Find Nearby Plumbers In North Las Vegas, Nevada

DJM Plumbing demonstrates exceptional performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is the strongest pillar, with 28 mentions highlighting punctuality, courteous demeanor, cleanliness, and responsiveness—including emergency Saturday calls and same-day service. Project completion is consistently praised with 24 mentions of thorough work, follow-through on callbacks, and complex problem resolution. Experience is well-documented across 18 mentions, with customers noting superior workmanship, diagnostic accuracy, and ability to correct previous contractors' mistakes. Pricing receives solid marks from 9 mentions emphasizing fair costs, transparency, and value-for-money decisions like repair-over-replacement recommendations.

• Three reviews contain only 'unknown' text (2016-05-27, 2016-05-18, 2015-10-06) and were excluded from scoring as unusable data.
• All 40 reviews are 5-star ratings with uniformly positive language. While this pattern could suggest fake reviews, the specificity of details (names, dates, problem types, follow-up visits, pricing comparisons) and consistency across 13+ years of reviews suggests authentic customer experiences rather than fabricated content.
• Recency skew: Only 5 reviews are from the past 12 months (2024), while 8 reviews are from 2017 or earlier. Most recent reviews (2024) maintain the same high quality standards as older reviews, indicating sustained performance.

This WW Score of 92.1 is highly reliable, based on 37 usable reviews with strong mention counts across all dimensions (9–28 mentions each). The consistency of positive feedback over 13 years, combined with specific, detailed accounts of service quality, professionalism, and fair pricing, provides robust confidence in this assessment.

Derek/Derrick demonstrates exceptional performance across all four dimensions with consistently high marks. Professionalism is a standout strength, with 26 reviews explicitly praising punctuality, responsiveness, communication, politeness, and appearance (mask-wearing noted positively). Project completion is nearly flawless across 28 mentions, with jobs finished on time, follow-ups honored, and callbacks completed. Pricing receives strong marks from 18 reviews emphasizing fair value, competitive rates, and transparent quotes with no hidden charges. Technical experience is validated by 20 reviews highlighting skill, knowledge, and efficient problem-solving. The contractor's ability to handle diverse plumbing tasks (water heaters, toilets, faucets, pipes, water softeners) and even non-plumbing work demonstrates versatility and competence.

• All 32 reviews are 5-star or 4-star ratings with only 2 four-star reviews; no negative or critical feedback present
• 8 reviews lack date information, limiting recency assessment for those entries
• Majority of dated reviews are from 2021 or earlier (20 of 24 dated reviews); only 4 reviews from 2023-2024, suggesting potential recency bias in available data
• Repetitive phrasing across reviews (e.g., 'fast and efficient,' 'fair price,' 'highly recommend') is consistent with genuine customer satisfaction rather than fake reviews, as specifics vary (different job types, personal details)
• No negative reviews or complaints detected; while this could indicate fake reviews, the specificity of job descriptions and personal anecdotes (broken shoulder, scheduling mistake, mask-wearing) suggests authentic feedback

This WW Score of 89.2 is highly reliable based on 32 reviews with consistent positive feedback across all dimensions and strong mention counts (18-28 per dimension). However, the lack of recent reviews (only 4 from past 12 months) and complete absence of negative feedback warrant some caution; the score reflects historical performance well but may not fully capture current service quality.

AC Plumbing (Andrew) receives consistently strong marks across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism and project completion each mentioned across all 10 reviews. Reviewers repeatedly highlight his punctuality, polite demeanor, clear communication, and responsiveness, driving a high professionalism score. Project completion is well-supported, with multiple reviewers noting jobs were finished thoroughly, on time, and with attention to detail — including one instance of going above and beyond by replacing a pipe with a longer piece to prevent recurrence. Experience is backed by six reviews referencing his technical knowledge, problem-solving, and quality of workmanship, including correctly identifying code violations from a prior installer. Pricing is mentioned positively in three reviews as reasonable and good value, yielding a moderate-confidence score that is solid but carries less weight due to fewer data points.

• All 10 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative or mixed feedback, which warrants mild scrutiny.
• No review dates are provided, making it impossible to assess recency or apply RULE 6 weighting. Scores should be interpreted without temporal context.
• While some reviews are brief and generic (e.g., 'prompt and does great work'), the majority include specific job details, named tasks, and situational context, which reduces — but does not eliminate — concern about authenticity.
• The volume of reviews (10) is relatively low; scores carry moderate-to-high confidence but should be revisited as more reviews accumulate.

This WW Score is reasonably trustworthy given that most reviews contain specific, verifiable details and all four dimensions are supported by direct evidence, though the absence of any negative feedback and missing review dates introduce a small degree of uncertainty.

Sharp Plumbing (Rob/Robert Sharp) demonstrates strong performance across all four dimensions with consistently high marks for professionalism, punctuality, responsiveness, and technical expertise. Pricing is fair and transparent with no hidden charges reported. Project completion is reliable with same-day or next-day service typical. The business shows exceptional skill in diagnostics and complex repairs (sewer lines, re-pipes, water heater replacements). Two negative reviews (no-show and missed estimate delivery) from 2021-2022 are offset by 50+ positive reviews, primarily from 2020-2025, indicating recent strong performance.

