Find Nearby Plumbers In Minneapolis, Minnesota

Big Dave's Plumbing earns a strong WW Score driven by an exceptionally large and consistent body of reviews spanning over a decade. Professionalism is the most frequently praised dimension, with dozens of reviewers citing punctuality, clear communication, friendliness, and responsiveness — including callbacks after jobs and even free phone advice. Project completion is equally strong, with reviewers consistently noting jobs finished on time, within or under estimated hours, and with no abandoned work; several repeat customers across multiple years reinforce this reliability. Experience scores are high as well, with reviewers frequently noting Dave's ability to diagnose problems quickly, improvise solutions for challenging situations, and educate customers along the way. Pricing scores slightly lower due to two explicit complaints — one reviewer objected to being charged for 30 minutes of drive time at the full hourly rate, and another felt $100 for under 30 minutes of work was steep — though the overwhelming majority praised his pricing as fair, transparent, and below competitor quotes. The score is tempered slightly by the presence of several blank or near-blank reviews and a handful of very old reviews (pre-2015) that carry reduced recency weight.

• 8 reviews contain no usable text (blank, single punctuation marks, or 'unknown') and were excluded from dimension scoring.
• Two reviews explicitly did not involve any work being performed (one phone referral only, one reviewer who never hired Dave) — these were excluded from project completion and experience scoring.
• One review (2016) explicitly states the reviewer did not hire the business and cannot rate it, yet left a 5-star rating — this is a data integrity concern.
• Two duplicate reviews detected: the shower faucet/wall repair review from 2017-01-24 appears to be posted twice with nearly identical text — only counted once per dimension.
• The vast majority of reviews are 5-star with very few negatives, which could suggest platform selection bias or review solicitation; however, the reviews contain sufficient specific detail, named tasks, and varied writing styles to suggest they are largely genuine.
• A significant portion of reviews (roughly 40+) are dated 2021 or earlier, meaning recency weighting was applied — reviews from 2023–2024 were given higher weight in scoring.
• No pattern of fake reviews detected — language, job types, and specificity vary meaningfully across reviews.

This WW Score is highly reliable — it is based on 78 reviews with usable data across all four dimensions, with strong mention counts in every category, consistent feedback over many years, and no significant fake review signals detected.

St. Paul Pipeworks demonstrates strong performance across all four dimensions with consistently high marks. Professionalism is the standout strength (89.5), with 127 reviews explicitly praising punctuality, communication, politeness, and responsiveness. Project completion scores 87.0 across 98 mentions, reflecting reliable job finishing and follow-through, though a small number of callback issues are noted. Experience and technical skill are well-documented (88.5 across 89 mentions), with reviewers frequently highlighting problem-solving ability and quality workmanship. Pricing is competitive and fair (84.0 across 52 mentions), though some customers noted surprise at service fees not initially quoted. The company's weighted WW Score of 88.2 reflects a trustworthy, professional contractor with strong execution.

• Three negative reviews (1-star ratings from 2023, 2022, and 2018) describe serious issues: incomplete repairs requiring callbacks, undisclosed fees, and water damage without reimbursement. These are legitimate complaints that lower overall confidence slightly but do not invalidate the predominantly positive pattern.
• Two reviews from 2022 appear to be near-duplicates with identical phrasing describing the same faucet repair failure, suggesting possible copy-paste rather than independent experiences. This reduces confidence in those specific complaints but does not indicate fake positive reviews.
• One review from 2024-01-21 has a near-duplicate version with identical content and excessive punctuation, suggesting possible duplicate submission rather than independent review.
• The overwhelming majority of reviews (149 of 152) are 5-star ratings with detailed, specific praise. While this is consistent with a genuinely high-quality contractor, the lack of critical feedback on most dimensions (only 3 negative reviews total) suggests either exceptional consistency or potential selection bias in review platform.
• Most reviews are from the past 3 years (2022-2025), with strong recency supporting current reliability assessment.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable, based on 149 usable reviews with strong data across all four dimensions and HIGH confidence ratings. The score reflects genuine strengths in professionalism and project completion, though the three documented negative experiences (failed repairs, undisclosed fees, unresolved damage claims) indicate the company is not perfect and customers should maintain reasonable expectations. The company's responsiveness and technical skill are well-established, but the pricing dimension shows some variability in fee transparency.

Marvel Sewer and Drain demonstrates strong performance across all four dimensions, with particularly high marks for professionalism (91.5) driven by consistent praise for punctuality, friendliness, communication, and respectful conduct. Project completion scores (87.0) reflect reliable job execution and follow-through, though two older negative reviews (2023) flagged communication failures on estimate delivery. Pricing (85.0) is consistently described as fair, competitive, and transparent with no hidden charges. Experience (89.0) is well-supported by detailed accounts of technical skill, problem-solving ability, and quality workmanship. The company's use of advanced camera technology and innovative repair methods (CIPP lining, no-dig solutions) is frequently highlighted. The WW Score of 88.2 reflects a trustworthy contractor with strong execution, though the two 1-2 star reviews from 2023 introduce some caution.

• Two negative reviews from April 2023 (ratings 1.0 and 2.0) describe identical failures: missed estimate delivery due to email typo, broken follow-up promises, and poor responsiveness. These are substantive complaints about project completion and communication that contradict the overwhelmingly positive pattern. However, they are isolated incidents from 2+ years ago and do not appear to reflect current operations.
• Majority of reviews (approximately 65 of 80) are from the past 12 months (2025, 2024), indicating strong recent performance. Only 2 negative reviews exist in the entire dataset, both from 2023, suggesting possible service improvement or isolated incidents.
• Multiple reviews contain generic praise ('Great service', 'Highly recommend') with minimal detail, but these are balanced by numerous detailed, specific accounts of work performed, pricing comparisons, and technical explanations. No pattern of fake reviews detected.
• Empty review text fields (approximately 6 reviews with only ratings) reduce usable data slightly but do not materially impact scoring as they provide no substantive information.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable, supported by 78 usable reviews with strong consistency across all four dimensions and high mention counts (28-62 per dimension). The overwhelmingly positive recent review history (past 12 months) combined with detailed, specific praise from verified customers across multiple service types (cleaning, lining, inspection) provides strong confidence. The two isolated negative reviews from 2023 are noted but do not materially undermine the overall assessment given the volume and recency of positive feedback and apparent service improvements.

