-star ratings except one 4-star review (2013-09-16), which is still highly positive. While the uniformity is notable, the reviews contain specific, varied details (different job types, customer names, specific problem-solving examples) that distinguish them from generic fake review patterns. No evidence of coordinated fake reviews detected.

This WW Score of 89.2 is highly reliable. It is based on 31 substantive reviews with consistent, specific praise across all four dimensions, high mention counts (12–24 per dimension), and a 12-year track record showing sustained quality. The score should be trusted as a strong indicator of contractor performance.

Plumbing Legends / Plumbing Upgrade receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — reviewers consistently praise punctuality, communication, cleanliness, and courteous behavior. Pricing is a notable competitive advantage, with multiple reviewers explicitly stating this company quoted thousands less than competitors and in some cases charged less than originally quoted. Project completion scores are strong, with numerous accounts of same-day or next-day service, emergency responsiveness, and jobs finished on time with no abandoned work; one reviewer also noted that two small post-job issues were resolved within hours. Technical experience is well-documented across a wide range of job types — from whole-house repipes and slab leak repairs to water heater replacements and minor fixture fixes — with reviewers frequently noting that work was done 'the right way, not the easy way.' The review set spans from 2016 to 2025, which introduces some recency concerns, though recent 2024–2025 reviews remain consistent in tone and quality.

• ALL 35 reviews are 5-star ratings with zero negative or mixed reviews — this is statistically unusual for a contractor with this volume of reviews and warrants mild skepticism.
• Several reviews use near-identical phrasing such as 'done the right way, not the easy way' appearing in two separate reviews (Feb 2025 and Jan 2025), which may suggest coached or templated responses.
• A cluster of 7 reviews posted within a 2-day window (2025-01-09 to 2025-01-10) and another cluster of 3 reviews on the same date (2025-02-09) is unusual and may indicate a solicited review campaign.
• The business appears to have operated under at least two names — 'Plumbing Legends' and 'Plumbing Upgrade' — and multiple technician names appear (Kevin, Alex, Jeff, Julian, Mike, Jivko, Dennis), which may reflect a legitimate business evolution but should be noted for transparency.
• RECENCY NOTE: Approximately 14 of 35 reviews are older than 3 years (pre-2022), with several dating back to 2016–2018. While older reviews are consistent in quality, they carry reduced weight in the scoring calculation.

The WW Score of 88.6 is supported by a high volume of detailed, specific reviews across all four dimensions, but should be interpreted with moderate caution due to the suspicious clustering of same-date reviews, universal 5-star ratings with no negative feedback, and some repeated phrasing that may indicate coached responses.

Red Bear Mechanical earns strong scores across all four dimensions based on a substantial and detailed review base spanning 2018 to 2024. Professionalism is the standout dimension, with nearly every reviewer explicitly praising communication, responsiveness, punctuality, honesty, and friendly demeanor from both office staff and field technicians. Pricing is consistently described as fair, reasonable, and competitive, with multiple reviewers noting they obtained multiple quotes and found Red Bear to be among the best value. Project completion scores are high, with reviewers describing jobs finished correctly, callbacks honored, and persistent issues resolved over multiple visits without complaint. Experience scores are also strong, with reviewers specifically calling out technical knowledge, honest diagnostics, problem-solving ability, and quality of workmanship on complex installs and repairs.

• All 28 reviews are 5-star ratings with zero negative or mixed reviews, which is statistically unusual and warrants mild caution.
• Several reviews use similarly enthusiastic language and superlatives, though most contain specific names, job details, and unique circumstances that suggest genuine authorship rather than fabrication.
• Approximately 14 of 28 reviews are older than 12 months (pre-August 2023), with 10 reviews dated before 2022. Recency weighting slightly reduces confidence in the overall picture, though the most recent reviews (2023-2024) remain consistently positive.
• No negative reviews or constructive criticism were found in any review, which may reflect selection bias on the platform rather than a perfect service record. One reviewer did note a minor cleanup incident that was self-corrected, which adds a degree of authenticity.

This WW Score is based on a solid volume of 28 detailed reviews with HIGH confidence across all four dimensions; however, the absence of any negative feedback and the all-5-star rating pattern introduce mild caution, and prospective customers should seek additional independent sources before making a final decision.