• Four reviews contain no text (empty review body), reducing data quality slightly but not affecting scoring
• One review is emoji-only (😀), minimal data value
• Two negative reviews from 2021-2022 (no-show and missed estimate) suggest past communication issues, but no recent complaints of this nature
• Cluster of reviews from 2021-06-10 (11 reviews on same date) and 2020-06-10 (8 reviews on same date) may indicate batch posting or review migration, but content is substantive and specific, not generic praise
• One review appears duplicated verbatim (garbage disposal/water pressure review appears twice: 2021-06-10 and 2020-07-10)
• Overall review authenticity is HIGH—reviews contain specific details (slab leaks, sewer line work, water heater replacements, kitchen island installation, etc.), varied language patterns, and realistic mix of service scenarios

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable, based on 52 usable reviews with strong mention counts across all dimensions (18-32 mentions each). The score reflects genuine customer satisfaction with recent performance (majority from 2020-2025), though two older negative reviews warrant awareness of potential communication gaps. The business demonstrates consistent excellence in technical execution and customer service.

Prostar Plumbing earns strong scores across all four dimensions, driven by an exceptionally large and detailed review base spanning 2017–2024. Professionalism is the standout dimension, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, communication, cleanliness, and courteous demeanor. Pricing scores well overall but is tempered by one reviewer who felt overcharged ($300 for a cartridge replacement) and another who noted they are 'not the cheapest,' preventing a top-tier score. Project completion is consistently praised — jobs are described as finished same-day or next-day, with follow-through on callbacks and emergency calls — but one significant negative review (2-star) describes $2,300 spent with no leak found or fixed, which meaningfully pulls this score down. Experience is well-supported by detailed accounts of complex diagnostics, slab leaks, full repiping, and multi-issue jobs handled competently, though one reviewer flagged a potential licensing/bond issue in 2020 which introduces a historical credibility concern.

• NEGATIVE REVIEW — UNRESOLVED JOB (2021, 2-star): One reviewer paid over $2,300 combined to Prostar and a referred restoration company (Jarvis Restoration), had 3 holes cut in drywall, and the leak was never found or fixed by Prostar. The reviewer fixed it themselves for $20. This is a material project completion failure and should be weighted seriously.
• NEGATIVE REVIEW — RESPONSIVENESS FAILURE (2021, 1-star): One reviewer reported a 22-day delay in receiving a quote response, suggesting inconsistent responsiveness.
• NEGATIVE REVIEW — PRICING COMPLAINT (2022, 4-star): One reviewer felt $300 to replace a shower cartridge was excessive, indicating pricing is not universally perceived as fair.
• LICENSING CONCERN (2020, 3-star): One reviewer explicitly stated Prostar did not hold a valid plumbing license at the time of their visit and could not provide proof of insurance. The owner acknowledged a bond issue. This is a serious flag, though it may have since been resolved given the volume of positive reviews post-2020.
• RECENCY NOTE: The vast majority of reviews (70+) are from 2021–2024, which is favorable. A small number of reviews date to 2017–2019 and carry less weight in the current score.
• FAKE REVIEW RISK — LOW: While nearly all reviews are 5-star, the majority contain specific job details, named technicians, and unique scenarios. Generic praise is present in a small minority of reviews (e.g., 'The best of the best — truly expert') but does not dominate the corpus. Fake review risk is assessed as low but not zero.
• REFERRAL PARTNER CONCERN: Multiple reviews mention Prostar proactively calling restoration companies (Jarvis Restoration) before assessing or discussing with the homeowner. One reviewer found this inappropriate. This pattern may indicate a referral arrangement that could inflate job scope.

This WW Score is based on a large, detailed, and mostly recent review set and carries HIGH overall confidence, but prospective customers should weigh the unresolved $2,300 job failure, the 2020 licensing concern, and the pricing complaint before engaging for high-cost or complex projects.

Martin Remodeling demonstrates strong performance across all four dimensions with consistently high marks for workmanship quality, fair pricing, and project delivery. The contractor shows particular strength in experience and project completion (both 88–89 range), with multiple reviews praising attention to detail, willingness to redo work, and ability to handle complex installations. Professionalism scores slightly lower (84) primarily due to documented communication and punctuality issues, including late arrivals and inconsistent appointment scheduling. Pricing is a clear competitive advantage, with customers repeatedly noting fair quotes and savings compared to other contractors. All dimensions are supported by 8+ mentions, yielding HIGH confidence across the board.

• One 1-star review (2021-08-16) citing language barrier and hang-ups during initial phone contact; this represents a significant professionalism failure but is isolated and may reflect staffing/communication process issues rather than work quality.
• Multiple reviews (particularly 2022-05-04) explicitly note inconsistent communication and appointment times as a weakness, suggesting this is a systemic issue despite overall strong performance.
• Review from 2022-06-03 (4-star) cites language barrier as reason for not giving 5 stars, corroborating communication challenges.
• Most reviews are 2+ years old (15 of 17 from 2021–2022); only 2 reviews from 2023–2024. Recency is limited, and current service quality may differ.
• One review (2022-03-19) uses informal/colloquial language and appears to be from a satisfied customer but lacks specific detail; however, no pattern of fake reviews detected overall.

This WW Score of 86.2 is reliable and well-supported by 17 reviews with consistent data across all four dimensions (8–13 mentions each). However, the score should be interpreted with awareness that most reviews are 2+ years old, and documented communication/scheduling issues suggest customers should set clear expectations around responsiveness and punctuality despite strong work quality.