Hessian Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all measured dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 58 reviews explicitly praising punctuality, communication, courtesy, and responsiveness from named technicians (Leo, John, Matt, Jonathan, Dalton, Nick, and others). Project completion is consistently reliable, with 52 reviews confirming jobs finished on time, thoroughly tested, and without callbacks or abandoned work. Experience and technical skill are well-documented across 35 reviews, with customers noting problem-solving ability, quality workmanship, and knowledgeable explanations. Pricing receives solid marks (82.0) from 18 reviews citing fair value and transparent quotes, though some note they are not the cheapest option. One significant negative review (1-star, October 2024) alleges water damage and poor follow-up, which tempers the otherwise exceptional rating. The company shows strong consistency across a 7+ year review history.

• One critical negative review (2024-10-19) alleges water damage to sub-floor and poor response to customer concerns. This is a serious quality/completion issue that contradicts the otherwise stellar record and warrants investigation.
• One older negative review (2019-11-12, 1-star) cites poor communication and non-responsiveness to callback requests, though a later review (2019-10-12) suggests this was eventually resolved.
• One review (2024-12-11) is blank text with 5-star rating—cannot assess content, treated as unusable data.
• Majority of reviews (approximately 65 of 71) are 5-star ratings with detailed positive content. While this is consistent with genuine high-quality service, the concentration of perfect scores is notable. However, the presence of 2 credible 1-star reviews and 2 credible 4-star reviews with specific details suggests reviews are not fabricated.
• Recent reviews (past 12 months) dominate the dataset (approximately 50+ reviews), providing strong recency weight. Older reviews (2013-2020) are consistently positive but less numerous.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable and should be trusted as a strong indicator of contractor quality. The score is based on 70 usable reviews with HIGH confidence across three of four dimensions, supported by 7+ years of consistent positive feedback and specific, detailed customer accounts. However, the October 2024 water damage allegation represents a genuine service failure that customers should be aware of, and the company's communication responsiveness (flagged in 2019) may warrant direct inquiry before booking.

Tim's Quality Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 88.2. The company excels in professionalism (89.5) with consistent praise for punctuality, communication, friendliness, and responsiveness across 32 reviews. Experience scores are equally strong (90.0) with 26 mentions highlighting skilled troubleshooting, technical knowledge, and quality workmanship. Project completion is solid (87.0) with 28 mentions confirming jobs finished properly and same-day service delivery. Pricing is the relative weak point (78.0) with 11 mentions—while most customers find value fair, several note costs as high relative to simplicity of work, and one significant complaint about $400/hour rates. Recent reviews (past 12 months) dominate the dataset and are overwhelmingly positive, supporting confidence in current performance.

• One strongly negative review from October 2024 citing poor follow-up communication, unresponsiveness, and high pricing ($400/hour). This is a material outlier and suggests occasional service failures despite overall positive trend.
• Multiple empty/blank reviews (5 instances with only 5-star ratings and no text) reduce data quality slightly but do not appear to be coordinated fake reviews.
• Pricing feedback is mixed: most reviews praise fair/reasonable pricing, but 3 reviews (including the 1-star) explicitly cite high costs. This suggests pricing may be above-market for some service types.
• Company appears to operate under multiple names (Tim's Quality Plumbing, Aart's and Tim's) which may indicate recent acquisition or rebranding—verify current legal entity.
• One review notes company is not currently licensed for plumbing in Minneapolis, limiting scope of services in that jurisdiction.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable, based on 56 usable reviews with strong mention counts across all dimensions (26–32 mentions each). However, the single severe negative review from late 2024 and mixed pricing feedback warrant caution: this company delivers excellent technical work and professionalism but may have inconsistent follow-up communication and pricing transparency in certain situations. Recommend verifying current licensing status and requesting detailed written quotes before engagement.

M&B Drain demonstrates consistently strong performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is evidenced by punctuality (multiple mentions of on-time or early arrival), courteous demeanor, and responsiveness (one review notes arrival 1.5 hours after initial call despite 12 other companies not responding). Project completion is uniformly strong with all jobs finished completely and on schedule, including proactive work on secondary issues. Pricing is a notable strength, with multiple reviews explicitly praising competitive or below-market rates and transparent upfront quotes. Technical skill is solid, with customers noting thoroughness, efficiency, and clear explanations of work performed.

• All 7 reviews are 5-star ratings with uniformly positive language, which is atypical. However, reviews contain specific details (drain clearing, kitchen/bathroom clogs, sewer main line work, response times, pricing comparisons) that suggest authenticity rather than generic praise.
• Review dates span 2018–2023 with significant gaps; most recent review is from November 2023, but two reviews are from 2018–2019 (4–5 years old). Recency is moderate.
• Review #3 (2020-12-11) is a correction/apology for confusing company names; while it confirms quick response, it provides minimal substantive detail and should be weighted lightly.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable. All four dimensions are supported by 4+ mentions with HIGH or MODERATE confidence, and the score is grounded in specific, detailed customer experiences rather than generic praise. The uniformity of 5-star ratings is offset by concrete evidence of professionalism, pricing competitiveness, and project completion across multiple independent reviews.